mouthporn.net
#sculpture – @stlukesguild on Tumblr
Avatar

Of Delicious Recoil

@stlukesguild / stlukesguild.tumblr.com

Every moment some form grows perfect in hand or face; some tone on the hills or the sea is choicer than the rest; some mood of passion or insight or intellectual excitement is irresistibly real and attractive to us,–for that moment only. Not the fruit of...
Avatar

Xipe Totec

- Mexico, Nahua culture, c. 900-1200 AD

I recently stumbled upon this fabulous ceramic figure of the Aztec god, Xipe Totec, a life-death-rebirth deity, god of agriculture, vegetation, the east, disease, spring, goldsmiths, silversmiths, liberation and the seasons.

Xipe Totec connected agricultural renewal with warfare. He flayed himself to give food to humanity, symbolic of the way maize seeds lose their outer layer before germination and of snakes shedding their skin. Without his skin, he was depicted as a golden god. Xipe Totec was believed by the Aztecs to be the god that invented war. His insignia included the pointed cap and rattle staff, which was the war attire for the Mexica emperor. He had a temple called Yopico within the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan. Xipe Totec is associated with inflammation, and eye diseases, and possibly plague. -Wikipedia 

- Xipe Totec, Central Veracruz, Mexico c. 1450-1500

I find these first two Xipe Totec figures with their hard masks... like Jason in the Friday the 13th series... to be the most intriguing... but there are any number of other Xipe Totec figures:

-Xipe Totec, Veracruz, Mexico c. 600-900 AD

Xipe Totec,  Mexico, Basin of Mexico c. 1400-1521

Avatar
reblogged

Hercules detail, The Farnese Collection, National Archaeological Museum, Naples

Photographer: Luigi Spina

The Farnese Hercules is an ancient sculpture, probably an enlarged copy made in the early third century AD and signed by a certain Glykon, from an original by Lysippos (or one of his circle) that would have been made in the fourth century BC. The copy was made for the Baths of Caracalla in Rome (dedicated in 216 AD), where it was recovered in 1546.

The heroically-scaled Hercules is one of the most famous sculptures of Antiquity,and has fixed the image of the mythic hero in the European imagination. It quickly made its way into the collection of Cardinal Alessandro Farnese, grandson of Pope Paul III. Alessandro Farnese was well placed to form one of the greatest collections of classical sculpture that has been assembled since Antiquity.

It stood for generations in its own room at Palazzo Farnese, Rome, where the hero was surrounded by frescoed depictions of his feats by Annibale Carracci and his studio, executed in the 1590s.

The Farnese statue was moved to Naples in 1787 and is now displayed in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale. wiki

Avatar
stlukesguild
Avatar

Edgar Degas (19 July 1834 – 27 September 1917)

Edgar Degas- Self Portrait

I spent a good many years as an art student obsessed with the work of Degas. I think what I recognized even then was just how important Degas was to the development of figurative art. He was truly the key transitional figure... the lynch-pin between the figure paintings of the old masters:

-Giorgione- Dresden "Venus"

-Titian- Danae

-Sir Peter Paul Rubens- The Three Muses

-Rembrandt- Bathsheba

-Boucher- Mademoiselle O'Murphy

-Delacroix- The Death of Sardanapolis 

-Ingres- Portrait of Princesse de Broglie

...and figure painting as it evolved in the hands of the Modernists:

-Gauguin- Spirits of the Dead Watching

-Pierre Bonnard- Bather

-Edouard Vuillard- Interior with Work Table

-Picasso- Family of Saltimbanques 

-Matisse- Odalisque 

-Modigliani- Grand Nude

Degas was also the key figure in my coming to terms with the daring and at times confusing innovations of the Modernists.

At the beginning of his career, Degas wanted to be a history painter, a calling for which he was well prepared by his rigorous academic training and close study of classic art. He spent endless hours at the Louvre studying and copying the "old masters". His idols included Raphael, Titian, Veronese, and Ingres. His efforts at portraiture were marvelous... among the finest of the 19th century:

-Portrait of Estelle Musson, the artist's blind Cousin

-Portrait of a Woman on the Balcony (Estelle Musson)

-Portrait of a Girl

In his early thirties, he changed course, and by bringing the traditional methods of a history painter to bear on contemporary subject matter, he became a classical painter of modern life.

The secret is to follow the advice the masters give you in their works while doing something different from them.-Degas

-Portrait of a Young Woman

-Portrait of the Painter Tissot

-Portrait of Henri Michel Levy

-Portrait of Victoria Duborg

-Portrait of the Bellelli Family

-Portrait of Giovannina Belleli

-The Mante family

In spite of Degas' mastery of portraiture, the artist struggled with "History Painting". History Paintings... invented multi-figural narrative compositions... were deemed to be the pinnacle or highest possible achievements within the hierarchy of painting. Michelangelo, Botticelli, Leonardo, Raphael, Titian, Rubens, Rembrandt, Boucher, Watteau... nearly all of the greatest painters of history had mastered the great narrative paintings. Degas sought to prove himself within this "highest" genre of painting.

The artist followed the traditional approach to creating a grand multi-figural painting. He chose narratives based upon what were surely edifying Greek, Roman, and Medieval themes. He made dozens... hundreds of studies from life... and endless compositional studies:

-The Spartan Girls Challenging the Spartan Boys

The end result, however, fell short of the artist's aspirations... and seemed somehow forced. One suspects that an artist as astute as Degas rapidly recognized that there was something overly artificial... mannered... and out of place about attempting grand narrative paintings based upon Greco-Roman and Biblical themes in the manner of the old masters undertaken by an artist living in Paris... the most modern and advanced city in Europe. On more than one occasion Degas had argued that one must learn from the old masters... yet not mimic them. It must have struck him that there was something absurd in spending his days in his Parisian studio painting Spartan Boys & Girls in the manner of Raphael or Rubens... and his evenings strolling the streets of Paris, carousing the bars and cabarets and admiring the unnatural colors of the gas lights; frequenting the opera, the ballet, and the brothels with all their modern artifice. 

As a result... Degas abruptly changed course, bringing the traditional methods and skills of a history painter to bear upon contemporary subject matter, becoming essentially a classical "realist" painter of the modern life. The change in his art was influenced primarily by the example of Edouard Manet, whom Degas had met in 1864... reportedly while both were copying the same Velazquez portrait in the Louvre.

Upon the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War in 1870, Degas enlisted in the National Guard, where his defense of Paris left him little time for painting. During rifle training his eyesight was found to be defective, and for the rest of his life his eye problems were a constant worry to him.

After the war, in 1872, Degas began an extended stay in New Orleans, Louisiana, where his brother René and a number of other relatives lived. Staying at the home of his Creole uncle, Michel Musson, Degas produced a number of works, many depicting family members.

Degas returned to Paris in 1873, and his father died the following year, whereupon Degas learned that his brother René had amassed enormous business debts. To preserve his family's reputation, Degas sold his house and an art collection he had inherited, and used the money to pay off his brother's debts. Dependent for the first time in his life on sales of his artwork for income, he produced much of his greatest work during the decade beginning in 1874.

The Cotton Exchange in New Orleans

The Stock Exchange

The Concord

A number of Degas' early portraits exhibit the psychological insight and tension that would exemplify his finest "realist" narrative paintings. The portrait of Tissot, for example, suggests a certain unsettling element as the burly artist scowls at us while a collapsed female figure (actually a manikin) lies sprawled upon the floor... the red ribbon of her hat and her twisted head almost suggesting that her throat had been slashed Jack the Ripper. The Portrait of the Bellelli Family, on the other hand, conveys a definite air of tension or unease between the wife, who pulls her daughters to her, and the husband sitting to one side... as if shunned and left outside the family circle.

The painting, Le Viol (The Rape) may be the most successful of Degas' works of the period. In many ways it echoes the sort of psycho-sexual dramas of the literature of the period (Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Flaubert, Zola, etc...)

-Le Viol

This painting presents an image of a couple in a darkened bedroom. They are separated by the bed and a velvet-lined box that glows with an erotic pink. The woman has collapsed upon a chair... distraught...  with her back to the man. He stands rigid, hands in pocket, a ghostly shadow suggestive of Edvard Munch hovering above him. One might also think of Munch with regard to the tilted perspective that creates an unsettling, rushing sensation. The narrative is left open-ended. Are we witness, after the fact, to an actual rape? Is this a scene of a poor young girl fallen into prostitution... the profession chosen by many poor young Parisian girls of the era who lacked any other means of support. Is it the wedding night of an unequal couple... perhaps an arranged marriage of an innocent, naive young girl and an older, experienced man? Or is it something else altogether?

-Beside Flowers

Disenchanted with the art exhibitions of the official Salon, Degas eventually joined a group of young artists who were organizing an independent exhibiting society. The group soon became known as the Impressionists. Between 1874 and 1886, they mounted eight art shows, known as the Impressionist Exhibitions. Degas took a leading role in organizing the exhibitions, and showed his work in all but one of them, despite his persistent conflicts with others in the group. Degas insisted on the inclusion of artists who were most certainly not "Impressionists", and he had little in common with Claude Monet and the other landscape painters in the group, whom he mocked for painting outdoors.

"If I were in the government I would have a brigade of policemen assigned to keeping an eye on people who paint landscapes outdoors. Oh, I wouldn't want anyone killed. I'd be satisfied with just a little buckshot to begin with." -Degas

"I always urged my contemporaries to look for interest and inspiration to the development and study of drawing, but they would not listen. They thought the road to salvation lay by the way of colour." -Degas

In spite of his protests, Degas' work began to exhibit elements that were clearly the result of his contact with the Impressionists. His paintings took on a lighter palette... and he began to employ a more fluid, "Impressionistic" brushwork... he even began to explore outdoor themes:

-Horse Races

The artist would later suggest that the horse races offered a real-world subject matter which captured a similar motion of human and animal bodies as one found in the ancient Greek friezes.

Around this time, the artist began to explore the medium of pastel in an ever-increasing depth. Up until this time, Pastel has been employed by few major artists outside of sketches... and in most instances it was used in portraiture and stressed a soft, delicate, hazy technique and "pastel" coloring:

-Francois Boucher- Portrait of Gustave Lunberg

Degas applied the dry pigment in a far more audacious and gestural manner stressing the individual marks and building the "paintings" up in complex layers and textures. Pastel enabled him more easily to reconcile his facility for line and love of drawing, with his growing interest in expressive color. The medium allowed the artist to straddle the line between "drawing" and "painting":

"Drawing is the artist's most direct and spontaneous expression, a species of writing: it reveals, better than does painting, his true personality."- Degas

Beginning in the 1870s and continuing for years after, Degas focused upon a limited number of themes. Not only had his dark palette that spoke of the influence of Dutch painting given way to the use of vivid colors and bold brushstrokes, but his imagery was increasingly centered upon the observation of contemporary life.

In the mid-1870s Degas began to explore the print media of etching, monoprint, and lithography. At first he was guided in this by his old friend, Ludovic-Napoléon Lepic as well as the examples of Rembrandt. Many of these prints focused upon the theme of the Parisian brothels. Lurid details were often hidden among the smoldering darks of the print ink, recalling the rich chiaroscuro of Rembrandt:

-Brothel Scenes

Monoprint inspired Degas to be more open to allowing for conspicuously unfinished passages and gestural brushwork.

“Conversation in real life is full of half-finished sentences and overlapping talk. Why shouldn’t painting be too?” - Edgar Degas

The artist was a fascinated by the possibilities of  exploring multiple variations upon the same afforded by the print medium, and he frequently reworked the same print repeatedly with pastel employing different approaches to color. Years later, he would explore similar possibilities working with photographic references.

Degas' brothel prints would be a major inspiration upon the work of Toulouse-Latrec...

Walter Sickert...

and even Pablo Picasso:

Unfortunately, Degas' brothel scenes, as well as his later paintings and pastels of bathers have led some critics and art historians to assume that the artist was a misogynist. The fact that he never married is also brought to play in this theory. Degas was certainly a curmudgeon... maybe even a misanthrope... but he also had close relationship with a number of women... he wrote a recommendation for at least one ballerina, organized an auction of artworks for the widow of his long-time, trusted friend and art-critic, Edmond Duranty... and acted as mentor and champion for at least two female artists: Mary Cassat and Suzanne Valadon.

Mary Cassatt was a highly educated, sophisticated, and wealthy society woman... as well as a determined artist. She moved with her parents and sister from Pittsburgh to Paris in 1873. Shortly thereafter, she saw Degas’ work in Durand-Ruel’s gallery window. She would later declare: 

"I used to go and flatten my nose against that window and absorb all I could of his Art. It changed my life. I saw art then as I wanted to see it.”

They met in 1877 through a mutual friend, M. Tourny, but both were aware of each other’s work before then. He had seen her work at the Salon and commented: “There is someone who feels as I do.”

Cassat was quite likely the woman most beloved by Degas during his lifetime. He would declare years after she had moved back to America, "I might have married her."

Cassatt persuaded her friend from Philadelphia, Louise Elder, to purchase a Degas pastel print. That friend eventually married industrialist, Henry Osborne Havemeyer, and acquired the largest Degas collection outside of Degas’ own.

At first, Cassatt was referred to as his pupil, but quickly moved out of that category. He was always glad to help her solve a printmaking problem or an art project. They exchanged images often. They spent a lot of time together. They would visit the Louvre together...

-Mary Cassat at the Louvre

-Mary Cassat at the Louvre (etching/monoprint)

-Mary Cassatt at the Louvre (etching/pastel)

Cassatt would take Degas along when she went shopping for clothes and hats. Degas always enjoyed watching young women; and the shopping trips were an excuse for watching sales-clerks as they moved, presented a dress, used their hands, created complex gestures necessary for trying on hats, every movement. Degas spoke of planning a treatise upon planning a treatise upon the manner in which women…observe every detail and nuance of dress and ornament comparing "a thousand of more visible things with one another than a man does." These characteristics, the artist thought, might surely lead women to eventually surpass men as artists.

Degas' excursions with Cassatt to the Milliner's resulted in a body of his finest paintings/pastels:

-At the Milliner's

Degas' use of strange angles or points-of-view, odd croppings, and tilted perspective were inspired by the artist's exposure to Japanese prints and snapshot photographs. 

Another major theme within Degas' oeuvre was that of the Parisian nightlife: bars, nightclubs, theaters, cabaret, etc... 

-At the Cafe

-The Absinthe Drinkers

-Woman at the Cafe

-At the Cafe des Ambassadeurs

-Cafe Concert

-Cafe Concert at the Cafe des Ambassadeurs

-Cafe Concert

Miss La La and The Cirque Fernando

Degas' focus upon the the Parisian nightlife was quite likely inspired by the example of the work of his close friend, Edouard Manet:

Degas again employed dramatic and shockingly original and even odd viewpoints and perspectives. His use of increasingly brilliant and artificial color was undoubtedly the result of the artist's observation of the unnatural effects of colored stage lights and gaslights. In these paintings, we often find ourselves as an intimate participant... sitting in the audience, looking up or down at the stage and over the orchestral pit, across the tables, or viewing the scene as if from back stage. Again, Degas' work in this genre would prove highly influential... inspiring artists such as Toulouse-Latrec:

Kees van Dongen:

Picasso:

and even Max Beckmann:

Degas' largest and perhaps most important body of work is most certainly his ballerinas. It is the subject matter most associated with the artist. Degas regularly attended the ballet and the opera. Just as the artist was a keen observer of the movements and gestures and every slight nuance of clothing and ornament of the women and young girls in the Milliner's shops, so he was even more fascinated with the motion and agility of the ballerinas, their beautiful costumes, and the almost ethereal nature they assumed under the colored stage lights. The ballet was a world of exquisite artifice perfectly suited to the tastes of an artist like Degas. He would later declare:  

"They call me the painter of dancers. They don't understand that the dancer has been for me a pretext for painting pretty fabrics and for rendering movement."

For 10 years Degas sketched the young ballerinas training and then reused the sketches for new artworks during the next 40 years. The earliest of his ballerina paintings tend to be populated with a number of small figures and painted in a "tonal" manner employing a limited palette of mostly earth tones. These paintings are clearly the result of the artist's striving to master the multi-figural narrative painting of his artistic idols within the context of the modern world. 

With time, the artist gained the trust of various ballerinas, their teachers, and even their parents. He began to move in closer... focusing upon the motions of a smaller group of dancers or even a single dancer. Rather than focusing upon the finished ballet, Degas was drawn to the artifice of stage sets, the view of ballerinas waiting in the wings backstage, the strenuous and repetitive physical labor, and even the boredom and exhaustion:

Having access to the intimate backstage comings and goings of the ballet, Degas was aware of socio-economic realities of the dancers. The girls often practiced to the point of exhaustion due to the cut-throat competition. For the poor Parisienne, the theater often offered one of the few alternatives to a life of drudgery as a washerwoman... or worse yet, the shame and derogation of prostitution. Even so, a good number of the girls fell into a form of prostitution as mistresses to wealthy "patrons" of the ballet. These well-to-do "patrons" would offer financial support to their "favorites", and these girls... selected more for their looks and sexual availability... would often be awarded choice roles. Degas painted a number of scenes which explore this sexual/economic drama:

In the above painting, we see a young ballerina standing backstage next to her "patron". Her back turned to him, her arms are folded in resignation and forfeit. 

In this pastel one can almost sense the lust of her elderly patron as he stares at his "prize" in her glittering and diaphanous costume.

In two more dynamic pastels, Degas presents us with an intimate... even voyeuristic view... as if we ourselves are one of the ballerinas patrons allowed a view into her private dressing room.

In the first painting we see a confident prima ballerina admiring herself in the mirror as one of the costume women makes last second adjustments. Behind her... almost hidden, a bespectacled patron looks on admiringly.

In the second painting, the ballerina glows magically from the light thrown off from the lamps before her mirror. The floor is strewn with clothes... her undergarments... reinforcing the sexual nature of the image... and the artifice of the ballet.

For all the brilliance and unquestionable beauty of Degas' earlier ballerina drawings/paintings, his later works rise to a level of unrivaled splendor, audaciousness, and formal innovation. The artist zoomed in ever closer... focusing upon the "movement" to be found within a small group of figures... or a single figure. In many ways, as the artist focused upon the twisting and turning and the musculature of his little Parisian dancers, they take on an almost "monumental" nature... (in spite of the small scale of the works)... not unlike the figures in Michelangelo's Sistine:

Degas also began to explore ever more the potential of color. He began to employ various colored papers in a manner not unlike the colored grounds utilized by the Venetian paintings as a means of unifying the painting as a whole while lending a greater "sparkle" to the bright impasto passages layered over the darker ground.

At the same time, Degas' pastels began to take on an increasingly textured nature. The artist slowly moved away from a more polished surface and began to allow layer upon layer of loose marks to remain. Degas’s use of fixative was the key to the appearance of his many-layered pastel works. Fixative made it possible for pastel to adhere to paper without smearing or smudging and enabled the artist to continue to work over pastel that has already been applied. Degas searched for a fixative that would not alter the matte, velvety quality of his pastels. Degas used a secret formula for fixative given to him by artist Luigi Chialiva that has not been duplicated today. By using fixative to prevent blending and smudging, Degas created a roughened surface to which each layer of pastel adhered easily. The fixative applied at different layers of the composition enabled Degas to create a work using multiple layers of pastel, which achieved an astonishing complexity of superimposed color.

Degas also experimented with the pastels themselves. The artist sought out various pastel-makers in order to find pastels which responded well to fixatives while retaining their original color, and allowed for repeated layers. He would also soak the pastels in water, alcohol, or various painting media or steam them until they took on an incredible soft, buttery nature close to oil paint.

Many of these pastels have an appearance that almost suggests the battered and weathered surfaces of antique fresco paintings.

The innovations and discoveries that Degas made in his pastels, carried over to his paintings... where he often employed hatches, dabs, and even fingerprints in a manner reminiscent of his pastels:

In many instances... such as this absolutely ravishing painting of ballerinas in full costume back stage... Degas employed a combination of both paint and pastel.

In 1881, Degas exhibited a sculpture of a young student of the Paris Opera Ballet dance school named Marie van Goethem:

The sculpture was two-thirds life-size and was originally sculpted in wax, an unusual choice of medium for the time. It was dressed in a real bodice, tutu and ballet slippers with a wig of real hair. All but a hair ribbon and the tutu were covered in wax. The extreme naturalism of the work recalls Baroque Spanish sculpture:

When the La Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans was shown in Paris at the Sixth Impressionist Exhibition of 1881, it received mixed reviews. The majority of critics were shocked by the piece. They compared the dancer to a monkey and an Aztec and referred to her as a "flower of precocious depravity," with a face "marked by the hateful promise of every vice" and "bearing the signs of a profoundly heinous character." 

In spite of these critical comments, it is clear that Degas... a master painter... and almost certainly the greatest master of pastel ever... also created, in one fell swoop, what was likely the single most audacious and innovative sculpture of the 19th century.

Degas continued to explore sculpture as a medium... increasingly so as his eyesight began to fail him in his final years. Yet it comes as no surprise... considering the uncomprehending and disparaging critical commentary... that Degas never public exhibited these works. 

The majority of Degas sculpture were small wax nudes, often based upon dance poses... but later related to his series of pastels and paintings of bathers... although he also produced a number of sculpture of horses. The artist may not have ever intended these to be exhibited or seen as finished works of art, but rather as sketches allowing him to envision the human figure seen from a variety of points-of-view.

The last major theme or subject matter of Degas' career was that of the female nude or "bathers". In part these paintings, which increasingly focused upon the single nude figure, must have been an outgrowth of the artist's experience with sculpture. At the same time, they are the result of the older artist's increasing isolation from society and his gradual loss of sight.

Degas earlier work was all rooted in drawing from real life settings: the racetrack, milliners, opera, ballet, cabaret, nightclubs, and cafes. These endless drawings from life were then employed in creating his finished drawings in the studio. In his later years, the artist had little by way of a social life. The majority of his days were spent in the studio... working with hired models.

Degas' "bathers" employed the same innovations in color, composition, and layered mark-making as did his later ballerinas. As he had done throughout the majority of his career, Degas' utilized his mastery of artifice to create images that revealed an uncompromising honesty... realism... naturalism. 

In spite of spending his days in the artificial experience of drawing from a naked life model in an artist's studio, Degas wholly rejected the artifice and idealization of the nudes common to the artists of the French Academy:

Degas, rather, chose to focus upon the "reality" of the female nude... as she might be seen in the modern world. His women were seen engaged in their daily private rituals of bathing and dressing.

Degas' bathers build upon the tradition of intimism... an approach to art in which the focus is upon private domestic (and often erotic) "dramas" of everyday life. This tradition dates back to the Dutch Baroque painters...

... and continues on through the Rococo...

Like these examples of intimism Degas' paintings of bathers reject the idea of a staged scene and the presumption of an audience that the individuals in the painting are aware of.

Hitherto the nude has always been represented in poses which presuppose an audience. But my women are simple, honest creatures who are concerned with nothing beyond their physical occupations... it is as if you were looking through a keyhole.- Degas

Degas' naked women go about their daily rituals of bathing without the least concern for decorum or how unappealing they might look in the process.

Little of this goes toward explaining just why these paintings were thought by many of Degas' peers to be so shocking... crude... vulgar. To understand such negative criticism, we must look at the realities concerning sexuality and decorum of the era.  

It was not the un-idealistic manner in which Degas rendered the nude female form, nor his audacious formal innovations which led to the outraged criticism of Degas' "bathers"... although these elements certainly contributed to the outrage. Rather, it was the fact that Degas had, in the eyes of his critics, broken a certain hypocritical silence or decorum. 

At this period in history, husbands and wives of the upper classes tended to almost live in separate worlds. In a great many instances they would have separate bedrooms. It would be rare for a husband to see his wife wholly nude, let alone engaged in bathing and dressing. As a result, it was assumed that Degas' bathers represented girls from the vulgar lower classes... or prostitutes. 

The existence of brothels and the fact that these were quite often frequented by the most well-respected (and often married) men was common knowledge... but something that was not to be spoken of. When Manet dared to broach the topic with his Olympia...

... or Flaubert and Zola in their writings... many of these "well respected" husbands were outraged. 

In reality, Degas' women were but artist's models... although undoubtedly some of them engaged in prostitution as well, as a means of at a time when their were few "career" possibilities open to women. Even so, Degas quoted in a discussion with one of his favorite models seems to make it clear that there was nothing sexual in the process of working with the naked model:

But it's true, isn't it Pauline, that people imagine that the artists and their models spend their time getting up to all sorts of obscenities? As far as work goes, well, they paint or sculpt when they are tired of enjoying themselves.

Degas transformed the artifice of the naked model posing for hours on end before the artist in his studio into the illusion of private domestic interiors scenes in which women were seen engaging in the every-day act of bathing and dressing. 

The repetitive theme and variation of women bathing reinforced the assumption that the women in question were prostitutes... that what Degas was presenting were brothel scenes once again... like his earlier monoprints which were known only to a small circle of friends and art connoisseurs. After all, only prostitutes were expected to engage continually in the act of bathing... between "clients." Some "clients" even paid to watch the girls bathe... dress and undress:

Nevertheless... there is nothing that suggests that Degas intended his "bathers" to represent anything more than women in their private domestic settings going about their daily grooming.

The fact that Degas' bathers are frequently accompanied by well-dressed maids greatly undermines the notion that what we are privy to are images of prostitutes in the brothels. Renoir was quoted as having stated that the most basic themes were eternal; the naked woman rising from her bath is Venus rising from the sea, and one can imagine no subject more worthy of art. Degas' habit of building upon archetypes from art history... especially classical Greece and Rome... suggest he was of a similar train of thought.

Degas' "Bathers" and their intimate settings would go on to serve as an archetype and a source of inspiration for later artists including:

Walter Sickert-

Henri Toulouse-Lautrec

Aristide Maillol-

Felix Vallotton-

Edouard Vuillard-

Pierre Bonnard-

...on into the later 20th century in the work of artists such as:

Harry Carmean-

 Grigory Gluckmann-

Balthus-

Elmer Bischoff and the rest of the so-called California School of Figurative Art painters-

artists of the London School/British Royal Academy such as Bernard Dunstan-

... and even an "abstract" artist such as Howard Hodgkin-

In Degas' late "Bathers" the artist employs all the skills and knowledge of a lifetime producing a nearly unsurpassed body of work. With his mastery of drawing, the artist was able to suggest not only the structure of the human form, but also the gestures... its movement through space... with but the most elementary of means. Like his heir, Matisse, he captures the essentials in a manner that appears almost effortless... and yet is anything but:

'Art' is the same word as 'artifice,' that is to say, something deceitful. It must succeed in giving the impression of nature by false means.

A picture is an artificial work, outside nature. It calls for as much cunning as the commission of a crime.

No art is less spontaneous than mine.- Degas

Degas' late "bathers" take on a monumentality and a sense of motion every bit worthy of comparison with Michelangelo:

Like Michelagelo, Degas, in spite of being limited to a single figure, is able to "unearth" a wealth of bold and unexpected poses and points of view, and convey a dynamic, explosive, and expressive array of gestures. Yet Degas, unlike Michelangelo, captures such tension as his women twist and torque through space in the most common of everyday acts: reaching to dry their feet or scrub their backs, dry their hair or pull on a dressing gown. 

For all the stylistic evolution, certain features of Degas's work remained the same throughout his life. He always painted indoors, preferring to work in his studio, either from memory, photographs, sketches, or live models. The human figure... primarily female... remained his core subject. He produced few landscapes... and these were always painted or drawn from memory or imagination.

It was not unusual for him to repeat a subject many times, varying the composition or treatment. He was a deliberative artist whose works, as Andrew Forge has written, "were prepared, calculated, practiced, developed in stages. They were made up of parts. The adjustment of each part to the whole, their linear arrangement, was the occasion for infinite reflection and experiment."  Degas himself explained, "In art, nothing should look like chance, not even movement".

Although Degas is known to have been working in pastel as late as the end of 1907, and is believed to have continued making sculpture as late as 1910, he apparently ceased working in 1912, when the impending demolition of his longtime residence on the rue Victor Massé forced him to move to quarters on the boulevard de Clichy. He spent the last years of his life, nearly blind, restlessly wandering the streets of Paris before dying in September 1917. On his death bed, he has been quoted as exclaiming, "Damn, and just when I was starting to get it!"

Avatar

Poem of the Day: Richard Wilbur- "Piazza di Spagna, Early Morning"

I can’t forget How she stood at the top of that long marble stair Amazed, and then with a sleepy pirouette Went dancing slowly down to the fountain-quieted square;

Nothing upon her face But some impersonal loneliness,- not then a girl But as it were a reverie of the place, A called-for falling glide and whirl;

As when a leaf, petal, or thin chip Is drawn to the falls of a pool and, circling a moment above it, Rides on over the lip- Perfectly beautiful, perfectly ignorant of it.

Avatar
reblogged

Cai Guo-QiangThe site-specific installation entitled Reflection consists of a 50-foot-long skeleton of a sunken Japanese fishing boat resting upon an imaginary beach of gleaming broken white blanc de chine porcelain fragments of deities from Dehua, China (via).

Avatar
stlukesguild

Unlike a great deal of the contemporary Chinese art that shows up in the art press... the mostly horrific crap built upon the worst aspects of Western Pop Art... this is a rather moving work of art.

Avatar

The Bronze Horses of San Marco, Venice

In 1198, Pope Innocent III called for a new crusade (The Fourth Crusade) against Muslims with the intended goal of conquering Muslim- controlled Jerusalem by means of an invasion through Egypt. The crusade was organized in 1199 and placed under the leadership of Count Thibaut of Champagne, but he died in 1201 and was replaced by an Italian count, Boniface of Montferrat.

Boniface and the other leaders sent envoys to Venice, Genoa, and other city-states to negotiate a contract for transport to Egypt, the object of their crusade. An attack on Egypt would require a formidable maritime force and the creation of a fleet. Genoa was uninterested, but in March 1201 negotiations were opened with Venice, which agreed to transport 33,500 crusaders, a very ambitious number. This agreement required a full year of preparation on the part of the Venetians to build numerous ships and train the sailors who would man them, all the while curtailing the city's commercial activities. The crusade was to be ready to sail on June 24, 1202 and make directly for the Ayyubid capital, Cairo. This agreement was ratified by Pope Innocent, with a solemn ban on attacks on Christian states.

By 1201 the bulk of the crusader army was collected at Venice, although with far smaller numbers than expected: approximately 12,000  instead of 33,500. The Venetians had performed their part of the agreement: there lay 50 war galleys and 450 transports—enough for three times the assembled army. The Venetians, under their aged and blind Doge Dandolo, would not let the crusaders leave without paying the full amount agreed to, originally 85,000 silver marks. The crusaders could only initially pay 35,000 silver marks. The Doge threatened to keep them interned unless full payment was made so a further 14,000 marks was collected, and that only by reducing the crusaders to extreme poverty.

Dandolo and the Venetians considered what to do with the crusade. It was too small to pay its fee, but disbanding the force gathered would harm Venetian prestige, as well as significant financial and trading loss. Following the Massacre of the Latins of Constantinople in 1182, the ruling Angelos dynasty had expelled the Venetian merchant population with the support of the Greek population. These events gave the Venetians a hostile attitude towards Byzantium but it remains unclear if Constantinople was always intended to be the target and the issue remains under fierce debate today.

Dandolo, who joined the crusade during a public ceremony in the church of San Marco di Venezia, proposed that the crusaders pay their debts by intimidating many of the local ports and towns down the Adriatic, culminating in an attack on the port of Zara in Dalmatia. The city had been dominated economically by Venice throughout the 12th century, but had rebelled in 1181 and allied itself with King Emeric of Hungary. Subsequent Venetian attempts to recover control of Zara had been repulsed, and by 1202 the city was economically independent, under the protection of the King.

The Hungarian king was Catholic and had himself agreed to join the Fourth Crusade. Many of the crusaders were opposed to attacking Zara, and some, including a force led by the elder Simon de Montfort, refused to participate altogether and returned home. While the Papal legate to the Crusade, Cardinal Peter of Capua, endorsed the move as necessary to prevent the crusade's complete failure, the Pope was alarmed at this development and wrote a letter to the crusading leadership threatening excommunication. However, this letter was concealed from the bulk of the army and the attack proceeded. The citizens of Zara made reference to the fact that they were fellow Catholics by hanging banners marked with crosses from their windows and the walls of the city, but nevertheless the city fell after a brief siege. There was extensive pillaging and the Venetians and other crusaders came to blows over the division of the spoils. Order was achieved and the leaders of the expedition agreed to winter in Zara, while considering their next move.

When Innocent III heard of the sack, he sent a letter to the crusaders excommunicating them, and ordered them to return to their holy vows and head for Jerusalem. Out of fear that this would dissolve the army, the leaders of the crusade decided not to inform their followers of this.

Boniface of Montferrat, meanwhile, had left the fleet before it sailed from Venice, to visit his cousin Philip of Swabia. The reasons for his visit are a matter of debate; he may have realized the Venetians' plans and left to avoid excommunication, or he may have wanted to meet with the Byzantine prince Alexios IV Angelos, Philip's brother-in-law and the son of the recently deposed Byzantine emperor Isaac II Angelos. Alexios IV had recently fled to Philip in 1201 but it is unknown whether or not Boniface knew he was at Philip's court. There, Alexios IV offered to pay the entire debt owed to the Venetians, give 200,000 silver marks to the crusaders, 10,000 Byzantine professional troops for the Crusade, the maintenance of 500 knights in the Holy Land, the service of the Byzantine navy to transport the Crusader Army to Egypt and the placement of the Eastern Orthodox Church under the authority of the Pope if they would sail to Byzantium and topple the reigning emperor Alexios III Angelos, brother of Isaac II.

It was a tempting offer for an enterprise that was short on funds. Doge Dandolo was a fierce supporter of the plan, however in his earlier capacity as an ambassador to Byzantium and someone who knew the finer details of how Byzantine politics worked, it is likely he knew the promises were false and there was no hope of any Byzantine emperor raising the money promised, let alone raising the troops and giving the church to the Holy See. Count Boniface agreed and Alexios IV returned with the Marquess to rejoin the fleet at Corfu after it had sailed from Zara.

Most of the rest of the crusade's leaders, encouraged by bribes from Dandolo, eventually accepted the plan as well. However, however there were dissenters; led by Reynold of Montmirail, those who refused to take part in the scheme to attack Christendom's greatest city sailed on to Syria. The remaining fleet of 60 war galleys, 100 horse transports, and 50 large transports (the entire fleet was manned by 10,000 Venetian oarsmen and marines) sailed in late April 1203.

Hearing of their decision, the Pope hedged and issued an order against any more attacks on Christians unless they were actively hindering the Crusader cause, but failed to condemn the scheme outright.

When the Fourth Crusade arrived at Constantinople, the city had a population of approximately 500,000 people, a garrison of 15,000 men, and a fleet of 20 galleys. For both political and financial reasons the permanent garrison of Constantinople had been limited to a relatively small force, made up of elite guard and other specialist units. At previous times in Byzantine history when the capital had come under direct threat, it had been possible to assemble reinforcements from frontier and provincial forces. On this occasion the suddenness of the danger posed by the Fourth Crusade put the defenders at a serious disadvantage.

The Crusaders followed south, and attacked the Tower of Galata, which held the northern end of the massive chain that blocked access to the Golden Horn. As they laid siege to the Tower, the Byzantines counterattacked with some initial success. However, when the crusaders rallied and the Byzantines retreated to the Tower, the crusaders were able to follow the soldiers through the Gate, and took the Tower. The Golden Horn now lay open to the Crusaders, and the Venetian fleet entered.

On July 11, 1203 the Crusaders took positions opposite the Palace of Blachernae on the northwest corner of the city. Their first attempts were repulsed, but on July 17, with four divisions attacking the land walls, while the Venetian fleet attacked the sea walls from the Golden Horn, the Venetians took a section of the wall of about 25 towers, while the Varangian guard held off the Crusaders on the land wall. The Varangians shifted to meet the new threat, and the Venetians retreated under the screen of fire. The fire destroyed about 120 acres of the city and left some 20,000 people homeless.

Alexios III's army of about 8,500 men faced the Crusaders' seven divisions (about 3,500 men), but his courage failed, and the Byzantine army returned to the city without a fight. The unforced retreat and the effects of the fire greatly damaged morale, and the disgraced Alexios III abandoned his subjects, slipping out of the city and fleeing to Mosynopolis in Thrace. The Imperial officials quickly deposed their runaway emperor and restored Isaac II, robbing the crusaders of the pretext for attack. The crusaders were now in the quandary of having achieved their stated aim, but being debarred from the actual objective, namely the reward that the younger Alexios had promised them. The crusaders insisted that they would only recognize Isaac II's authority if his son was raised to co-emperor and on August 1, he was crowned Alexius IV, co-emperor.

Alexios IV realised that his promises were hard to keep. Alexios III had managed to flee with 1,000 pounds of gold and some priceless jewels, leaving the imperial treasury short on funds. At that point the young emperor ordered the destruction and melting of valuable Byzantine and Roman icons in order to extract their gold and silver, but even then he could only raise 100,000 silver marks. In the eyes of all Greeks who knew of this decision, it was a shocking sign of desperation and weak leadership, which deserved to be punished by God. The Byzantine historian Nicetas Choniates characterized it as "the turning point towards the decline of the Roman state."

Forcing the populace to destroy their icons at the behest of an army of foreign schismatics did not endear Alexios IV to the citizens of Constantinople. In fear of his life, the co-emperor asked the crusaders to renew their contract for another six months, to end by April 1204. Alexios IV then led 6,000 men from the Crusader army against his rival Alexios III in Adrianople.

During the co-emperor's absence in August, rioting broke out in the city and a number of Latin residents were killed. In retaliation armed Venetians and other crusaders entered the city from the Golden Horn and attacked a mosque (Constantinople at this time had a sizable Muslim population), which was defended by Muslim and Byzantine residents. In order to cover their retreat the Westerners instigated the "Great Fire", which burnt from 19 to 21 August, destroying a large part of Constantinople and leaving an estimated 100,000 homeless.

In January 1204 the blinded and incapacitated Isaac II died, probably of natural causes. Opposition to his son and co-emperor Alexios IV had grown during the preceding months of tension and spasmodic violence in and around Constantinople.

A nobleman Alexios Doukas became the leader of the anti-crusader faction within the Byzantine leadership. While holding the court rank of protovestilarios, Doukas had led Byzantine forces during the initial clashes with the crusaders, winning respect from both military and populace. He was accordingly well-placed to move against the increasingly isolated Alexios IV, whom he overthrew, imprisoned and had strangled in early February. Doukas then was crowned as Emperor Alexios V. He immediately moved to have the city fortifications strengthened and summoned additional forces to the city.

The crusaders and Venetians, incensed at the murder of their supposed patron, demanded that Mourtzouphlos honour the contract which Alexios IV had promised. When the Byzantine emperor refused, the Crusaders assaulted the city once again. On April 8, Alexios V's army put up a strong resistance which did much to discourage the crusaders.

The Byzantines hurled large projectiles onto the enemy siege engines, shattering many of them. A serious hindrance to the crusaders was bad weather conditions. Wind blew from the shore and prevented most of the ships from drawing close enough to the walls to launch an assault. Only five of the wall's towers were actually engaged and none of these could be secured; by mid-afternoon it was evident that the attack had failed.

The Latin clergy discussed the situation amongst themselves and settled upon the message they wished to spread through the demoralised army. They had to convince the men that the events of 9 April were not God's judgment on a sinful enterprise: the campaign, they argued, was righteous and with proper belief it would succeed. The concept of God testing the determination of the crusaders through temporary setbacks was a familiar means for the clergy to explain failure in the course of a campaign.

The clergy's message was designed to reassure and encourage the Crusaders. Their argument that the attack on Constantinople was spiritual revolved around two themes. First, the Greeks were traitors and murderers since they had killed their rightful lord, Alexios IV. The churchmen used inflammatory language and claimed that "the Greeks were worse than the Jews", and they invoked the authority of God and the pope to take action.

Although Innocent III had again demanded that they not attack, the papal letter was suppressed by the clergy, and the crusaders prepared for their own attack, while the Venetians attacked from the sea; Alexios V's army stayed in the city to fight, along with the imperial bodyguard, the Varangians, but Alexios V himself fled during the night. An attempt was made to find a further replacement emperor from amongst the Byzantine nobility but the situation had now become too chaotic for either of the two candidates who came forward to find sufficient support.

On April 12, 1204, the weather conditions finally favoured the Crusaders. A strong northern wind aided the Venetian ships in coming close to the walls. After a short battle, approximately seventy crusaders managed to enter the city. Some Crusaders were eventually able to knock holes in the walls, large enough for only a few knights at a time to crawl through; the Venetians were also successful at scaling the walls from the sea, though there was extremely bloody fighting with the Varangians.

The Anglo-Saxon "axe bearers" had been amongst the most effective of the city's defenders but they now attempted to negotiate higher wages from their Byzantine employers, before dispersing or surrendering.

The crusaders captured the Blachernae section of the city in the northwest and used it as a base to attack the rest of the city, but while attempting to defend themselves with a wall of fire, they ended up burning down even more of the city. This second fire left 15,000 people homeless.

The crusaders completely took the city on April 13.

The crusaders inflicted a savage sacking on Constantinople for three days, during which time they looted, terrorized and vandalized the citizens of Constantinople. A great many ancient Greco-Roman and medieval Byzantine works of art were either stolen or destroyed. The magnificent Library of Constantinople was destroyed.

Works of immeasurable value were destroyed merely for their material value. One of the most precious works to suffer such a fate was a large bronze statue of Hercules, created by the legendary Lysippos, court sculptor of no lesser than Alexander the Great. Like so many other priceless artworks made of bronze, the statue was melted down for its content by the Crusaders whose greed blinded them.

Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication, the crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated and sacked the city's churches, monasteries and convents. The very altars of these churches were smashed and torn to pieces for their gold and marble by the warriors who had sworn to fight in service of Christendom

The civilian population of Constantinople were subject to the Crusaders' ruthless lust for spoils and glory: thousands of them were killed in cold blood. Women, even nuns, were raped by the Crusader army, which also without question.

Although the Venetians engaged in looting too, their actions were by far more restrained. Doge Dandolo still appeared to have far more control over his men. Rather than wantonly destroying all around like their comrades, the Venetians stole religious relics and works of art which they would later take to Venice to adorn their own churches with.

Principal among the riches plundered were the Four Horses displayed in the Hippodrome of Constantinople. They are most likely of Roman origin, although some argue for an older, Greek origin. Originally accompanied by a quadriga, or chariot, they were , having arrived there centuries before, from Rome.

The horses were placed on the facade, on the balcony above the porch, of St Mark's Basilica in Venice with a clear political intention of conveying a sense of triumph... as the symbol of continuity of the imperial power of Byzantium... and ultimately the Roman Empire...that Venice had now inherited.

The sculptures date from classical antiquity and have been attributed to the 4th century BC Greek sculptor Lysippos, although this has not been widely accepted. Dating of the sculpture has been uncertain. Some scholars now suggest it dates from between the second half of the second century and the early third century AD in the Roman imperial period. Analysis with carbon 14 suggests it dates to the beginning of the second century BC.

Although called bronze, analysis suggests that as they are at least 96.67% copper.

In 1797, Napoleon had the horses forcibly removed from the basilica and carried off to Paris, where they were used in the design of the Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel together with a quadriga.

In 1815 the horses were returned to Venice by Captain Dumaresq. He had fought at the Battle of Waterloo and was with the allied forces in Paris where he was selected, by the Emperor of Austria, to take the horses down from the Arc de Triomphe and return them to their original place at St Mark's in Venice.

The "Bronze" Horses of San Marco undoubtedly rank among the most stunning works of classical antiquity to have survived.

Avatar

Lorenzo Ghiberti: The Gates of Paradise

Lorenzo di Cione Ghiberti, one of the most influential artists of the early Renaissance, was born in Pelgao, near Florence, Italy, in 1378. He was educated by his father, Bartoluccio Ghiberti, a well-respected goldsmith in Florence. A child prodigy, he passed the examination to become a guild master goldsmith by 1398 and received his first commission shortly thereafter.

In 1400, he traveled to Rimini to escape the plague in Florence and received further training as a painter, assisting in the completion of wall frescoes at the Castle of Carlo I Malatesta.

In 1401, Lorenzo Ghiberti began work for a commission sponsored by the Arte di Calimala (Cloth Importers Guild) to make a pair of bronze doors for the Baptistery of Florence. Seven finalists, including Filippo Brunelleschi, Donatello, Jacopo della Quercia, and Ghiberti, worked for a year to depict in bronze the story of Abraham’s call to sacrifice his son Isaac. In the end, it came down to two artists, Ghiberti and Brunelleschi.

-The Sacrifice of Isaac- Brunelleschi

-The Sacrifice of Isaac- Ghiberti 

Brunelleschi’s version emphasized the violence, while Ghiberti devised a calmer, more lyrical composition. To our eyes, the Brunelleschi seems more powerful and “modern.” But Brunelleschi’s determination to cram as many attention-grabbing devices into one work may have seemed willful to 15th-century Florentine jurors. Certainly, Ghiberti’s craftmanship was superior; unlike Brunelleschi, who soldered his panel from many separate pieces of bronze, Ghiberti cast his in just two, and he used only two-thirds as much metal—a not-inconsiderable savings. The combination of craft and parsimony would have appealed to the practical-minded men of the Calimala.

Ross King's book, Brunelleschi's Dome, offers a fascinating view of the competition for the commission of the doors and subsequent competition between the two artists. Brunelleschi would turn away from sculpture and focus upon architecture, becoming one of the towering geniuses of the Renaissance... in many ways a model for the ideal of the "Renaissance Man" as exemplified by Leonardo and Michelangelo. 

Ghiberti's victory in the competition would eventually result in two sets of doors.  The original plan had been for the first set of doors to depict various scenes from the Old Testament, but the plan was later expanded to include scenes from the New Testament. These doors were to be placed at the Northern entrance to the Baptistery in compliment to Andrea Pisano's door on the South side of the Baptistery, completed in 1336:

-Andrea Pisano- South Doors of the Baptistery of Florence

-Lorenzo Ghiberti- North Doors to the Baptistery of Florence 

Ghiberti spent 21 years laboring upon the the doors, completing the work in 1424. In Ghiberti’s North Doors contain 14 quatrefoil-framed scenes from the life of Christ, the evangelists and the church fathers. In rendering the doors, Ghiberti adopted the linear grace of the early 15th century gothic style of Florence to the expressive power of the newer Renaissance style. The result was a heightened illusion of depth.

By the time of the completion of the Doors, Ghiberti was widely recognized as a celebrity and the top artist in this field. Along with the production of the Doors, Ghiberti worked upon designs for stained glass windows, acted as an architectural consultant on several projects, and created two major bronze sculptures of the Biblical figures of St. John the Baptist and St. Matthew.

-St. John the Baptist

-St. Matthew

These bronze figures were placed in niches in the Orsanmichele, along side sculptural figures by Nanni di Banco, Andrea del Verrocchio, Donatello, and Giambologna.

Ghiberti fame and reputation was such that he was showered with commissions, including one from the Pope. In 1425, however, he would be given his most important commission... that for a second set of doors for the Baptistery of Florence... this time for the East side of the Baptistery. He and his workshop (which employed many assistants including talented masters in their own right such as Michelozzo, Paolo Uccello and Benozzo Gozzoli) toiled for 27 years, upon the project... far excelling themselves... and in the process producing one of the greatest works of the Italian Renaissance. 

After completing the first set of doors for the Baptistery of Florence, Lorenzo Ghiberti embarked upon an intense exploration of new ways of forming pictorial space and lifelike figures to occupy it. Historians believe that Ghiberti encountered Leon Battista Alberti, a young humanist scholar who, inspired by the art of Florence, composed theoretical treatises on the visual arts. Ghiberti was also influenced by 11th century Arab polymath Alhazen, whose Book of Optics, about the optical basis of perspective, was translated into Italian during the 14th century.

Ghiberti incorporated these techniques into the Baptistery’s next set of bronze doors, considered his greatest work. Dubbed the “Gates of Paradise” by Michelangelo, each door portrays five scenes from the Old Testament. In the individual panels, Ghiberti used a painter’s point-of-view to heighten the illusion of depth. He also extended that illusion by having the figures closer to the viewer extend outward, appearing almost fully round, with some of the heads standing completely free from the background. Figures in the background are accented with barely raised lines that appear flatter against the background. This “sculpture’s” aerial perspective gives the illusion that the figures become less distinct as they appear farther from the viewer.

Ghiberti employed the recently discovered principles of perspective to give depth to his compositions. Each panel depicts more than one episode. In "The Story of Joseph" is portrayed the narrative scheme of Joseph Cast by His Brethren into the WellJoseph Sold to the MerchantsThe merchants delivering Joseph to the pharaohJoseph Interpreting the Pharaoh's dreamThe Pharaoh Paying him HonourJacob Sends His Sons to Egypt and Joseph Recognizes His Brothers and Returns Home. According to Vasari's Lives, this panel was the most difficult and also the most beautiful.

Having said that, I must admit that my personal favorite panel is that of the Creation of Adam, the Creation of Eve, the Fall, and the Expulsion:

The figures are distributed in very low relief in a perspective space (a technique invented by Donatello and called rilievo schiacciato, which literally means "flattened relief".) Ghiberti uses different sculptural techniques, from incised lines to almost free-standing figure sculpture, within the panels, further accentuating the sense of space.

Michelangelo referred to these doors as fit to be the "Gates of Paradise" (It. Porte del Paradiso), and they are still invariably referred to by this name. Giorgio Vasari described them a century later as "undeniably perfect in every way and must rank as the finest masterpiece ever created". Ghiberti himself said they were "the most singular work that I have ever made". 

I must certainly agree with Michelangelo, Vasari, and Ghiberti.

*****

After 27 years of careful restoration, The Gates of Paradise (Michelangelo’s naming of Lorenzo Ghiberti’s Renaissance work) were put on public display once again in September, 2012. The original resting place of the doors, the Baptistry of San Giovanni, has been donned with replicas since the restoration began. The doors will not be sent back to the Baptistry of San Giovanni, but instead they will be displayed at the Museo dell’Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore; they are to be kept in glass cases filled with nitrogen to prevent future damage.

Made more than 500 years ago, the doors weigh around nine tons and are made of bronze and layered with gold. There are ten panels, each representing a different story from the Old Testament - from the creation of Adam and Eve to the battle of David and Goliath.

During World War II, the “Doors of Paradise” were temporarily removed from the baptistery to spare it from damage. Over the years the doors had become blackened by wind, water, and pollution. The most serious damage occurred as a result of the devastating flood of Florence of 1966 when the Arno breached its banks. Six of its 10 panels were ripped away by the force of the raging muddy waters. The panels were re-attached, but it became obvious that a full-scale restorantion was needed.

Ghiberti’s masterpiece is one of several Italian art treasures to end up in a museum following restoration.

The four gilded bronze horses on the facade of St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice were moved inside St. Mark’s museum in 1982 and replaced outside by copies.

In the heart of Rome, the 1,800-year-old bronze equestrian statue of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, badly eroded by pollution, was removed from its outdoor perch in 1981 atop the Capitoline Hill for restoration and is now a star of the Capitoline Museums. A replica of the statue adorns the square outside the museum.

"When you take an artwork from its original context, it is always a defeat," Cristina Acidini, a Florence museums official, told The Associated Press. However, she added, it is a "necessary process to save the original."

Avatar

Contemporary Artists: London Fieldworks

London Fieldworks was formed in 2000 by artists Bruce Gilchrist and Jo Joelson for creative research and collaboration at the art, science and technology intersection. Typically, their projects engage with the notion of ecology as a complex inter-working of social, natural, and technological worlds

London Fieldworks' Spontaneous City in the Tree of Heaven is a sculptural installation drawing on the ecology and biodiversity of two sites on opposite sides of London: Duncan Terrace Gardens in the East and Cremorne Gardens in the West. The installations are constructed from several hundred bespoke bird boxes mounted in two trees of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and reflect the forms of the surrounding architecture; a combination of Georgian town houses, and 60's social housing around Duncan Terrace Gardens, and the World's End Estate adjacent to Cremorne Gardens. Spontaneous City in the Tree of Heaven has developed out of a recent London Fieldworks project, Super Kingdom, commissioned by Stour Valley Arts for Kings Wood in Kent, where 'show homes' for animals were constructed based on the architecture of despot's palaces. The installations have been commissioned for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and Islington Council by up projects as part of their Secret Garden Project ; a new programme of artists commissions and events for secret gardens, lesser known green spaces, and urban corners across London.

Spontaneous City has also been commissioned by the Norfolk and Norwich Festival, May 2011, across three of the city’s public gardens, lesser known green spaces and urban corners. and also in May for the Clerkenwell Design Week, as a their 2011 legacy project. The Spontaneous Cities are temporary interventions in the trees reflecting the local architecture, a metaphorical interplay between the condition of the animal and the human. As well as being open to occupation by urban birds and insects, Spontaneous City can also be read as an allegory of population crash and dwindling biodiversity.

Avatar

My Favorite Artists: Another 100

Limiting myself to even 50 "favorite" artists proved difficult. Coming up with yet another 100 artists that I would count among my favorites, on the other hand, was no challenge whatsoever (and this excludes art works created by anonymous masters). Among the artists I included upon delving deeper into the late 19th and 20th centuries are many that might be deemed "commercial artists": illustrators, designers of posters, books, decorative art objects, etc...

The narrative (one might say the "myth") of Modernism often dismisses or wholly ignores the achievements of such artists. While I greatly respect the achievements of Modernism and love many Modernist artists, I often suspect that the movement in some ways resulted in tossing out the baby with the bath water. Modernism opened up an incredible array of possibilities long ignored... but too often it also resulted in dismissing the possibility of continuing to build upon the "realist" traditions of Western art. Quite often it was the illustrators and comic book artists and pin-up artists and other "commercial artists" who kept this tradition and the necessary skills alive. One suspects that any number of these artists, irrelevant to the Modernist narrative, will be recognized as being among the leading figures of the art of the period. 

1. The Artists of the Shanameh of Tabriz (the "Houghton Shanameh"): Bizhad, Sultan Muhammad, Mir Musavvir, Aqa Mirak:

2. Praxiteles:

3. Leonardo Da Vinci:

4. Velazquez:

5. Jan van Eyck:

6. Brunelleschi:

7. Giselbertus:

8. Maitani:

9. The Limbourg Brothers:

10. Lorenzo Ghiberti:

11. Lucas Cranach:

12. Matthias Grünewald:

13. Hans Baldung Grien:

14. Nicolas Poussin:

15. Gentile da Fabriano:

16. Correggio:

17. Bronzino:

18. Rosso Fiorentino:

19. Pontormo:

20. El Greco:

21. Joachim Wtewael:

22. Duccio:

23. Georges de la Tour:

24. Gerard Ter Borch:

25. Jacob Jordaens:

26. Andrea Mantegna:

27. Jean-Honoré Fragonard:

28. Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin:

29. Clodion (Claude Michel):

30. Gainsborough:

31. Antonio Canova:

32. Étienne Maurice Falconet:

33. Jean-Jacques (James) Pradier:

34. Lorenzo Bartolini:

35. G.M. Benzoni:

36. Anton Raphael Mengs:

37. Albert Bierstadt:

38. Gustave Courbet:

39. Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot:

40. François-Auguste-René Rodin:

41. Hokusai:

42. George Bellows:

43. Robert Henri:

44. John Singer Sargent:

45. James Mcniell Whistler:

46. William Morris:

47. Phoebe Traquair:

48. Alphonse Mucha:

49. Henri Toulouse-Lautrec:

50. Aubrey Beardsley:

51. Eric Gill:

52. Edmund Dulac:

53. Arthur Rackham:

54. Harry Clark:

55. Norman Lindsay:

56. George Barbier:

57. Maxfield Parrish:

58. Maurice Denis:

59. Edvard Munch:

60. Egon Schiele:

61. Emil Nolde:

62. E.L. Kirchner:

63. Georges Rouault:

64. Maurice de Vlaminck:

65. Kees van Dongen:

66. Andre Derain:

67. Balthus:

68. Charles Burchfield:

69. Marsden Hartley:

70. Joseph Cornell:

71. Salvador Dali:

72. Henri Rousseau:

73. Joan Miró:

74. Edward Hopper:

75. George Tooker:

76. Chaim Soutine:

77. Diego Rivera:

78. Jean Dubuffet:

79. Francis Bacon:

80. Arshile Gorky:

81. Philip Guston:

82. Milton Avery:

83. Fairfield Porter:

84. Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, and Steve Ditko:

85. R. Crumb:

86. Alberto Vargas:

87: Gil Elvgren:

88. Tom Wesselman:

89. R.B. Kitaj:

90. Robert Kushner:

91. Lucian Freud:

92. Avigdor Arikha:

93. Odd Nerdrum:

94. Leonard Koscianski:

95. Michael Bastow:

96. Francine van Hove:

97. Bo Bartlett:

98. Will Cotton:

99. Aron Wiesenfeld:

100. Ikenaga Yasunari:

Avatar

My Favorite Artists

I don't know how many times the question arises in both online and "real-life" discussion to the effect of "Who are your favorite 5... 10... 20... (insert number of choice here) artists." The question may be cliche... but what the hell, any chance to explore some of my favorite artists shouldn't be passed up. 

So here we have it: My 50 Favorite Artists... Plus One:

1. Sir Peter Paul Rubens:

2. Michelangelo Buonarotti:

3. Rembrandt van Rijn:

4. Pierre Bonnard:

5. Edgar Degas:

6. William Blake:

7. Paolo Veronese: 

8. Giorgione:

9. Titian:

10. Raphael:

11. Gianlorenzo Bernini:

12. Giovanni Bellini:

13. Pieter Breugel:

14. J.M.W. Turner:

15. Max Beckmann:

16. Henri Matisse:

17. Fra Filippo Lippi:

18. Albrecht Dürer:

19. Claude Monet:

20. Vincent van Gogh:

21. Vermeer:

22. Ingres:

23. Botticelli:

24. Hieronymus Bosch:

25. Utamaro:

26. Gustav Klimt:

27. Edouard Vuillard:

28. Paul Klee:

29. Amadeo Modigliani:

30. Fra Angelico:

31. Paul Gauguin:

32. Pierre Renoir:

33. François Boucher:

34. Francisco Goya:

35. Eugene Delacroix:

36. Aristide Maillol:

37. Giotto:

38. Simone Martini:

39. Caravaggio:

40. Anthony van Dyck:

41. Edouard Manet:

42. Tiepolo:

43. Odilon Redon:

44. Rogier van der Weyden:

45. Pablo Picasso:

46. Tintoretto:

47. Caspar David Friedrich:

48. Corot:

49. Watteau:

50. Winslow Homer:

51. Anders Zorn:

The first 15 or so of these artists are largely set in stone... from then on they might rise or fall depending upon my mood... and some one or two might fall out of the list altogether to be replaced by others.

Avatar

Contemporary Artist: Wendell Castle

Oscar Wilde declared that "the artist is the creator of beautiful things." Many Modernist artists, critics, and theorists rejected this notion. "Beauty" was seen as suspect... a right of the privileged... and art was valued more as an expression of feelings or ideas. As a result, contrary to the efforts of John Ruskin, William Morris, the Arts and Crafts Movement and the Bauhaus, there was a perception of an increased divide between "fine art" and "applied arts", "decorative arts", "commercial arts" and "crafts".

-Angel Heart

-Music Stand

In spite of this, the celebrated American designer/craftsman Wendell Castle (1932-) has been creating unique pieces of handmade sculpture and furniture for over four decades which have consistently challenged the traditional boundaries of functional design and "fine art".  His achievements have established him as the father-figure of the American studio furniture movement.

-Chest of Drawers 

Castle is renowned for his superb craftsmanship, his whimsically organic forms and his development of original techniques for shaping solid, stack-laminated wood.

His iconic masterpieces in wood and in Technicolor gel-coated fiberglass from the late 1960s and 1970s are fast becoming some of the most important and coveted examples of 20th century design.

-Castle Desk recently put up for sale at auction for $1.2 Million

Castle was born in Kansas and received a BFA from the University of Kansas in Industrial Design and an MFA in sculpture, graduating in 1961. He then moved to Rochester, New York to teach at the School of American Craftsmen and established a permanent studio in the area. He also served as head of the woodworking department at the Rochester Institute of Technology.

Castle's numerous awards include a 1994 'Visionaries of the American Craft Movement' award sponsored by the American Craft Museum and a 1997 Gold Medal from the American Craft Council. In 2007 he received the Modernism Lifetime Achievement Award from the Brooklyn Museum. He has received grants from the National Endowment for the Arts and the Louis Comfort Tiffany Foundation, among others. His work is included in the permanent collections of museums including The Museum of Modern Art, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Arts and Design, and the Brooklyn Museum in New York; the Smithsonian's American Art Museum and the Renwick Gallery in Washington, D.C.; The Art Institute of Chicago, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and the Detroit Art Institute.

-Doctor Atomic

-Like an Echo

-Nirvana

-Past Joys

-Top of the World

-Warm Nights Coffee Table

-Dark Wish Chair

-Santa-Ana

-Table

-Museum installation view

-Park Bench

-Chair with Legs

-Chair with Wooden Pillow

-Chair with Wooden Pillow (variation)

-Chair with Sports Coat

-Ghost Clock

-Ghost Clock

The Trompe-l'œil works such as Chair with Wooden Pillow and Ghost Clock echo not only the American tradition of trompe-l'œil paintings by such early American artists as William Harnett:

... and John Peto:

... but also the "found object" tradition of Modernism seen in the work of Picasso, Kurt Schwitters, Duchamp, Joseph Cornell, and Robert Rauschenberg. 

Works such as Chair with Wooden Pillow and Ghost Clock essentially invert Duchamp's "found objects" by offering works of art that appear, on first sight, to be but found objects... but upon closer inspection are clearly trompe-l'œil illusions... immaculately crafted/carved/rendered.

-A New Environment

-Unicorn Family

Castle's larger sculptural installations contain elements of Surrealism and suggest paintings by Picasso and sculpture by Brancusi... among other artists.

Avatar

Contemporary Artist: Ana Maria Pacheco

The French writer and art critic, André Malraux made a good number of observations concerning art that have remained with me for years:

There are no Sumerian, Egyptian, or Medieval hacks, but (our time is overrun with them). 

Masterpieces were never the "best products of their period," and they seem to be connected only with each other, and to rejoin each other across time- sometimes very long periods. The best part of Rodin's work knows nothing of the three centuries preceding it but continues Donatello. 

We know... that the pursuit of the divine is no assurance of genius, but genius cannot exist without it.

The artist can reach art only on the stairs of his highest values which he recognizes within his heart...

(In other words, the passion for nothing more than fame and fortune cannot replace god or spiritual longing as a source of passionate inspiration for the artist)

All great works of art are "original" but not in the modern sense of the word. For they are unique, but not unusual. Today "original" tends to mean "surprising"... the search for novelty... and the unusual.

For centuries religion... the Catholic Church and other religious/spiritual institutions... were the greatest patrons of the arts. There were, as Malraux suggested, few Medieval... and one might add few Renaissance "hacks" for the simple reason that the artists were largely employed in the honest expression of their highest beliefs and heart-felt faith. 

One first discovers a wealth of hack-work in the field of painting during the Baroque period... especially in Holland. While the French, Spanish, and Italian artists still labored for the aristocrats and the church... whether their art conveyed their unsullied faith in the infallibility of these institutions... or whether, like Bosch and Breughel (among others) they offered satirical critical commentary upon the same. The Dutch, however, turned painting into one more mass-produced commodity. They instituted the middle-man... the art dealer... and they promoted specializations in order to reach every possible market: "You want a landscape with cows?" We got a guy who paints just that." "You want a still-life painting with lobster and tropical fruit to convey your wealth?" We got that too."

Rembrandt struggled... and in his later years slipped into obscurity and poverty for the simple reason that he could not paint for such a market. Even when he made an attempt... such as in these paintings of a young girl at the doorway... a subject any other "Little Dutch Master" would have rendered in a cloyingly cute manner... certain to attract the buyer...

Rembrandt was unable to avoid attempting something a bit more profound... a sense of the personality or character of the sitter... and a certain brooding meditation upon the temporal nature of youth and beauty.

**********

All these thoughts came to bear as I stumbled upon the sculptor, Ana Maria Pacheco. Ana Maria is a sculptor, painter, print-maker who was born in Brazil and works and resides in the UK. Her work is partly inspired by the troubled period of Brazil's history, culminating in the takeover by the military junta in 1964, to which she was an eyewitness. Pacheco is best known for her multi-figure groups of polychrome (painted) sculptures carved from wood. These often deal with social/political issues as well as questions of spirituality and mortality. The works themselves are at once darkly sinister, touching, and comic. 

I brought up Malraux's comments and the notion of the church as patron of the arts for the simple reason that Pacheco's strongest work is undoubtedly a multi-figural installation created for Salisbury Cathedral, entitled The Longest Journey... which undoubtedly alludes to the journey from life to death... and whatever (if anything) awaits beyond.

Pacheco's choice of medium: polychromed wood, alludes to the Spanish/Latin-American tradition of polchromed retables or altarpieces:

-Retable of the Cathedral of Toledo, Spain

-Retable of Turibius of Mongrovejo

-Retable of the Cathedral of Iglesia de Santa Ana in Maca The simplistic forms of her carvings suggest the wood sculpture of the German Expressionists, such as E.L. Kirchner:

They also offer a nod in the direction of the simple and honest work of folk artists... in a manner not unlike the work of Elie Nadelman:

Perhaps most importantly, Pacheco's work employs a clarity of form and simplicity of gesture commonly found in the work of medieval sculptors:

This simplicity was demanded by the Church that looked to the visual arts as a means of conveying the essential narratives of the faith to a largely illiterate audience. Malraux speaks of true "originality" as having little to do with novelty or striving for the latest astonishing effects. In contrast to many sworn-Modernists, Malraux recognized that in spite of the usual accusations of conservatism and reactionary tendencies, an artist may actually build upon the past... and even ignore the present... even entire generations ... and still achieve work of real merit... even genius.

Pacheco avoids novelty and ornate or convoluted pseudo-intellectual complexities. Rather, she employs a "traditional" visual language capable of reaching an audience unfamiliar with the intellectual Onanism of Post-Modernist art and theory.  Her installation, The Longest Journey, is quite touching in its representation of the waiting figures... men, women, and children. The boat suggests the crossing over to an unknown shore... whether this be the crossing of the River Styx undertaken by Dante in the Comedia... Max Beckmann's iconic Modernist masterpiece, Departure, to which the sculpture almost surely pays homage...

...or any number of folk tales and songs that allude to going down to the river and waiting to cross over to the other side. Pacheco's work is worth exploring. Beyond The Longest Journey she has created memorable images of the often sinister powers that be and their abuse of those who they lord over:

These sculpture... in both form and subject... recall certain paintings by the American painter, George Tooker:

Perhaps intriguing to the literary lovers are Pacheco's allusions to various literary/poetic narratives... such as Aeneas fleeing the destroyed city of Troy and carrying his elderly father, Anchises... an image implied by Pacheco's Shadows of the Wanderer:

And then there is the Dark Night of the Soul, an image of suffering, brutality, and torture that is both a response to The Martyrdom of Saint Sebastian by the Pollaiuolo brothers, and the great poem by the visionary Spanish poet, San Juan della Cruz:

You can explore more of Pacheco's work at her website: http://www.prattcontemporaryart.co.u...ria-pacheco-2/

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net