I can’t recall if I’ve mentioned this before on tumblr, it would have been more interesting and saved on character models if they had just made Lila and Zoe the same person.
I’ve mentioned this to a few on Discord before, but they could have just combined the characters of Lila and Zoe into ONE single character.
Despite being portrayed as a major antagonist, Lila hasn’t seen much use. In addition, her lies are so outrageous that it makes everyone else look dumbed down in order to believe her rather than making Lila out to be a real credible threat.
Zoe, on the other hand, while nice and sweet, feels superfluous. She’s ultimately just a replacement for Chloe since Thomas didn’t want her to be a hero. If that was really the case, no Bee user was really necessary. There are a multitude of other options the writers could use besides needing individual holders for the Miraculous: still as of yet unrevealed Miraculous, dual wielding, and potions come to mind. These are gimmicks that they have introduced but done very little with, even if they would be extremely useful to the heroes at this point, and even act as game breakers for the fight against Hawk Moth.
So we have one character not being used enough and another one introduced at the last minute with little purpose. The simple answer would be to simply combine the two into one single character:
Chloe’s sister, who is a massive liar and manipulator but hides it behind a sweet facade.
If Zoe was more like Lila, I could see her using Chloe as a tool to make herself look better. After all, who would ever suspect Zoe of anything when Chloe is right there? Always a bully. Always overly emotional. Always acting out. Always demanding to get her way and throwing massive tantrums and running to Andre whenever she doesn’t get what she wants.
It would ultimately be what ends up causing trouble in the family. Zoe would cause trouble and then frame Chloe for things and Chloe would know Zoe was actually responsible and in turn blame her and throw a tantrum. Andre would of course cater to Chloe, but that would just make everyone watching think that Chloe is falsely blaming Zoe for what she does and getting away with it, which only makes people sympathize with Zoe and like her more. The fact that Chloe would be telling the truth would be overlooked. And Audrey would see the difference in behavior as well. And when it comes to which of her daughters to take with her to New York to be with her and see the inside of her industry…well, of course she’s going to take the “well behaved daughter”.
It could even play into Chloe’s character arc and show how she develops. Zoe would regularly lie and blame Chloe for things she did, and Chloe would react in a way that seems more like a child throwing a tantrum to not have to deal with a consequence rather than a girl who was upset over being falsely blamed for something that wasn’t her fault. And since she’s so used to it, she ends up just responding that way to everyone in general.
As the only one who knew Zoe was lying and getting away with it, she’d ultimately feel she’d have to throw the tantrums and demand her father punish Zoe to see any justice done. But even this only helped Zoe in the end, as it would cause everyone else to see Zoe as the sympathetic figure who is being falsely blamed by her immature sister…they wouldn’t know Zoe was the one who started it in the first place.
And that would be how they grow up. With Zoe antagonizing and setting up Chloe while Chloe would have outbursts in response that everyone felt they just had to put up with. And when Audrey leaves for New York and needs to decide whether to take her daughters with her…well, clearly Zoe is so well behaved and polite and wonderful while Chloe is demanding and accusatory.
Zoe would know this, and as New York would come with more opportunities for her, Zoe would want to go…and all the better if she can cost Chloe the opportunity. So she sets up another incident framing Chloe. Chloe of course tries in vain to tell everyone Zoe did it. And no one believes her.
Audrey ultimately deems Chloe unable to handle it, so she goes to New York with just Zoe, and leaves Chloe behind.
It’d explain why Chloe acts as she does in canon and is so reliant on her father’s authority for any perceived slight. She felt her sister always got away with everything and her father has been the only one in her corner. In her mind, her actions are always the lesser problem compared to the wrongs of someone else because she has that inner need to see justice done after all that time dealing with someone who always seemed to sidestep it.
Cue Chloe’s character arc, as she starts to or is even FORCED to start to take notice of just what SHE’S doing. How she’s hurting people and how her own behavior is unjust. As she grows and stops responding to every perceived slight, she gains the ability to better handle situations without blowing up. And even, dare I say, starts to gain real friends.
Then Zoe returns. And it seems like a perfect opportunity to play again at the tricks and manipulations she subjected Chloe to as kids. Only this time, Chloe is able to not only NOT respond, but to outwit her. AND she has support this time.
It wouldn’t undo all of Zoe’s manipulations over the years. And it wouldn’t justify Chloe’s own bullying. But it would better explain a lot of why she is how she is, and offer more of a step for her to break out of it.
That way, we’d have a character arc for Chloe and a real credible threat of Zoe as well as a REASON as to why she would be so believable.