the tube in TEH (and skyfall!)
right so this is a thing i already wrote about a little in my addition to this post a while ago.
basically in the empty hearse the supposed district line is actually a jubilee line train. the district line security footage looks like this:
as you can clearly see the interior and exterior this is the same type of train as these here which are jubilee line trains.
and then the bomb is in this one:
which is the (now longer in use) district line train. completely different carriage shape, green poles instead of yellow etc.
and for a show that’s so heavily centered on london this is weird as fuck? i use jubilee line a lot so it’s glaringly obvious to me but you don’t even need to be a londoner to notice the different types of these trains. so i’ve always been wondering WHY this is, is there a deeper meaning to it?(the lost special or something lol) or is it because the filming location which i believe is the disused charing cross jubilee line platform, but if that’s the case why not just go with jubilee line in the first place? it stops at westminster too so it would have fit the storyline and locations and all. ??¿¿¿???? why?
ANYWAY. so i was watching skyfall the other night and it appears they just took this thing (besides pretty much the rest of the film too) from there as well?? or maybe it’s just a coincidence. maybe despite filming in obvious jubilee line trains/platforms film makers insist on making it the district line? who knows. anyway.
here’s bond at supposedly temple station (sorry shitty screen cap)
yellow and green lines on the walls indicate circle and district lines. the train is a jubilee train.
yep still a jubilee train and terminates at wimbledon which is a district line destination.
it even has a district line map inside the train.
i’m tagging some of you meta writers here if i may, if anyone might have any more insight/intel on this one, has it already been discussed in greater length, answers, theories, anything! cheers! @tjlcisthenewsexy @raggedyblue @sarahthecoat @devoursjohnlock @inevitably-johnlocked
nice catch! I wonder about this too. I know sometimes in filmmaking, one location stands in for another because it’s easier and less expensive to film there, so most of it could just be that. I’m sure it would have been easier to take over a closed station, than to try to film in one that’s in use. (There are setlockers visible in shot in one scene in TEH!) But my recollection is that the detached carriage that was full of wires and stuff, and was going to need to accommodate lights, various camera angles, etc, was a purpose built set, so they definitely chose that appearance. Then there’s all this weird intertext with bond, especially skyfall, so who knows if that was just the same “we film where we can get permission and make the logistics work”, or a deliberate visual quotation?
yeah the bomb carriage was definitely a purposely built set so that makes it even less sense to me, why not just build one to match with the carriages shown in the security footage, nevermind the name of the tube line! or maybe i’m just being pedantic haha. but the tube nerd in me will not have peace until i get some answers!
also as far as i remember the tube line in skyfall being specifically the district line didn’t have huge plot related significance? or maybe if they’d gone further west towards the MI6 building (district and circle go westbound along the river, jubilee goes northbound from westminster) but i think they got off around embankment?? can’t believe i can’t remember anymore i just watched it. anyway. rambling now. at least bond can get away with the consistency of the train appearances etc even if it might bug a londoner who rides the tube a bit!
but the main question is, why so obviously different trains, mofftiss??
especially in an episode that included a massive train nerd (and sherlock mirror) who was a key character in both the case aspect and the character aspect of the show. *shrug*