Why would you fall? Why would you want to be one of us? You don’t mean that. (requested by @k-vichan)
Why would you want to be one of us? // But those are human things.
4.10 // 9.09
I DON'T KNOW HOW I DID IT. I JUST DID.
That’s literally the point of the post though.
That scene is from season 5. This gifset is from season 4.
It’s called retconning.
Angel banishing sigils were introduced in this episode. Anna was the first one to use them. On Uriel and Cas. She then showed Dean how she did it (which is basically this gifset)
It’s a small but significant change. Because it effectively erases Anna’s influence on the Winchesters -even if just a little- and attributes it to Castiel. In fact, if you watch s5 closely, they spend a lot of time erasing a lot of Anna’s presence or just tweaking canon -like right here- so that her legacy is shifted onto Cas. Like. The Winchesters completely forgot that Castiel wasn’t the only angel on their side. Anna was too. They don’t mention her again until her final episode.
And then of course her last episode, which was a MASSIVE effort to completely vilify her once completely sympathetic character, never once giving us her side of the story. Like it barely touches on the point that hey, Castiel actually turned her in, and that she’s been tortured in ways that make Hell look cuddly for months. Instead, we have Dean -who had a connection with Anna, romantic or not- crack a joke about her state of mind. Instead, we have Anna being treated more like a one-off villain like Virgil than like the important recurring character from s4 that introduced the theme of free will into the show. Instead, we have her burnt away into a crisp -something that was COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY TO THE PLOT- and then never mentioned again.
In other words, it was like the writers decided to erase her from the show forever, and this was how. First with the little things, and then with the big things.
Look, I’m not saying that Castiel’s character wasn’t the right choice for that particular storyline. I think it was a good writing decision. It’s a lot more powerful to see an angel fall rather than to meet an already fallen angel, I get it. But it’s the way that they decided that Anna’s character needed to be completely erased and destroyed the way it was in order to make room for Cas that really irritates me.
Anna may not have been right for THAT role, but she definitely proved to be an interesting enough character to be given another one. An encounter with the Harvelles. Escaping heaven and trying to lead a very small band of rebel angels. Exploring her relationship with Castiel (angel siblings okay I wanna know about that) Or honestly, just giving her better death and acknowledging that hey, Anna did have an impact on the Winchesters. Anna did have an impact on Castiel. Instead of, you know, pretending she never existed.
….This was a little wrong.
But the point is, yeah, this retcon was small. But it was really significant. And it pisses me off because it began the trend of erasing Anna’s legacy from the show.
Much of this is valid, more than, particularly the frequently overlooked part where Anna could have had her own role apart from the half-conceived TFW intentions for her character that built Castiel’s story instead--and all the people going ‘OMG Cas STOLE hers! He’s why she’s dead!’ are full of internalized sexism and incognizant bullshit.
All except: it wasn’t a retcon. That part’s a lot wrong.
She didn’t show Dean how she did it, that wasn’t “basically this GIFset”, because, in this GIFset, when Dean asked “You want to tell me how?” she didn’t know how she did it. She never taught him, because she didn’t know, and he’d walked in too late to see her firsthand and learn that way.
Contrarily, Dean was front and center, watching every stroke, when Castiel made the sigil in the Green Room, in 4x22. Right there, for every single symbol, and for the proper order. Ergo: Castiel did teach him how to do it.
There are plenty of ways to complain about Supernatural’s misogyny (especially when it comes to Anna) without overwriting or ignoring context in canon and then complaining about oversights or writing failures that never happened. And if only, if only, the woodpecker sighs, if only the fantastic and clever lady lovers in this fandom didn’t near constantly do the latter to validate the former.
(P.S. Anna, important as she is as a symbol of angels exerting their will and making choices, is also not the origin of Free Will, or the leader of Team Free Will, in terms of what that means, because the capitals are supposed to indicate free will for humans, not angels, not demons, not everyone. Team Free Will fights for humans to all have free will--having it for oppressors of humanity comes secondarily. Dean is the origin of fighting for free will for humans, if it’s not Castiel [as he existed millennia before Dean and desired to rebel/rebelled for this cause again and again], and the leader of Team Free Will. And though I’ll definitely entertain arguments about how in-character 5x13 really was, what she planned in 5x13 was against the motives of Team Free Will, whose main aim was to keep as many humans from being controlled by--or dying for--angels’ purposes as possible, themselves included.)
(Additionally: Anna also didn’t teach Castiel what feelings were, what doubt was, what’s right, or pretty much anything of the sort. Not that we saw anyway, in S4/S5. They were both rebels in Heaven, it’s canonically established, but for different reasons. Anna was more-than-justifiably envious of human free will and Fell so she could join them, while Castiel tried to be loyal to Heaven, for God, until humanity was threatened. And though Anna tried to fashion herself Castiel’s mentor in a way, most of what she said he already knew, and when he asked, even begged, for specific guidance, she refused to actually teach as much as preach. Contrarily, again, Dean, the three times Castiel rebelled in S4, when Castiel asked him what to do, gave him specific expectations/orders to fill. That was kind of important in the teaching, considering the fact that Castiel hadn’t been without them--instructions in order to do what was expected of him and/or be punished if he deviated, for millennia--and acting on what he felt or wanted was kind of fuzzy, and scary, by then. Anna WAS an important catalyst--mostly by what she represented and as inspiration, not by much of what she did herself, thanks sexism--of his rebellion, arguably, but she wasn’t the reason, she’s not the origin, and she wasn’t the one who taught him to. ...And fun fact, neither was Dean, not primarily at least, not even close to entirely, despite Castiel’s unreliable narration. Castiel rebelled in many ways, many times, long before S4. He didn’t have to be taught. He just had to relearn.)