some Alex Nino in black and white.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Mike Mignola in black and white.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Loki by Frank Miller
Loki Laufeyson, by Esad Ribic.
*Sketched and painted on the inside cover of the Loki miniseries hardcover for a lucky fan*
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Marvel Fanfare, Vol. 1 # 37, by Charles Vess.
Thor, Vol. 1 # 353 Page 24 by Walt Simonson, with Lettering by John Workman, and Colors by Christie Scheele.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
art process for the ‘X-Men: the Asgardian Wars’ Paperback Cover (and the HouseAd for the same), by Arthur Adams.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Marvel Fanfare, Vol. 1 # 45 Page 06, as penciled by John Buscema, and inked by me, Ungoliantschilde.Tumblr.com last night.
I posted this way back in 2015. I look at the line work I developed since then, and I have a nagging suspicion that this is better than my later ink work, which was cleaner and more polished. I don’t ink as much any more because I, frankly, should be doing my own work. Looking back on it, my inks on this drawing look like my ideal version of my own drawings and sketchbook work (if that makes sense). Not every aspect of it is exactly “right”. But, the feel of it, and the sketchy line work. Yeah, that’s how I draw. I got tired of inking because I felt like I was deliberately cleaning up line work that I would prefer to be more sketchy and impressionistic.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
‘Loki and his Horde of Chaos’, by Mike Mignola.
Very early Mignola. I think this was from 1981 or 1982. I forget where I found this.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Amazing Spider-Man, Vol. 1 # 504 by John Romita, Jr., with Inks by Scott Hanna, Colors by Matt Milla, and a Script by J. Michael Straczynski.
ungoliantschilde reblogged
Anonymous asked:
Jonathan Majors is very good actor I say. But I did not find Kang to be very intimidating at all. This is to be the next big bad guy, the next Thanos? I'm not seeing it.
Jonathan Majors is indeed a good actor. It’s a testament to his acting that he made what was almost a whole Wikipedia page worth of exposition in episode six enjoyable to watch. Although that wasn’t Kang. That was Immortus… the older, warier variant of Kang… the variant of Kang that wants peace and order rather than war and conquest. Kang the Conqueror is a whole other kettle of fish. we haven’t seen him yet. He‘ll be portrayed by the same actor but is likely to be a lot less mirthful and unthreatening and a lot more of a Thanos-level menace (or at least that’s my expectation).
Look, all I want is for someone to compare him to Thanos and for him to get annoyed, declaring that “Kang the Conqueror does not require trinkets to mold the universe to his whim. My will and wits suffice.“ or something of that ilk.
First up, seconding that he managed to make like five solid minutes of exposition fun (and the shot compisition, sound direction and music managed to make exposition slightly menacing).
And, yeah, one thing to remember about Kang is that not only does every version of Kang hate each other, but each era of his existence hates each other. Like, he’s got four or five identities he adopts at various points in his life,and each of those hates the others. And they almost all hate Immortus, his final fate, the most.
Because Immortus is the scholar. He’s the barbarian who became king by his own hand and has lived to become bored of conquest.
If there’s one thing we get from Kang, it’s this shot from Avengers Forever:
Yes. 100% yes.
This is the basic breakdown:
“Younger Kang (Iron Lad) is an idealistic Whelp and a fool!”
“Older Kang (Immortus) is a feeble old librarian, desperately trying to maintain his relevance!”
“And I, the true Kang, am the rightful lord of all time and reality! Muahahaha!”
Avengers Forever is best summarized as the above argument, and Kang made the Avengers pick sides and help him.
Favorite character. Ever.