mouthporn.net
#racism – @shihlun on Tumblr
Avatar

zero focus

@shihlun / shihlun.tumblr.com

零焦点
Avatar
reblogged

Chocolat (Claire Denis, 1988)

Avatar
shihlun
There are two ways to interpret this statement. The fact that the scene immediately follows Aimee's and Protee's encounter implies that the horizon serves as a metaphor for the impossibility of a real connection between Africans and Europeans. In the felicitous words of Adam Muller: 'The horizon, after all, and particularly as Marc explains it, is the site at which the land and the air reconcile; it is a site in principle only, remaining forever unreachable, lying at the very limit of our ability to perceive it' (2006: 746). As with land and air, a reconciliation of (ex-)colonizer and (ex-)colonized is conceivable only on a theoretical level.
In my opinion, however, there is still another interpretation that takes into account the film's contemporary framework. The horizon, as Marc explains it, is an optical illusion that pretends to be a (geographical) reality. The encounter between the adult France and William 'Mungo' Park, the man who offers her a ride in his car, shows that the notion of race linked to ideas of culture and national belonging is itselfan illusion. What France sees in Mungo is an illusion based on the colour of his skin, just as his reaction to France ones much to the same delusion. What they believe they have seen serves as a characterization that does not match the actual person. It is, in my opinion, not the impossibility of a union between Europe and Mrica that the metaphor of the horizon stands for, but rather the elusive nature of race and identity itself.
Avatar

Toyo Miyatake (1895–1979)

- Untitled (Opening Image from Valediction)

(1944)

In 1942, Franklin D Roosevelt authorised the relocation of more than 100,000 Japanese Americans to internment camps. Miyatake and his family were forced from their home and taken to a camp in Manzanar, California. As photography was outlawed there, Miyatake smuggled in a lens, built a makeshift box camera, and began surreptitiously documenting life at the camp. He was eventually discovered but was allowed to continue shooting, due in part to the support of Ansel Adams, who had photographed Manzanar as a visitor.
Avatar

"Life Magazine, April 19, 1968,” (1995) by Alfredo Jaar

Alongside a reproduction of a photo of (Martin Luther) King’s funeral that ran in “Life,” (Alfredo) Jaar graphically lays bare the nation’s racial divisions at the time of the civil rights leader’s death. In one frame, Jaar represents all of the African Americans at the funeral march with black dots. In a second frame, he shows the white people present as red dots. There are thousands of black dots and only a few dozen red ones.
Avatar

Adam Broomberg & Oliver Chanarin. Shirley, C-41 Photographic Print, 19 x 26 cm, 2012

A young, glamorous Caucasian woman wearing a white fur stole, long black evening gloves and an expensive-looking pearl bracelet is pictured from the waist up in front of a mid-grey background. The way the photograph is framed makes it unclear, but she is surrounded by what appear to be three velvet cushions in primary colours: one blue, one yellow and one red. Her friends call her ‘Shirley’.
The print she inhabits is what is known as a ‘norm reference card’ and the model pictured worked at the Kodak lab in Rochester, NY, in the mid 70′s. When colour film was first developed in the 50’s, Kodak photographed a white female employee , the original Shirley, and distributed a picture of her to all of its colour printing labs across the US. All subsequent cards with different models are known as ‘Shirley cards’, and ‘skin-colour balance’ in photographic printing refers to a process in which your Shirley of choice is used as a basis for measuring and calibrating the skin tones in the photograph.
It was the French director Jean-Luc Godard who made the apparent predilection of Kodak for white skin famous, by refusing to use Kodak film stock on a filming assignment in Mozambique in 1975. He had been invited by the newly-elected Marxist president Samora Machel – alongside Jean Rouche and Ruy Guerra – to formulate a new model for a national television station. Local TV didn’t exist in Mozambique and Machel didn’t want to follow the Western capitalist model. Godard accepted the commission on the condition that he could use video and not film. Kodak film, he insisted, was ‘racist’.
It was only after Kodak’s two biggest consumers, the confectionary and furniture industries, complained that they could not accurately render dark chocolate or dark wood that the chemists in Rochester began to develop an emulsion that could more accurately depict darker colours. Their Gold Max was the first popular consumer film to address this problem: it was initially referred to by Kodak as being able ‘to photograph the details of a dark horse in low light’.
The relationship between the social and the technical, the possibility that politics could be bound up with the material, and the idea of a material unconscious has always interested us. Once, on our way out of Tel Aviv airport after visiting and photographing Yasser Arafat in his compound just weeks before his death, our 5”x 4” film was X-rayed maybe 30-40 times. The Israeli security staff knew where we had been and what we had been up to, and they were deliberately attempting to damage our film. They succeeded. The yellow waves – a result of X-ray damage, evident on the negative and subsequently on the print – is their clumsy signature. What is so interesting is that the film continued to record the narrative of that conflict even after it had been exposed. Film, as a material, it seems, has a longer biography then we imagine and has a political life of its own, one of which we are not entirely in control.
Recently, we accepted a commission to ‘document’ Gabon. We made two trips out there to photograph a rare Bwiti initiation ritual. Months before our departure from the UK, we began to collect unexposed Kodak film stock that had expired between the 1950’s -70’s; film that Godard would have called racist. We took just this film stock along with us on our journey deep into the rainforest to find the most orthodox and authentic version of this ritual. Using outdated chemical processes we succeeded in salvaging just a single frame from the many colour rolls we exposed there. This is it.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net