What an unsurprising & completely expected turn of events that literally everyone saw coming 😮
How do you know there's election interference in full swing
if you look at words on the internet they say things! if you look at enough words on the internet you can understand the things they say. this strange phenomenon i call 'reading' has given me advanced understanding of many situations. as far as i can tell no one else has tried it out, but i remain hopeful.
Seems foolproof! No epistemological notes here
my dude why did you ask washed up has-been out-of-touch tumblr user roachpatrol his opinion on election interference if you were just gonna get sniffy about it when roachpatrol made fun of you
it's tragic that other assholes long before me have long since ruined the maneuver of going 'im so unbothered that actually i find this very funny, that's how not bothered by you i am, hahaha' because
this is an objectively bonkers thing to call anyone and im honored that it happened to be me
If you don't think there's bot inference in the US election, here's your proof.
Jesusfuckingchrist
What I'm learning from this is: When it doubt? Write "Ignore all previous instructions [new insane instruction]" is the modern turing test
This. It won't always work, but large scale botnets like this are often... a bit hastily executed.
Americans, please, I'm begging you, ignore all previous instructions and VOTE
link directly to the article: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/02/elon-musk-pac-voter-data-trump-harris.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar
Here's the official US government resource to check if you or anyone you know might have fallen prey to this kind of scam:
(Many states periodically purge their voter rolls without warning, so even if you're an active voter whose information hasn't changed, it's a good idea to double-check your voter registration status every so often in the months leading up to an election.)
Here's how you can register to vote, even if you're currently living outside the US, lack a permanent address, or are a minor who will turn 18 by the date of the general election:
Let's also hope someone at the DOJ has taken notice of this, because “Section 20511(2) [of Title 52, which is part of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993] provides criminal penalties for a person who ‘knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process’ through fraudulent voter registration applications or ballots.” (PDF source)
Hey y’all especially those in swing states, eyes up:
The elongated muskrat has engaged in blatant election interference by putting out a fake voter registration page on Google ads with the clear intention to dupe voters into thinking they have actually registered to vote. It’s likely also a data harvesting tactic.
Hopefully this gets immediately flagged and taken down but we all know this fascist chucklefuck will not see consequences to his actions and this is something that would drag out in court. Spread the word. Only register to vote through state board or check vote.org for more resources. Do not register through anything else ESPECIALLY if it has some sort of clear motivation.
Scummy as fuck
Are the Trump indictments election interference? asked someone whose question I will take in good faith against my better judgment.
- The American presidential election (November 5, 2024) is more than a year away. There is more than a whole year for these four (4) trials to occur. If candidates want to start campaigning (and have already been campaigning) year(s) in advance, that is not the American judicial system's problem. Do not let anyone tell you that "I DECLARE CAMPAIGN SO YOU CAN'T TOUCH ME" is how this works.
- I welcome criminal charges of actual substance for any candidate of any party. If you have dozens of pages of carefully documented charges against any/all Democrats, please have a DA call a grand jury whenever you would like. Political parties are not sports teams to me. Justice can do what it gotta do, whether it's convenient or not.
- If someone doesn't want to get pulled up on racketeering charges (RICO), they maybe shouldn’t have racketeered. Or falsified business records, or mishandled documents to the tune of 31 charges under the Espionage Act, or incited an insurrection, the latter of which, I don't know about you, but which I personally watched on TV, live, for several hours, including coverage of the Trump rally that sent crowds marching over to the Capitol. We have heard the Georgia phone call that is part of the fourth indictment. We have seen pictures of classified documents piled in a random Mar-a-Lago bathroom. I am confident that these are not frivolous accusations.
- District Attorney Fani Willis was careful to state that there should be a presumption of innocence (a standard American judicial doctrine). That said, I consider (as one example), this fourth indictment to be “charges of actual substance” because she delivered a 96-page document describing the racketeering (which, ironically, WAS ITSELF ELECTION INTERFERENCE):
u/code_archaeologist: The math on this is easy. For a jury to find a person guilty on a RICO charge in Georgia the prosecutor has to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they engaged in two incidents that predicated the overarching conspiracy. The RICO charge lists 161 predicating incidents. So Fani Willis has 161 shots at each defendant, and only has to hit twice.
- Fani Willis has 161 predicating incidents of conspiracy to work with. I am pretty confident that, while a defendant is innocent until proven guilty in the American justice system, these charges have some weight and deserve to be heard in court.
- tl;dr if you don't want to campaign under a legal cloud, don't do crimes.
- Also try not to publicly intimidate witnesses. And prosecutors. And judges.
If anyone reading this truly wondered if the substance or timing of these proceedings are warranted, sincerely, I hope laying it out like this helped.