mouthporn.net
#bellamy x clarke – @selfihateyouithink on Tumblr
Avatar

round and round the winchesters go

@selfihateyouithink / selfihateyouithink.tumblr.com

I am an Angel of the Lord who probably would do well in finance, and I don't like to do what people expect. Thirty-four. White USian. Autistic, anxious depressive (with PTSD). Nonbinary/genderqueer (demigirl). She/they pronouns. Sex-indifferent pan gay greyromantic demisexual. INFP/ISFP. Survivor. Socialist. Feminist. Relativist. Agnostic atheist. Struggling college student (yes, still). Honest misanthrope (because humans are works of art but humanity is tainted by its hatreds, conceits, and deceits), almost never neutral (because the status quo isn't), and unapologetic slasher 'til death do I stop. I am things, I question things, I like things, I hate things, I watch things, I read things, I write things, I say things, I do things. Things happen on this blog.
Avatar
Avatar
reyairia

Hello, my name is Strong Female Character, and my secret power is reaffirming the heterosexuality of the disproportionately male cast.

Hello, my name is Slash Shippers, and my job is to dismiss female characters that might get in the way of my non-canon ship and then insist that what I’m doing is called activism.

Avatar
fozmeadows

Hello, my name is Common Sense, and I’m here to point out that neither of these problems would exist if we had more narratives featuring multiple queer and/or female characters; that straight women, while undeniably subject to restrictive and stereotyped portrayals, still get more mainstream and varied roles than queer anybody, such that dismissing queer fandom’s understandable desire for self-validation as sexist is really gross; that the aforementioned lack of female characters is doubly damning to those of us who want and need to see more queer ladies; and that it’s hypocritical to blame fandom for not having a higher opinion of lone, often poorly or inconsistently written female characters than their creators do, being as how our reception of those characters is dependent on their ability to make them three-dimensional in the first place, and especially not when so many fics still go out of their way to revive fridged women or give them better arcs than their source material ever did.

Foz nailed it, thank you Foz.

reyairia: “Hello, this (terribly written) female character is only there as a tool to reinforce heterosexism and homophobia--often while straining consent to the breaking point, subtly enough that (casual) viewers in rape culture will still see it as het (attraction), having her assaults/harassment be made/kept ambiguous and called strength by the majority.” freckles: “Hello, let’s blame fans for valid emotional reactions to this, while subtly validating homophobia’s erasive standards of ‘canon’, with an attitude suggesting it’s gratuitously sexist to prioritize ‘not real’ queerness over ‘real’ (straight) women who tend to follow the pattern rey suggested of, again, being a tool to reinforce heterosexism/homophobia.” foz: “Hello, let’s turn blame where it belongs. Not on fans, with valid emotional reactions to (terribly written) near-singularly heterosexism/homophobia-enforcing straight female characters, in a way that victim-blames for the effects of institutional homophobic erasure and invalidates those who react that way if the ‘ship’ isn’t ‘canon’ enough--subtly weaponizing homophobic gaslighting that means queer ships are almost never that, but on the creators for lack of giving us anything else, and thus often forcing us to choose between prioritizing women and prioritizing queer pairings, and making our emotions for both fight themselves like this, while we also fight each other’s emotions like this. Not to mention, many (while having those fights) try to salvage what we can of both women and queer pairings anyway.”

Me: (rephrasing) No one’s saying it’s okay to hate fictional women, that’s not what’s being said here (though I would argue sometimes it should be said, it’s not always the end of the fucking moral world if you hate a fictional woman or two, especially considering the way they’re presented by sexist creators). People are saying the different standard created and upheld for queer ‘non-canon’ ships here, regarding emotional reactions to female characters who’re ‘in the way’ (and it’s fairly often more complicated than that), perpetuates homophobia, because of the safe-to-say institutionally validated assumption that most ‘canon’ ships will not be queer and female characters will often be employed solely as a way to remind queer fans of that. People are saying that there is a valid reason to have a negative emotional reaction to the character employed that way, as she often represents little but heterosexism/homophobia (especially after repeated fights of this very nature with people like freckles make it clear to us that nobody even cares that those things exist in her case), and that since heterosexism/homophobia maintains a standard where every woman being “dismissed” or whatever is a straight woman and every ‘non-canon’ ship is queer** (and thus generally devalued and dismissed), people who feel safe in condemning people for this emotional reaction are being functionally homophobic by wording the justifiably exasperated ‘don’t hate women for x’ this way. (**The institutional exception proves the rule in this case. The relative lack of something like, idk, hating/demonizing/dismissing the lesbian Commander Lexa in The100 [because she’s complex, causes conflict, and most of all, gets ‘in the way’ of a ‘non-canon’ m/f ‘ship’ by being half of a canon ship with gay feels on both sides--if not fully a resolution and relationship yet] as a hugely widespread and prevalent standard for many fictional women, condemned by many as habitual of shipping in a specific way... ...is not because people statistically like lesbians better [they do their best to make up for the lesbians not around as much as straight women are to be ‘dismissed’, by hating Lexa even harder, trust me], but because no one ever believes m/f is ‘non-canon’, even and especially while f/f is canon, because of, AGAIN, institutional heterosexism and homophobic erasure and fandom’s expectant validation of the double standard created by that. Statistically, few [myself not included] treat Blarkes this way for how they react to Lexa [despite her being a rare lesbian antagonist, allowed to be complex and yet still have the love of the bisexual protagonist, as well as a woman] yet many do 'Slash Shippers’ for how they react to much worse written straight female characters reinforcing heterosexism and doing little else. That’s the exception that proves the rule: the rule being that this heavily touted different standard for queer 'non-canon’ ships is homophobic.) To summarize: Please don’t dismiss/hate innocent female characters solely for any ship. Please check yourself regarding ladies and check up on if that’s why you do. Please try and work yourself out of doing so, especially if that’s why. But please do not create and uphold different standards for this depending upon how “canon” queer ships are, okay. Queer people get enough shit already.

Avatar
Avatar
karolinedean
the contrast. what gets me is that the last person clarke expects to betray her does it. and the last person clarke expects to see reason, considering 300 of Lexa’s warriors were massacred, surprises her. when a door closes, a window opens for new hope. and clarke finds that in lexa. this is when she starts to trust lexa. this is when she fully realises they’re on equal grounds. they both want peace. whereas bell wants revenge and will divert away from clarke due to difference in philosophies.
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

What does canon mean? Or non canon?

canon:

imageimage

non canon:

image
Avatar
#Cue instant laughter#Shipping#Canonization#This post is gold#(...if I don't think about how seldom we get to be the top one.)#Lexa.Clarke#vs.#Bellamy x Clarke#Writing things#Watching things#To clarify: kissing doesn't make things canon by itself and anyone who says that has a negligible grasp of consent issues and attraction.#But the kiss here fulfills all the parameters that DO make it canon: they're alone there's no outside pressure just feelings and want#The metaphor here is 'we deserve and thus are having something that's more than surviving' and they both discuss possible relationship after#And the kiss is slow so that both of them know what's gonna happen...and they both keep going in (w/o ANY other reason to do so) for more.#No consent issues whatsoever no abuse no posturing no situational coercion nobody to manipulate with it...etc. etc. Fucking. nothing.#Nothing but two people who really want each other being in the moment and having each other even if it's not gonna mean being TOGETHER yet#It's as canon as canon gets without an actual textual relationship.#Meanwhile Bellarke is fucking nothing except friends and co-leaders of the same group (and so more amicable than with Lexa cos SAME GROUP)#And yet cos it's m+f (het read) people are beating down doors and setting shit on fire because it's not canon it's NOT canon IT'S NOT CANON#And trying to invalidate some of THE MOST VALID queer canon because their presh het is legit just friends and everybody fucking knows it#That's why this post is gold#The 100#Heterosexism cw#(for the tags)#(for the current predicament Clexa canon is giving us in line with the general trend of what they usually give WLW)#Cultural appropriation cw#Fandom
Avatar

konvalija replied to your post:

it's good to mention that the show is veeeery far from books plotwise,, in books it was a love triangle between Wells, Clarke and Bellamy (where Bellamy had basically Finn's personality bc Finn doesn't exist in books) so I doubt they will pull it off

Well, good, cos I would have been bored to death by that much focus on het. As it was, I just barely made it through the Raven/Finn vs. Finn/Clarke.

(Was Bellamy biracial in the books cos if so, making Finn was kinda racist?)

But so basically they just kind of wrote Finn where Bellamy was in the books with book!Bellamy’s characterization and put Clarke with him? Then, wow, yes, even more no romo, full friends for Bellamy, bye? 

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

hii you have seen ur the 100 gifsets and im just starting the show so i barely know anything but doss the clarke x lexa ship actually have a shot at happening?i heard (spoilers i guess?) that the series is based on books where the main ship is clarke x bellamy? do you think theyll change that or maybe i have incorrect info anyways

Um…do you care if spoilers? Because the answer is “yes” with some caveats about their future, but I can’t go into specifics if you don’t want spoilers.

Bellamy/Clarke is really, seriously, not a thing from Clarke’s end in this series, I will tell you that much. There’s no spoilers in that. It’s just not. And honestly, it’s barely a thing from his end, but what comes from his is still like an inch more than the nothing from her. (I’ve heard about the books, and I’d very much like to tell literally every little jerkass Bellamy/Clarke shipper to shut the fuck up and go read those if they want that and stop trying to stomp on representation.)

Lexa/Clarke is a thing. More strongly evidenced from Lexa’s side, tbh, but still…confirmed. I assume you know about the kiss, so yeah, that’s pretty damn text-y. There’s like, no reason for that kiss, no framing, that could make it non-con, either, so like. Yeah. Text. I don’t personally consider it enough text to say “Clarke wants Lexa” or “Clarke is in love with Lexa” (or “Clarke is biromantic and/or bisexual” for that matter) by itself, but. Anyway.

I have no secure knowledge of whether they’ll do the books’ thing, but I really don’t see it happening in terms of Bellamy/Clarke, going by what’s come so far. Though there is another het ship that happens, jsyk. [shrug]

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

While I agree with your meta that people should shut up about Lexa making the wrong choice and being a bitch bla bla bla (I mean come on the choice was totally understandable, her people are her priority after all) I don't agree with the "Especially not if the ship you're trying to defeat is queer" you're making it sound an awful lot like people are not allowed to criticize queer ships, which is unfair to everyone.

Oh, sweet anon, you should have checked my blog before sending this. Because I have no problem with you personally, but you’re making me laugh with this. (P.S. False equivalencies help no one. Criticize to undermine het ships before you ever criticize to undermine queer ships, to help make up the deficit that homophobia causes. K? K.)

“People are not allowed to criticize queer ships” is not a thing that I believe, nor a thing that I have ever claimed to believe, nor a thing that I act in accordance with. Not ever. I am the ship critique queen, whether OTP or not; have you noticed there’s no Lexa/Clarke on my blog apart from what I posted last night? That’s because I’m waiting for them to give me a reason in text to believe definitely that I can support this ship. I would never be like “OH MY GOD NEVER CRITICIZE QUEER, ALWAYS HET”. That’s not me at all.

“People are not allowed to unfairly vilify queer characters to prop up a het ship that has no basis in canon thus far from the side of the other queer girl who kissed said vilified queer character last week.” is a thing I will always say, and act in accordance with. Because Lexa made a choice that’s very believable and very justifiable for her character, while still in the process of growing as a character, and “Bellamy’s the only one Clarke can count on” is (hetero)sexist bullshit that ignores that Bellamy was exactly in this place last season and weaponizes a morally grey straight boy against a morally grey lesbian, like that shit’s never been done before and exists in a vacuum. It doesn’t. Learn it.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

'instead of being sexist and homophobic as fuck' umm just because someone doesn't treat lexa and bellamy the same doesn't mean they're being sexist and/or homophobic. I like the idea of Clarke and Bellamy together just like I also liked the idea of Clarke and Lexa. I hate what Lexa did and I think it has ruined Clexa in an irreparable way but that in no way makes me 'sexist' or 'homophobic' it just means I think what Lexa did was wrong and I don't see a future for Clexa after it.

“umm just because someone doesn’t treat lexa and bellamy the same doesn’t mean they’re being sexist and/or homophobic.” Yeah it does.

I don’t have to humor the rest of this, really, because you lost me the moment you decided that weighing these characters differently has nothing to do with their marginalized identities. Yeah. It does. Everything after that is “this is the reason why I’m treating her differently” and I don’t care to read that. [shrugs]

Avatar
Avatar
tim-lucy

In the end there’s only one co leader clarke can count on. And that is Bellamy Blake. 

Ah, yes, Bellamy was so reliable last season, in his first season--like Lexa's is now, before he was accepted by The 100 and the Ark people. So reliable, saying things like "I'll cut off her hand if I have to" about forcing Clarke to join his cause of convincing the Ark they were dead, arranging an attack on Wells for the same thing, sacrificing 300 people and their fucking only means of communication at the time so that he could avoid any recompense for shooting Jaha, hanging someone from a fucking tree because they kissed his sister, etc.

So fucking reliable as a leader. Not at all out for himself and loyal only to those who would obey him, or who were down to help his survival, or whom he considered his own (like Octavia).

Oh wait, no, he wasn't. But you held on and let him grow, until he got to a situation that allows him to be reliable as a viable choice to survive.

Don't pretend one ruthless Slytherin survivalist badass is better than the other to prop up your ship, especially not if the ship you're trying to defeat is queer.

Give Lexa the same treatment as you gave Bellamy, hold on for her to grow and get into a situation where she can be reliable and viably survive, instead of being sexist and homophobic as fuck.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net