mouthporn.net
@vehementlyvagabond on Tumblr
Avatar

time 2 eat some garbage

@vehementlyvagabond / vehementlyvagabond.tumblr.com

i'm vee and i divine and do magic sometimes
Avatar

Do you guys have a nickname given by your deities? 👀

Avatar
teawitch

Yeah, sort of.

In some traditions this is a name that is not shared with others so that it being used has significance. Of course for that to work well, the name has to be something very unusual.

It's not the craft name - a name used within various traditions to allow members to separate their witchy and professional lives. Craft names can be fairly common and sometimes change or are added to as one progress in a tradition. (Raven, Silver, Luna, etc. would be craft names)

Avatar
windvexer

Yeah but it's sarcastic

Avatar
Avatar
windvexer
Anonymous asked:

It's funny how, as a society, we'll embrace technological advances yet there's this tendency with witches who will refuse non-traditional tools in their own craft. For example: candles. LED candles can be programmed to flicker and mimick the appearance of a flame without the fire and smoke. With the internet, you can watch a video of a candle burning on your phone or PC monitor. Aside from techno witches or chaos magicians, I'm not sure why others haven't caught on and considered experimenting. I bring this up to ask: What are your thoughts about the (possible lack of) creative experimentation with modern technology on witchblr?

Bud I love your vibes of experimentation but idk why we have to try and drag all of witchblr like this.

"Aside from techno witches" so, aside from all the witches who are already using technology in their practice, why isn't everyone else also using it?

I think experimenting with digital stuff and technology is great, but I do take a tiny lil bit off offense to you saying "I'm not sure why others haven't caught on," which kind of implies that if people thought about using technology in their practice they'd obviously want to experiment with it, as opposed to people just realizing they could and then deciding not to.

Not all witchcraft is about doing the most convenient thing 100% of the time, and what you perceive to be the most rational or helpful course of action actually isn't necessarily accessible for everyone.

What about people who specifically get into witchcraft as a way to reconnect with tradition?

What about witches who find power and utility in working with certain tools that they can't grasp within modern technology?

What about witches who work with a spiritual or animistic path and literally believe they're connecting with the physical candle flame in a way that can't be reproduced/replicated by digital stuff?

What about witches who are experienced energy workers and perceive that the energies produced by the physical candle aren't the same as those produced by watching an internet video, and have decided that these two things aren't interchangeable?

What about witches who are sick of screens and are using witchcraft as a way to touch grass?

I think all of the witches I know who are seriously invested in magic have experimented with technology as part of their practice, very often for accessibility/disability issues.

I dislike the idea that all these hypothetical witches need to "catch on" to a certain specific kind of experimentation for some reason. But, as someone who has experimented with using digital/technology in magic, I can affirm that it doesn't fully replace my actual physical practice. Can it be helpful in many ways? Yes. Can the intersection of magic and technology be very powerful? Yes.

But I have to say if the witchblr buds really are completely lacking in technological experimentation, I really don't have commentary on that, except that I'm happy for everyone leading self-determined lives and I hope they keep doing it.

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
extantdecay

How the hell are you all able to trust strangers to do a reading on you?

Hello, random individual! Yes, I want a tarot reading on my spiritual path. I trust you, person I've never met.

I'm not just making fun of people, I'm genuinely asking, how can you possibly believe anything someone you have never met says about you in a reading?

It's kind of the same reason your therapist is a total stranger when you first meet them - objectivity.

It's fine and dandy to get a reading from someone who knows you. There's nothing wrong with it, and that association may give them some insight, but it may also give them a slight bias. (Again, nothing wrong with that, it's just a possibility.)

Getting a reading from a stranger may provide a birds-eye view that someone closer to your situation might not have. And you can trust that they're not coloring their interpretation of the reading due to a personal association with you.

Sometimes getting that outside perspective can be very helpful. If the reading resonates with you, if the interpretation provided is meaningful or makes sense, then it works. If it doesn't, then it's a miss, which does happen.

If you get the chance to get a reading from a stranger, even just for fun, I do recommend it. It's a neat experience and the information you get might just surprise you!

thank you Bree, yes, the most valuable reason why one asks for a reading from a Third Party is because there is LESS bias, there will still be some, but at least the chance is lesser, and the severity is lower. Another reason is because that person is Better at a particular reading than the Querent. As a person who does card and energy readings, and frequently deals with those Over There, my readings with Gods and Deities and Those Who Live Over There is better than my readings about human to human relationships. Its like saying, why eat out if you can cook? Which also applies to me, who is good at cooking home meals but just could not bother making very time and ingredient intensive recipies. The option is there, and it is lovely thing.

Avatar
windvexer

I believe in the literal power of divination, which is to say, if someone has the actual skill to perform a magical divinatory reading, they do not need background information on you. In my experience, the more you personally know about someone, the more difficult it is to provide a clear, unbiased reading.

alternatively, how can i decide if they’re a trustworthy/reliable reader without at least seeing what they can do? yeah, some folks are going to be duds, but i also don’t go around fully and uncritically believing everything any reader tells me. there are always going to be inner aspects to the situation that the reader is not privy to, and it’s up to me to decide what i do with the information from the reading.

if nothing else, i look at it as supporting small businesses and giving newer diviners a chance to practice and hone their skills.

Avatar

Eugenicist and bioessentialist beliefs about magic

Like New Age, modern witchcraft developed at a time period when eugenics and so-called race science were highly popular ideas - and consequentially, some of these ideas influenced people’s beliefs about magic. These beliefs also influenced modern conspiracy theories about the occult, which in turn influenced perceptions of magic in general. Here’s some of these beliefs:

  • People are either born with magical gifts, or they’ll never have them at all.
  • People born with magical gifts are meant to be spiritual leaders and guide the world into a new age.
  • There are special bloodlines whose members are more capable of performing magic than others.
  • People who can perform magic are able to do so only because they have special ancestry.
  • Some racial groups are more capable of performing magic than others.
  • Some bloodlines or racial groups are more capable of performing certain kinds of magic than others (EG, so-called “light magic” or “dark magic”).
  • The traditions of your genetic ancestors will always come to you easily and intuitively, with little to no study required. (And if they don’t, you aren’t a “true witch.”)

Modern witchcraft was also hit by the gender essentialism stick, and claims that come from this line of thinking include:

  • Magic requires or at least massively benefits from some performance or symbolic representation of heterosexuality or heteronormativity; other forms of magic will be inherently weaker.
  • Literally all magic is a recreation of heterosexual reproduction.
  • The womb is a woman’s most potent source of magic.
  • There are only two important deities: the god and the goddess.
  • All goddesses represent the divine mother archetype, all gods represent the divine father archetype.
  • Feminine energies are soft and nurturing, masculine entities are aggressive and bold.
  • Masculine energies are too strong in the world, and are the reason for imperialism, violence, etc. The imbalance can be corrected by focusing on feminine energies.

So yeah, always watch out for claims like this because they don’t come from a good place.

Avatar

Even if someone tells you that they're getting their insights from gods or some other higher beings, you still have to ask yourself "who else is saying stuff like this?" If their rhetoric lines up with the rhetoric of actual hate groups, then hatred is what they're channeling - no matter how much it's been prettied up with poetic language and grandiose imagery.

Avatar
windvexer

I never really thought about this before but I think this is really good advice.

Asking yourself where else in your life you're hearing that same message is a good idea.

Avatar
Avatar
stantler

Many lgbt teenagers and young adults growing up on the internet today have socially conservative beliefs that they voice at all times that they got from their conservative parents which they’ve never challenged because they think the life experience of being gay or trans makes them politically progressive

This is why I hate it when people say something homophobic and then go “so you’re really accusing me, a whole ass lesbian, of being homophobic 🙄” like yeah

There's a model of culture that I like to cite for this idea, called the Iceberg Model:

The LGBT youth (and young atheists, too) will cut off the stuff "above the water" but not really examine the stuff down below that line that they have as part of their upbringing.

So you get young LGBT people making comments like OP cited, or young atheists acting with an Evangelical persecution complex, and going, "Don't call me Culturally Christian!"

Avatar

On Blue being a "healing color"

"If, then, one can obtain a stoppered bottle or decanter of richly coloured blue glass, it can be used to get the benefit of this healing colour. Fill the bottle with water and stand it in a sunlit place for a couple of days. To drink this water will be beneficial to health and psychic sensitivity.
Alternatively, get a piece of deep blue glass and frame it so that the sharp edges are covered. Hold this glass so that the sunlight shines through it and the coloured ray is directed upon any part of the body affected by illness, preferably upon the bare skin. Do this for as long as you conveniently can, up to about half and hour at a time. Many beneficial results have been claimed from this practice. Electric lights is sometimes used to shine through the glass but warm natural sunlight is best, if available."
(p. 59 , Natural Magic, Doreen Valiente)

Just hear me out friends, just hear me out okay. Just listen. Okay, hear me. Maybe. .... maybe... it's the sunlight. And not the color of the light that's doing something. I KNOW I MIGHT be talking out my ass for a minute, but maybe.

Also I am very amused at the idea of drinking stagnant water for psychic abilities. Need a remind yall of the book that ... was like "Don't drink the stagnant water beside your bed because a ghost done did touched it."

I mean I know she's saying to stopper it. But still. Also ghosts are afraid of blue glass (according to a bit of Southern American lore hence the trees with the blue glass). But like. it's a bit of a folk custom nah? The blue glass thing? Interesting no?

Oh that's neat!

I was going to say that I love that blue is a healing color for her when we know now that it'll keep you up at night and causes eyestrain.

Also more apothecary facts: blue quilted glass bottles were used to indicate the contents were poisonous in the 1800's. It was one of the first standardized consumer safety measures. The bright color was a warning and the texture also helped correctly ID the bottle in the dark.

So super healing, Doreen!

At GlossyFeathers specifically...

I'm sorry...that last line...are we talking shit about the boundary defying, queer-supporting, Nazi-fighting British spy who was part of an interracial marriage in the 30's - turned Mother of Modern Witchcraft who is Doreen Valiente? The same woman who dealt with Gerald Gardner, Robert Cochrane, and various other men of highly inflated ego claiming long-standing familial traditions on multiple occasions, without whom it is 99.99% likely that modern witchcraft wouldn't have taken off in the first place? The self-same woman who took the Gardnerian book of shadows and made it what it is today by removing the overtly stolen OTO and Thelema elements, then providing some of the most iconic poems and invocations we have today?

We will not stand for the slander of Mama Doreen. You may not agree with Doreen, but Doreen is THE reason you practice witchcraft today and even have the ability to be that snide about healing colors, Glossy.

Literally the color of the ocean was, and is still known to help calm the mind. The sea heals a broken heart is what we say in my home, and lots of us believe it's because of the color, because I live in the South and we know about blue in the sea and on the porch. And its just as protective as it is healing. Your mention of its history in storing and identifying poisonous apothecary material speaks exactly to that quality of protection.

There are also legit medical studies on the benefits of deep blue light therapy. Not the garish and bright blue lights of cell-phones, but various wavelengths of blue are use for skin treatments, mental health, and even cancer treatments.

Witchcraft is an idiosyncratic practice. It is based on our on personal understanding and recognition of the patterns in the world around. Everyone perceives the world differently, ergo everyone's witchcraft will look a little different. But beyond that, the color blue had been considered healing for centuries before Doreen wrote a single word. And further still, Doreen didn't put anything to paper she did not actually do. If she wrote it, she did it. She doesn't tell us that nothing else will work ever. She doesn't demand we do this. She provides an example of something she's had success with for us to use if we should ever need it.

Doreen Valiente held an interest in folk-magic from the time she was a child. She began practicing witchcraft at 31, and kept at it until she passed at 77. That's 46 years of experience in witchcraft, magic, and occultism. To treat 46 years worth of experience as not worthy of consideration is pure ego - the same ego that drove Doreen to leave Gardner's coven and seek out other practitioners.

It was also Doreen Valiente who stood up and told the witchcraft community that it needed queer people to survive, at a time when many witchcraft groups were trying to oust queer people for not fitting the male-female dichotomy of their "perfect" little world. Doreen said "fuck that" and gave an impassioned speech about queer rights in the craft, making space for queer folks to safely step into the craft which she arguable created.

The viewpoint from which you are looking at this seems to be "well we're modern so we know better." But I would argue "we're modern, so we see less." We see the blue of our phone screens and computers and completely forget about the blue of the sky, of the sea, of blueberries and butterfly pea flower and cobalt fish floats. Blue from a computer screen causes eye-strain certainly, and if that's the only blue you know, your perception will be that blue is harmful.

But when you stop, look a little deeper, a little further back before we had *motions around* all this, you see that blue has been sacred, powerful, and yes, healing, for a very, very long time. It isn't hard to see why, unless we refuse those older experiences for our newer ones. We may have a more refined theoretical knowledge of magic, but we do NOT have a better functional knowledge if it, because we don't live with it like our ancestors did - even in 1953.

So let's take a moment and pay our respects to Doreen Valiente, without whom queers would have struggled much longer to enter the craft, without whom the "traditional witchcraft" community would be extremely lessened, and without whom the modern witchcraft movement likely never would have taken off to such glorious heights, meaning most of us would not be practicing.

This? This reply bothers me so I will step in. Doreen Valiente is not "untouchable" - and her record does not abstain her from her very problematic elements throughout this book that I am currently copying word for word directly from the source material itself. I think it's interesting that you're so offended by criticism - valid criticism of Valiente's poor references work and poor material. You stated it yourself, "But beyond that, the color blue had been considered healing for centuries before Doreen wrote a single word." Right? And yet, there can be no examples for those "healing attributes" found in Valiente's work here. It's just her word and her word alone. For you, that seems to be enough - since you have put let's see... the entire modern witchcraft (oof, as if there is only one kind of witchcraft modern or otherwise) ... on her shoulders. But for me, that is not enough description, not enough depth. I'm going to need a lot more than her word. Alone.

This is also the same woman who seems to love Aleister Crowley and Helena Blavatsky - since she quotes them, talks about how fantastic they were and doesn't quite get into the mess of it all. And also surprisingly? She seems to be a fan of Hitler - whom she thinks it's a great fact that his name is numerology accounted for 2 - and also for whom she thinks he was born into a psychic village as a fun little interesting fact. It's in this book, already quoted on this blog. Very unsure about her relationship with Nazism based on the content of this book alone, which is in her word. Alone. But maybe I shouldn't trust her word. Alone, right?

This other shit? Her "years of practicing" all this other huffing about modern witchcraft, all this other mess in this post - is a distraction. I don't particularly care for her fame, I don't particular care how many people she influenced (though I am thankful for your knowledge that she was queer friendly, which I did not know ahead of time).

What I do care about is that Doreen Valiente is as flawed an author in the New Age section as every other author. She is not above criticism, snide or otherwise. She is not above asking for details, demanding citations, and demanding clear evidence which in the majority of this book she misses the mark completely. She does not go into depth about the color of the sky or the ocean or any of those things. Only that you hold up some glass in front of sunlight and bam you're healed. Which each one of those links you've provided - do not make that same guarantee that Doreen Valiente does. When I started this book, I felt that Doreen Valiente was definitely going to talk to me about how magic should be - I felt very much that there was snippets of things that made sense. That someone in her position - someone who had experienced the bullshit with Gardner or the bullshit with other occultists - would make the attempt to jump and be better than others. And she has failed at every turn since after page 10, I believe. Maybe sooner than that.

You don't like what I'm saying? Then you don't like what's fucking written in her own book. You don't like that I'm quoting it directly? That's too fucking bad. Block me. I'll continue to post as I have - give my thoughts on pieces and move on. There's another 80+ pages I have left of this book. The fact that Doreen Valiente just "claims" that blue glass will heal you is a problem. Simply because it's blue. Not just for cancer. Not just for skin healing. Heal you. Including when you drink from it, the blue will heal you. Not just when light is going through it. As I said, we know that sunlight (in general) does have healing elements, and sunlight is particularly healing for certain types of mental health conditions - as well.

Sometimes we need to look at our heroes and our idols and ask ourselves - are they worthy? I don't find Valiente worthy of this level of reply, in fact, I am concerned that you are attempting to shut up someone's opinion because you're offended that someone might find Valiente a little silly. We are allowed to mock those who came before us, and demanding respect for "respect's sake" is very suspicious. But Valiente maybe has changed in some of her other books - I have the ABCs of Witchcraft to review later.

I'm extremely disappointed by what I have found in THIS book though. And THIS *taps the quote above* is part of her legacy. This Book *taps the book* is part of her legacy. Her words? Are part of her legacy. A legacy of not explaining things to people or citing works or putting down details. A legacy that influenced numbers of other new age authors to write the same way. We don't disagree on this part. And foundationally part of the problem with Valiente is what she has done to the community. In the end, if you ask (or well demand) that I be respectful to her, I will tell you that I am respectful when it is deserved. And when it is not, I am not. Valiente did not earn this right simply by being, I asked her work to speak for her. And it did not hold up to my standards. And I, like all of us on tumblr, is just a random stranger easily quieted by that block button if you don't like that. Simple, easy, no need to all this... whatever this is.

Avatar

Hello internet user whose entire concept of feminism comes from tiktok. In front of you are three ancient myths about women. You have five minutes to figure out which one of them was made up in the 1970s. If you choose wrong, you will be ripped to pieces by Maenads.

Okay since everyone wants the test, instead of giving you three myths here’s several myths. One of them is a real Greek myth with sources of it from ancient times and the rest of them are fake. One of the misconceptions was specifically invented in the 70s.

1. In every version of the myth, Medusa is born a human and Athena turns her into a monster

2. Hestia, goddess of the hearth and family, willingly gave up her place as the 12th Olympian to make room for Dionysus

3. Persephone chose Hades and wandered into the underworld of her own free will

4. Pandora didn’t know what was in her jar and unleashed evils on humanity by accident

5. During the voyage of the Argonauts the huntress Atalanta beat the hero Peleus the father of Achilles in a wrestling match

6. King Midas of Phrygia decided to give up his golden touch after turning his daughter to gold

7. Aphrodite was widely worshipped as a war goddess in Greece

lmao I promise you that only one of these is real.

Hiding the answers under a cut in case you wanna guess on your own.

Explanations for all of them, again under a cut.

Guys this post isn't about neo-pagans and a lot of you are reading this as me hating new retellings or something. I have nothing against any of these stories. I just get frustrated when people "well actually" me about the "original" version of a myth when they have no sources for what they're saying. These stories not being exactly the way you thought they were doesn't have to mean anything. It's fine.

Avatar
alexseanchai

"modern writers" no we know specifically who invented that. Robert Graves. This JSTOR article seems to require an institutional login, not just a JSTOR account, but if the DuckDuckGo preview says in context what it looks like it says, someone called him on having no sources for Hestia stepping down in favor of Dionysos, in 1955.

Thanks, I’d forgotten the name of the guy and was too preoccupied to go digging for him.

Avatar

Ah, so I made a very awful discovery about a blog I used to follow. This person is quite literally transphobic. I am sharing this with the helpol community with the intention of spreading awareness.

@oflightandprophecy is their name. I have since blocked them. I was very civil; I didn't really know how to respond to their bigotry, being a trans person myself, so I just kind of thanked them for clarifying then ran away. 💀 Here are the screenshots of our interaction:

To clarify, this person was claiming that the gods do not support trans rights activists nor people who do not believe gender is based upon sex. Frankly, this was very disappointing to discover, and I am truly fucking disgusted with this viewpoint. I do not have the words to describe how vile this is to me. My advice to everyone out there is to block people like this. We really don't need this within our community.

How truly fucking despicable to spread a message like this.

Edit:

Here is another person for you to block. 💀

Avatar
skaldish

I don’t go here (helpol), but this is actually a very good example of what fearmongering looks like in pagan spaces.

Fearmongering is the act of making people afraid in order to achieve some kind of end-goal—in this case, to spread transphobic propaganda.

What can this particular argument effective (especially to impressionable newcomers) is the following:

  1. It’s spoken by a perceived authority figure.
  2. The perceived authority figure is speaking on behalf of an absent supreme authority, whose absence means there’s no double-checking the truth of their words.
  3. The perceived authority figure is using emotionally-charged language to provoke an emotional response, which interferes with critical thinking.

But they’ve provided no evidence to back their claim. No matter how emotionally charged something is, anyone making any argument ever needs to explain the “why” behind it. (And even when they do, it doesn’t automatically make their argument factual. False logic exists.)

Avatar

Whoa there, pardner! What have you done to make sure that belief or practice actually originates in ancient times and didn't come from the imagination of a repressed Victorian romantic?

Avatar
Avatar
windvexer

Another reason we gotta stop conflating witchcraft with paganism:

There is a huge difference between "working with" gods as a part of a magical practice,

and worshiping/honoring gods as part of a personal spiritual or religious practice.

Stop making hopeful pagan seekers think they need to learn "advanced witchcraft" before they are allowed to honor the gods.

(No, I don't believe that working with gods in magical practice is advanced. But that doesn't mean it's okay to act like magical business relationships with gods is the same thing as having pagan spirituality.)

Avatar

game awards fiasco has left me with a conclusion . the "cool woke" people in spaces online are still embarrassingly ignorant (or worse, tolerant) of antisemitism to the point where people can straight up explicitly say the most obvious bullshit and it'll be memed within five minutes. this has seriously hurt the credibility of some people i really care about, so im writing this in hopes the next time an antisemite makes the news i dont see thirty posts regurgitating their trash on my feed again.

if you want to do your part in preventing this, please do some reading into what antisemitic dogwhistles look like and how to avoid giving them a platform. the american jewish committee has a pdf with a list of many antisemitic dogwhistles here, and though it isn't comprehensive to everything antisemites come up with, it's a good start for helping you identify these phrases if you've never spoken to any jews about this before.

i will say this though. much of identifying dogwhistles is using your brain because they're hidden and cryptic on purpose, but learning about what they mean and how they're used can help you stop spreading this trash.

Avatar

saw yet another one of those “stop calling us culturally christian atheists, my abuse does not make me privileged. this is just religious people feeling threatened by atheism” posts again

your abuse does not make you privileged ofc but your membership in a dominant cultural group does. the fact that you’re unable to understand that there is a dominant cultural group and you are in it does make that less true. in fact it makes it more true.

and the “religious people feeling threatened by atheism” is literally just projection of christianity onto everything. like yes, it’s normal to assume that everything is like the thing you are familiar with, but really it is not always. jews talking about the way christian culture marginalizes us and how frustrating it is when people try to deny that they’re part of a dominant cultural group is not being threatened by your atheism bc we’re religious. how could it be when like half the jews talking about this are atheist or agnostic ourselves. your inability to distinguish a minority cultural group calling you out from christianity is part of what indicates that yeah actually. you see christianity as a default which is the problem in the first place.

Avatar

If you interpret “religion” as meaning “belief” or “faith”…

If you think all religions have a dualistic afterlife, such as the duality of “heaven” and “hell”…

If you believe that someone’s intentions or internal feelings are more important than their actions…

If you think that religious texts are to be taken literally, are unchanging, and are authoritative…

If you believe that you have an obligation to make all others believe like you or think like you, or that you must protect others from believing in the wrong thing…

If you believe culture and religion are severable…

If you believe Christmas or Easter is a secular holiday…

…you might have some internalized Christian hegemony to examine.

Avatar
Avatar
cryptotheism
Anonymous asked:

is christmas secular? i go back and forth on it a lot. i wanted to hear ur take if ur willing <:)

Like, there really isn't any nuance here. It's not secular.

Hey, anon seems to be asking in good faith. I have a policy here that nobody should be made fun of for wanting to learn.

if you celebrate christmas, even if you do not consider yourself a christian, you are still culturally christian. christmas is a christian holiday and as such cannot be entirely secular.

you can celebrate whatever winter holiday you like, you can create your own, but ask yourself why you’re calling it christmas if you’re not participating in the christan holiday cycle?

requisite disclaimer that it’s perfectly okay to be christian or celebrate christmas, but there are some biases at work here that deserve examining.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net