This show really turned this moment into a way to mock fidget spinners by having the only allistic play with it, juxtaposed humorously with Sam being a “smart guy”, and all y’all can fucking talk about is how ‘cute’ it is, AWW JARED. I love how little this show or fandom cares about autistics. Except I don’t. I hate it.
So I was very disappointed with VegasCon even though my expectations were really low to begin with; I mean I knew what to expect and for the most part I got that. You could say it lived down to my expectations.
I feel like I knew what I was getting into when I bought tickets. I am aware of what is normal and what isn’t when it comes to Sci-Fi conventions. I was telling a friend of mine how much it costs to get a photo and an autograph from Jared or Jensen and his jaw dropped.
“When I met Stan Lee, I got a picture of him and his autograph for free! And he’s way more famous than any of these guys!”
“I know,” I said. “It’s ridiculous.”
I walked in with my eyes open. I knew what was coming. I just underestimated how depressing it was to see how much money Creation Ent. is making off fans and how badly they treat the fans who aren’t able or willing to pay upwards of $500 per convention on tickets alone.
Shoshannah Stern @Shoshannah7 I’m actually standing on a couple apple boxes in this. LOL. #SPNFamily
ugh i just saw an antis gif of jensen anti destiel reaction and im upset :( why does he have to be such a homophobic asshole about his dislike :'(
Because he is a homophobic asshole? That’s my answer, I guess.
Anonymous said:July 16th 2015, 7:37:00 am · a day agoew have you seen the new posts going ass kissing jensen ackles and pretending hes not a homophobe.
I haven’t yet, been off Tumblr for about a week, but I’m so unsurprised tbh.
Anonymous said:July 10th 2015, 3:54:00 am · 7 days agohi, why did you tag jareds quote about ruby with word of god? actor statements arent word of god cause jared isnt the “god” in the fictional world since he has no content control.
Well, for starters, tbh, he does have some control over content? All actors have some control over what they express in canon–where the subtext is strongest, how they interpret the script to push certain ideas–sometimes contrary to what the writer may have intended, even, etc.
But also, “Word of God” is just my catch-all tag for any of SPN’s creators (which yes, include actors, writers, producers, directors, higher-ups, etc.) making definitive statements about how they believe things are in SPNverse.
(My catch-all tag for ANY creators making definitive statements about their particular ‘verses, tbh.)
stab me it would hurt less
[x]
And then Jensen says, calling back to the conversation they'd just had about Rule 63!Castiel, "You mean Zooey Deschanel." because he doesn't have a single protest to making out with Castiel as long as Castiel is played by a woman, wow shocking, because he is and has always been a homophobic douchetruck and anybody's "he just doesn't ship it! he just doesn't like the ship!" projections are completely off the damn mark.
If it's "easier" it's probably because they're thinking in those terms and queerness isn't factoring in to make the whiny straight boys uncomfortable.
Have you seen jareds comment about the impala being the "third main character" idk if this spefici case he was merely joking but I kind of think he is irritated with Mishas popularity? like this isnt the first time, like recently when he said the show is about two brothers and when the audience disagreed he went "yeah and an angel yadayada". The workplace bullying of Misha. Did he even at all publically congratulate Misha on winning the PCA (thathe was also nominated for)?
I hate Jared Padalecki. And he is a fucking asshole to Misha Collins, no matter what emotional reason he has for it—jealousy, whatever. This surprises me absolutely none. Especially if he was in a Brothers panel, where they amp up the “who cares about Castiel” nonsense.
Anonymous said:January 27th 2015, 2:36:00 pm · a day ago there are not many similarties between me and dean but at least we both despise wincest lmao
SAME. Though, since I’m Cas, there are many similarities between me and Dean (though honestly less of them IRL than for in-text Cas, cos I’m more in the know and more passionate about human power differentials and he would be getting his ass handed to him regularly about how kyriarchist he is if I knew him as me!Cas but the writers don’t do that with Cas even though he hasn’t got near the same attachment to that shit Dean does).
But yeah, fuck Wincest. Little will ever please me more than the fact that if you say “Wincest” into a mirror three times, Dean Winchester will come out of it looking outright ill and say, “You know we’re brothers, right?”. :)))
Anonymous said:January 28th 2015, 1:49:00 pm · 16 minutes agoHoly shit, your response to Yael is cr*zy and rude. SPN isn’t your case study, dude. Deal with it.
I don’t care; P.S. fuck your ableism. Her “neutral” ~niceness with complete lack of attention to power imbalances in media representation or fandom dynamics is helping no one and aids silencing people who are trying to. It’s pretty hilaribad that she can condemn “Sam erasure” and “Sam hate” versus Destiel shippers (I know this firsthand) but lol can’t even bring herself to agree people are ignorant when they’re whining about the ~pointlessness of Destiel as good queer rep or whatthefuckever. Very unhelpful choice of cause, and I’m quite sick of seeing it everywhere. She’s like a Just the Brothers wolf in seemingly neutral sheep’s clothing and people like that need to stop.
(Also if she’s straight, she doesn’t belong in this conversation anyway, because HOLY TERRIBLE ALLYING, BATMAN.)
(I don’t even get the point of “case study”, forgive me. Your invalidating nastiness didn’t hit home.)
Anonymous said:January 28th 2015, 3:11:00 pm · 4 hours agoOk realistic talk without arguing over meta, headcanons and assumed subtext: Destiel won´t happen because the show´s on the CW, they have zero queer main characters in each of their shows. Robert Singer is still supposedly the most powerfull person behind spn, he won´t let it happen. And look at how they handled pr and things like Askspn so far. Sure some writers are more baity and fanservicing but the overall arc won´t lead to it. i´m queer, I don´t see it happening, you should let it go, too.
Yes, because so much has changed because people saw the futility of hope and idealism and fighting and instead ‘let it go’.
/shows you the door.
I’m in no mood to entertain any more defeatism today.
Fuck off.
Anonymous said:January 28th 2015, 6:53:00 pm · 21 minutes agoYour Sam//Jared hate is disgusting. Especially when you have Cas/Misha up so goddamn high on a pedestal. But I expect nothing less from a Cas stan
Am I invited to basically say “I know you are but what am I” here. Is my life today that fucking ridiculous. Fuck off.
(I don’t hate Sam. I hate Sam stans. I do hate Jared. For good fucking reason.)
Anonymous said:January 28th 2015, 10:53:00 pm · 5 minutes agobless you
/fond smile. Thank you, sweet anon. This is nice to hear when I’m being called ableist slurs and being reminded I’m not a “good Destiel shipper” like the others. Just, very nice to hear, thank you so much, when people are coming to silence me.
Anonymous said:January 29th 2015, 4:17:00 am · 6 minutes agoWhy should I like Jared Padalecki when he clearly doesn’t like me? I’m a Cas/Misha fan and he continuously deminished their role and popularity of them and their fanbase. I’m a destiel fan and he says homophobic fan-alienting “it’s not what the show is about”, I’m a women and a feminist and he thinks female characters are ruining the show cause if they are their it ~turns to romance eww~. tell me, why should I like him when he just unneccessarily shits over everything that matters to me?
You took the words right out of my mouth, anon. Among the many and varied reasons I hate Jared, those are tops.
Anonymous said:January 29th 2015, 5:35:00 am · 24 minutes agoLove how you are such a bad Cas Stan who Hates Sam when like refuting arguments but Sam Stans can make post Sam is the ONLYLYLLYLY character who forgives and blabla and get every with it. Just da Bruddas and Sam stans get everaway with every bullshit but Cas and Destiel fans OPEN existence is offensive and is so "loud" that even mainstream had to acknowledge us ugh fucking obnxious destiel shippers!! naive and ignorant!
RIGHT? It reminds me a bit of gendered power dynamics, how women are all "hey stop treating us like shit please" and men are like "hey stop existing in ways that don't please us." and they consider this of equal injury.
Anonymous said:January 29th 2015, 5:47:00 am · 12 minutes ago"even pushing it into mainstream places like TV Guide and the Advocate" My favorite part. Ah, Yes, couldn't be that mainstream media simply picked up on the romantic subtext of Dean and Cas' storyline Destiel shippas PUSHED it. Of course. I mean D E S T I E L. Take the l i t add u m n a. Ilumnat add another L and two i. Illuminati. BOOM. The code is cracked. You did it
/laughing. Fucking love it, anon. What gorgeous and accurate satire.
Anonymous said:January 29th 2015, 5:56:00 am · 3 minutes agoCan't believe I'm suppose to be destiel trash when sharing this fandom with people who ship "#wee!cest".
#Weecest is a stain upon the Earth, tbh. And yeah, exactly. Until people are all "lol I'm weecest trash" I refuse to say that about Destiel. I loathe myself for enough without adding that while shippers of the worst things ever are cool with themselves about it.
The Ackles: BurCon '14
From Jensen’s M&G:
Danneel calls JJ “Jaybird”, so Tom says “I wanna play with Jaybird!”
Tom has a crush on JJ
Jensen and Jared joke that JJ has two choices: older and younger (Tom & Shep) "Keep it in the family!"
Fan: “If Jared has a daughter, JJ has three choices!” Jensen: “I’m cool with that”
Danneel sent Jensen a video of JJ during Halloween. Some little boy (4-5 year old) in a Spiderman costume came up to JJ and said something like “nice chicken costume” (Jensen couldn’t remember exactly what). JJ looked at him, pursed her lips, and went “hmph” and turned around Jensen was very proud of her for that
Jensen: “And then Tom came and punched him in the face...no I’m just kidding”
Bless that one fan and their ‘enough of your heteronormative assumptions for your children’ comment, though
love that u tag rdj with rebulicans xD why arent you using that tag for jensen?
Cos I don’t actually know for sure Jensen’s a Republican? And RDJ’s being a Republican was relevant to that specific post.
Anonymous said:November 16th 2014, 6:21:00 am · 5 minutes ago
I believe when Jensen sold his house there was some publish info (I could google it again?) where you could see that he’s registered as a republican. I think there was also once s/t that you cold see that Jared’s wife domnated 1000+ doller for Romney as well, but I only remember this one distantly. it was a while since i saw/read that
Oh, this’ll go over just great!
Yes and yes to what you've said. Yet there are fans who don't actually delve into stuff as deeply as tumblr is wont to do, and they just appreciate the eroticism of Jared P and Jensen A fucking. I think what we often forget is that most people's awareness of things like abuse on screen is vague at best, since it's often not even by tptb seen as such. It's just handled as a trope, a bit of drama, of tension. I don't think spn tptb would say that Sam's and Dean's relationship is abusive, even.
So basically my brother bought me a Jensen Misha photo OP (because he is a douchebag lol) and I think he thought I would sell it or something but I decided to make the best of it so Rose and I came up with the idea of the signs (that was before Jensen made that lonely Jensen tweet lol) and so during the OP I walked up to them and asked them to hold up the signs and look sad. The moment Jensen saw the sign, he laughed and then looked at me and said “You know what, I do miss Jared.” And he had the cutest smile on his face and it was just so fucking cute and dumb and soooo fucking sweet uwu He loves Jared so much and his face in that pic is so adorable aahhhhhh
So…this is really tacky.
Jensen may be oblivious to the fandom—unless he fakes it really well—but Misha is definitely not. He knew exactly why she chose these signs, what she meant by it, and why she didn’t even want to be in the picture with them.
You know what? Hate the character, hate the ship, hell even hate the actor if you must. But do you really feel good about yourself for making another human being—however temporarily—feel like shit? Especially in a situation where he has to stay “on” for the fans’ sakes?
Whether you’re a teenager or in your 20s, 40, whatever—you’ve only got a few decades left before you die. There’s very little time left before your entire consciousness ceases to exist. Will you really be satisfied that you spent so much of your time and effort on this planet being petty, spiteful, hateful, and hurtful?
Shame on you.
#Long post about romance stuff.
I have lots of meta thoughts and some of them are tangential, roll with me on this.
Okay first this is bullshit. Shockingly, since it's defending the misogyny of Jared Padalecki (and Aisha a bit by extension, considering he called her answer brilliant).
Let me take my response to this on Twitter just to illuminate.
EXCEPT BULLSHIT BECAUSE HIS RESPONSE SHOULD HAVE BEEN “IT’S NOT DIFFERENT BECAUSE WE RESPECT WOMEN SAME AS WE RESPECT MEN AND--
—TREAT THEM THE SAME, WE WISH WE HAD EVEN MORE OF AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH WOMEN WHO WEREN’T LOVE INTERESTS SO IT WAS LESS UNCOMFORTABLE"
Then he should have talked about how fucking awesome Charlie, Jody and Krissy and any other character they’ve worked with who isn’t one are
You can fucking talk about how “we hate the love interest part of it too” till you’re blue in the fucking face but the fact is that WE--
—tout the awesome of female characters written as people and not satellites and ask for MORE; he shat on every woman cos satellites exist
He has a responsibility to prop up female actors, not kick them when they’re down cos of what SPN’s sexism's done with them in the past
And he failed. entirely.
Also if you think his answer wasn’t very possibly an abject FAILURE of a smokescreen for not answering the real question behind the question
aka “Are you as sexist to them as the show is to the characters?” by pushing aside female actors for female roles in the show, you’re naive
Because his wife is on record talking about the sexist way she was treated on the show, and so everybody fucking knows it happens
His response endorsed any sexism/queerphobia SPN shows w/ women as love interests, but NEVER men because “the human experience” or w/e.
You can just fucking suck my fucking ass if you don’t get that and want to be like “oh but he’s just like us hating the romance"
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
More to the point, a lot of us hate the romance because of how it’s written, not romance in SPN in general.
And not because romance can’t last but because they are WRITTEN as alternatives to what the show and characters are about
Meg isn’t what Cas is about, and Amelia, Lisa, Cassie, Robin, & Jess aren’t what Sam and Dean are about cos not what the show is about
SIDENOTE, aka tangent: this is really fucking relevant to literally everything people have been saying about how it's "ooc" or whatever for Cas to consider Dean killable if he's a monster.
S7 Cas was in a totally different place mentally than Castiel is now.
We were given a lot of insight into Castel's mindset the past two seasons, that he feels violence is not the answer, that he knows his time as Godstiel was the worst thing ever, that Metatron trying to be God is very much a thing Castiel would stop at any cost because angels playing God is villainous, that Crowley will get the fury for being as callous as he is no matter his cause that Meg didn't.
Castiel, at this point, unlike S7 Cas, would kill himself and anybody else to keep the world safe, but really, really doesn't want to, and doesn't think it's justified for any end; would rather save anybody he can and only kill those beyond repair. Castiel would never be or support another Godstiel, would in fact be on the side of Hester killing him, at this point, and Dean is not exempt from that, even if he's like the closest you can get.
If Dean starts to threaten the world and there's no way to save him, Castiel will kill Dean, but it's still a last resort to end all last resorts (whereas for Sam I'm not sure what reading I'm getting yet; will he contrast that by being too trigger-happy? Not super likely. Or instead by being literally unwilling no matter what to kill Dean? More likely.) What this does, however, is reaffirm that Castiel, apart from that time he needed Crowley or the time he needed Meg, both for very life-saving reasons and absolutely not at all for affection reasons...rejects demons. Castiel knows demons are sometimes beyond salvation, and he hates a lot of them, and he knows the danger of empathizing with them instead of keeping killing them as a possibility. Castiel has come out of the mindset he was in in S7 enough to understand that whatever he did, he's no demon, and his choices matter no matter how the universe is set up, ~Sorry or not: "problem with angels" or not.
S7 Cas, by contrast, was trying really hard to find some way to survive his depression and PTSD, the self-loathing it inspired--especially with Sam's Hell "madness", with any coping mechanisms he could, and Meg, I'll bet you literally anything I own, played Sorry with him the same way he did with Dean, and gave him that same kind of speech he gave Dean in 7x21; she took advantage of his incredible capacity for empathy to create the mindset Zerbe talks about in that post to absolve herself in his eyes, false identified with him, and kept it up even through 8x17 (contrary to acting like herself a bit more in front of someone she knows she can't manipulate anymore cos he'll see right the fuck through it, Sam, with "you hit a dog, why" and "puked in my mouth a little" and the undeserved entitlement of "you guys didn't look for me, like, once?").
Paired with the disdain she had for his neuroatypicality, using his trigger word the way she did Sam's in S1 (which btw butterflydm is like the one tidbit you missed in your Hellatus Meta, "freak" "Hellhounds" "Alastair" "useless"), it was a very effective manipulation to get "power where she can get it", but by S8 Castiel was starting to come out of it, which is why his fondness level had toned way down in S8 (while hers has gone up), and he doesn't agree with her about like, anything, at all, except the bare minimum to keep her complacent and pay his debt (he owes her, his words). As Zerbe said, after he came out of it--and even before, tbh, once he had some other way to cope--he would have killed her once she'd flipped on them again. But Cas doesn't kill allies until they become more trouble than they're worth, even if he disagrees with a lot of their shit, and he has a penchant for fondness that defies all logic when it comes to people who've just seemingly helped him.
So naturally, in S7, he wouldn't have as readily killed someone who cared about him/he cared about (no matter how little), when he was in the "Meg and everybody else including me are all products of a shitty system and don't deserve to die for that" mindset she fed him a lot of the time.
And naturally in S9, he would. Partially because, as much as I will literally always maintain that Meg was Evil till the end (especially, as with Spike, in the way she treated her "unicorn"), Dean is going to be worse, Dean is going to be a force to be reckoned with in a way even Meg never was; Dean's going to go all Faith Lehane, "I got a bit...dangerous for a while." enjoying the empty fun of Evil with Crowley (his Mayor? Maybe.), and unlike Meg, he's going to come back, but someone still is going to have to be ready for him to resist that, and if he does, Cas is gonna have to pull a Buffy and go after him, because that's what they do.
"It takes a great deal of bravery to stand up to your enemies, but a great deal more, to stand up to your friends." One of the most Slytherin things Dumbledore ever said about a Gryffindor, and one of Cas's primary leading philosophies right now ("punish him Castiel or we're gone" or whatever Hannah said in 9x22...). It is not more loving to forgive anything a person will do, I agree with Zerbe, and to suggest it is (that whole "when's a monster not a monster" mentality I so loathe as a person who used to believe it and dated "demons") is to feed abuse culture by suggesting someone you love can never be dangerous enough, never be monstrous enough, to fight back against justifiably or leave because they are Not Good no matter how you feel.
What you should be paying attention to instead is that even under Meg's spell (mentally, not literally) in S7, Castiel would not protect her as she wanted (and she ditched him for it) when he was close to death (by Hester), he would not fight, but, as Zerbe pointed out, they're making Dean the one who tests him; Castiel wants his mojo to save Dean, wants to live to help the man he loves, wants to fight for Dean (and Dean's humanity) in every capacity no matter how close to death he is.
End tangent, because the one-sided bullshit of Meg/Cas is over anyway, and was never canon, not at all, because Castiel said no and only ever showed her the barest affection as it was, because as I said, Meg as a person wasn't something Castiel was ever actually about.
Dean/Cas is still on the cards; they're who matter, because Dean is.
But back to Jared:
Jo’s love instead of just lust is not what Dean is about, Anna’s ‘destroy whatever—incl. Sam—starts the Apocalypse’ isn’t what it’s about
Romance doesn’t fail on Supernatural because ‘romance is always gonna fail on Supernatural, incl. Dean/Cas, cos it’s always tragic'
Romance fails on Supernatural thus far because the romances (& women!) were written contrary to the story instead of in harmony w/ its aims
If women were ever fucking written as consistently aligning w/ the aims of the narrative (like Cas is), het romance'd fit right in for Sam
(And we already have a Cas for Dean, so no need to add another woman specifically for romance that fits in the story, cos lol, they DO)
God I get so angry at people who are fucking missing the point of why Jared is WRONG
Yeah, okay sure, whatever, Jared doesn’t like romances like us, but the response to that is not to tout the greatness of male-driven shows
The sexist, misogynist response to that is to do that, to tout how great it is that SPN is male-driven and women are rare cos no romance
The feminist response to “boo romance” is to tout the greatness of characters and arcs for women that aren’t “love interest” and boost more
Get it? That’s what he did wrong. He took the opportunity to shit on women cos romance instead of to ask for more women without romance.
But on another note, Ruby WAS what the show was about and they purposefully made her a villain and an obstacle so she had to die
Ruby or Anna would’ve been a great Cas counterpart for Sam, a defecting demon or humanist angel to form romance that aligns with the show
They /were/ what the show's about, saving people (demons were people once), recruiting angels (who only hated people cos of Heavenly brainwashing)
And they purposefully curbed the characters into being bound for death as obstacles to what the boys needed to do, when romance WOULD’ve fit
So like, fucking eat me.
Eat me. About Jared being some sort of assenting party about women on SPN. Just fucking eat my ass.
(P.S. Charlie wasn't a love interest. Charlie had a love interest. Big fucking difference. Also, lol so much lol that you think it's justified that female characters who are not just love interests but ever had any romantic storyline at all are "annoying" to you or Jared or anybody else, or that you think his discomfort at acting with women who're "eye-sexy" or whatever would justify his throwing the possibility of the show being at all female-driven/queer-driven under the fucking bus. Those storylines weren't one-sided, but I don't see Jared talking about how dudes in SPN are involved in romance too.)
I responded to this on Jezebel. I'm sorry you're angry, but you're also mistaken.
First of all, thank you for taking the time to clarify your position.
This is one of the first times I’ve been exposed to Internet backlash of this magnitude. While you have more experience as a public figure, I can empathize with the overwhelming feeling of strangers passing judgement.
Respectfully, however, I don’t think that I am mistaken.
I couldn’t find specifically what the reference to Jezebel related to, but I did find your statement made initially on Facebook Link here, for those who are interested. I will make my response to that.
To begin, for those who don’t know, your response was largely made in reaction to my commentary on comments made at the recent Nerd HQ/Supernatural panel at SDCC, and the subsequent fan-wide discussions that it catalyzed. My post is here.
Continued under the cut.
During Sunday’s Nerd HQ panel at Comic-Con with the cast of ‘Supernatural,’ an audience member asked if the dynamic on set changed for the male dominated cast on episodes with a female guest star. The responses she got from star Jared Padalecki and panel moderator Aisha Tyler perfectly, and problematically, demonstrated why the show continues to be criticized by fans for its treatment of female and queer characters.
Before she could even finish her question, Jared joked about two of his co-stars not really counting as men- “We also have Mark Sheppard and Misha [Collins],” to which Aisha added something to the effect of “things we don’t know about Misha.” It was a little hard to hear. Jared has purposely misgendered people before to make a “joke” or be demeaning, (one example being a tweet about Justin Bieber). Statements like these are sexist and transphobic and represent the idea of masculinity which ‘Supernatural’ seems to buy into- that only masculine men are real men and that masculinity is defined by what you can’t be (i.e. feminine) rather than what you are.
The questioner rolled her eyes, clearly not amused.
Jared then mentioned his wife, Genevieve Cortese, whom he met during the show’s fourth season when she played the demon Ruby. “Well, we all know what happened to me; I ended up marrying her. So I can’t do that again.”
Obviously not. The rest of his answer is where we start heading off the cliff.
“I don’t think it makes it too different. I think it’s easy in a male-dominated cast to not have to…there are so many shows that deal with romance that there needs to be a show that doesn’t deal with romance. That’s why we have ‘Supernatural,’ to deal with all the other parts of…to deal with the many other facets of human nature and existence, even in a bizarre way. But we don’t have to worry about, ‘Oh, there’s a scene where this-;’ We just kinda make a show about something else.”
So…women on your show could only ever be romantic interests? You don’t mind having zero lead female characters because then you don’t have to worry about getting bogged down by girly romance? Does romance not exist for men in the absence of women? It’s such a strange and dismissive answer.
Over the past nine seasons, there have been several reoccurring female characters whose stories were not about romance, including Abbadon, Ellen, Meg, Pamela, Bela, Charlie, Jody, and Naomi. (Note: Only Jody and Charlie are still alive, and Charlie- our only canonically queer character- is currently in another dimension.)
Speaking of female characters who have been primarily romantic interests, we mainly have Lisa and Amelia, both of whom were ditched by the brothers in order to focus on the family business. So yes, the Winchesters have each yet to have a lasting relationship and the nature of their work is clearly what has gotten in the way. It seems impossible for either of them to have a relationship at this point that is separate from hunting.
BUT, luckily, men do not need women in order to experience romance! For a long time now, the show’s most significant and popular romantic narrative has been male/male- the relationship between Dean Winchester and the angel Castiel. As a supernatural being, Castiel has been intertwined with the brothers’ work from the moment we met him and he has stuck around, on and off, for six season. The major barrier between Dean and romantic relationships therefore doesn’t apply to Cas. It is homophobic and biphobic to assume that romance isn’t possible among men, and considering the popularity of the Destiel relationship, it was offensive of Jared to ignore that possibility.
And then Aisha Tyler jumped in and everything went from bad to worse.
“The thing that I feel is so great about ‘Supernatural’ despite the monsters and everything is that it’s a show about the interior relationships of men, the interior lives of men, and it’s very rare that the relationships are emotional, they’re complex, they’re dynamic. And when you’re looking at a show where it’s all about male/female relationships, that’s the focus, but to see these guys that are struggling with their filial relationships and their intermasculine relationships is really unusual on TV and I think the show does that very, very well. And if you like guys, you’re curious about men, or you have a guy in your life, it’s a great show to watch to understand not all men, but these men. These characters I think are really well-written guys.”
Where to begin?
1) Ah yes, the precious, white, cisgender menz, they are so rare on television and often so two-dimensional.
2) Who needs ladies when you’ve got men with a co-dependent sibling relationship?
3) Are you a lady who likes men? Are you curious about men? Got a man in your life? To understand these delicate creatures, watch this show about men who use misogynistic language!
Are you fucking kidding me?!
If there’s one thing you need to know about ‘Supernatural’ and its fandom, it’s in this quote from a recent article on The Daily Dot. “Most of the constant refrain of criticism stemmed from [Supernatural’s] status as the whitest, manliest, straightest show ever to have inexplicably cultivated a fandom that is its demographic polar opposite.”
News flash: No one watches ‘Supernatural’ to learn about men. The fandom hasn’t carried the show to its 10th season because of its masculinity. Sam and Dean being “manly” is so far down the list of why people watch the show and why so many identify with it in such strong ways that it’s almost laughable.
Most of the frustration fans feel comes from the fact that the people who work on ‘Supernatural’ still don’t seem to understand why the show has the particular audience it does and what that audience actually likes about the show. Without that understanding, they keep making decisions about the characters that keep earning them criticism. ‘Supernatural’ sees itself as an essentially masculine show, and one that feels the need to constantly prove that point. But their focus on masculinity is seriously limiting their possibilities for character development, something essential for a long-running series.
Fans want to see these characters grow, but when you limit the type of people they interact with so they only see versions of themselves, and when you put restrictions on who is available for romantic storylines and who is not, you run seriously low on options to expand these characters’ world, and therefore their storylines.
"How dare you insult this poor, defenseless, privileged, white, able bodied, cishetero actor when he says shitty things! I can’t believe this! I’m sick of people being offended when he consciously says offensive things or doesn’t think about what comes out of his mouth! It’s horrible that he has to deal with this kind of abuse from a small percentage of people on the internet whose words will never even reach his ears! I don’t care if they have to deal with the effects of bigoted mindsets like his every day, he shouldn’t have to deal with the fifteen minutes of vitriol from his supposed fandom! God, why are people such inconsiderate, rude assholes? He should be able to shirk any sense of societal responsibility he holds in order to express his opinions, even if they are shitty!"