mouthporn.net
#love is a burning thing – @sarahthecoat on Tumblr
Avatar

SarahTheCoat

@sarahthecoat

mostly Sherlock. The New Semester my dreamwidth
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

THE EMPTY BOX

The Sign of the Four is an intricate house of mirrors, in which the reader is invited to enter and to which, in a very veiled manner, a way out has been indicated.

It’s not a coincidence that one of the first things we are told is that “Some facts should be suppressed”. This immediately after the opening that deals with the bad habit of Holmes, an opening that is a perfect counterpart of the closure. The story opens and closes with Holmes dedicated to drugs, and in the middle we are explained why, suppressing the real reasons, or rather hiding them behind others, reflecting them in a mirror, telling their exact opposite.

If you notice carefully, in the first part of the novel there is a continuous play between the OPPOSITES. A suggestion that what is happening could be the exact opposite. NEGATIVE vs POSITIVE. First of all we introduced Mary Morstan. I have often seen her description as proof that Watson was actually describing Holmes and I honestly never understood the point. Actually it would seem to describe its exact opposite: FEMALE, BLONDE, MINUTE, IMPERFECT INCARNATE, BEAUTIFUL BUT NOT REGULAR FEATURES, SWEET AND AMABILE EXPRESSION. Holmes we know well: MALE, DARK, TALL, PALE, only a few lines after his features are described as “his clear-cut, hawklike features” and without even a precise reason. Rarely if ever the expression of Holmes is called sweet and lovable. The only thing certain is that Watson is infatuated from the beginning of the woman, but he thinks he is not at her level, and this even before any treasure is named in history.

On the first evening of their adventure, the doctor admits, because of the great stress, that he has repeatedly been confused. It seems he had told how during the war he had shot a musket entered his tent with a tiger, and advised caution with castor oil and ease with strychnine (CONTRARY).

During the evening the three pass the bridge of Vauxall Bridge Road, crossing the river to reach a more neglected part of the city. Here they stop in front of a house, squalid like the neighborhood that houses it, and the door is opened by an exotic Indian servant (CONTRARY). The house itself is a surprise, squalid outside, inside it hides incredible treasures and is luxuriously furnished (CONTRARY).

After all these opposites, perhaps it would not be so crazy if we asked ourselves if, by chance, the unreliable narrator, is not trying to tell us that yes he fell in love with someone, yes he probably did it when he set his eyes on he, yes, the first time they were close to each other was in the moment of danger, but he is not Mary Morstan but her CONTRARY.

“Miss Morstan and I stood together. A wondrous subtle thing is love, for here were we two who had never seen each other before That Day, between-whom no word or even look of affection had ever passed, and yet now in an hour of trouble our hands instinctively sought for each other . I have come to you so far, but I have been able to do it for you” . So how many times have we seen Holmes and Watson doing exactly the same thing? holding hands in the dark, looking for comfort? is this therefore love ?.

At this point in history we come to know the two brothers Sholto and we enter another dimension, from the opposite to the mirror.

The two are brothers, to be precise twins. One of the things that tormented us in BBC Sherlock is the sentence ”they are never twins“, even if then the solution of the case “my husband is three people” actually turns out to be a case of twins, even three identical … are they twins or are they never? Does it refer to something else? With this I don’t want to imply that Thaddeus Sholto and Bartholomew Sholto aren’t twins. At the textual level there isn’t doubt that they are, but on a metaphorical level? On a metaphorical level they aren’t twins because they are the same person. They are identical twins, the same coin with two faces.

Thaddeus Sholto a refined esthete, an arts lover, a pipe smoker, a hypochondriac who believes he has a heart condition … he asks Watson to check his heart.

Bartholomew Sholto is a chemist, misanthrope, he is found killed in a closed room. He kept a treasure hidden, a treasure that he didn’t want to share with anyone, but his killer took his treasure away from him (I understand that the fandom has irremediably corrupted my mind, but I would dwell on the murder weapon: “It was long, sharp, and black, with a glazed look near the point”.)

I would say that it is quite evident that the SHOLTO dyad represents SHerlock Holmes or SH which is good at the same.

Both share the same treasure, the treasure of Agra, which represents homosexual love (it comes from the east). A brother wants to share it with Mary Morstan. Attention, as I said here the games change, we aren’t longer in the realm of the opposite, but in the house of mirrors.

To better understand the mirrors you have to take a step back in time and forward in history (this meta  is a bloody mess, I believe that nobody will ever understand anything).

Before Mary, Thaddeus and Bartholomeus there were their parents.

The CAPTAIN ARTHUR (really not too thin) MORSTAN, father of Mary who will marry CAPTAIN WATSON and MAJOR SHOLTO father of the twins that as we said can be seen as the perfect sum of Holmes. The two were inseparable.

Thaddeus Sholto / SH, a Bohemian esthete wants to share the treasure with Mary Morstan / Watson while Bartholomew Sholto, a grumpy chemist wants to keep it hidden. But a man with a wooden leg arrives to take it away anyway. Now … a man with a wooden leg. I go back to the point where the fandom ruined me, once I was a good person, but considering the Victorian pruderie for the legs, which were even covered even those of the tables or called limbs because to say legs was indecente, here we have a man, Major Sholto, literally terrorized by another man with a wooden leg, and every bloody time I can’t help, but  I think of an embarrassing and persistent erection.

Anyway, I said, Bartholomew was robbed by a man with a massive erection and was killed by the long, dark, shiny, wet spine (not my words, thank you) of whom? Of a wild of Antipodes. A native of the Andaman Islands at north of Sumatra (a case? Possible?). A cannibal. One who regulalry banquets with his similars. Now it’s obvious that put it in this way is repulsive, but Tonga represents the wild, unmentionable and inconceivable side of the events linked to the treasure of Agra. The erotic and unspeakable side in an era in which even the conjugal kisses were unspeakable. The wild and primordial side that dwells in any English gentleman (or not). In this case he prefers to feast with his fellows. (is that why in TFP Moriarty refers to cannibals in the TFP? in addition to the more obvious, too obvious, reference to SAW? And the fact of making him whistle is a mockery to Fleming, considered the tone definitely “bond” of the episode? Ian Fleming had made tell to someone of his Bond that you can recognize a homosexual, because he didn’t know how to whistle … but here I went off topic…).

The same Jonathan Small (the man with the massive erection) will turn out to be a fairly accurate mirror of Watson. MILITARY, INJURED to a leg, after having been involved with the theft of the treasure and sentenced to life imprisonment, he will start working in an infirmary and learning notions of MEDICINE. In the course of history it is suggested that during his stay in India he learned a certain familiarity with the men that it was not allowed at home: “Mr. Abelwhite was a kind man, and he would often drop into my little shanty and smoke with me, for white folk out there feel their hearts warm to each other.

And so, it’s Small / Watson that forces SHolto to separate from his treasure after having him (his uncontrollable and wild part) stabbed (with his meat dagger) … ok, I’ll stop.

But things at the end of the 1800s were not very simple, they are not yet for someone now. We have Mary Morstan not particularly anxious for the treasure to be recovered, Watson who is terrified of it, Holmes quivering for a solution, but in the meantime also strives to be at his best like never before. He plays serenades to sleep Watson and lays dinners in which he plays the part of the friendly and jovial guest. A few other times, if we never, we see behavior more like a courtship.

And then there is the pursuit on the river. Holmes and Watson chase Small, Tonga and the treasure who are on board a small and fast boat, the  Aurora

I would stop for a moment on the name because it’s worth it. Aurora was the name of the Latin goddess of dawn, she is who brings a new day every morning from the east. She is the mother of the four winds, one of whom has a curious name … Eurus …

This is a frenetic pursuit, narrated with a growing climax. Watson himself admits that he has never experienced such excitement, “I have coursed many creatures in my countries during my checkered career, but never did sport give me such a wild thrill as this mad, flying man-hunt down the Thames” , while the engines are “panting”, and in the end the guns of the two men simultaneously shoot “Our pistols rang out together”, while Tonga disappears in “ the white swirl”. After that the Aurora gets stuck, Small tries to escape, but his wooden leg gets entangled in the soft ground.

“See here,” said Holmes, pointing to the wooden hatchway. “We were hardly quick enough with our pistols.” There, sure enough, just behind where we had been standing, stuck one of those murderous darts which we knew so well. It must have been whizzed between us at the instant that we fired. Holmes smiled at it and shrugged His shoulders in his easy fashion, but I confess That it turned me sick to think of the horrible LITTLE death Which had passed so close to us That Night.”

Now if all this is not a climax and an exhausted post orgasm also cloaked by a certain sadness I don’t know … (certainly could also be a pursuit along the river).

After the capture of Small Watson is left again at the bridge of Vauxall Bridge Road, which had already crossed earlier to reach the house of Thaddeus Sholto. It seems that the river is a watershed for our two men, and interesting things happen in the middle. “SHERLOCK (voiceover): When does the path we walk on lock around our feet? When does the road become a river with only one destination? Death waits for us all in Samarra. But can Samarra be avoided?” (x)

The doctor brings the treasure to Mary / Watson who does not seem at all anxious or happy to receive a treasure (intended to be then shared with the eccentric Sholto).

To our romantic eyes the story Holme /Watson is the most beautiful that has ever been written but we must never forget that at that time it was a love that could not be told. We can therefore forgive the recalcitrance to Watson. We can understand the why of Mary. Keeping in mind that some things in history are told to us otherwise. That some facts have been suppressed. That the treasure was thrown into the river, was buried by layers of mud, and there is only one beautiful empty box left. But this doesn’t mean that the treasure is gone, it is only hidden. A full declaration of subtext. The jewels are there, they are scattered around all the stories of the Canon, the reader careful is able to find them but have been dragged around by words like the river water. For all the others the Canon remains a beautiful box of fine Indian manufacture. Wonderful to see, even if it is empty inside.

This novel is a labyrinth in which to get lost, and I found, perhaps, the exit only of some corridors. I don’t know if I managed to make me even vaguely understand, thanks for coming up here, you are heroes (or masochists).

@raggedyblue  Seldom I’ve enjoyed reading a meta that much as this one. This is so interesting and fascinating and - as I think - ‘right up the street’ of Mofftiss. 

Some thoughts that came immediately to mind while reading:

The leg - it reminded me at once of @sagestreet ‘s brilliant meta about ‘Cleopatras leg’ … the sexy tapestries in ASIB …. and the leg hidden/vanished behind Mark Antony’ s red coat. A leg dyed red to make it invisible. Something hidden in plain sight. Fake tan. Painted over. Like a facade.  Looks like a massive case of ‘the lazy universe’  :)))

Well, in the 19th century, in the Victorian era, people thought that this Egyptian equivalent of a lap dance was too offensive to their prudish sensibilities. So, they dyed that part of the tapestry red to make her leg disappear.
This way the leg had the same colour as Mark Antony’s coat and looked as if it were just a piece of the red fabric said coat is made of. The leg visually disappeared into the fabric.

The poison - in a metaphorical reading, where poison is equal to the ‘chemistry of love’, the poisoned dart of Tonga hit Holmes …. almost … but got stuck in his coat …. in his protecting armour, his ‘security wall’. Metaphorically …. in his mask, his facade …. whatever you might all it. Mary, the facade, the guardian. 

Oposites …. negative vs positive - Sherlock fighting against his worst enemy - his archenemy - himself. Holmes killing Homes. You know that for some time now I suspect Sherlock BBC tells the story of Sherlock being at war with himself. His emotions at war with his brain, with logic and reason. 

One half of the human race at war with the other. The invisible army hovering at our elbow, attending to our homes, raising our children, ignored, patronised, disregarded, not allowed so much as a vote. TAB

The league of furies, the monstrous army …. emotions.  ‘Not just a criminal organisation; it’s a cult’  (TBB). Seems like Sherlock is chased by emotions already since S1. 

Did I say that your meta is a joy to read? It is!  :))))

Thanks @ebaeschnbliah I’m just melted ☺️. I absolutely agree, BBC Sherlock is the the narration of what’s going on in the strange funny head of that incredible man, in his head and in his heart. How he’s trying to get them to get along. A journey that began more than a century ago.

Yes, @raggedyblue   The Mind Palace. It’s like a whole world in his head. (TAB)  :)))))

“He wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano.“     Steven Moffat on Sherlock (IGN interview, February 2014)

‘It is what it is’ …. has the snowcapped mountain realized by now that he’s actually a volcano and ready to …. explode like a gigantic bomb?  :)))))

Sherlock imagines the massive explosion under the parliament (brain). But he’s actually ‘on fire’ since TGG. Probably before that, because the ‘pink case’ is ablaze already in PILOT and ASIP. :))))

Avatar
sarahthecoat

rb for discussion, yes!

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

THE COLD WAR

“There’s an east wind coming all the same, such a wind as never blew on England yet. It will be cold and bitter, Watson, and a good many of us may wither before its blast. But it’s God’s own wind none the less and a cleaner, better stronger land will lie in the sunshine when the storm has cleared.”

So says Holmes in HLB, probably speaking of the World War, but it could also be of the new that advances, of the progress, of the new ideas. Thinking of BBC Sherlock as a rereading, an interpretation of the Canon, what significance could the Moffits have attributed to the wind of the east?

Let’s say that the theme of homosexuality is central. Let’s say that the fact that practically all the villains are homosexual is neither politically incorrect, nor caused by bad writing, hipocrisy, or a bad joke (although I can very well understand that it may not be appreciated at all, they are running on a line that is definitely too thin). It happens damn intentionally and that there is a reason behind it ( I think )

. In the period in which the Canon was written, homosexuality was a bad thing, at least it was considered a criminal thing. Even now it is not universally accepted. In BBC Sherlock many of the villains have ties to the east, Moriaty in the first place. We have the case of the Chinese circus, the Czech gallerist and also the Golem was from Czechoslovachia. There is the boy from Minsk to who Sherlock denies his help and there are the killers in TRF. During his “death” Sherlock, as well as Holmes, travels exclusively in East and in Serbia is captured and tortured. After his return the villains lose their ties with the east, they gradually become closer. There is Magnussen from Scandinavia, but then Culverton is English. But at that point, Eurus, the east wind, has arrived. Even the mess of AGRA happens in the East, Mycroft is always solving some international drama, Korea is mentioned, also in connection with Moran. Watson himself is no stranger to the joys and sorrows of the East. He was in Afghanistan from where he returned wounded in body and spirit (In the canon aboard the ship Orontes, name of a river that is known to flow in reverse). Everything that comes from the East is negatively connoted, but for Sherlock also the emotions are considered negatively. We are seeing reality from his point of sight. Contrary to the West there is repression. Mary is probably a former CIA agent, CIA agents intervene when Sherlock meets his sexuality, Irene. In America, Dr. Frankland began his studies on the HOUND project, an homophobic fog that can alter your behavior and change what you are and feel. Mrs. Hudson (whom I think represents Sherlock’s heart) was married to a dissolute man involved with drugs… perhaps a reference to a possible promiscuous past of Sherlock when he used drugs. But his heart was not involved, he just typed. Whatever it is, it’s been over, it’s been over in America. We are facing the most classic Cold War’s deployments. East against West. Waiting for the wind from the east to blow so strong as to break the wall (or the glass) and run free. I want to be free, said Moriarty. Small bonus, during the World War II, the code name for the invasion of the Soviet Union by the Axis was Operation Barbarossa (Readbeard). And someone used the same code to monitor the possible invasion of the east wind * usual quote about the coincidences * @ebaeschnbliah @gosherlocked @possiblyimbiassed @sagestreet @sarahthecoat @tjlcisthenewsexy @tendergingergirl @devoursjohnlock @loveismyrevolution @sherlockshadow

Avatar
sarahthecoat

interesting thoughts!

Yes, very interesting thoughts, @raggedyblue   What spontaneous comes to mind after reading this:

Jim Moriarty (the Hound of the Holmes?) and the East Wind, Eurus, ‘got on like a house fire’ (TFP). I have the feeling that, on a metaphorical level, everything related to places east of GB, represents Sherlock’s past, his repressed and resurfacing memories, the family history. Everything that made him the man he is today. On one sub-level this seems to deal with the charakter evolution of Sherlock inside this story. On another sub-level it seems to outline the history of the character Sherlock Holmes - his common representation -  from past to present. Changing the one character in this story - Sherlock - might lead to a change in the perception of the character Sherlock Holmes as a whole.

The boomerang …. comes from Australia … that’s very far east of GB. A bommerang is a thing that comes back to the one who throwes it. The term ‘boomerang effect’ is also used as a description for something that goes wrong, for something that ‘backfires’ … something that leads to ‘unintended consequences’. The car in ASIB backfires the same moment the boomerang comes flying back and so the ‘blunt instrument’ killes the distracted hiker. That action definitely backfired in more than one way. And this 'backfiring’ case is the prelude for the appearance of Irene - the Woman - Adler. Mrs. Sex, who is instructed by Jim Moriarty, Mr. Sex, how to play the Holmes boys.

Me too … * usual quote about the coincidences *  :)))))

Forgot to mention a main point:  the changing of the character Sherlock Holmes seems to be done by Sherlock himself in this story. By taking on his own case - the pink one - and by investigating, deducing and evaluating himself. :)

The boomerang, right @ebaeschnbliah, when I had made the mental list of places to the east I had also thought about John’s trip to New Zealand but then I forgot about it. A trip made to get away from Sherlock, with a girlfriend, but I wonder how, he came back single, after a engine’s arrest metaphorical… but after all he traveled to the ends of the east, what would he ever expect? However, yes, the East can correspond to both Sherlock’s past and homosexuality, because the two are in some way connected and repressed. The emotions, his story, what he really is as a character in the series but also at the literary level.

Let’s say he’s solving the most important case in his life.

Avatar
gosherlocked

Very interesting thoughts, @raggedyblue and @ebaeschnbliah. Sometimes I wonder if we will ever disentangle the whole web of allusions and symbolism in this show. The whole East (Wind) metaphor goes far deeper than a lost sister. And I only just realised the clue about “getting on like a house on fire” which ties Eurus and Jim to Musgrave Hall and 221b as well. 

Absolutely, @gosherlocked  And I remember very well your wonderful meta 'Set this house on fire’.  The 'house’ representing the human body. Translating this to the above mentioned words from Eurus, the East Wind … 'we got on like a house on fire’ …. doesn’t this mean that Mr.Sex (Jim) together with Eurus (East Wind) made a body burn? And isn’t LOVE called a 'burning thing' ? 

The more wind, the higher the flames. :))))  And with that I’m back at '666 the number of the beast’ and the Great Burning of London in 1666 … the East Wind had a big role in that one as well. Also Isaac Newton, prisma and the colour of rainbows. :)))))

wow, VERY interesting discussion. I like the association of irene with the boomerang and the backfiring, because it feels like it confirms my headcanon that irene switches from team jim to team sherlock after he saves her at the end of ASIB. On the subtext level where she represents his libido, of course. But i like the idea for the surface level too.

Avatar
reblogged

LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING

________________________________________________________________

“He (Sherlock) wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano.“     Steven Moffat (IGN interview, February 2014)

A volcano is associated with fire, flames, heat, explosions, erruptions, ash …. One could easily say that the inside of a vulcano is a rather hellish place.

Recently @gosherlocked wrote a very interesting meta about the topic of fire (‘Set this house on fire’) and @tendergingergirl added some equally interesting informations about the fire symbolism in dreams.

What I want to play with here, is ‘FIRE’ as a metaphor for LOVE … as I did already a little bit in a comment on this post by @sherlockshadow  which got this whole FIRE=LOVE theory in my head really going (and Johnny Cash, of course).  :)))

If Sherlock BBC is a story told from the inside of Sherlock’s head - partly or entirely - the audience perceives those parts exactly how Sherlock envisions certain things …. and not how they really are.

All that matters to me is the work. Without that, my brain rots … love is a dangerous disadvantage …   the chemistry is incredibly simple, and very destructive …  all emotion is abhorrent to me. It is the grit in a sensitive instrument … romantic entanglement, while fulfilling for other people … and so on and so on ….

This is what Sherlock thinks about emotions and LOVE. Would it be very far fetched to assume, that he might compare LOVE to a serial killer or to a poison, to fire and flames. Anyone can become LOVE’s victim and then even the most clever and intelligent people tend to turn into useless idiots. Does Sherlock view LOVE as something extremly dangerous and destructive to his mind and therefore to his work? Or to put it much more dramatically: does Sherlock depict love as a spawn from hell, created by the devil?

Let’s see what FIRE (in all its shapes) is able to reveal … under the cut ….

Avatar
sagestreet

Hey, @ebaeschnbliah. I’ve been meaning to write a comment to this meta for ages. Sorry for taking soooo long.

I absolutely agree that all the fire imagery on the show can be read as a fire=love metaphor. I think @gosherlocked had pointed that out recently, too.(And I might have a separate meta in the pipes about that later on…)

For now, I would like to comment on this screenshot of yours from the meta above, @ebaeschnbliah:

You correctly point out that there are flames visually rising from the pink case, but then remark that this was more obvious in the Pilot and that unfortunately, in ASiP, the chair got in the way.

I would like to argue that the chair itself is very important here. (And it’s not a coincidence or sloppy blocking that this scene was shot in this way.) I think the chair adds such a beautiful layer of meaning to the whole scene.

It’s the clients’ chair, the visitors’ chair. 

You (and many others over the years) have already pointed out that the (suit)case is metaphorically THEIR case, the case of their relationship, the case that needs to be solved, the pink (=gay) case of Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson. And I love, love, love your brilliant find, @ebaeschnbliah, that this very case is visually shown to be ON FIRE. It’s not just a case-as-in-a-puzzle, it’s a case of LUUUUUURVE.:D It’s burning (fire=love!). The flames are coming out of the case to show us that Sherlock and John are quickly falling in…burning passion with each other, I guess. I really like this discovery of yours, @ebaeschnbliah!

But the chair, that visitors’ chair, is important, too.

Love (the burning case!) came to John and Sherlock as a visitor. It’s sitting between them in the clients’ chair. It’s visibly seated in the chair all their clients sit in: So love is basically a difficult case that needs to be solved. They have to treat it like a client, like a puzzle a client has brought to them. It has come to 221b as a difficult riddle that Sherlock Holmes will have to solve. That’s why it’s sitting in THAT chair.

That explains both sides of this scene so beautifully: On the one hand, we can see that Sherlock and John’s feelings for each other are already ablaze; the love (case) between them has already been ignited and flames are coming out of it. On the other hand, this love (case) is still sitting in the chair like a case that is waiting to be solved. 

The cinematography of this little scene in ASiP foreshadows so much about the show as a whole: That the love between John and Sherlock is already so, so, SO strong it’s on fire, yet also that the story will be progressing veeery slowly: Because they need time to solve this; they’re solving it like a case, after all…the case that is probably their most difficult one ever, the case that’s sitting in the clients’ chair.

Gosh, I love ASiP!

It’s such a cinematographically gorgeous piece of film history. I’m certain years from now this episode will be taught in film classes at universities…

Sure, other episodes of ‘Sherlock’ are great, too. But ASiP gives us these beautiful symbolically coded shots at a very organic-feeling pace. It doesn’t shout at us or blurt out too much information to be processed at once (like some of the later episodes). ASiP progresses at a very natural pace, but it has beautifully coded scenes like the one above…and it has them right from the start of the episode (think: the apple and the mug with the snake on it right at the beginning in John’s flat, aka that scene that @loudest-subtext-in-tv famously wrote about). 

I love ASiP. It is one of those things that really shows us what kind of brilliance Moffat is capable of as a writer (on his good days:)).

Avatar
sarahthecoat

love this discussion! The pink case (=the puzzle of their love) in the client chair also suggests how a client ("mary"; "you're just a client now") both partially obscures our view of it (though, not john & sherlock's view so much!) AND holds it up to the fire. Like the way s3 (and 4) were partially obscured by "mary", but also more intense.

Avatar
reblogged

LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING

________________________________________________________________

“He (Sherlock) wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano.“     Steven Moffat (IGN interview, February 2014)

A volcano is associated with fire, flames, heat, explosions, erruptions, ash …. One could easily say that the inside of a vulcano is a rather hellish place.

Recently @gosherlocked wrote a very interesting meta about the topic of fire (‘Set this house on fire’) and @tendergingergirl added some equally interesting informations about the fire symbolism in dreams.

What I want to play with here, is ‘FIRE’ as a metaphor for LOVE … as I did already a little bit in a comment on this post by @sherlockshadow  which got this whole FIRE=LOVE theory in my head really going (and Johnny Cash, of course).  :)))

If Sherlock BBC is a story told from the inside of Sherlock’s head - partly or entirely - the audience perceives those parts exactly how Sherlock envisions certain things …. and not how they really are.

All that matters to me is the work. Without that, my brain rots … love is a dangerous disadvantage …   the chemistry is incredibly simple, and very destructive …  all emotion is abhorrent to me. It is the grit in a sensitive instrument … romantic entanglement, while fulfilling for other people … and so on and so on ….

This is what Sherlock thinks about emotions and LOVE. Would it be very far fetched to assume, that he might compare LOVE to a serial killer or to a poison, to fire and flames. Anyone can become LOVE’s victim and then even the most clever and intelligent people tend to turn into useless idiots. Does Sherlock view LOVE as something extremly dangerous and destructive to his mind and therefore to his work? Or to put it much more dramatically: does Sherlock depict love as a spawn from hell, created by the devil?

Let’s see what FIRE (in all its shapes) is able to reveal … under the cut ….

Bravo @ebaeschnbliah ! 👏 This meta is so good, I want to applaud like after a theatre performance! Because I do feel you’re on to something here, some very important subtext. Yes, there really is fire everywhere in this story. I particularly like the image of Sherlock trying to hide his heart - John - behind a facade - ‘Mary’ - to protect it against the fire of Love. 'Save John Watson’, indeed!

In a recent discussion about Mummy Holmes’ book “The Dynamics of Combustion” (I don’t know how to link it from my mobile) it ocurred to me that maybe what Sherlock is doing in TAB and S4 is trying to calculate the exact dynamics of how his heart is going to be burnt out (=combusted) in order to protect it. And to calculate this he is running scenarios of what might happen, which makes him go deeper and deeper into his own mind, all the way to his childhood trauma (TFP).

Isn’t it interesting, that even though the facade - 'Mary’ - has been consumed by the fire in TST, it keeps coming back in TLD and even at the end of TFP to cover up what’s going on? Putting a lid on Sherlock’s and John’s relationship by saying that who you really are doesn’t matter? Maybe it isn’t enough to burn the facade - maybe the only way to destroy it is to openly address it? (heteronormativity)

This whole burning heart metaphor (which really is one of the most classic ones, isn’t it?Probably the most classic one!) makes me think of a song I used to listen to many years ago. I can’t translate it to English, but it’s about a guy who was searching for his lost heart out on a city dump. He had thrown it away because he couldn’t cope, but now he wanted it back. Suddenly he sees a fire on the dump; someone is warming themselves on his burning heart. He tries to stomp on the fire, but the person stops him and convinces him that there won’t be any ashes, because his heart is burning for them - his friend. And they claim his heart as theirs, because they found it on the dump. He asks 'but what about me?’ And the answer is 'well, you can have mine!’

So this is what must happen, right? The only way for Sherlock to save John Watson - his heart - is to offer it to John, no matter if it’s being combusted. And in return, he will have John’s ❤️ :)

And, by the way, same thing with water (=emotions). This is what that guy in the rain at the beginning of ASiP should have done to protect himself; he should have accepted his (boy)friend’s shared umbrella. Because, as John would say, friends protect people.

Avatar
raggedyblue

exactly @possiblyimbiassed, as I said a comment of the post on Holmes mom’s book (x). We have Sherlock  elaborating his hypothesis, as we know he has always more than one. His heart is about to burn, but is it necessarily a bad thing? Surely at the beginning it sees this, fire is in the serial killer gun, but it’s obvious also here that it’s not dangerous, it doesn’t kill, it’s just hidden in something that can kill. The appearance that deceives, Sherlock’s prejudices over love, passion. But in the end, when the 221b explodes and burns, nobody gets hurt and everything can safely come back as it was before, softer, cleaner, tidy, warmer. And Mary, Sherlock’s facade (I always struggle to see it) or John’s facade burns with a fire that has the opposite color, is a blue fire, like the deep water color, the cold one in which Sherlock swam all over his life. I don’t know if it only happens to me, but sometimes when I sleep and try to wake up but I can’t (probably depends on the sleep phase when I am, it happens to me when I take a nap and then the alarm sounds, but of course my sleep doesn’t it ended in an autonomous way), I see me as underwater, I look up, I see the light that filters through the water but I can’t reach the surface.  Whether considering that Sherlock lives on the bottom, immersed in freezing waters that anesthetize his feelings, whether he is coma and not waking up, the comparison seems to work.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

HMM, tumblr failed to notify me of this tag, but glad i found this anyway. WOW, that waking up imagery!!

Avatar
reblogged

LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING

________________________________________________________________

“He (Sherlock) wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano.“     Steven Moffat (IGN interview, February 2014)

A volcano is associated with fire, flames, heat, explosions, erruptions, ash …. One could easily say that the inside of a vulcano is a rather hellish place.

Recently @gosherlocked wrote a very interesting meta about the topic of fire (‘Set this house on fire’) and @tendergingergirl added some equally interesting informations about the fire symbolism in dreams.

What I want to play with here, is ‘FIRE’ as a metaphor for LOVE … as I did already a little bit in a comment on this post by @sherlockshadow  which got this whole FIRE=LOVE theory in my head really going (and Johnny Cash, of course).  :)))

If Sherlock BBC is a story told from the inside of Sherlock’s head - partly or entirely - the audience perceives those parts exactly how Sherlock envisions certain things …. and not how they really are.

All that matters to me is the work. Without that, my brain rots … love is a dangerous disadvantage …   the chemistry is incredibly simple, and very destructive …  all emotion is abhorrent to me. It is the grit in a sensitive instrument … romantic entanglement, while fulfilling for other people … and so on and so on ….

This is what Sherlock thinks about emotions and LOVE. Would it be very far fetched to assume, that he might compare LOVE to a serial killer or to a poison, to fire and flames. Anyone can become LOVE’s victim and then even the most clever and intelligent people tend to turn into useless idiots. Does Sherlock view LOVE as something extremly dangerous and destructive to his mind and therefore to his work? Or to put it much more dramatically: does Sherlock depict love as a spawn from hell, created by the devil?

Let’s see what FIRE (in all its shapes) is able to reveal … under the cut ….

Bravo @ebaeschnbliah ! 👏 This meta is so good, I want to applaud like after a theatre performance! Because I do feel you’re on to something here, some very important subtext. Yes, there really is fire everywhere in this story. I particularly like the image of Sherlock trying to hide his heart - John - behind a facade - ‘Mary’ - to protect it against the fire of Love. ‘Save John Watson’, indeed!

In a recent discussion about Mummy Holmes’ book “The Dynamics of Combustion” (I don’t know how to link it from my mobile) it ocurred to me that maybe what Sherlock is doing in TAB and S4 is trying to calculate the exact dynamics of how his heart is going to be burnt out (=combusted) in order to protect it. And to calculate this he is running scenarios of what might happen, which makes him go deeper and deeper into his own mind, all the way to his childhood trauma (TFP).

Isn’t it interesting, that even though the facade - ‘Mary’ - has been consumed by the fire in TST, it keeps coming back in TLD and even at the end of TFP to cover up what’s going on? Putting a lid on Sherlock’s and John’s relationship by saying that who you really are doesn’t matter? Maybe it isn’t enough to burn the facade - maybe the only way to destroy it is to openly address it? (heteronormativity)

This whole burning heart metaphor (which really is one of the most classic ones, isn’t it?Probably the most classic one!) makes me think of a song I used to listen to many years ago. I can’t translate it to English, but it’s about a guy who was searching for his lost heart out on a city dump. He had thrown it away because he couldn’t cope, but now he wanted it back. Suddenly he sees a fire on the dump; someone is warming themselves on his burning heart. He tries to stomp on the fire, but the person stops him and convinces him that there won’t be any ashes, because his heart is burning for them - his friend. And they claim his heart as theirs, because they found it on the dump. He asks 'but what about me?’ And the answer is 'well, you can have mine!’

So this is what must happen, right? The only way for Sherlock to save John Watson - his heart - is to offer it to John, no matter if it’s being combusted. And in return, he will have John’s ❤️ :)

And, by the way, same thing with water (=emotions). This is what that guy in the rain at the beginning of ASiP should have done to protect himself; he should have accepted his (boy)friend’s shared umbrella. Because, as John would say, friends protect people.

Avatar
raggedyblue

exactly @possiblyimbiassed, as I said a comment of the post on Holmes mom’s book (x). We have Sherlock  elaborating his hypothesis, as we know he has always more than one. His heart is about to burn, but is it necessarily a bad thing? Surely at the beginning it sees this, fire is in the serial killer gun, but it’s obvious also here that it’s not dangerous, it doesn’t kill, it’s just hidden in something that can kill. The appearance that deceives, Sherlock’s prejudices over love, passion. But in the end, when the 221b explodes and burns, nobody gets hurt and everything can safely come back as it was before, softer, cleaner, tidy, warmer. And Mary, Sherlock’s facade (I always struggle to see it) or John’s facade burns with a fire that has the opposite color, is a blue fire, like the deep water color, the cold one in which Sherlock swam all over his life. I don’t know if it only happens to me, but sometimes when I sleep and try to wake up but I can’t (probably depends on the sleep phase when I am, it happens to me when I take a nap and then the alarm sounds, but of course my sleep doesn’t it ended in an autonomous way), I see me as underwater, I look up, I see the light that filters through the water but I can’t reach the surface.  Whether considering that Sherlock lives on the bottom, immersed in freezing waters that anesthetize his feelings, whether he is coma and not waking up, the comparison seems to work.

What beautiful comments @possiblyimbiassed and @raggedyblue . And yes, the 'burning love’ metaphor is really an ancient one …. and yet modern in every era of humankind. I think the 'facade’ turning up even after the consumation through fire (love) isn’t out of the ordinary at all. It looks like Sherlock hid behind this facade for a very long time, therefore it will also take time to adjust to the new 'naked’ situation. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Mary turns up again in a future episode … like Jim does. Maybe messages on DVD represent memories?

That song about the heart on the dump …. this reminds me strongly of Sherlock looking for the pink case in the skip. If that case represents indeed his very own case …. which I don’t doubt … just look how he overlaps with Jennifer Wilson in this pic.

His whole face is pink. And searching for that 'pink case' on a skip, is telling a lot about how Sherlock thinks about himself. 'How do I have utility?’ I think the pink case catching fire, is a very positive development for Sherlock. :))))

.

silverybees answered to your post “LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING”

He leans back thru the fireproof door as he first introduces himself at St Barts

Thanks @silverybees for this wonderful addition. As I interpret this lovely scene …. Sherlock leaves the safety of pure science, guarded by a fire-proof door, and gives John his address. 'Come and share with me …'   Could be dangerous though ….  :))))

OMG! The fireproof door. Great catch! @ebaeschnbliah @silverybees

The name is Sherlock Holmes and the address is 221 B Baker Street. 

Seriously! This show! :)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

RB for excellent additions!

Avatar
reblogged

LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING

________________________________________________________________

“He (Sherlock) wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano.“     Steven Moffat (IGN interview, February 2014)

A volcano is associated with fire, flames, heat, explosions, erruptions, ash …. One could easily say that the inside of a vulcano is a rather hellish place.

Recently @gosherlocked wrote a very interesting meta about the topic of fire (‘Set this house on fire’) and @tendergingergirl added some equally interesting informations about the fire symbolism in dreams.

What I want to play with here, is ‘FIRE’ as a metaphor for LOVE … as I did already a little bit in a comment on this post by @sherlockshadow  which got this whole FIRE=LOVE theory in my head really going (and Johnny Cash, of course).  :)))

If Sherlock BBC is a story told from the inside of Sherlock’s head - partly or entirely - the audience perceives those parts exactly how Sherlock envisions certain things …. and not how they really are.

All that matters to me is the work. Without that, my brain rots … love is a dangerous disadvantage …   the chemistry is incredibly simple, and very destructive …  all emotion is abhorrent to me. It is the grit in a sensitive instrument … romantic entanglement, while fulfilling for other people … and so on and so on ….

This is what Sherlock thinks about emotions and LOVE. Would it be very far fetched to assume, that he might compare LOVE to a serial killer or to a poison, to fire and flames. Anyone can become LOVE’s victim and then even the most clever and intelligent people tend to turn into useless idiots. Does Sherlock view LOVE as something extremly dangerous and destructive to his mind and therefore to his work? Or to put it much more dramatically: does Sherlock depict love as a spawn from hell, created by the devil?

Let’s see what FIRE (in all its shapes) is able to reveal … under the cut ….

Bravo @ebaeschnbliah ! 👏 This meta is so good, I want to applaud like after a theatre performance! Because I do feel you’re on to something here, some very important subtext. Yes, there really is fire everywhere in this story. I particularly like the image of Sherlock trying to hide his heart - John - behind a facade - 'Mary’ - to protect it against the fire of Love. 'Save John Watson’, indeed!

In a recent discussion about Mummy Holmes’ book "The Dynamics of Combustion” (I don’t know how to link it from my mobile) it ocurred to me that maybe what Sherlock is doing in TAB and S4 is trying to calculate the exact dynamics of how his heart is going to be burnt out (=combusted) in order to protect it. And to calculate this he is running scenarios of what might happen, which makes him go deeper and deeper into his own mind, all the way to his childhood trauma (TFP).

Isn’t it interesting, that even though the facade - 'Mary’ - has been consumed by the fire in TST, it keeps coming back in TLD and even at the end of TFP to cover up what’s going on? Putting a lid on Sherlock’s and John’s relationship by saying that who you really are doesn’t matter? Maybe it isn’t enough to burn the facade - maybe the only way to destroy it is to openly address it? (heteronormativity)

This whole burning heart metaphor (which really is one of the most classic ones, isn’t it?Probably the most classic one!) makes me think of a song I used to listen to many years ago. I can’t translate it to English, but it’s about a guy who was searching for his lost heart out on a city dump. He had thrown it away because he couldn’t cope, but now he wanted it back. Suddenly he sees a fire on the dump; someone is warming themselves on his burning heart. He tries to stomp on the fire, but the person stops him and convinces him that there won’t be any ashes, because his heart is burning for them - his friend. And they claim his heart as theirs, because they found it on the dump. He asks 'but what about me?’ And the answer is 'well, you can have mine!’

So this is what must happen, right? The only way for Sherlock to save John Watson - his heart - is to offer it to John, no matter if it’s being combusted. And in return, he will have John’s ❤️ :)

And, by the way, same thing with water (=emotions). This is what that guy in the rain at the beginning of ASiP should have done to protect himself; he should have accepted his (boy)friend’s shared umbrella. Because, as John would say, friends protect people.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

OH, this is beautiful! :)

Avatar
reblogged

LOVE  IS  A  BURNING  THING

________________________________________________________________

“He (Sherlock) wants to rise above us like a snowcapped mountain, but he’s actually a volcano."     Steven Moffat (IGN interview, February 2014)

A volcano is associated with fire, flames, heat, explosions, erruptions, ash …. One could easily say that the inside of a vulcano is a rather hellish place.

Recently @gosherlocked wrote a very interesting meta about the topic of fire (‘Set this house on fire’) and @tendergingergirl added some equally interesting informations about the fire symbolism in dreams.

What I want to play with here, is 'FIRE’ as a metaphor for LOVE … as I did already a little bit in a comment on this post by @sherlockshadow  which got this whole FIRE=LOVE theory in my head really going (and Johnny Cash, of course).  :)))

If Sherlock BBC is a story told from the inside of Sherlock’s head - partly or entirely - the audience perceives those parts exactly how Sherlock envisions certain things …. and not how they really are.

All that matters to me is the work. Without that, my brain rots … love is a dangerous disadvantage …   the chemistry is incredibly simple, and very destructive …  all emotion is abhorrent to me. It is the grit in a sensitive instrument … romantic entanglement, while fulfilling for other people … and so on and so on ….

This is what Sherlock thinks about emotions and LOVE. Would it be very far fetched to assume, that he might compare LOVE to a serial killer or to a poison, to fire and flames. Anyone can become LOVE’s victim and then even the most clever and intelligent people tend to turn into useless idiots. Does Sherlock view LOVE as something extremly dangerous and destructive to his mind and therefore to his work? Or to put it much more dramatically: does Sherlock depict love as a spawn from hell, created by the devil?

Let’s see what FIRE (in all its shapes) is able to reveal … under the cut ….

Avatar
sarahthecoat

Wow, good work, there really is fire in every episode!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net