@ t100 writers
Don’t act like you’re this beacon of queer rep when all you do is oversexualize queer girls and make queer boys act like brothers. Fuck you.
Why can we have a CL sex scene, but not even have Miller kiss his boyfriend when he’s sending him off into battle?
Why does Clarke need a fucking sex scene to prove she’s bi but miller doesn’t even get to kiss his bf?
IF YOU ARE OKAY WITH ROMANTIC AFFECTION AND SEXUALITY BETWEEN TWO WOMEN BUT NOT BETWEEN TWO MEN, YOU ARE HOMOPHOBIC
The last part of this post (presumably directed at The100′s creators) is about all the good stuff this post has in it. @ OP (and anyone reblogging this): Don’t act like you’re this beacon against homophobia/heterosexism, when you weaponize mistreatment of gay men against wlw protagonists and imply having a first priority bisexual protagonist’s arc include sex scenes is somehow sexist/mistreating women, while also, esp. in OP’s case, treating it as a factual conclusion that the het-read platonic male and female protagonists are in love, despite all evidence to the contrary. Ask yourself: Why does chastising JR for this require implying he’s doing something wrong by exhibiting Clarke’s sexual experiences with women. Why does that need to have anything to do with Miller/Bryan for you. Why are you implying in this post that if they don’t have the kiss, they shouldn’t have the bisexual protagonist’s sex scenes or it must be some sort of female objectification.
Then let me know: are your motives as transparent to you as they are to me?