mouthporn.net
#warner bros – @ungoliantschilde on Tumblr
Avatar

Ungoliantschilde

@ungoliantschilde / ungoliantschilde.tumblr.com

My name is John and I am into Comics, Movies, Artwork, Painting, Rock'n'Roll and Music in General and Pop-Culture in particular. I enjoy polite discussions and requests!
Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Hello John, how do you feel about that Disney is paying Marvel comic book creators $5,000 for work it's adapted for billions (total shocked i know) and the recently news that talented creators are starting Substack subscription services for their comic book projects?

First. Be careful about throwing around numbers like that. Maybe one creator got $5k. Maybe you heard a rumor that it was standard. Regardless, the only people who know the truth are the artists, writers, and staff working at Marvel Comics. And anyone that doesn’t currently work there and frankly never has is a moron for telling you they know how much money these people make. People used to argue with Brevoort on here about his sales figures. As if some jackhole on Tumblr knows more about the comics industry than a 30+ year veteran that’s still working at the highest level. So, your quote of $5,000 is dubious. But, I digress.

I think… I think that Marvel and DC treat their talent departments like professional athletes. And that really is a pretty good analogy. Being able to produce interior artwork for a monthly comic book is akin to being a high level athlete playing a professional sport. I have gradually gotten my family to understand why I like comics so much by being as clear and blunt as possible: the BEST figure artists in the world draw comics. Period. Being able to quickly and imaginatively render body language and facial expressions is a basic job requirement for a pro comic book artist. Animators on movies rarely get credit. But the lead designer? The lead artist? They get all the awards and recognition. Those are the pencilers of comic book art. Those are the people whose last name is listed on the cover of a book, right next to the logo of the publisher. They’re like pro athletes, competing at the top of the game.

Now. Follow that line of thinking. Derek Jeter was a fantastic shortstop for the Yankees. Fantastic. One of the best ever. And when he was done, he was done. He doesn’t get to go places and advertise himself as Mr. Yankee the Shortstop. He goes and advertises himself for autographs as… Derek Jeter. The guy that played shortstop for the Yankees.

I talk a lot about Barry Windsor-Smith as my favorite artist of all time. Barry… Barry never got that he was the artist for a company that was paying him on a work for hire basis. He doesn’t own the rights to Conan the Barbarian. He doesn’t get to dictate how Marvel reprints his work if they so choose.

If Ralph Lauren hired you to design a necktie for them, and it wound up being a huge sales success that became this iconic necktie for Ralph Lauren. It would still say “Ralph Lauren” on that tag thing on the back of the necktie. It wouldn’t say your name. You designed the necktie. Ralph Lauren produced it, bought the materials, paid for the manufacturing, shipping, distribution, marketing, and paid you. It’s Ralph Lauren’s necktie. That’s not a capitalism or “America is bad” thing. That’s a business thing. That’s called work for hire.

I am a very amateurish artist myself. I have debated trying to write and draw my own stuff for a while now. And I might someday. But I grew up loving the licensed properties published by Marvel and DC. They inspire me and I still love reading and rereading them.

I am not at all surprised that Disney is lowballing the talent. That’s how Disney makes money. You get the best product for the least amount of money, and you sell it for a profit. That process is absolutely not cool to the talent. That’s why creator owned projects are on the rise. That’s basically the core business model of Image and Dark Horse. Artists make names for themselves drawing Spider-Man, Batman, the X-Men, or Superman. They get burnt out on playing the pro-sports version. Their work gets edited a lot. And they don’t get paid what they’re worth. Some of them stick it out and become hardcore company players.

John Romita, Jr. is a BEAST. Dude has been firing on all cylinders for decades. And he’s a company man thru and thru. Robert Kirkman started at Marvel and DC, and he clearly found a different avenue of success.

If Disney is paying its talent less then they feel they deserve, then I wish them the best of luck in trying to make a backend deal to make more profits off of the books they’re producing for Disney. Seriously. Good fucking luck. Disney absolutely SCREWED Scarlet Johansson on the Black Widow royalties. According to her lawsuit, She got fucked out of $50,000,000 million. And Disney’s response to her lawsuit was to call her all kinds of horrid shit in public. I was not surprised. I just shook my head and thought of the countless number of other creative people that have tried to fight Disney for their royalties. And lost. Check my tags for Carl Barks.

Make yourself a name drawing Wolverine. Then go shove it down Disney and Warner Bros’ throats by creating your own thing.

Avatar

Been thinking about this a bit.

Scarlet Johansson’s lawsuit has big ramifications for the comics community. Even if it gets thrown out. Most likely what will happen is that Disney will either run her out of money, or pay her a settlement. They will bury her in legal fees and litigation for a couple years until she quits, or they will settle and pay her less than she is asking. I’m betting on a fight where she loses.

See, if Disney settles or pays her what she wants… that sets a legal precedent. That means that other creators can file suit against Disney and use her case as an example as to why they’re due more money for royalties. That’s a big problem for Disney.

Scarlet Johansson is a lot more than a pretty face. She’s not Jessica Alba - pretty furniture to be discarded once she can’t wear a leotard on screen any more. Scarlet can actually act. And she’s smart and she knows her market.

So here’s me, hoping that Scarlet Johansson becomes the flag bearer for creator’s rights in the comics industry. She has put a spotlight on it, and it’s getting more attention than any creator ever has in the past. I hope her lawsuit causes a seismic shift in how comic book companies are able to treat their talent departments. I really do.

Read every thing I have said, and please signal boost this. This could actually be a big deal. I don’t ask much of my beloved followers. I’m asking you all now.

Signal boost this for creators rights.

Avatar

Batman Vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice OK, my Brother and I talk via text a lot about this stuff, and I figured I would try to summarize our conclusions into a review. there will be spoilers. So, I will start with the positives. Zack Snyder understands imagery and iconography. He cast the movie almost perfectly. Looking back at his filmography, Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was his only real misstep in terms of casting. Affleck was great as Batman and as Bruce Wayne. Looked the part, sounded the part, and he did not do the growl thing that hurt the Christian Bale version. Henry Cavill is Superman. I am going on record saying that he has played Superman in two bad Superman movies in a row, and his portrayal has been dictated by the scripts. He looks, acts, and sounds like Superman. He is the only guy that has gotten it right since Christopher Reeve. It is a different version than Chris Reeve's, which is OK in my book. Gal Gadot was the best part of this flick. She was PERFECT as Wonder Woman. Beautiful without being overly Sexual, Powerful and Fierce, but above all else: Grace. She brought a grace and dignity to the role that it needs. The supporting cast was great. Jeremy Irons is great fit for Alfred. Amy Adams is a great fit for Lois. Diane Lane is great as Ma Kent. Kevin Costner was great too, for that matter. Nailed it. Perry White, Jenny Olsen, and so on? They were fine. The Daily Planet staff was great in their roles. No complaints there. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex was... Wrong for the movie. And, in a weird way, his casting and portrayal was indicative of the biggest problem with the movie. Jesse went for the 1930's Mad-Scientist Fleischer Serial version of Lex. a Crazy guy on the edge of town with a death ray kinda thing. it did not fit with the tone of the movie, and it did not fit with the portrayal of the other characters. If you do a Golden-Age Lex, you kinda need to do a Golden-Age Superman. They play off each other better. So, I get what he was trying for, but it did not work. It is indicative of the larger problems with the movie because of that one crucial word: Tone. Cavill is doing a modern Superman. Affleck did a Batman heavily influenced by the Dystopian Future that Frank Miller envisioned. So... Dystopian Future Batman, Modern-Era Superman and Wonder Woman, Golden Age Lex, and a shit-ton of references to iconic scenes from the past 30 years of the comics. It felt... Forced. It felt like there was no story there, so Snyder just threw every "cool" thing he could think of at the wall and just kept filming. Doomsday as a villain was a stupid move too. That was a blatant attempt at "let's have Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman go through their greatest hits!" That's what the movie was, really. A montage of Snyder's favorites moments from the comics, with a crappy story meant to loosely tie it all together. It... Sucked. It was fun to look at Batman fighting Parademons. It was fun to watch Wonder Woman chop off Doomsday's hand with her sword. Affleck was fun as Batman. the whole fight scene between him and Superman was fun to watch. And that's the key: Snyder understands IMAGERY. He understands casting. What Snyder does NOT understand is storytelling or tone. The movie was all over the place in terms of tone. It could have been a fun World's Finest movie, with a brief confrontation in the beginning. A fun, "World's Finest" would have even worked with the version of Lex Luthor that Eisenberg did. Have Lex team up with Hugo Strange or something, and it would have been great. Mad Scientists Versus Superheroes would have been fun. Instead, we got dystopian, dreary, doom and gloom Superman Vs. Batman. and Wonder Woman was in it for no other reason than because they could. She showed up to get a photograph. Really? I mean, I am glad she was in the movie and all but... really? She was in the movie to get a photograph back? That is a pretty dumb reason, and they should have given her more motivation, but whatever. Dawn of Justice was a bad movie. It was better than Man of Steel, but it was still a bad movie.

Avatar
reblogged

I know you have a lot of love for the DC writers so my question is if you could pick 3 and pitch a book for them, kind like how you did with rucka and the cyclops one. Have any in mind?

Avatar

all i know if geoff johns should write x-men one day.

that would be cool.  

also i could take a nap :)

Avatar
Avatar
oncomics

I soooo disagree with my rebbe. I so dislike Johns’ work.

Can’t imagine do an X-Men that wouldn’t be the worst run ever.

I like Geoff Johns as a writer on one book. His Flash series made me a fan of the Flash. Same with his Green Lantern work, which only soured as he got more and more assignments from DC. 'Infinite Crisis' was not bad, but it was not great either. What happened AFTER Infinite Crisis was fantastic. '52' reads very, very well (imho). And you have to read it like it is a true graphic novel.

Similarly, Jim Lee was great on Cover art, and his two successful monthly runs on "Batman: Hush" book with Jeph Loeb was pretty good, and then he did 12 issues with Brian Azzarello, now in trade as "Superman: For Tomorrow". After Jim Lee drew Superman, he started work on two projects: "All Star Batman and Robin, the Boy Wonder" with Frank Miller, and that DCU MMORPG game was basically designed by Jim Lee. All the character models are based on Jim Lee's art. All of DC's Merchandise is based around Jim Lee's art.

Jim Lee is a HUGELY influential artist, and he gets a lot of attention for his posters.

He sucks at facial expressions and storytelling though. Put it this way, I doubt that Jim Lee will be drawing Archie.

Jim Lee is successful because his art is very marketable, and that's an amazing talent to have. I am not knocking the guy for his art. I think that in general, DC treats their characters like they are action figures. The comics might as well come free with the toys. That's Jim Lee's effect on DC, in a nutshell. He draws splash pages that kick ass, and not much else.

At DC, Geoff Loeb and Jim Lee are in charge because Warner Bros like their ideas. And rightfully so.

My personal opinion is that Geoff works better with a smaller cast & Jim Lee should continue on as scheduled, I guess.

But... Geoff Loeb at Marvel? With a focus on characters and not merchandising the characters? Geoff Loeb at Marvel would rock.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net