mouthporn.net
#racism – @spockvarietyhour on Tumblr
Avatar

Spockvarietyhour

@spockvarietyhour / spockvarietyhour.tumblr.com

Danny, He/Him. former 80s-90s kid. Lots of Scifi and way too much media, too many gifs. It's Not a Stargate Rewatch Rewatch (SGU S2), V The Series (1984) Various other media. ko-fi.com/spockvarietyhour
Avatar
“The way that racism operates aesthetically is to neglect or, in extreme cases, erase whoever is not white. In the 1950s, for example, Kodak measured and calibrated skin tones in still photography using a reference card featuring “Shirley,” a white model dressed in high-contrast clothing. Ultimately, Shirley ended up being the standard for image processing in North American photography labs. It didn’t matter if the photo in question contained entirely black people; Shirley’s complexion was still treated as the ideal. Kodak’s film was so bad at capturing the different hues and saturations of black skin that when director Jean Luc Godard was sent on an assignment to Mozambique in 1977, he flat-out refused to use Kodak on the grounds that its stock was “racist.” Only when the candy and furniture industries began complaining that they couldn’t accurately shoot dark chocolate and brown wood furniture did Kodak start to improve its technology.”
Avatar
Avatar
alex51324

So, the NDA signed by producers of The Apprentice just expired, and one of them has published a tell-all article. Most of the article is about how they used standard reality-TV tricks to portray Trump as being wealthy and intelligent, when in reality he was, and is, a deeply indebted buffoon.

The money shot, however, comes when Trump and the producers are preparing for climax of the final episode, when the winner will be decided.

Per the FCC's rules for game shows, producers could not be involved in deciding who would be fired each week, or who would ultimately win: it had to be Trump's decision alone, like contestants and viewers were told it was. The producers could, and did, give him a presentation about the strengths and weaknesses of the contestants each time he had to make a decision. These were recorded, in case questions ever arose about whether the producers had crossed the line.

So, for the final episode, there were two contestants remaining. Both were men, one white, the other Black. They'd both done well in the final challenge of the competition. As the producers were summarizing the points for an against each candidate, this happened:

“Yeah,” he says to no one in particular, “but, I mean, would America buy a n— winning?” Kepcher’s pale skin goes bright red. I turn my gaze toward Trump. He continues to wince. He is serious, and he is adamant about not hiring Jackson.

In the finished program, Trump chose the white contestant as the winner.

(Four years later, Trump would propagate the baseless conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was not a native-born US citizen and therefore had not legitimately won the presidency.)

The article also describes how women working on the production faced discrimination based on whether or not Trump wanted to look at them while they did their jobs:

While leering at a female camera assistant or assessing the physical attributes of a female contestant for whoever is listening, he orders a female camera operator off an elevator on which she is about to film him. “She’s too heavy,” I hear him say. Another female camera operator, who happens to have blond hair and blue eyes, draws from Trump comparisons to his own Ivanka Trump. “There’s a beautiful woman behind that camera,” he says toward a line of 10 different operators set up in the foyer of Trump Tower one day. “That’s all I want to look at.”

And there's a third anecdote where he pressures a woman producer to break the FCC rules, while being casually misogynistic toward a contestant:

Trump corners a female producer and asks her whom he should fire. She demurs, saying something about how one of the contestants blamed another for their team losing. Trump then raises his hands, cupping them to his chest: “You mean the one with the …?” He doesn’t know the contestant’s name. Trump eventually fires her.

This information is pretty unlikely to persuade anyone who wasn't already persuaded by any of the other things Trump has done and said, which would for anyone else be a career-defining scandal. But it is a useful reminder of who we're dealing with.

(Link is to Slate, an x-number-of-free-articles-a-month site, but the incognito window trick works.)

Important update to this story:

This journalist has a plan for how to get the boardroom tape of Trump discriminating against Kwame Jackson on the basis of his race, while referring to him by the n-word. (Note: the producer who wrote the original story says he thinks the tapes are not recoverable, but he doesn't say why he thinks that.)

First, this journalist has traced where the tapes would be: the production company has changed hands since then, but now belongs to Jeff Bezos/the Amazon conglomerate.

Secondly, he has checked with the FCC, and what the producer described in his article would be illegal game-show fixing--the exact thing that the producers were trying to avoid being accused of, when they decided to record these sessions.

Thirdly, he has ascertained that either the FCC itself, or the Senate committee that oversees the FCC, could demand these tapes--because of the game-show fixing, not the the specific word--and even subpoena them if they are not produced.

So, if you think it might be beneficial for the public to see a tape of Donald Trump saying the N-word while committing a crime, you can reach out to either the FCC, or the Senate Commerce Committee to say so!

The chair of the Senate Commerce Committee is Maria Cantwell, she is a Democrat out of Washington, and here's her website.

Here is the FCC's contact page, and here's a list of the Senate Commerce Committee members. If you happen to be a constituent of one of them, they'd be a great person to reach out to about your recent but intense commitment to uprooting racism in game shows!

(Another Slate article; the incognito window trick still works.)

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
wilwheaton
America is living through a reign of white supremacist terror, but we won’t bring ourselves to call it that, treat it that way, or hold accountable the provocateurs in the Republican Party who are catalyzing and instigating the attacks. You might be forgiven for missing the significance of the weekend news that a gunman who fits the profile of domestic right-wing terrorist – white, male, 21 years old – allegedly targeted Black people and opened fire in a Jacksonville Dollar General store, killing three people of color before committing suicide. It’s easy and not entirely erroneous to drop this incident in the bucket of runaway gun crimes in an America with few gun regulations. But it’s the wrong bucket to put in it. This is the runaway violence of white supremacists against minority groups happening in tandem with the rise of a radical right-wing Republican Party, but with little public acknowledgment or understanding of what’s really happening.
Avatar

Computers damaged in the Computer Centre Incident at Sir George Williams University. Arising from a conflict over student charges of racism, there were sit-ins, occupations, negotiations, hearings, culminating on February 11 in a fire that destroyed the Computer Center. There was $2 million damage to the Computer Center; 97 people were arrested (69 were SGW students), and 12 minors were charged in juvenile court. February, 1969 [Concordia University Archives]

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
wilwheaton
After the 2014 police killing of Laquan McDonald, Chicago officials appointed a commission to study policing in the city. When the commission issued its report two years later, Steve Bogira of the Chicago Reader noticed that the report bore striking similarities to a report issued after the death of Daniel Claiborne, a 70-year-old Black man, also at the hands of police. Both reports, Bogira noted, found that residents in the city’s minority neighborhoods were frequently subjected to illegal stop and frisks. Both found that Black and Latino residents reported frequent verbal harassment and humiliation from police. Both reports found that police misconduct complaints were almost never sustained, and often weren’t thoroughly investigated. The Claiborne report found a 43-point disparity between the percentage of the city’s population that was Black and the percentage of Black people shot by police. The McDonald report found a 42-point disparity. Here’s the punchline: the Claiborne report was issued in 1972—43 years before the McDonald report. Over nearly a half century, very little had changed.
Avatar
Avatar
txttletale

it’s darkly funny that every other country in europe with a brutal and inhumane asylum system is completely changing their tune on ukrainian refugees because They’re White This Time but the UK is like lol. lmao. sorry guys you’re still on racism 1? we’re on racism 2. our refugee policy is still operating on HP-lovecraft-the-welsh-aren’t-white rules. oh you’re white and christian? cool story come back when your name is Bellingsworth Imperialism-Terfcroft and your ancestors caused a south asian colonial famine

the funniest part is that all the right-wing columnists who’ve spent the last 22 consecutive years scaremongering about the dangers of e.g. syrian refugees are now all shocked and appalled that the nightmarish system they lovingly campaigned for is working exactly as intended

The UK is so Galaxy Brain on xenophobia and racism that we’ve got an entire Tory of cabinet full of Brown politicians—most of them the children of refugees and immigrants—being like “All Hail the Glorious Empire! My hobbies include stock trading, fox hunting, and deporting Latvian cleaning ladies. Keep Britain for the British, and God Bless Margaret Thatcher! #IHeartBrexit” without like… the slightest hint of irony or awareness.

It’s as if there’s some Faustian bargain you can strike where bigotry will never personally hold you back, so long as you agree to be as xenophobic as possible towards anybody else on this Great Isle who has ever once considered seasoning their food.

Avatar

An entire report on racism in the health care system of BC had to be written because of some evil nurses playing a version of "the price is right" in emergency rooms where they tried to guess the blood alcohol level of indigenous people coming in seeking medical treatment. That kind of racialized "oh they're just addicts looking for a fix" mix of malice and medical neglect has killed multiple people. Including Brian Sinclair and Joyce Echaquan. Nurses are no less culpable for murdering vulnerable people than others with institutional power over vulnerable and marginalized people and I'm fed up with people relying on boogeyman stereotypes they parrot about drug users and mentally ill people to justify institutional violence.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
wilwheaton
Judge Donna Scott Davenport oversees a juvenile justice system in Rutherford County, Tennessee, with a staggering history of jailing children. She said kids must face consequences, which rarely seem to apply to her or the other adults in charge.

This woman needs to be kicked off the bench and disbarred. Then, she must be prosecuted for abuse of power.

Source: i.redd.it
Avatar
Avatar
alwaysbewoke

there are no good cops

I am sharing this to remind myself to search this up later to verify this. If anyone has any info about this story, please feel free to let me know!

THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE EXPOSURE OF THIS ABUSE

Avatar
Avatar
gahdamnpunk

Why can’t women just dress how they want ffs

It’s not just misogyny, it’s racism and islamophobia, don’t leave those out

I can see how this could be interpreted as Islamophobia.  But the blurb above does not tell the whole story.  The whole story is that Quebec has a law that NO religious symbols can be worn or displayed in any government work-place.  So this is a policy that treats all equally - religious and non-religious alike - and separates church and state so that there is no endorsement of any religion.  Some people think that this infringes on religious liberty, but in fact, people can still be religious if they want - they just can’t display it as a representative of the government.  Way to go Quebec!

I’m sorry that’s literally the definition of Islamophobia, like wearing a head covering is a major part of her religion. it hurts no one and has been around for hundreds of years. Allowing a government worker to wear something which is apart of their faith isn’t endorsing shit other than personal freedom. And I fucking bet you the law isn’t enforced on Christian’s who wear cross necklaces but is enforced on religions like Sikhism and Islam. Like I’m sorry to tell you but this does infringe on people’s religious rights and should not exist in the first place. Overall you are really misguided but then again you have the url noreligionisgood and probably don’t go out of your way to educate yourself on the religions you dunk on

Perhaps banning people for wearing items relating to their faith is… bad? Perhaps pretending like it’s being applied “equally” when everyone knows they are targeting specific head coverings worn by people of specific Faith’s and cultures is…. islamophobic?

Avatar
rebellum

It’s literally a law that only affects non-christians. There are schools and stuff that have giant crosses, there is LITERALLY a giant cross on Mt. Royale, but it’s not considered religious by the government bc it’s “part of quebec’s history.” Don’t fucking praise the quebec government its horribly Islamophobic attitude.

How do people not grasp that laws like Quebec’s directly target someone whose faith includes wearing a hijab or a yarmulke or a dastar, while leaving Christians completely unaffected? A Christian wearing a cross necklace is not an element of their worship or beliefs, and a necklace can be worn beneath clothing.

Heads up: if a law applies to everyone, but it’s very clear that the law requires CERTAIN groups to sacrifice more than, say, the dominant group? That law is discriminatory. Y'all remember the argument of “gay men and lesbian women have the right to marry someone of the opposite binary gender, so laws specifying marriage as between one man and one woman aren’t discrimination! They apply to straight AND gay people equally!”? You understood then how it was wrong and discriminatory to have a law that didn’t affect the majority group but directly affected a minority group.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net