HOLY SHIT I CANT BELIEVE I JUST READ THIS
What the fuck??? Seriously, what the fuck? The amount of people who just don’t give a shit about others is fucking astounding.
Yeah, my top post is 267 notes and growing for nothing. Actually, it’s a reblog retort by some “abolitionist vegan” crying milk was rape. I deleted it after 100 notes to shut the tofu nazis up. Don’t have to look at the notes anymore though on my activity page, so I’ll just collect the tears and use it to season my steak. I think there’s some kind of bug though, because they still pop on the dash, but I barely read that anyways. XD
But yes, that’s at least 260 people that think drinking a glass of milk makes you a rapist on this shitty website. Combined with the other idiots I heard from, it’s like at least 320 people. So this is a mainstream Tumblr opinion I guess.
This is horrible!!! My empathy lies with you. To feel like you are in the minority with your stances, is such a terrible feeling to have. I wouldn’t wish it on anybody.
I can’t tell you the instances where I’ve had to explain basic mammalian biology to an uneducated vegan.
I explain to them that cows unlike every single other land mammal in the history of existence does not have to be sexually penetrated first in order to lactate. They are not like humans or dogs or cats or elephants or tigers or lions or moose or deer, etc…Cows are a medical anomaly in which they become impregnated just by simply giving them kisses on their forehead.
Sure, the vegan propaganda machine might say that the industry uses a tool that they self describe as a “rape rack” in order to get the cows pregnant which in turn creates the milk that was obviously biologically designed for humans, not their own offspring. But I think that’s just a bunch of PETA nonsense. At worse, they use a tool called a “non-consensual sexual penetration rack”.”Rape rack” just sounds so crass.
Doesn’t “non-consensual sexual penetration” sound so much better? The word “rape” has such a negative connotation. But “non-consensual sexual penetration” has a lot more flair I think.
Vegans don’t get that if an action is normalized by society, then it inherently just can’t be insanely unethical. Ethics are based on a majority vote. If lots of people consume milk, then how in the world could it be unethical? You don’t even have to look at it from a conceptual standpoint.
I wish you luck fighting this with vegans. It’s going to be a tough battle…they have some seriously messed up indoctrinated, and conditioned beliefs. They don’t understand all the hard work that a human being has done to become a human being, to make them more entitled to basic empathy. The cow was too stupid to not have been born human, therefore not entitled to body autonomy.
Just ask people how this narrative is correct. They won’t steer you wrong. After all, the last thing the dairy industry wants is an uneducated public believing in nonsense like mammals have to become impregnated through sexual penetration in order to lactate. Ha! The crazy shit vegans believe.
"The cow was too stupid to not have been born human, therefore not entitled to body autonomy."
Archie-edits, your ass has been handed over to you hundreds of times. It’s time to step down.
It’s ok. Shhhh, it’s ok.
I know how bad it sucks to be wrong. It happens to most of us.
*makes a post and gets overwhelmed at vegans telling them why they are wrong and provides facts* *deletes post* *makes another post making fun of vegans and calling them "tofu nazis"* *gets overwhelmed again at the responses and deletes the post* *ignores literally everything that it said and still continues to call us "tofu nazis" and makes another very, very original steak joke*
Cool bravo encore etc