Satanic Capitalist

The election was a loss for Palestinians — and not just because Trump won

From start to finish, Palestinians became a target, and candidates were only interested in maintaining the status quo.

Vox

Since the war in Gaza began, the threat of a protest vote — in which voters would choose to abstain from the presidential election or vote for third-party candidates who had no shot of winning — hung over Democrats’ heads because of President Joe Biden’s unconditional support for Israel and its right-wing government. When Vice President Kamala Harris became the nominee, her lack of willingness to distance herself from Biden on this issue didn’t help alleviate that threat. Meanwhile, Donald Trump accused Democrats of not being sufficiently pro-Israel. Throughout the election, pro-Palestinian voters tried to pressure Biden to change course, organizing protests on college campuses across the country and forming various campaigns to punish him at the ballot box. One group, the Uncommitted National Movement, asked Democratic voters to cast their ballots for “uncommitted” instead of Biden during the primaries, and they amassed hundreds of thousands of votes — enough to secure delegates at the Democratic National Convention (DNC).

But no matter how much pro-Palestinian voters pushed candidates to give them a better vision for how to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, none were willing to meaningfully address the concerns of pro-Palestinian voters. And for Americans who regarded Gaza as one of their top concerns, their choice boiled down to either punishing Democrats or stopping Trump. The result was an election in which neither outcome would have been a win for Palestinians. While it’s impossible to point to any single issue to explain why Harris lost to Trump, it’s clear Harris lost at least some voters because of the Biden administration’s stance on Gaza. And now Trump, who vowed to ban Palestinian refugees from entering the United States and said he would revoke visas from foreign students who are deemed antisemitic, is the president-elect.

When it came to which candidate had a better vision for how to end the war in Gaza, neither Biden, Harris, nor Trump offered a compelling message. Biden offered Israel unqualified support, sending billions of dollars in military aid. His administration defended Israel even as it committed horrific war crimes, including hospital bombings. Instead of reckoning with the rapidly rising death toll in Gaza, he cast doubt on the numbers that the Gaza Ministry of Health had put out — numbers that humanitarian groups and even the US government had deemed reliable in the past. At times, Harris, after she became the Democratic nominee, tried calling out Israel for the staggering death toll, saying that “far too many” civilians had been killed and emphasizing that how Israel conducted itself during this war mattered. She called for an end to the war, but after having served in the administration that financed Israel’s war with virtually no conditions, it wasn’t a particularly convincing message. Harris also muddied her outreach — or lack thereof — to Arab Americans by coupling any sympathetic statement about Palestinians with a staunch defense of Israel. At her DNC speech, for example, she said the death toll in Gaza was “heartbreaking” and that Palestinians’ right to self-determination ought to be realized — reiterating long-held US talking points — but also prefaced that statement by again justifying the war itself. When she was asked whether she was worried about losing Arab American voters because of Israel’s conduct, she said, “There are so many tragic stories coming from Gaza,” but that “the first and most tragic story is October 7.” For his part, Trump didn’t try to say he would be any better than Biden on Gaza. Earlier this year, he said Israel should wrap up the war and “get back to peace and stop killing people.” But he said it not in the context of sympathy for Palestinians, but out of concern that Israel was making itself look bad. “And the other thing is I hate — they put out tapes all the time. Every night, they’re releasing tapes of a building falling down. They shouldn’t be releasing tapes like that,” he said. “That’s why they’re losing the PR war.”

Ultimately, whether Trump would end up being worse than Biden or Harris on this issue didn’t necessarily resonate with pro-Palestinian voters. For them, what’s been happening over the last year already represented the worst. Israel, after all, has already been credibly accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. As one Georgia voter told me in the week before the election, “In no way do I imagine Trump is better for Palestine … [but] I can’t imagine it worse.” That helps explain why so many Arab Americans came out against Harris on Election Day. In Dearborn, Michigan, an Arab-majority city, Trump won 43 percent of the vote compared to Harris’s 36 percent. In 2020, Biden won the city with 69 percent of the vote, and though Harris lost there, Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian American, won her reelection to Congress with 62 percent of the vote. As much as this issue resonated with many voters, America’s politicians were not ready to rethink the country’s relationship with Israel, even as the war escalated to the point where now over 44,000 Palestinians have been killed. In July, when Netanyahu gave an address to Congress, he was met with a standing ovation.

What Electing a Predator Would Say to Sexual Assault Survivors

(Triggering Warning: This article deals with sexual abuse and violence and may be triggering to survivors of such abuse.)

johnpavlovitz.substack.com

One of the great honors of the work I do, is that people turn to me when they don't believe they can turn to anyone else. They allow me sacred proximity to their suffering and their grief. And even though it is a tremendous privilege to be given access to the deepest recesses of people's hearts and stories, this also means getting a front row seat to the incredible damage so many live with. Recently, I heard from a woman who I'll call Emily. Years ago, Emily was assaulted by a stranger at college. Now a successful, outwardly-thriving 36-year old, she has shared this information with almost no one close to her, because of the fear and undeserved shame she still carries. Emily suffers alone every single day and through many sleepless nights, because someone else saw her as an object, ignored her consent, and disregarded her humanity. And yet as horrific as that day was for her, it was only the beginning of the nightmare she's had to endure. There have been more fresh nightmares in recent months. She's had to hear friends, co-workers, and family members openly defend the words and behavior of Donald Trump, oblivious to the way these things silently wound her and force her deeper and deeper into isolation and sadness; how their words cause her to relive her trauma all over again.

She's had to hear Conservative radio hosts make the issue of consent the punchline to some twisted joke. She's watched well-known Christian leaders proudly endorse a court-adjudicated rapist. She’s had to hear Trump flippantly declare that the woman the courts determined he assaulted was “not attractive enough” for him to have done so, that she would not have been “the chosen one”, implying others were. She's listened to other women defend him, blame victims, and openly campaign for the reelection of this self-confessed sexual predator. Over and over and over she's had to hear that she doesn't matter. Over and over she's been told that she's expendable. Over and over she's been reminded that her pain is inconsequential when there are Supreme Court Seats and Congressional majorities at stake. Maybe she's had to hear this from you, too. Maybe it's been your social media tirades and coffee break conversations and sarcastic comments that she's had to endure; bleeding internally, suffering in silence, grieving anew.

Maybe it’s you driving around with a bumper sticker or flying a flag or posting a yard sign with the assailant of at least one woman, but likely dozens, perhaps hundreds more. (The dozens of credible accusations and the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs point to a lifelong pattern.) I suspect this may not matter to some of you voting for him, but I hope you'll think about it. Emilys are everywhere. They are your daughters, your wives, your sons, your co-workers, your neighbors. People you know and love and worship and work with have survived sexual assault, whether you know it or not. They are in your kitchen, your staff room, your classroom, your church pew, your timelines. They are listening to you and they are being brutalized again, because people they know and love and worship with and work with are okay elevating a sexual predator to the Presidency and dismissing their trauma and excusing away his despicable acts and words about women. I wonder if that's something you are okay with.