mouthporn.net
#disney+ – @ungoliantschilde on Tumblr
Avatar

Ungoliantschilde

@ungoliantschilde / ungoliantschilde.tumblr.com

My name is John and I am into Comics, Movies, Artwork, Painting, Rock'n'Roll and Music in General and Pop-Culture in particular. I enjoy polite discussions and requests!
Avatar

I firmly believe that the best part of the Netflix marvel shows was Daredevil. Those 3 seasons are nearly perfect, and I’m really excited for the Disney+ “Born Again” series.

*Kinda Spoilers*

That being said… I do not understand why anyone has criticism of the Daredevil that showed up in the latest episode of She-Hulk. That was a deliriously fun, light episode, and we even had a good hallway fight scene. He moved like Daredevil, and it was fun. The show was a continuation of a lot of the comics. The Netflix show was like an adaptation of the Frank Miller/Brian Michael Bendis/Ed Brubaker stories. Dark, brooding, gritty, and brilliant.

The Spider-Man: No Way Home and now the She-Hulk version of Daredevil is kind of inline with what Mark Waid said before he started his absolutely fantastic run on Daredevil with Chris Samnee. Mark Waid said he felt like he needed a stiff drink after reading the dark, gritty Marvel Knights Daredevil. Bendis and Maleev won an Eisner for the Dark and Gritty Daredevil. It was good. And it was kind of its own thing, and the Netflix series really adapted it well.

Mark Waid intentionally wanted to make Daredevil more fun. And I think he won an Eisner too. Stop hating on the new direction that Marvel and Disney are taking the MCU Daredevil. It will be fun, and the Netflix series is still on Disney+ if you want to watch.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
docgold13
Anonymous asked:

Jonathan Majors is very good actor I say. But I did not find Kang to be very intimidating at all. This is to be the next big bad guy, the next Thanos? I'm not seeing it.

Jonathan Majors is indeed a good actor. It’s a testament to his acting that he made what was almost a whole Wikipedia page worth of exposition in episode six enjoyable to watch. Although that wasn’t Kang. That was Immortus… the older, warier variant of Kang… the variant of Kang that wants peace and order rather than war and conquest. Kang the Conqueror is a whole other kettle of fish. we haven’t seen him yet. He‘ll be portrayed by the same actor but is likely to be a lot less mirthful and unthreatening and a lot more of a Thanos-level menace (or at least that’s my expectation).

Avatar
Avatar
krinsbez

Look, all I want is for someone to compare him to Thanos and for him to get annoyed, declaring that “Kang the Conqueror does not require trinkets to mold the universe to his whim. My will and wits suffice.“ or something of that ilk.

Avatar
yeomanstuff

First up, seconding that he managed to make like five solid minutes of exposition fun (and the shot compisition, sound direction and music managed to make exposition slightly menacing).

And, yeah, one thing to remember about Kang is that not only does every version of Kang hate each other, but each era of his existence hates each other. Like, he’s got four or five identities he adopts at various points in his life,and each of those hates the others. And they almost all hate Immortus, his final fate, the most.

Because Immortus is the scholar. He’s the barbarian who became king by his own hand and has lived to become bored of conquest.

If there’s one thing we get from Kang, it’s this shot from Avengers Forever:

Yes. 100% yes.

This is the basic breakdown:

“Younger Kang (Iron Lad) is an idealistic Whelp and a fool!”

“Older Kang (Immortus) is a feeble old librarian, desperately trying to maintain his relevance!”

“And I, the true Kang, am the rightful lord of all time and reality! Muahahaha!”

Avengers Forever is best summarized as the above argument, and Kang made the Avengers pick sides and help him.

Favorite character. Ever.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net