mouthporn.net
#twenty years ago – @sarahthecoat on Tumblr
Avatar

SarahTheCoat

@sarahthecoat

mostly Sherlock. The New Semester my dreamwidth
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
thememacat

In The Great Game, we learn that Moriarty killed Carl Powers 20 years ago. And that is where a young Sherlock Holmes began, by trying to get the police interested in Carl’s missing shoes.

In the Hound of Baskerville episode, we learn that Bob Frankland got his start 20 years ago … and part of how he got started was by killing Henry Knight’s father when he caught him doing experiments with the HOUND nerve gas.

Twenty years before these episodes aired would have been (approximately) 1990 to 1995. Don’t know what was in the air during that time, but it sure gave a start to a lot of nastiness.

Actually, this is absolutely brilliant. This connection could be spun out in a ton of different ways. Was young Moriarty exposed to the gas somehow? Did it make him lose his mind? Is there some sort of metaphorical paralleling going on?

Avatar
sarahthecoat

interesting to run across this after @sagestreet ’s recent meta discussing the possible allusion to the AIDS epidemic in the “murder=falling in love” metaphor. I just did a real quick google on “aids 1990” and confirmed my recollection that the early 1990s were the peak of the new cases, loads of famous people died , and there was horrible stuff like an immigration ban, workplace harassment, irrational terrorizing of people with hiv/aids. Talk about “fear in the air”, it was bad. If bbc moriarty represents mr sex, internalized (or not) homophobia, ticking time bombs, yeah, this could be a “where he started” kind of moment, at least in young sherlock’s consciousness. Love could literally kill you.

Exactly! @sarahthecoat

And not just kill you, but potentially kill the one you love. No wonder Sherlock would rather be alone.

in case anyone needs it, i think this is the meta by @sagestreet that first brought up HIV/AIDS: http://sagestreet.tumblr.com/post/180410462932/hhholmes-is-about-the-gay-sex-scene Look into the discussion in the notes as well. It was a real game changer for me.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
thememacat

In The Great Game, we learn that Moriarty killed Carl Powers 20 years ago. And that is where a young Sherlock Holmes began, by trying to get the police interested in Carl’s missing shoes.

In the Hound of Baskerville episode, we learn that Bob Frankland got his start 20 years ago … and part of how he got started was by killing Henry Knight’s father when he caught him doing experiments with the HOUND nerve gas.

Twenty years before these episodes aired would have been (approximately) 1990 to 1995. Don’t know what was in the air during that time, but it sure gave a start to a lot of nastiness.

Actually, this is absolutely brilliant. This connection could be spun out in a ton of different ways. Was young Moriarty exposed to the gas somehow? Did it make him lose his mind? Is there some sort of metaphorical paralleling going on?

Avatar
sarahthecoat

interesting to run across this after @sagestreet 's recent meta discussing the possible allusion to the AIDS epidemic in the "murder=falling in love" metaphor. I just did a real quick google on "aids 1990" and confirmed my recollection that the early 1990s were the peak of the new cases, loads of famous people died , and there was horrible stuff like an immigration ban, workplace harassment, irrational terrorizing of people with hiv/aids. Talk about "fear in the air", it was bad. If bbc moriarty represents mr sex, internalized (or not) homophobia, ticking time bombs, yeah, this could be a "where he started" kind of moment, at least in young sherlock's consciousness. Love could literally kill you.

Avatar
reblogged

THE  BIG  QUESTION

________________________________________________________________

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF REICHENBACH

Some time ago I wrote about the three solutions presented in The Empty Hearse (Solutions or Choices) and about the possibility that those three explanations for the ‘fall’ represent actually three different choices for Sherlock to solve his problem. Let me phrase my former statement again:

Sherlock dismisses LOVE/Molly and SEX/Jim as fake and decides instead to team up with BRAIN/Mycroft.

But what is the cause for this decision? And if this is some kind of metaphorical equation Sherlock is experimenting on, what can be found on the other side of that equation? What exactly happens on Bart’s roof and why? Who is involved?

This is a metaphorical reading of events before, at and after Bart’s roof. It deals with the veiled surface level of the story, as I call it, based on the assumption that everything that is shown on screen, is told and coded by the ‘language of Sherlock’s mind’. 

Enjoy (this theory) if you like under the cut ..

HOLY ACTUAL SHIT what an angle to look at reichenbach now!!! i almost want to rewatch the episode! (but might still be a bit too painful…)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

well worth re reading, thanks for bringing it back up! Not only john and jim enter sherlock's life at the same time, but also molly and mrs hudson. At least, this is when he moves in to mrs hudson's house, though he met her before.

Hope as a "serial killer", if "murder=falling in love", then hope makes people fall in love.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net