mouthporn.net
#oppression – @tangleofrainbows on Tumblr
Avatar

tangle of rainbows

@tangleofrainbows / tangleofrainbows.tumblr.com

just an enby in new york . . . agender, 29, it/itself
Avatar
Avatar
cannibality

theres a material difference between how ppl subject to transmisogyny + people not subject to transmisogyny are treated

there’s a material difference how ppl subject to homophobia + people not subject to homophobia are treated

this isn’t gatekeeping or identity politics, its material analysis of what we have in common and what we don’t have in common as classes

and its fine not to have stuff in common. most of my political organising is done in coalition with people who aren’t subject to forms of social harm that i am, and vice-versa. that doesnt mean we cant work together, it doesnt mean we can’t be extremely effective, but it does mean that we are materially treated very differently and there’s nothing positive that comes out of eliding that

Avatar

Franchesca is an entrepreneur in the business of Slay #FranchescaRamseySlaysOnTwitter

Avatar
chescaleigh

I was not having it last night. 

Avatar
honoriaw

“if the biggest injustice you’ve ever faced is someone asking you to watch your language around them you’re privileged as fuck, get over it.”

Avatar

Within any community of marginalized people it seems like there are going to be some people whose experience of discrimination was dominated by hostility (”we don’t serve people like you here” “if you’re gay I’m kicking you out of the house” “he’s retarded, he doesn’t even know that we’re making fun of him”), people whose experience of discrimination was dominated by internalized negative stereotypes (”I thought people like me were burdens on their families” ”I felt like if I didn’t marry a man and have kids, there was no other way I could lead a valuable live” “I thought that people like me having sexual desire was gross and disgusting”) and people whose experience of discrimination was dominated by invalidation (”you’re not gay, honey, it’s a phase” “you saying you’re mentally ill is insulting to people with real illnesses” “you’re really white for a black person”)

And obviously lots of people get all three heaped on them, or different things for different axes of marginalization, but I think that a lot of community discussions I’ve seen have broken down along the fault lines of people having experienced fundamentally different forms of discrimination.

And that’s how you get “who is more privileged” debates - is invalidation less oppressive than internalized self-hatred? If you haven’t experienced hostility, are you really oppressed? It’s also how you get the “oh, we’ve solved that” flavor of cluelessness - hostility is easier to see than invalidation and internalized negative stereotypes, and so once hostility has been made socially unacceptable some people might think the space has been successfully cleansed of bigotry.

Also, some solutions can be very frustrating if they’re for the wrong problem - for example, if you think someone’s problem is internalized self-hatred so you tell them “it’s not true that the other kids don’t like you! people won’t see you any differently for who you really are!” when, in fact, they’re dealing with hostility because yeah, the other kids are in fact bullying them for who they are.

I guess the only remedy I have to propose is to keep in mind that another person’s experience of discrimination may be really different than yours, and don’t immediately try to put it on a spectrum as “worse” (and so I should feel guilty over my relative privilege) or “better” (and so I need to defend my place of relative disprivilege). It’s a multi-dimensional space we’re working in. 

Avatar

the thing is that like, when i hear self-described conservatives complaining about how hard it it to be conservative on a strongly left-of-center college campus in the united states, they overwhelmingly boil down to basically “i insulted and hurt a bunch of people and now they’re super upset at me”. and like, yes, i get it, it sucks to have a bunch of people upset at you, especially if you don’t understand why what you said was hurtful and the hurt people aren’t expressing their hurt in a way that is kind, nice, ~productive~, ~calmly and rationally intellectual~ or w/e — that is, indeed, a lot to go thru! but at the same time, you insulted and hurt a bunch of people and they kind of have a right to be upset at you, esp since this complaint is almost never “a bunch of people are upset about my views and i don’t understand why, but i really want to, can someone help me see their perspective so i can better understand what i’m rejecting?”, but instead almost always comes out “gosh these people are so close-minded and just group-thinking their way along with the Liberal Orthodoxy, totes shutting down legitimate criticism. conservatives are the real oppressed group here!”

and like no, just no. like yes, sure, if you express the view that racism is no longer an issue in the united states or that the state should only offer marital benefits to heterosexual couples (with the concomitant view that gender (coercively) assigned at birth is Real and Determinate and Inviolable) on many college campuses in this country, you’re going to get a lot of pushback, much of it probably kinda strident and even *gasp!* vitriolic. but like where, in the contemporary united states, are you going to worry that you might not be hired if you let slip in a job interview that you think taxes are too high, that you go to church regularly? where are you going to fear that if you make your views on funding social security known or go to a party wearing the clothes that make you feel the most comfortable you might be assaulted and possibly killed? the idea that a persistent, stonewalling, even knee-jerk ad-hominem reaction to the airing of us-conservative views is somehow equivalent in severity of the backlash against marginalized groups is farcical in the extreme

like, people actually spray paint swastikas on us college campuses not infrequently, black students are regularly singled out for extra scrutiny by campus police, students and alumni go into hysterics when islamic students want to use campus facilities for prayer, trans students are regularly forced into housing that does not match their gender and denied medical care that they need. while i was at yale (a place that many conservatives have railed at for being a liberal bastion that was super ~isolating~ and ~alienating~ for them to go to!), the word “fag” showed up scrawled on a wall outside one of my classrooms, and i had to walk past it for over a week. that’s the kind of thing that casts a pall, that sends the subtle but unmistakable message that “you might feel safe here, but that feeling is an illusion. there are people out there — anonymous people, people you might pass on the sidewalk every day — who hate you and wish you unspecified but potentially grievous harm. they can get into your classrooms, the places you live and learn, and they can mark them, invisibly and with impunity.” and like yes, sure, in those circumstances it was a small and subtle fear, but it is real and it is awful

and there’s no equivalent for conservatives as an identity group. (i know that identity politics is often gross and messy and i’m not necessarily 100% down with it, but w/e.) there has never been a time when conservatives, as a group, have been demonized and dehumanized by the united states government and public. there has never been a time when conservatives were considered by many in the country to be subhuman, to be property. the us government has never rounded up conservatives and put them in concentration camps just because we were at war with a conservative country; they do not have a long history of being treated as Suspicious Foreign Agents in their own country, facing constant and perpetual exile after exile. no jury has ever found it reasonable to say “ah yes, it TOTALLY makes sense that you were so shocked to find out that you were talking to a conservative in that bar that you attacked and killed them — not guilty of murder!” none of these things are how the world works

when i hear people on the left complain about feelings of isolation and marginalization, it is almost never “i’m in the intellectual minority here and the people around me are just group-thinkily not open to calmly and rationally engaging with my ideas.”. instead, it’s overwhelmingly “i don’t feel safe here because of X aspect of my identity.”. those are very different claims

and so like yes, part of me does feel cold and heartless saying that i fundamentally do not care about conservatives feeling isolated on college campuses in the us. i believe that the feelings they are feeling are genuine, and that they represent genuine human suffering. it is unarguable that there is at least a spark of callousness in looking on that and saying “i honestly don’t give a shit.”. but contemporary united states conservatism — whether social or financial — is inextricably tied to ideas that have done tremendous amounts of harm to marginalized groups thruout history — and are still wreaking such harm today, right here and now — and i want it to be as uncomfortable to hold and advance those views as possible. if you are going to advance views that result in human suffering, you do not get to be shielded from confronting that suffering. if someone comes to my dinner party and reduces the other guests to tears with biting insults, i’m not going to comfort them thru the stinging social ostracism they subsequently face — i’m gonna comfort the people they just pointlessly tore to shreds. and like maybe that’s heartless, but i don’t see how i can support my trans comrades while also patting someone on the back and telling them that they shouldn’t feel bad for advocating for social policies that will exacerbate trans youth homelessness, and i don’t think it’s hard to see which side of that fork i’m always gonna take

conservative students probably do feel real isolation on many college campuses in the united states, but unless and until “making conservatives feel more welcome” stops meaning “making campus cultures more accepting of conservatism and shoving its gristly consequences further out of sight”, it’s just not a problem i feel is even remotely in need of addressing

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

So you're OK with prejudice/bigotry as long as it's not backed systemically? If the feminist revolution happened tomorrow and women were put in charge world wide, by your own definition this blog would then be sexist... would you keep it going?

tiger alpha: “ok but do you realize that the whole point is that that can’t happen, at least not tomorrow, and definitely not with the goal of making women the systematic oppressors of men also how is it prejudice if i’m posting just screenshots of conversations goddammit how about instead of being angry at us you be angry at your fellow straight white men who harass women like this and create the need for this blog" 

eagle one: “yes 5ever”

Avatar
Avatar

Gay people can be racist

Gay people can be misogynistic

Gay people can be transphobic

Your problematic behavior is not excused because you have been oppressed. You are continuing the cycle of oppression to other marginalized communities and you of all people know better.

Shape. The. Fuck. Up.

My brother and his husband are the biggest pieces of shit when it comes to racism and transphobia. Please don’t think just because someone is oppressed that they won’t oppress others and treat them like shit. Don’t let them get away with it.

Avatar

. . . did you seriously just try to argue that no one belonging anywhere under the lgbtq umbrella is told that they’re not beautiful, that physical appearance policing is not a tool that is used for any queer people? like, really? if you were referring very narrowly to cis, masc, rich, white gay men, i’d probably be inclined to agree, but like . . . transmisogyny exists? i cannot take seriously the claim that the united states is a society that regularly and universally affirms trans women (even white trans women) as beautiful.

Avatar
Avatar
ponett

i hate the “it isn’t a choice”/”born this way” narrative because it’s basically just giving cishet people permission to think shit like “well he might be gay, but it isn’t his fault!” like being bi or a lesbian or trans or aromantic or whatever is only “acceptable” if you didn’t have any control over it.

like it has to be some kind of unfortunate twist of fate. that’s not removing the stigma at all, it’s just treating non-cishet identities like some kind of burden. it’s a less bigoted rewording of “hate the sin, not the sinner.”

like sure, some people might really be “born that way,” but should that really change anything? should we really have to provide excuses for our identities like that?

it’s also completely ignoring the possibility that gender and sexuality can be fluid and that people can have control over their own identities and that the people and things and ideas you’re exposed to can influence the way you think about your identity

also you know what definitely doesn’t follow the “born this way” narrative? religion. no one is born believing all the tenets of their faith — even the people who claim that everyone is born with some deep-seated sense of god’s existence don’t argue that small children have a fixed and biologically determined knowledge of, say, the entire catholic catechism. and people change their minds about religion all the time — and some religions even make it a point for their members to go out and try to make other people choose to convert.

but — at least when it comes to most flavors of christianity in the contemporary united states — no one is arguing that just because presbyterians aren’t biologically presbyterian they shouldn’t have the right to live their lives by their religious principles as they see fit (within the limits of not trampling on the rights of others etc). we don’t have “born this way” campaign for religions because religious choices are seen as inherently valid, in a way that queer sexualities and gender identities aren’t.

claiming “born this way” with regards to gender and sexuality can be a powerful rhetorical gambit in the face of those who try to deny us our rights/humanity/very existence on the premise that “it’s just a choice”, but i think it’s an even stronger move to pull the entire argument out by its roots: even if sexuality and gender identity are 100% willfully and consciously chosen, why is that a valid basis for taking away our rights, dignity, and lives? as the op says, the “born this way” narrative can easily slip into this kind of pity party. “oh those poor queers, they just can’t help themselves!”

we don’t need your pity. we need you to stop taking away our rights and lives.

Avatar
I left home at age 10 in 1961. I hustled on 42nd Street. The early 60s was not a good time for drag queens, effeminate boys or boys that wore makeup like we did. Back then we were beat up by the police, by everybody. I didn’t really come out as a drag queen until the late 60s. When drag queens were arrested, what degradation there was. I remember the first time I got arrested, I wasn’t even in full drag. I was walking down the street and the cops just snatched me. We always felt that the police were the real enemy. We expected nothing better than to be treated like we were animals-and we were. We were stuck in a bullpen like a bunch of freaks. We were disrespected. A lot of us were beaten up and raped. When I ended up going to jail, to do 90 days, they tried to rape me. I very nicely bit the shit out of a man. I’ve been through it all. In 1969, the night of the Stonewall riot, was a very hot, muggy night. We were in the Stonewall [bar] and the lights came on. We all stopped dancing. The police came in. They had gotten their payoff earlier in the week. But Inspector Pine came in-him and his morals squad-to spend more of the government’s money. We were led out of the bar and they cattled us all up against the police vans. The cops pushed us up against the grates and the fences. People started throwing pennies, nickels, and quarters at the cops. And then the bottles started. And then we finally had the morals squad barricaded in the Stonewall building, because they were actually afraid of us at that time. They didn’t know we were going to react that way. We were not taking any more of this shit. We had done so much for other movements. It was time. It was street gay people from the Village out front-homeless people who lived in the park in Sheridan Square outside the bar-and then drag queens behind them and everybody behind us. The Stonewall Inn telephone lines were cut and they were left in the dark. One Village Voice reporter was in the bar at that time. And according to the archives of the Village Voice, he was handed a gun from Inspector Pine and told, “We got to fight our way out of there.” This was after one Molotov cocktail was thrown and we were ramming the door of the Stonewall bar with an uprooted parking meter. So they were ready to come out shooting that night. Finally the Tactical Police Force showed up after 45 minutes. A lot of people forget that for 45 minutes we had them trapped in there. All of us were working for so many movements at that time. Everyone was involved with the women’s movement, the peace movement, the civil-rights movement. We were all radicals. I believe that’s what brought it around. You get tired of being just pushed around. STAR came about after a sit-in at Wein stein Hall at New York University in 1970. Later we had a chapter in New York, one in Chicago, one in California and England. STAR was for the street gay people, the street homeless people and anybody that needed help at that time. Marsha and I had always sneaked people into our hotel rooms. Marsha and I decided to get a building. We were trying to get away from the Mafia’s control at the bars. We got a building at 213 East 2nd Street. Marsha and I just decided it was time to help each other and help our other kids. We fed people and clothed people. We kept the building going. We went out and hustled the streets. We paid the rent. We didn’t want the kids out in the streets hustling. They would go out and rip off food. There was always food in the house and everyone had fun. It lasted for two or three years. We would sit there and ask, “Why do we suffer?” As we got more involved into the movements, we said, “Why do we always got to take the brunt of this shit?” Later on, when the Young Lords [revolutionary Puerto Rican youth group] came about in New York City, I was already in GLF [Gay Liberation Front]. There was a mass demonstration that started in East Harlem in the fall of 1970. The protest was against police repression and we decided to join the demonstration with our STAR banner. That was one of first times the STAR banner was shown in public, where STAR was present as a group. I ended up meeting some of the Young Lords that day. I became one of them. Any time they needed any help, I was always there for the Young Lords. It was just the respect they gave us as human beings. They gave us a lot of respect. It was a fabulous feeling for me to be myself-being part of the Young Lords as a drag queen-and my organization [STAR] being part of the Young Lords. I met [Black Panther Party leader] Huey Newton at the Peoples’ Revolutionary Convention in Philadelphia in 1971. Huey decided we were part of the revolution-that we were revolutionary people. I was a radical, a revolutionist. I am still a revolutionist. I was proud to make the road and help change laws and what-not. I was very proud of doing that and proud of what I’m still doing, no matter what it takes. Today, we have to fight back against the government. We have to fight them back. They’re cutting back Medicaid, cutting back on medicine for people with AIDS. They want to take away from women on welfare and put them into that little work program. They’re going to cut SSI. Now they’re taking away food stamps. These people who want the cuts-these people are making millions and millions and millions of dollars as CEOs. Why is the government going to take it away from us? What they’re doing is cutting us back. Why can’t we have a break? I’m glad I was in the Stonewall riot. I remember when someone threw a Molotov cocktail, I thought: “My god, the revolution is here. The revolution is finally here!” I always believed that we would have a fight back. I just knew that we would fight back. I just didn’t know it would be that night. I am proud of myself as being there that night. If I had lost that moment, I would have been kind of hurt because that’s when I saw the world change for me and my people. Of course, we still got a long way ahead of us.

Sylvia Rivera, interviewed by Leslie Feinberg for Workers World, 1998. (via femmewitchbabe)

Avatar
reblogged

character development 

nope that would be called successful female socialisation in a patriarchal society

Please do not use feminism to shame my interests.

I like pink and dresses and art and music and fashion. I also like blue and sports and comics and I choose not to wear makeup and have had short hair for the past five years. I am a person with feminine and masculine interests. I have not been socialized to be more feminine, I have adopted new interests, grown as a person and learned to embrace both my feminine and my masculine sides.

If you want to do a feminist reading on this silly ass comic about how I’ve changed over the past decade maybe you should look at why I actively avoided things typically viewed as “feminine”.

You’re not helping feminism by making me feel like I don’t have control over myself. You’re not helping feminism by shaming girls who consider themselves more feminine than masculine.

Thank you and goodbye.

ok so there’s a lot going on here and im sorry if i dont address everything perfectly but i’m very exhausted by this type of discussion. i have a lot to say on this topic so im going to put it in a list in the hopes of getting it all out

1. the first thing i notice is that you seem to have taken my comment as some sort of personal attack or “shaming”. its not. I didn’t reblog this from you directly, it just came up on my dash, and in hindsight i should have realised that artists on tumblr are very connected with their work but when you just see something floating around on your dash it easily becomes very isolated from any original context, so i saw just the comic and a title. its important to understand this because my comment was only on what i saw. it has nothing to do with you as a person, and my critique was of the work alone. so im sorry if you feel personally shamed, but that was not the intention, nor is it in the meaning of my words, or how this kind feminist analysis should be interpreted.

2. i’d like to explain what i see when i see your comic because it might help you understand why i felt a comment was necessary. i see in your comic what i see happening all around me, in the kids i teach and my friends and myself and adult women in my life and even in strangers in the street: females who, as girls, are disinterested in what society expects of them, but slowly over time become, as women, exactly what society always told them they would. in your title (for lack of a better word) i see what society tells girls and women what they want them to think this change is, “character development”, and not socialisation, pressure and grooming to fit a certain set of ideas that have been laid out for them since birth.

3. i’d also like to explain what i meant because i’m not sure you’ve understood. that’s probably because it was an offhand remark in a reblog so i’ll go into more detail here. femininity is designed by the patriarchy to be uncomfortable, restrictive, expensive, painful, time consuming etc. women don’t choose completely of their own accord to go through the discomfort of femininity. for example, shaving or waxing is definitely not something that women would do if society didn’t tell them they should. it only became a thing when companies realised they could profit off it. just because some women have come to enjoy it in whatever way, does not mean they would have chosen it before it was forced on them. further analysis can be (i’d say should be) done to understand that this enjoyment that women learn to experience from appearing “pretty” and feminine is because of the effects it has on the way people (men, let’s name the oppressors) treat them. a woman who looks feminine is going to be treated much better than a woman who doesn’t. when i say that women who have developed to fit this patriarchal mould are not doing it from “character development” as you described, i mean that they haven’t naturally and individually reached this point, they have been socialised by the patriarchy, through advertising, media, books, and the reaction they get from men and society in general when they conform, to believe that this is what they want for themselves.

4. i am definitely not saying that this is the fault of women, individually or as a whole. the patriarchy (operated by men) is designed to oppress us by using gender roles. i’m definitely not saying that you or any woman should change your behaviour. i’m just pointing out that it isn’t a natural phenomenon that women wear dresses and makeup.

5. i’m not trying to make you “feel” like you don’t have control of yourself. I’m pointing out that all women have been manipulated by the patriarchy. none of us has full control of ourselves! its important that we recognise this so that we can identify when it effects us, support each other and eventually become free from the patriarchy. that’s literally the point of feminism. i’m sorry if that knowledge scares you (honestly i’d be worried if it didn’t), but there’s no point in hiding from it. 

6. i looked through the first couple of pages and found a conversation you had with someone about being scared of being seen as girly and i kind of want to address that too. 

6.a) the reason being girly can be seen as weak is because, well, it is. like, not sure if you’ve picked this up yet but femininity is designed to fuck us over. its not there for fun. dresses are restrictive, heels mean its harder to run away or be active, make up is time consuming and expensive, shaving is uncomfortable, time consuming and expensive. i could go on, but i hope you see what i’m getting at. its not feminists’ fault that you feel this way, its the patriachy’s.

6.b) if you really think that women who conform to these gender roles are worse off than those who are gender non conforming, i’m concerned. while the gender roles are designed to punish women, women are also punished if they don’t conform. its much harder not to shave, simply because of how you’re treated if you don’t conform. butch lesbians are some of the hardest hit by patriarchal gender roles, because they have said a loud and resounding “fuck you” to patriarchy, and nobody likes a girl who doesn’t conform.

Ok SO that took way longer than i was expecting and turned into a bit of an essay but i am SO SICK of these arguments that are all about choosing your choice and whatnot. please can we all try to think a little more critically about the world we live in and maybe some good will actually come of it.

Again, sorry you were offended by my comment, and if you’re still offended or want to talk more or whatever i am more than happy to! i probably didn’t make any sense so questions are also welcome!

and i hope we all learned a little something here. i learned that typing with cold hands is really hard!!

Avatar
yalesappho

LOL ABSOLUTELY NOT ON MY DASH

"butch lesbians are some of the hardest hit by patriarchal gender roles" HAHAHA except for all the trans women of color who are MURDERED ON THE REG for not only being "gender non conforming", but being born "male" and being FEMME. seriously if you are a butch dfab person and you think that you have it worse than femme dmab people, you are not aware of reality and you need to take about 10 seats.

Furthermore. I absolutely refuse to allow people, feminists, lesbians, people who are supposed to be on my side here to conflate femme presentation with 1) compulsory femininity and 2) “choose your choice” feminism. Let me tell you something, as a femme as fuck political lesbian who hates men and masculinity and patriarchy MORE THAN YOU COULD EVER IMAGINE, your theorizing is BULLSHIT and it is NOT LIBERATORY.

Let me tell you about how as a child, my wonderful, radical, second-wave mother encouraged me to wear overalls and play with trucks, and little tiny h was all like “lol no” and wore pink frilly dresses and played with dolls. Let me tell you about how little tiny h was active and spunky and smart and strong as fuck, and would 100% be out there on the playground doing cartwheels in her little frilly dresses and not giving a single fuck that the other kids could see her underwear. Let me tell you about how at around age 10, little h saw that all the “cool girls” were tomboys, and played sports, and hated pink, and talked about boys all day and night. And little h tried to fit in, even though she hated sports, and loved pink, and tbh the growing attention of boys and men made her SUPER UNCOMFORTABLE in a way that she would not be able to fully articulate until she got older and learned about terms like “male gaze”, “objectification” and “rape culture”.

Let me tell you about how I am now a grown as fuck, femme as fuck, man-hating political lesbian woman, and I could slice your face off with my femininity from a yard away and you would dare to condescendingly call me a “product of socialization” (as if you are not! as if butches just pop out of the womb in little cargo shorts and crew cuts or whatever your ~~super radical~~ self-presentation is!) when I’m the one who has to deal with men constantly constantly objectifying me and treating me as subhuman just because I am walking around the world in a way that is comfortable and freeing for me. Let me tell you, and please believe me when I say that if men did not exist, if patriarchy did not exist, I would be out in public looking 100 times as femme, 100 times as “slutty” as I do now. 

THE MASTER’S TOOLS WILL NEVER DISMANTLE THE MASTER’S HOUSE (Audre Lorde, duh) and if you don’t think that masculinity is the master’s tool, then I really don’t even know what to tell you. Femme is not about “choosing your choice” and pretending that patriarchy does not exist as an oppressive and socializing force, it’s about LIBERATION from patriarchy. Femme is about being for yourself, and not for the male gaze. Femme is POWER, and femme is for EVERYBODY. We are not free as a society when little boys cannot be femme. We are not free as a society when trans women are murdered for courageously being femme, living femme, owning femme when they are not supposed to because they are supposed to be “men”. We are not free as a society when butches condescend to explain to femmes that we are oppressed. We fucking damn well know we are oppressed, we know it every time we are threatened with rape and death and domination just for being ourselves, just as you know the same. Don’t you fucking dare tell me that I am not radical, that I have no agency, because that’s what the patriarchy tells me every day.

Femme is not compulsory femininity. There is a difference. When I shave my legs in the summer to go to work, because that’s what’s seen as professional, that’s compulsory femininity. When I shave my legs because I love how luxurious the sheets feel on my bare legs at night, that is femme. I don’t wear makeup most of the time, but when I do I wear dark pointy eyebrows and bright red lips to emphasize my laugh and my snarl and to scare away all the men in a 10 foot radius. If you think that’s compulsory femininity I don’t even know what to tell you.

I think we all learned something today like maybe don’t be condescending to people who wear dresses because they will fuck you right up. thank u.

Avatar

Jesus Christ, people.

If you’re not a trans woman and you’re not listening to trans women, then shut the fuck up about Eddie Redmayne playing Lili Elbe. None of y’all are saying anything new or insightful. It’s the same old bullshit that falls into these categories (and probably others since I am only counting what I have seen in the past 30 minutes):

  • Trans women should be grateful for any representation
  • They cast the best actor for the job
  • By saying you want trans women to portray trans women you want to typecast all trans women
  • Actors don’t need to experience something to portray it, so cis actors don’t need to be trans to portray trans people.
  • Transmisogyny just isn’t important enough. We’ll deal with this once transphobia is conquered

Okay, so all of these are bullshit.

No one - trans women included - should feel any obligation or gratitude for shitty representation, and casting a cis man to portray a trans woman is shitty representation. This is true for several reasons and my list is guaranteed to not be complete: The common trope about trans women is that we are constantly portrayed or described as “men in dresses.” Casting a cis man reinforces that transmisogynist trope and only serves to harm how trans women are seen. Even when cis women are cast as trans women, the “men in dresses” trope is going to be invoked. One great example of this is TransAmerica starring Felicity Huffman. Huffman’s makeup for the film included facial appliances to make her look “more masculine” and they even had a prosthetic penis for at least one scene.

Further, it’s not representation and is just shitty. These actors don’t do shit for the trans community. They get in, do their role, and get out. They don’t in any way represent trans women to trans women. Laverne Cox does, Janet Mock does because they are trans women and are in a position to do some good for trans women with the way they approach interviews and such.

The notion that they cast the best actor is bullshit because the casting director decides who to invite. There was no casting call that included trans women for the Dallas Buyer’s Club, for example. Jared Leto got the job and then it was his idea to make his character a trans woman - as a shock tactic, not as a genuine or honest portrayal. If trans women are not called to try out for trans women roles, how can anyone even pretend that “the best actor got the job?”

The notion that it is typecasting is bullshit. Trans women do not get many roles at all in Hollywood, and those they do get are nearly always as trans women (and are often sex workers as well). The only roles trans women have a chance for are playing trans women, but cis men predominantly claim these roles from casting directors who don’t even consider casting a trans actress in the first place.

It is true that actors play a wide variety of roles that involve experiences beyond their own personal experiences. However, this is again bullshit because the problem isn’t so much that they can’t relate to trans women but that they think they can and give us shitty stereotyped representation that serves only to portray trans women as men in dresses and again when they step out of the role they don’t do shit for trans women.

That last one I saw a bit ago - someone literally said that transphobia is far more important and that we can deal with transmisogyny once transphobia has been dealt with. Literally telling trans women to stand at the back of the line. How often has this occurred? This is precisely the same argument HRC used for supporting a trans-exclusive ENDA in 2007-2008. This is precisely the same argument many many cis LGB orgs have used over the decades to essentially steal trans women’s time and energy to promote their various LGBT measures before throwing trans people under the bus and bargaining for cis LGB-focused legislation and promising to come back for the T later - a later that never comes.

Plus, transmisogyny is a very sharp knife. It cuts at trans women all the time. Everything from white trans women earning something like .68 cents on the cis white man’s dollar and trans women of color earning significantly less to the racist transmisogyny and transmisogynoir that kills so many trans women of color.

A recent study showed that community involvement is an indicator for increased chance of depression in trans women. This is because of microaggressions, outright aggressions, degrees of ostracism, and an expectation that trans women just shut up and let all the transmisogyny pass without comment - and those who do not are forced out of these communities.

All of this shit about justifying cis men as trans women falls into that category. NONE OF YOU are doing SHIT to help trans women, so kindly shut your fucking mouths, sit the fuck down, and LISTEN to trans women. It has been 33 goddamned years since John Lithgow portrayed Roberta Muldoon in The World According to Garp and it has been 40 years since a trans woman was portrayed by Robert Reed in the series Medical Center

For those of you who think we just need to keep fucking waiting, how long precisely do you think that will continue? It’s been FOUR DECADES and this shit is still going on. Don’t answer that question. Stop shitting all over trans women in posts about Eddie Redmayne and take some time to educate yourselves.

Avatar
One of the ways of thinking about social change is “let’s get the few most charismatic people who look the most like what society already thinks are good people, and have a few really spectacular cases and maybe some New York Times articles about them, and people will think we’re good, and like us, and perhaps we’ll make an advance for everyone.” Turns out that doesn’t really work. It turns out that if you solve the problem for people who are the least vulnerable of the vulnerable, usually you end up mobilizing ideas that actually further the stigma of those who are considered outside or not good enough. And so, the idea of “trickle-up” social justice is that we should actually, ethically, start with those who are facing the worst conditions, who are most losing their lives, those people in prisons and immigration facilities, and experiencing poverty and homelessness, we should start by figuring out how to solve the problems for them. And inevitably, that will solve the problems for everyone, but it’s not the other way around.

Dean Spade, 

Trickle-Up Social Justice

(via

)

Avatar
If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, he would be 86 years old. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, we would all be at work. And our children would all be at school. And that very important piece of mail you were expecting would arrive today, and not be delayed until Tuesday. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, there would be no parades or special banquets or elementary school MLK oratory contests. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, there would be no Martin Luther King Jr. boulevards, streets or avenues. None of that. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, many white churches would have had absolutely no reason to include Lift Every Voice and Sing in their Sunday services yesterday. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, he would demand that we take more urgent notice of the fact that we still live in a world where there are such things as a white church. Or a black church. Or a Latino church. Or an LGBT church. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, he would be very proud of Coretta’s support for LGBT equality and would have stood by her side in that struggle. If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today, he would still dream that one day every valley would be exalted, and every hill and mountain made low, the rough places made plain, and the crooked places made straight, “and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.” If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today … If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today … If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today … And this is where I draw a blank. Then that blank turns into the painful realization that if MLK were still alive today, he’d be a very different man from the one we remember. Not different bad. Different good. Different in that his ministry of radical racial, social and economic justice would have evolved in ways we can hardly imagine. And I realize how much we lost. I think about the Poor People’s Campaign, just a few weeks after his assassination. I imagine how things would have been different had he lived to lead the tent cities on the National Mall. I imagine how he would have responded to the ugliness of the 1974 Boston busing fight. I imagine his work moving from the South to the North. I imagine myself, a little boy, watching Dr. King on television, passionately opposing Reaganomics. In fact, if Dr. King were still alive in 1980, would Reagan have made it to the White House? I imagine Dr. King at some point having returned to Cicero. Better yet, I imagine Dr. King returning to Dallas in all his “Outside Agitator” glory. Because Dallas never got to see that King. I’ve always heard that one of the problems regarding race relations in Dallas is that we never had our Montgomery moment. Our Birmingham moment. Our Selma moment. I would like to imagine that, had he been alive, Dr. King would have returned to Dallas to stand in solidarity with our Latino brothers and sisters to protest the murder of 12-year-old Santos Rodriguez by a Dallas police officer in 1973. Perhaps that was our Selma moment. If so, how do we honor it as such? If Martin Luther King Jr. were alive today … He’d be 86 years old. A grandfather and a widower. Perhaps he might be too frail to stand on the front lines in Ferguson or New York City. But I believe he would speak out in support of the young people in those cities and across the country fighting against police brutality. He’d remind them that old-guard civil rights leaders once considered him a young troublemaker, too. And he’d remind them to not back down. To Stand. Fight. Pray.

Playwright Jonathan Norton, a graduate from Booker T. Washington High School for the Performing & VIsual Arts, penned an unforgettable poem in honor of MLK Day, entitled “If Martin Luther King Jr. Were Alive Today.” 

There’s no commentary on my part, just a reflection of what the words bring to mind. Very powerful and sobering reminder of Martin Luther King Jr’s legacy and impact.

I’m literally crying wow

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net