mouthporn.net
#us politics – @uswe on Tumblr

we are more than our worst days

@uswe / uswe.tumblr.com

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
sturionic

Activism is not cold-calling.

Activism is not cold-calling, and this is critically important to understand.

I'm seeing a lot of posts on here about 'building bridges' and 'finding community,' and then (extremely valid) response posts saying "BUT HOW??" And I'm going to explain something that can be very counter-intuitive: there is strategy involved in community.

As a longtime volunteer labour organizer, I’ve taken and taught many trainings on the strategy of talking. Something that surprises a lot of people is the very first thing you do in a union campaign. You sit down with your organizing committee, take out pen and paper, and literally map it out. You draw a physical map of the workplace: where are the entrances, exits, break rooms, supervisor offices. Essentially, ‘where is it safe to have a union conversation.’ Then you draw another physical chart of your coworkers. You sort out who is union-friendly, openly hostile to unions, or somewhere in the middle, and then you plan out very deliberately and carefully who talks to whom and in what order.

Consider: If Vocally Leftist Jane walks up to Conservative David and says "hey what do you think about unions," David is going to shut down immediately. He's not inclined to listen to Jane. But if Jane talks to Moderate Jason and brings him into the fold, then Jason is a far more effective strategic choice to talk to David, and David may actually hear him out without an instant reaction.

IMPORTANT CAVEAT: If Conservative David turns out to be Alt-Right David, and could be dangerous to follow organizers, we write him off. We are not trying to reach Alt-Right David. We are trying to reach Conservative David, who may actually be persuaded to find solidarity with other employees as fellow workers. Jason is a safe scout to find out which one he is. It does no one any good if Leftist Jane (or even Moderate Jane who is a visible minority) talks to Alt-Right David and puts herself on his radar. Not only has she done nothing to convince Alt-Right David to join a union - she's probably actively turned him against the idea - but now she's also in danger and the entire campaign is at risk. NOBODY WANTS THIS. Jane was NOT a hero for doing this. The organizing committee was foolish and enacted a terrible strategy to everyone's detriment.

Where you can make a difference is with people who will listen to you. You having a conversation with your well-meaning but clueless Centrist Democrat Auntie, and maybe gently helping her understand some things the media has been glossing over, is way more strategically useful than you marching up to MAGA Neighbour You've Met Once and trying to "build community" or "understand" them. They don't care. They're impervious, dangerous, and cruel. But maybe your beloved auntie will think about what you said, and then talk to her friend Anna who IDs as "fiscally conservative" but didn't vote because she can't bring herself to get on board with Trump. Then perhaps Anna talks to her brother Nic who has MAGA leanings but isn't all the way there yet. Proto-MAGA Nic would not have listened to you, nor would he have listened to Centrist Democrat Auntie, but he might absorb some of what his sister is saying.

This is not a cop-out or an echo chamber. This is you spending your time and energy strategically and safely. You are not a useful activist to anyone if you’re dead. Anyone who is telling you to hurl yourself directly at MAGA assholes like cannon fodder has no understanding of the strategy behind community building, and you should feel comfortable writing them off.

Last point: If you are tired, emotionally devastated, and/or in danger: take a break. This post is for people who would feel better jumping into action, not for people who are too overwhelmed to even think about it right now. You are worth so much even if you’re not actively Doing Activism, and your rest is worth more than “a break period so you can recharge and Do More Activism.” We all deserve the individual dignity of being worthy of comfort, rest & safety just on the basis of being human, outside of whatever we're doing for others' benefit. To deny ourselves that dignity is to devalue ourselves, and that’s the absolute last thing any of us should be doing right now.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

You can't "Russia psyops" your way out of Holocaust Harris aiding and abetting a genocide

Okay. So, first off what I'm talking about in the video is a well documented, real thing we know that has happened. Your complete dismissal of it is, frankly, bizarre.

Secondly, what's your goal here? The US is a two party system. Either Harris or Trump will be elected President. Now it's true -- neither candidate is willing to walk away from the Israeli government. but while Harris seems unwilling to do so for geopolitical reasons, Trump is a zealot who wants to "finish the job."

Discouraging people from voting for Harris will not save a single Palestinian life. Trump is Netanyahu's preferred candidate. And frankly, Trump wants to do so much worse here in the US. He's coming after immigrant populations, queer rights, women's rights, and so much more. Trump also wants to withdraw our support from Ukraine and abandon NATO.

There are people who will die here in the US and abroad under a second Trump administration.

Over the next four years it's likely two more Supreme Court seats will come up, and who gets nominated will 100% depend on who holds the White House. The reason we've lost things like abortion access in the United States is because of a conservative majority court put in place by Trump. The makeup of the court for the next forty years depends on what happens now.

So, in short, how do you propose we stop this? How do you propose we save lives? "The Revolution" isn't coming, and there are real human lives on the line right now.

If you don't have real solutions to stop a second Trump presidency, you aren't actually helping anyone.

(Also, this "Holocaust Harris" stuff is such bullshit. I get that her position on Israel isn't that different than Biden's, but she's not actually in power right now? The US Vice President has zero say over foreign policy. The biggest power they have is breaking ties in the Senate, showing up as a mouthpiece for the President when they aren't available, and having a heartbeat. Daniel Webster turned down the Vice Presidency saying "I do not propose to be buried until I am dead," for a reason)

Guess who blocked me instead of actually defending their principles.

Just guess.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

oppression isn’t generational and trying to frame politics as “the old people are wrong and the young people are right” erases the fact that there are old people who have been fighting the good fight for decades and the fact that there are young people who are literally nazis

Plus while there might be less old people fighting the good fight it’s usually because they were killed or were part of the minorities that have poor living conditions that kill you early

Avatar
uswe

Also!! The alt-right purposely targets young men. Toxic masculinity and the weird shift once you're out of school leaves a lot of straight, cis, white men without a lot of ways to make positive connections to other people. The alt-right gives them a community. One of my brothers-in-law is right now in the process of circling this drain. It's upsetting and gross to watch. So I was having a conversation with my 21-year-old roommate who is a probably-cis dude who grew up in the south with a lot of toxic masculinity that wasn't super escapable and he mentioned spending a lot of time watching political youtube, so we had a whole conversation about this. The roommate dude is all right, and aware of the problems. Like, this is tumblr, we talk a lot of shit about straight white boys. But to decrease the number of young nazis we have to deal with as they get older and get more systemic power, make sure the young men in your life are okay. Make sure they have a D&D group or some kind of actual support network that's not nazis.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

Donald Trump announced today that he is adding another twenty candidates to potentially fill any vacancies on the Supreme Court. I’m sure everyone on this list is an awful human being and a danger to society, but I want to highlight three of these new candidates:

  1. Ted Cruz (49) — the Texas Senator who’s a notoriously anti-LGBT bigot, among other things.
  2. Tom Cotton (43) — the Arkansas Senator who described slavery as a necessary evil and (pictured above) made it immediately clear after the announcement was made that he would (1) attack women’s reproductive rights, (2) defend gun rights, and (3) protect the “right to worship” — which is just a smokescreen for denying queer people basic civil liberties and again denying women their right to choose under the veneer of “religious freedom.”
  3. Daniel Cameron (34) — the Kentucky Attorney General who has refused to press charges against the police officers who killed Breonna Taylor. He took over 150 days to even reach out to Taylor’s family after she was murdered.

Justice Ginsburg recently announced that she’s battling cancer — her and Justice Breyer, two of the only four remaining left-leaning justices on the court, are both in their 80s. If Trump is reelected, he will almost certainly be able to replace the two of them with far-right conservatives who will be a danger to minorities — and these men aren’t just dangerous because of their values, but because of their relatively young ages. You need to know that these are lifetime appointments to the Court and Cruz, Cameron, and Cotton have an average age of 42. Again, for context, RBG is 87 years old. Trump could singlehandedly guarantee a 7-2 conservative Supreme Court for decades to come, leaving lasting damage long after he leaves the White House — damage that will affect us, our children, and our children’s children.

This election is not the time for complacency. Almost 200,000 Americans have died because of our President’s incompetence. If he is reelected, I can’t even begin to fathom what could happen to our country. You need to vote this election and make sure that these monsters never find themselves in a position of such power. Vote for Biden.

Avatar
biglawbear

You aren't just voting for President for the next four years. You're voting for judges for the next forty.

*screams in non American*

*screams in American ineligible to vote*

Avatar
thevicster

real. scary. 👆

Avatar
debmont8686

Boost!! This is real.

Jesus FUCKING Christ please boost this and please please please register to vote and fucking vote blue!!! We cannot leave the next generation with this shitshow

It’s not only 4 years. SCOTUS is a lifetime appointment.

Avatar
sheisraging

The offices of the president and vice president are not the only relevant parts of a presidential election. If people had actually listened, and thought about this in 2016, we might not be stuck with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh for the rest of their lives.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

She/her also personally fought against transwomen in prison seeking gender affirmation surgery...

Avatar
alex51324

Here’s an article that gives more details on the story, and what Harris said about it.  The key points:

  • It was the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation that refused the surgery to the inmates.  When the inmates fought the policy in court, as Attorney General of California, it was Harris’s job to represent the Department.  Yes, she did it, but it wasn’t something she decided on her own to do.  (Also, not for nothing, the inmates won the case.)
  • Her characterization of the episode:   “On that issue I will tell you I vehemently disagree and in fact worked behind the scenes to ensure that the Department of Corrections would allow transitioning inmates to receive the medical attention that they required, they needed and deserved,” Harris said.
  • A policy now exists for inmates to receive transition-related care in California prisons (although apparently the DoC isn’t doing a great job of holding up its end of the bargain*--quelle surprise).  

(*For the record, Harris finished her time as AG and became a Senator shortly after this agreement was reached, so it’s someone else’s job now to enforce it.) 

The thing to keep in mind here is that, as Attorney General, Kamala Harris couldn’t wave her hand and have everything in the entire California Department of Justice go exactly as she wanted it--and she won’t be able to as Vice President, either.  We currently have a president who thinks that’s how it works, and we’re damned lucky he’s wrong.  

She had (and will have to) work with large number of people who hold different views.  (Another article I read said that the California Department of Justice, which she ran as AG, employs about 4,800 people--that’s a lot of different views.)  If she had refused to back the Department of Corrections in their case, she would have alienated people whose cooperation she needed to be able to rely on.  (If she even had the option of not backing them and staying AG--I’m not sure how it works, exactly.)  Even people who agreed with her about the specific matter might have disapproved of her hanging her subordinates out to dry.  (Another thing our current president does constantly--notice how Harris isn’t saying that the person in her office who actually wrote these briefs is a bad guy that she barely knew.)

So here’s what actually happened when Kamala Harris “fought against transwomen in prison seeking gender affirmation surgery”:

  • The Department of Corrections had a policy denying gender-affirmation surgery to inmates.  
  • Two inmates fought that policy in court.
  • Harris defended that policy in court (or, more accurately, was the supervisor of the person who did so--but the legal documents went out under her signature, and she takes responsibility for their content).
  • Harris also worked to change the policy.  

If you’ve had a job, you’ve probably been in the position of having to carry out a policy that you don’t agree with.  Your choices are to quit your job in protest or stay and argue that the policy should change.  If you pick option B, you still have to follow the policy while you’re working to change it--again, just about the only person in the world who doesn’t know this is Donald J. Trump, because he’s never had a real job where he answered to anybody.  

What this incident shows is that Kamala Harris is accustomed to working in a system where she doesn’t always get her own way, and that she knows how to lose the battle to win the war.  As VP, she’s going to need those skills--especially if the Republicans keep the Senate, but even if the Democrats sweep everything in November, we’re notoriously bad at all pulling in the same direction.  We’ve had about enough of the “I’m taking my ball and going home” style of leadership.  

Avatar
armeleia

This.

I get it, I really do - but Trump has literally stripped away rights from trans kids and fucked the careers of trans people in the military. Pence believes in conversion therapy.

We can remember and discuss these issues, but at the end of the day, Trump/Pence is the greater evil and we need to vote in a unified way to get them out of office because the second term would be so much worse. Don’t vote independent, just suck it up and recognize that we’re not gonna get a perfect candidate ever.

Voting Trump is a face full of glass shards, and a vote for an independent is a vote for Trump. This isn’t complicated.

I had not seen this explanation, and I’m reblogging it because I probably have followers who haven’t either.

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
prince-atom

What the fuck are Democrats, who only control the House, supposed to do about defunding the USPS that the rest of us can’t do? Pass legislation that Mitch McConnell will use to stop another draft in his Senate offices? Which Trump will only veto if it does get signed into law? Do you understand that the House passed $3 trillion in Coronavirus relief BACK IN MAY which McConnell is sitting on? We need to organize and march and demonstrate over the USPS and yes, that means Trump’s stormtroopers are going to bust more heads and no, that doesn’t mean the Democrats are complicit, the elected leadership cannot organize us because that would be astroturfing. Are they to walk out? Then they surrender what power they have.

Avatar
finnglas

You know, this whole “do-nothing Democrats” that I hear coming from some supposed leftists sounds very familiar.

Where have I heard it before?

Oh right. From Trump. All the time.

I’m just saying, when your talking points are indistinguishable from the fascist would-be dictator currently taking a dump all over democracy, maybe you want to examine them a bit more closely and see whom you’re really helping.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
idlnmclean

There is a whole bunch of billionaires that are throwing fits at the prospect of not having record breaking profits this year, and they are throwing millions of dollars into dangerous schemes to convince the people of the US of a fantasy that is terrifying and horrifying.

Avatar
uswe

I think it's really important both to establish that this is true and to establish that this is not true everywhere. New Zealand is on the verge of safe reopening because it's done there, South Korea is cautiously reopening. The big differences there are responsible emergency management. Like. That's the thing. That's the whole thing. "But Chiomi," you argue, "I'm pretty sure you're super biased because that's your field." And you would be super right! But also a fool. I will apparently argue about this shit while barely lucid at 4 in the morning as the ultrasound tech sees if my gallbladder has imploded. Persuasively! I made the ultrasound tech mad about mismanagement, too. Because the deaths that are ticking inevitably towards 100k (93.8k today) during the first wave, with an inevitable second wave and no vaccine on the horizon, the deaths that we will eventually talk about in terms of percentages because that's the only way to comprehend the numbers, they were preventable. The CDC used to have a pandemic response team. Trump gutted it in 2018 for the sake of the budget. Other countries are supporting individuals on a month by month basis, not expecting survival and encouraging the clamor towards dying for the sake of the economy with the piddly one-time payment. Early identification, tracking, tracing, and testing could have kept this to a concerning but relatively minor outbreak like SARS, MERS, or H1N1. You know, those recent health problems (some of them even coronaviruses with similar rates of infectivity!) that were contained because there were adults in charge. But no. Our only analogue right now is the 1918 Flu Epidemic. The one before modern communication, epidemiology, and emergency management. This isn't because of some inherent trait of Covid-19. It's because Trump saw everything we'd learned in the intervening century and threw it out the fucking window.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

I’m not going back out in the world until there’s a vaccine. 

I read this last night and it kept me up

Avatar
stilljewelss

Reblogging because of the very important info at the end of the article - if you experience symptoms of a stroke, seek help IMMEDIATELY because even large strokes are treatable, but time is of the essence.

Avatar
abner-krill

I just grabbed this from Google because the article didn't have any easy info on stroke identification. Remember the basics:

F- face, is it under control?

A - arms, can you raise them both at the same time?

S - speech, can you talk or are you slurring?

T - time is of the essence, go to a hospital IMMEDIATELY

This is scary stuff. Stay informed lovelies.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
roach-works

wildly depressing to see how many people on tumblr firmly believe that billionaires need that money in order to fund things like schools, hospitals, shelters, soup kitchens, roads, parks, and scientific progress. 

like, guys, holy shit. no individual needs to have a billion dollars so they can personally chose to pay for any of that stuff out of the goodness of their heart and the largeness of their bank account. THAT IS WHAT TAXES ARE SUPPOSED TO PAY FOR. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE TAXES. THAT IS WHAT TAXES DO. 

THE POINT OF TAXES IS EVERYONE POOLS A FAIR AND AFFORDABLE FRACTION OF THEIR MONEY TOGETHER AND THEN WE GET TO HAVE A FUNCTIONAL SOCIETY WHETHER OR NOT SOME DUDE WITH AN INCOMPREHENSIBLE AMOUNT OF MONEY FEELS LIKE BEING NICE TO THE REST OF US TODAY.

BILLIONAIRES NOT HAVING ENOUGH MONEY FOR ALL THE CHARITY THEY WOULD DO IF WE LET THEM HAVE MORE MONEY IS NOT THE PROBLEM. BILLIONAIRES NOT FORKING OVER ANY OF THE MONEY THEY OWE IN TAXES IS THE PROBLEM. 

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
cumbrane

the only good candidate

i dunno whos running his social media but i wanna kiss them. i think im in love

move the fuck over bernie

i remember like mike gravel in 2008 lol

Remember that ad where he threw a rock into a lake and then stared into the camera unblinking for two minutes? I desperately want shit like that back

That account, along with his whole campaign, is the work of three teenagers. 

From the article:

“These young students contacted me a week ago asking would I run for president and I responded to them saying, ‘Do you realize how old I am?’” Gravel told The Washington Post. “I’ll be 89 years old in May, so it’s preposterous to think that I could serve as president.”
It took some convincing, but Gravel was ultimately persuaded by a three-page strategy memo that the students drafted and their assurance that they would handle all of the day-to-day work of the campaign. Their ultimate goal wasn’t to win the election but rather to qualify him for the Democratic debates, so that he could use that platform to “issue a critique of American militarism, plutocracy, and inaction on climate,” as his newly-created website states.
“These people weren’t just whistling Dixie,” Gravel said. “They were well-grounded.”
Managing the campaign are David Oks, 17, and Henry Williams, 18. Elijah Emery, 18, handles the finances.

Incredible…

Avatar
lynati

Well, that’s *one* way to get into politics while still in high school. TAKE GOOD NOTES FOR YOUR OWN FUTURE CAMPAIGNS!

Avatar
dogmatix

So you’re telling me the latest Democratic candidate is literally three teenagers in a trench coat?

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
fullmarx

Bloomberg reported yesterday that if Sen. Sanders implemented his highly progressive tax plan, billionaires could face an effective tax rate of up to 97.5%. This will be met with complete apoplexy amongst the ruling-class, but, apart from the fact that it is entirely correct that governments use punitive tax regimes to discourage socially destructive behaviour such as ruthless exploitation and wealth hoarding, let’s put it in perspective.

If Jeff Bezos was hit by a 97.5% wealth tax, he would still be a billionaire. His fortune currently stands at roughly $108,200,000,000. After a Sanders wealth tax, he would still sit atop a hoard of almost $3.75bn. The tax from he alone would enable the federal government to wipe the debt of a million students (c. $50bn), to train half a million new grad nurses (c. $25bn), to pay the entire education budget of the five lowest spending states for a year (Utah + Idaho + Arizona + Oklahoma + Mississippi = c. $24bn) - and still, still have enough spare change to double federal spending on energy efficiency and renewable energy ($4bn).

And that’s just one big fish.

Put in that sort of context there is simply no moral justification for any individual to have the private enjoyment of the sort of wealth that could seriously adjust the social outcomes of a entire nation’s working-class.

Pitchforks are an extremely moderate and conservative reaction.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net