mouthporn.net
#communism – @typical-atheist-scumbag on Tumblr
Avatar

Wheels' Trashfire

@typical-atheist-scumbag / typical-atheist-scumbag.tumblr.com

Most people call me "Wheels." We're living in the circus George Carlin was talking about.
Avatar

I know this bot just reposts from /r/whitePeopleTwitter, but what about this is ‘white’?

The actual New Scientist article is a lot more ambiguous.

And here’s another article, also from NS.

I don’t think “people feel better when you give them free money with no strings attached and tell them they can’t get other benefits” is actually groundbreaking research. 

Also, “doesn’t disincentivize working” is not the same as “actually incentivizes working”.

> Mr Simanainen says that while some individuals found work, they were no more likely to do so than a control group of people who weren’t given the money. They are still trying to work out exactly why this is, for the final report that will be published in 2020.

Not to mention the assumption that what “worked” in Finland will automatically work everywhere else. Or even that this is economically feasible.

My favourite conclusion, which I don’t see listed here but maybe that’s because it was brought up shortly after the program ended, people trusted the government more.

Which honestly when I read the research paper my eyes started to gloss over, by the end of it I was terribly annoyed that they had used as many words as they had when I could have gotten the point out in 2 words instead of 2 pages.

Bribery Works

Though they don’t take into account what happens when all of a sudden the bribe is no longer big enough.

Which is going to wind up being the defining problem anyone that tries to set this up on a national scale is going to have deal with.

This concept is ultimately about developing a rationing system for when the dried up husk of the current system falls away. Wait and see.

Yup, they're in the process of destroying the "old system" now. Here's a taste of what they want to replace it with. (From WEForum) this is what they want within the next 10 years and they're getting it!

Avatar
                                  Agenda 2030 Exposed: Preamble-Introduction

What does the UN want your future to look like? In this video series, we will be dissecting Agenda 2030 AKA: Agenda 21, and breaking down the document a few sections at a time. Today's video will be an In-depth look at the Preamble through Introduction  of Agenda 2030.

Avatar

A True Feminist Hero.

He also lived on money given to him by Friedrich Engels which came from Engels’ family’s ownership of a factory. So basically Marx lived his life writing his bullshit on the backs of real workers.

He let most of his children die in squalor while he wrote long-winded excuses for why he shouldn’t be expected to provide for them.

Before that he wasted his father’s money on liquor instead of making any effort during his education and then worked a string of odd jobs for short-lived newspapers. The man never had a real job in his life.

He was racist as shit even for the time. He hated black and Jewish people with a passion. His views on Jews were very similar to those of the Nazis.

People who knew him said he mocked and despised his followers as much as the “bourgeoisie” and felt superior to pretty much everyone. Gustav Techow said “personal domination is the end-all of his every activity”

Marx was the L. Ron Hubbard of his day. A useless, evil piece of shit who managed to amass a following among other useless, evil pieces of shit and others who were too dim to know better.

So basically a run-of-the-mill commie

Plus he was also pretty fucking racist.

Here’s a few examples from this article- http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2217122-karl-marx-the-racist/

“For example, in a July 1862 letter to Engels, in reference to his socialist political competitor, Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote, “It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother had not interbred with a n*****. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product. The obtrusiveness of the fellow is also n*****-like,” according to the book “Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy.”

Regarding Mexicans, during the Mexican-American War, he wrote: “Without violence, nothing is ever accomplished in history.” But then he asks, “Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?”

And Engels, the co-author of the famed (or infamous) “Manifesto of the Communist Party,” added: “In America, we have witnessed the conquest of Mexico and have rejoiced at it. It is to the interest of its own development that Mexico will be placed under the tutelage of the United States.”

Marx—whose grandparents were Jewish, but whose parents converted to Christianity—wasn’t a fan of his ancestral religion either, writing in his essay “On the Jewish Question”:

“What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money . … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist,” Marx wrote in the book—which critics have later described as virulently anti-Semitic.”“

What a great guy!

this is your creator, Commie Scum.

@dear-tumb1r he's a typical commie too.

Avatar

What is feminism?

At its core, feminism is feminist theory. Feminist theory is all founded on patriarchy theory. Patriarchy theory is part of critical theory. Critical theory is meant to amend classic marxist theory. Part of classic marxist theory is conflict theory. Patriarchy theory is sometimes called ‘the conflict theory of gender’. Conflict theory, patriarchy theory, and critical race theory are all forms of the same idea, and essentially go as follows:

Society does not consist of individuals, but expresses the sum relations within which these individuals stand. The system of our society is capitalism/patriarchy/white supremacy. In it, there is a privileged class, bourgeois/men/cishets/whites, who work in the power and interest of each other and against the power and interest of other groups, thereby establishing themselves as a separate class. All oppression stems from them having too much power as a class. By not being part of the elite class, the proletariat/women/lgbtQ/PoC are an oppressed victim class. To create social justice, the system must be overthrown by way of the victim class giving up their individuality and personal pursuits to create a movement or ‘collective class consciousness’ (marxism/communism/feminism/black nationalism/blm) which will serve the function of ending capitalism/patriarchy/whiteness, ultimately creating a balance of power between the collectives.

As a school of thought, feminism is a branch of Marxism, clearly.

But then there is the layperson’s definition, the colloquial use of the word ‘feminism’:

The popular belief is that ‘feminism’ is just some general word that comes from the dictionary relating to the women’s suffrage movement or the simple belief in ambiguous ‘equality’. But women’s suffrage was known by suffragettes simply as “women’s suffrage”, not as “feminism”.

Feminism actually refers to feminist theory due to being popularized by feminist theory during the 1960′s and 1970′s, then further popularized and propagated by it ever since. Thus, today, feminism most meaningfully refers to the feminist theory. Feminist theory is the guiding light of feminism as a school of thought.

   They don’t stand in front of thousands of feminist courses reciting the dictionary definition of feminism for a whole semester, what they do is examine all other courses and subjects through the lens of feminist theory. The dictionary is philosophically illiterate, basing definitions on lamen’s terms and not consistence with actual schools of thought within philosophy, history, or academia. We don’t obtain words from the dictionary, it obtains words from us, describing them as they have come into use. The problem is, the common person doesn’t know anything about feminism as a school of thought, they simply think it means ‘gender equality’ all while reciting feminist ideas from feminist theory not even knowing it’s part of its own entire worldview.

  Feminism does not mean ‘liberalism’, and liberalism does not imply ‘feminism’. Feminism does not inherently refer to the belief in universal rights, the right to self determination, nondiscrimination, tolerance, or any such enlightenment period ideas that are within the realm of classic liberalism. Those ideas predate even the 1837 inception of the term ‘feminisme’. If the dictionary definition of feminism were true, it would mean that feminism simply means equality, creating a contradiction between egalitarians who believe in liberalism vs egalitarians who believe in feminist theory. If a believer in equality can reject all of feminist theory -the entire foundation of feminism as a school of thought- and still meaningfully be called a feminist, then one could be a feminist against feminism - A dictionary feminist against feminist theory. This is the issue with the dictionary argument of feminism, it is a contradiction to feminism’s foundation. Feminism does not have a monopoly on the idea of equality, its simply on variation of it, and even it differs with itself between its various sects.

  Our modern concept of feminism is entirely intertwined with the ideas of Feminist Theory, Patriarchy Theory, Intersectional Theory, Queer Theory, and Critical Race Theory. The way feminism manifests in the world is entirely dependent on these bodies of feminist theory. And that’s all philosophical. What people really care about is the way they manifest as a force in the world, an ideological and political force through the feminist movements such as Radical Feminism, Gender Critical Feminism, Political Lesbianism, Queer Feminism, Intersectionalism, Womanism, Black Feminism, Black Nationalism, and BlackLivesMatter, all of which follow their own versions of the feminist ideology. A superficial dictionary definition is simply not enough to answer the question of what feminism is.

      -Mod Libertas [FAF]

Avatar

You ever wonder why these Communists and socialists on the left don't just move to a communist or socialist country? I have a feeling they would love Cuba! You get just enough of everything as long as you don't have an opinion that might offend ppl.

Avatar

They’re chickenreds. They say capitalism sucks while they’re drinking Starbucks and blogging angrily on their Macbooks. They say America is a police state, secure in the knowledge they can criticize the government and not get picked up in the dead of night by the secret police. They condemn the Constitution while taking advantage of the freedoms it guarantees.

Chickenreds. Commies who are too cowardly to move to a Communist country.

Avatar

Do you think it's also that they just want to force their ideology on all of us as well? They definitely are too cowardly because even if they don't want to admit it, life is awful in communist and socialist countries. They just want things exactly their way where they are right now.

Avatar

Daily Insanity!! (Special Edition)

I apologize for not putting up my Daily Insanity posts for a wild. To make it up to you, I have something extra special for you. I have literally found the greatest example of sjw narcissism and stupidity on the internet! If you want to truly cringe harder than you already have it anything that I’ve ever screencapped, then go check out, @the-church-of-no-recess! her blog will make you cringe harder than anything you have ever seen before. She even had the audacity to trash me the other night instead of just addressing my argument. It’s my argument is so wrong, why wouldn’t you just address it? I hope you love this blog as much as I do. I only wish that I was able to post on it… For some reason my phone won’t let me. @sini-sterility @iicraft505

Avatar

bad politics red flags:

  • “egalitarian”
  • “libertarian”
  • “republican”
  • “anti-shoplifting”
  • “anti-communism”
  • “pro-cop”

What exactly is wrong with wanting true equality I'm sorry about all groups equally instead of focusing on just one? (egalitarianism)What is wrong with knowing that the government is corrupt and wanting it to downsize a little? (Libertarianism) I mean, I don't agree with all libertarian and I think some of them can be a little bit much but they do have some good points. What is wrong with being Republican? Not all Republicans are ignorant misguided religious fanatics. I'm not a republican myself and I disagree with a lot of their ideas but I know some very intelligent Republicans that have some very good ideas and points. (conservatism) what is wrong with not stealing things from stores when you want them? Unless you are starving and desperately need food, water, or other necessities of life, you have no right to steal things. Pay for them like everyone else. What's wrong with realizing that communism is inherently flawed? What's wrong with realizing that it's a bad idea and that it's been tried several times and history only to have ended in an oppressive ( like actually oppressive) dictatorships. I have never heard of a communist country being a nice place to live. It has never worked and it never will work. Why would you even want to try it? What's wrong with caring about cops? Most cops are very good people! They are people that risk their lives to protect you! They just want to be able to get home to their families, what's wrong with understanding that? Do you suggest that we live in a civilization without cops? Do you not understand that most of the time when a person is injured by a cop, is because that person who's a direct threat to that cop? Like I said, all they're trying to do is get home to their families and I don't understand how you expect them to handle it. You expect them to take kindly to a person that is trying to injure or kill them? Do you expect them to just not arrest people that are breaking the law? Do you expect them to be super nice and loving about you either being a spoiled little brat and threatening them? Do tell me, OP, what do you actually expect of them?

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net