Commas Sleeping in the Grass

TCR | 2014.05.19

Stephen, cracking HIMSELF up with the way over the top farce.

Ah, those moments when his real personality pokes through.

X

"a star shines on the hour of our meeting"

This is exactly the kind of thing that needs to be said right now, so props to Colbert.  The aim of terrorism is exactly what it says on the label—terrorizing people.  The more the response to terrorist acts is, ‘We’re not scared,’ the weaker and more ineffective the attackers are.

He gets it.

actually so powerful

praise this post

what doesn’t this man get right..seriously.

How do YOU view the Republican party survey.

Did you know “IN THE CLOSET” is a sexual orientation but asexual is not?

Stephen Colbert, king of nerds.

Mr. Franco, that was ill-advised.

beeishappy:

TCR | 2013.02.25 [x]

My lovely followers, please follow this blog immediately!

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

^

(mic drop)

boom

whoa.

Damn.

I’m going to fucking memorize this shit.

“When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.”

yes.

ba dum tsk

Got ‘em.

idjitscarryon:

steezinonyouhoes:

LMFAO OMG FOREVER REBLOG 

THIS IS TOO RELATABLE 

#THATCOLLEGELIFE 

WE HAVE BEEN $5 FOOT WRONGED

Via/Follow The Absolute Greatest Posts…ever.

(via/follow The Absolute Funniest Posts Blog)