I was . . . deeply disturbed by the art of Luce you reblogged. I understand having issues with the Catholic church; I'm not Catholic and have a long list of disagreements with them myself. But I don't think artwork of a little girl (even a fictional one) dying brutally is going to convince Catholics that they're wrong about anything. I don't think it's going to help anyone. For my part, it mostly made me feel sick and sad.
in isolation i wouldn't like it much either on those grounds, but as you could see in the post it was a reworking of an existing notable work on the subject of 'missionary getting eaten by wild animals,' and thus very clearly part of an ongoing artistic dialogue about colonialism.
so yeah this one is in the category of 'art that's not for you' and definitely not about convincing catholics of anything.
this one is 'making fun of catholic church for attempting to use a cutesy avatar to sanitize their historical atrocities.' different conversation.
Fascinated in a kind of appalled way with Anon's emotional reaction here. Like to me the pastiche of the missionary painting is an expression of already having been made to feel "sick and sad " BY the cutesy kawaiicore mascot quietly sporting the almost comically racist missionary necklace. If the art is INTRODUCING the feeling of being "deeply disturbed" into the conversation going on around the mascot for you, uh, that's bad, man. You have fallen for propaganda that isn't even trying to hide that it's aiming to appeal to you by painting anime eyes on a blob with a big head. Luce is not a little girl; it's an ad campaign purchased to make people more receptive to a political entity's objectionable intentions by giving them an easy to imprint on face. Please interrogate your instinctive responses to images slightly more deeply than this.