mouthporn.net
#batman vs. superman: dawn of justice – @ungoliantschilde on Tumblr
Avatar

Ungoliantschilde

@ungoliantschilde / ungoliantschilde.tumblr.com

My name is John and I am into Comics, Movies, Artwork, Painting, Rock'n'Roll and Music in General and Pop-Culture in particular. I enjoy polite discussions and requests!
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
comicweek

In My Darkest Moments, I’m Taunted by the Suspicion that my Parents’ Murder was the Best Thing That Ever Happened to Me.

Cynically, I Tell Myself it has Given my Life a Destiny and the Means to Fulfill it.

The Affleck Batman’s outward appearance is inspired by The Dark Knight Returns. Underneath the costume is an Alex Ross-Paul Dini inspired one, who has lost his way after twenty years in Gotham. 

“In BvS, Bruce was a man obsessed with the past and the wrongs he perceived had been done by Superman’s hand. What he went through in that film gave him a totally different understanding of those events and who Superman really was. “

- Ben Affleck (source)

Batman: War on Crime Written by Alex Ross and Paul Dini Art by Alex Ross Lettering by Alex Ross

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - Ultimate Edition Directed by Zack Snyder Written by Chris Terrio and David S. Goyer Cinematography by Larry Fong Edited by David Brenner

So much of the design and visual effects of the Zack Snyder universe was so incredibly spot on that it clouds a clear review of the movies.

Zack Snyder directed 3 shitty movies in a row. Each one was a little better than the one before, but they were all pretty much just bad.

And the facts that Henry Cavill was perfect as Superman, Ben Affleck was great as Batman, and holy fuck - Kevin Costner and Diane Lane as Ma and Pa Kent were overshadowed by a series of movies that cared more about making things look “cool” than they cared about actually making a good movie. They sucked. They were not “controversial”.

Basically, anyone with a brain and a basic understanding of the characters thought Snyder’s movies were stupid, over long drivel. But, they made a bunch of money overseas and in middle America. So, the defenders call them “controversial”. They were bad. The Big Bang Theory was ridiculously popular. It made sooo much money. And everyone on Tumblr routinely makes fun of how badly written that show was. Snyder’s movies sucked. They weren’t controversial. They sucked. And Batfleck being wasted on them was collateral damage.

The movie dawn of justice seemed to me to be rushing thru the story to play catchup with Marvel Movies. So the movie was like quick origin quick origin fight fight fight and done..

Yep.

Man of Steel had a lot of problems. Most of all? Too violent for Superman. It’s not about him killing Zod at the end. It’s about how the first 40 minutes was Russell Crowe as space Conan, then a nearly perfect 40 minutes of Kevin Costner teaching Superman to be... Superman. And then an hour and a half of stuff blowing up. Man of Steel was not a good movie, and it was NOT Superman. If anything, it was a movie about Rob Liefeld’s “Supreme” character.

Dawn of Justice was a montage of scenes from the comics. That warehouse fight where Batman saves Martha was staged and shot to have multiple direct references to the Dark Knight Returns. And the first time you see it, it’s like “hey, cool!”... and then you sit back and think about the whole movie and realize that there was really no plot to speak of, just a loosely connected series of “cool” things. It wasn’t a movie. It was Zack Snyder desperately trying to tell everyone that DC is darker and cooler than the Marvel movies. It’s entertaining, but it’s mindless.

And, lastly, Justice League. Wanna talk about competing with Marvel? I think DC wanted to have Darkseid as the big bad, because they don’t know how to market their movies. Then, Marvel beat them to the punch anyways and gave audiences the more interesting version of Darkseid: Thanos. So, DC said screw it, we’ll change the villain. And they could have dug out a classic JLA villain.

Despero would have been great. And different from Marvel. Eisenberg was terrible as Lex, but Dawn of Justice set him up as the villain, so we could have had the Injustice Gang. All of those were viable options.

But, nope.

Instead we got Steppenwolf. If any of Darkseid’s goons qualified as a twerp, it would be Steppenwolf. The guy is twerp. He shows up in the comics and gets smacked. That’s his role as a character. And his role in the movie was as a clear stand-in for Darkseid. And they switched him out because Marvel already did Darkseid first and better. That’s just fucking lame.

Oh, and another thing. Not having Grant Gustin as the Flash was a HUGE missed opportunity. That was an epic blunder. They could have made all of the DC platforms unified, just by saying “yeah, the CW shows are in the same universe”. Free marketing, better story, etc.

But, nope. We got some dude wearing a space suit and I kept wanting to see Grant Gustin being the better version of Barry Allen.

Zack Snyder’s DC movies were not controversial. They were bad.

Avatar
reblogged

Batman Vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice

OK, my Brother and I talk via text a lot about this stuff, and I figured I would try to summarize our conclusions into a review.

there will be spoilers.

So, I will start with the positives.

Zack Snyder understands imagery and iconography. He cast the movie almost perfectly. Looking back at his filmography, Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was his only real misstep in terms of casting.

Affleck was great as Batman and as Bruce Wayne. Looked the part, sounded the part, and he did not do the growl thing that hurt the Christian Bale version.

Henry Cavill is Superman. I am going on record saying that he has played Superman in two bad Superman movies in a row, and his portrayal has been dictated by the scripts. He looks, acts, and sounds like Superman. He is the only guy that has gotten it right since Christopher Reeve. It is a different version than Chris Reeve’s, which is OK in my book.

Gal Gadot was the best part of this flick. She was PERFECT as Wonder Woman. Beautiful without being overly Sexual, Powerful and Fierce, but above all else: Grace. She brought a grace and dignity to the role that it needs.

The supporting cast was great. Jeremy Irons is great fit for Alfred. Amy Adams is a great fit for Lois. Diane Lane is great as Ma Kent. Kevin Costner was great too, for that matter. Nailed it.

Perry White, Jenny Olsen, and so on? They were fine. The Daily Planet staff was great in their roles. No complaints there.

Jesse Eisenberg as Lex was… Wrong for the movie. And, in a weird way, his casting and portrayal was indicative of the biggest problem with the movie. Jesse went for the 1930’s Mad-Scientist Fleischer Serial version of Lex. a Crazy guy on the edge of town with a death ray kinda thing. it did not fit with the tone of the movie, and it did not fit with the portrayal of the other characters. If you do a Golden-Age Lex, you kinda need to do a Golden-Age Superman. They play off each other better. So, I get what he was trying for, but it did not work.

It is indicative of the larger problems with the movie because of that one crucial word: Tone. Cavill is doing a modern Superman. Affleck did a Batman heavily influenced by the Dystopian Future that Frank Miller envisioned. So… Dystopian Future Batman, Modern-Era Superman and Wonder Woman, Golden Age Lex, and a shit-ton of references to iconic scenes from the past 30 years of the comics.

It felt… Forced. It felt like there was no story there, so Snyder just threw every “cool” thing he could think of at the wall and just kept filming. Doomsday as a villain was a stupid move too. That was a blatant attempt at “let’s have Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman go through their greatest hits!” That’s what the movie was, really. A montage of Snyder’s favorites moments from the comics, with a crappy story meant to loosely tie it all together.

It… Sucked. It was fun to look at Batman fighting Parademons. It was fun to watch Wonder Woman chop off Doomsday’s hand with her sword. Affleck was fun as Batman. the whole fight scene between him and Superman was fun to watch.

And that’s the key: Snyder understands IMAGERY. He understands casting. What Snyder does NOT understand is storytelling or tone. The movie was all over the place in terms of tone. It could have been a fun World’s Finest movie, with a brief confrontation in the beginning. A fun, “World’s Finest” would have even worked with the version of Lex Luthor that Eisenberg did. Have Lex team up with Hugo Strange or something, and it would have been great. Mad Scientists Versus Superheroes would have been fun.

Instead, we got dystopian, dreary, doom and gloom Superman Vs. Batman. and Wonder Woman was in it for no other reason than because they could. She showed up to get a photograph. Really? I mean, I am glad she was in the movie and all but… really? She was in the movie to get a photograph back? That is a pretty dumb reason, and they should have given her more motivation, but whatever.

Dawn of Justice was a bad movie. It was better than Man of Steel, but it was still a bad movie.

Avatar

Batman Vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice OK, my Brother and I talk via text a lot about this stuff, and I figured I would try to summarize our conclusions into a review. there will be spoilers. So, I will start with the positives. Zack Snyder understands imagery and iconography. He cast the movie almost perfectly. Looking back at his filmography, Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was his only real misstep in terms of casting. Affleck was great as Batman and as Bruce Wayne. Looked the part, sounded the part, and he did not do the growl thing that hurt the Christian Bale version. Henry Cavill is Superman. I am going on record saying that he has played Superman in two bad Superman movies in a row, and his portrayal has been dictated by the scripts. He looks, acts, and sounds like Superman. He is the only guy that has gotten it right since Christopher Reeve. It is a different version than Chris Reeve's, which is OK in my book. Gal Gadot was the best part of this flick. She was PERFECT as Wonder Woman. Beautiful without being overly Sexual, Powerful and Fierce, but above all else: Grace. She brought a grace and dignity to the role that it needs. The supporting cast was great. Jeremy Irons is great fit for Alfred. Amy Adams is a great fit for Lois. Diane Lane is great as Ma Kent. Kevin Costner was great too, for that matter. Nailed it. Perry White, Jenny Olsen, and so on? They were fine. The Daily Planet staff was great in their roles. No complaints there. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex was... Wrong for the movie. And, in a weird way, his casting and portrayal was indicative of the biggest problem with the movie. Jesse went for the 1930's Mad-Scientist Fleischer Serial version of Lex. a Crazy guy on the edge of town with a death ray kinda thing. it did not fit with the tone of the movie, and it did not fit with the portrayal of the other characters. If you do a Golden-Age Lex, you kinda need to do a Golden-Age Superman. They play off each other better. So, I get what he was trying for, but it did not work. It is indicative of the larger problems with the movie because of that one crucial word: Tone. Cavill is doing a modern Superman. Affleck did a Batman heavily influenced by the Dystopian Future that Frank Miller envisioned. So... Dystopian Future Batman, Modern-Era Superman and Wonder Woman, Golden Age Lex, and a shit-ton of references to iconic scenes from the past 30 years of the comics. It felt... Forced. It felt like there was no story there, so Snyder just threw every "cool" thing he could think of at the wall and just kept filming. Doomsday as a villain was a stupid move too. That was a blatant attempt at "let's have Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman go through their greatest hits!" That's what the movie was, really. A montage of Snyder's favorites moments from the comics, with a crappy story meant to loosely tie it all together. It... Sucked. It was fun to look at Batman fighting Parademons. It was fun to watch Wonder Woman chop off Doomsday's hand with her sword. Affleck was fun as Batman. the whole fight scene between him and Superman was fun to watch. And that's the key: Snyder understands IMAGERY. He understands casting. What Snyder does NOT understand is storytelling or tone. The movie was all over the place in terms of tone. It could have been a fun World's Finest movie, with a brief confrontation in the beginning. A fun, "World's Finest" would have even worked with the version of Lex Luthor that Eisenberg did. Have Lex team up with Hugo Strange or something, and it would have been great. Mad Scientists Versus Superheroes would have been fun. Instead, we got dystopian, dreary, doom and gloom Superman Vs. Batman. and Wonder Woman was in it for no other reason than because they could. She showed up to get a photograph. Really? I mean, I am glad she was in the movie and all but... really? She was in the movie to get a photograph back? That is a pretty dumb reason, and they should have given her more motivation, but whatever. Dawn of Justice was a bad movie. It was better than Man of Steel, but it was still a bad movie.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net