I saw that thing you posted about something called an OhNut. I am going to use this opportunity to ask you a question de dilation, if that's okay? I'm a trans lady... I hate having a p*nis (dysphoria). If I'm not comfortable about receiving penetration, (or any form of sex even) would it be unfeasible for me to get a vaginoplasty? I don't want to feel stuck between two unpleasant situations, so I would like to ask you for advice on this. <3
Lee says:
If you want to have a vaginal canal (maybe you just want one!), you can get full-depth vaginoplasty even if you don't plan to use your new vagina for penetrative sex-- but you would need to use a dilator regularly to maintain the depth and width of the canal.
If you don't want to be vaginally penetrated, even if you do it yourself with a dilator in a non-sexual context, you might find that minimal-depth vulvoplasty is a better option for you than full-depth vaginoplasty.
Minimal-depth vulvoplasty (sometimes also called zero-depth vaginoplasty) creates an external 'female' vulva, so you'd be able to pass while changing in the locker room for example because you'd have labia majora, labia minora, and a clitoris, but you wouldn't have an internal vaginal canal that could receive penetration.
If you know know that your feelings on vaginal penetration will not change over time as your dysphoria lessens after surgery, minimal-depth vulvoplasty is a good option because it significantly reduces many of the risks of medical complications associated with full-depth vaginoplasty.
But it may not be ideal for folks who think that their feelings regarding penetration might change over time as their relationship to their body changes and they want to explore different activities as they grow to be more comfortable in their post-op bodies and have lessened dysphoria.
If there's a chance that someone even maybe might become interested in exploring vaginal penetration, they will need to consider very seriously whether minimal-depth vulvoplasty is the right choice for them because it requires either using or discarding a lot of the tissue that could have been used to create the vaginal canal for full-depth vaginoplasty.
That means that there's no easy path to create a vaginal canal after someone has had minimal-depth vulvoplasty, so they can't just change their minds a few years after surgery and decide that they want a vaginal canal after all.
All that being said, minimal-depth vulvoplasty is a great option for people who want to have a vulva instead of a penis and are certain that they never want to be vaginally penetrated. There are many people who have had minimal-depth vulvoplasty and are very pleased with the results.
Of course, every surgery has risks, and I'm not getting into the in-depth risks and benefits in this post-- this post is more about letting you know what your options are regarding vaginal canal depth and the ability to receive vaginal penetration.
If you are seriously considering this surgery, you should make a consultation to discuss the risks and benefits and expected outcomes with a gender-affirming genital surgery team. For this type of surgery, you'll likely see a urologist and a plastic surgeon who collaborate on creating the genitals you want to have.