mouthporn.net
#jim=sex – @sarahthecoat on Tumblr
Avatar

SarahTheCoat

@sarahthecoat

mostly Sherlock. The New Semester my dreamwidth
Avatar
reblogged

THE  BIG  QUESTION

________________________________________________________________

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF REICHENBACH

Some time ago I wrote about the three solutions presented in The Empty Hearse (Solutions or Choices) and about the possibility that those three explanations for the ‘fall’ represent actually three different choices for Sherlock to solve his problem. Let me phrase my former statement again:

Sherlock dismisses LOVE/Molly and SEX/Jim as fake and decides instead to team up with BRAIN/Mycroft.

But what is the cause for this decision? And if this is some kind of metaphorical equation Sherlock is experimenting on, what can be found on the other side of that equation? What exactly happens on Bart’s roof and why? Who is involved?

This is a metaphorical reading of events before, at and after Bart’s roof. It deals with the veiled surface level of the story, as I call it, based on the assumption that everything that is shown on screen, is told and coded by the ‘language of Sherlock’s mind’. 

Enjoy (this theory) if you like under the cut ..

HOLY ACTUAL SHIT what an angle to look at reichenbach now!!! i almost want to rewatch the episode! (but might still be a bit too painful…)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

well worth re reading, thanks for bringing it back up! Not only john and jim enter sherlock's life at the same time, but also molly and mrs hudson. At least, this is when he moves in to mrs hudson's house, though he met her before.

Hope as a "serial killer", if "murder=falling in love", then hope makes people fall in love.

Avatar
reblogged

SOLUTIONS  OR  CHOICES

In the episode The Empty Hearse three possible solutions for the fall from Bart’s roof - the Reichenbach Fall - are presented. While the first and the second are right away explained as the imaginations of someone else, the third one claims  to show the real event. On a closer look though that solution is also rather unlikely. Sherlock’s account of the event gets recorded on camera, (including image interference, which is always a bit suspicious) by no one other than Anderson (I’m the last person you’d tell the truth). Furthermore there is that little incident with the inexplicable timelaps, when Sherlock talks to Anderson about the possible destruction ot the Parliament and this at a time where he and John are still in the carriage with the giant bomb.

SHERLOCK: Of course you’ve wasted police time, perverted the course of justice, risked distracting me from a massive terrorist assault that could have both destroyed Parliament and caused the death of hundreds of People.

But why are three solutions for the fall offered in the first place, I wonder? Three variations, filmed in detail … it feels a bit much and not really necessary. Normally, a single but solid and plausable solution would have been sufficient, one would think. 

Unless …. the three solutions aren’t about possible ways to survive a real fall from a rooftop but something else entirely. 

What if the truthfulness of the different solutions isn’t the important part at all? The most notable feature in all three solutions is, that in each one Sherlock teams up with someone else. With Molly, with Jim, with Mycroft. What if this is the key aspect for the presentation of three fall solutions? To demonstrate three different possibilities … three different choices.

Three solutions or three choices?

Avatar
gosherlocked

Wow, this is just the most brilliant thing I have ever read about the three solutions, @ebaeschnbliah! This is beautiful. And you know what? In TFP, the last episode so far, both Jim and Mycroft are dismissed, they do not provide any solution or help. John, however, stays with Sherlock to the end, he is the one who helps him up after the coffin scene, who has become family for Sherlock. And this is mirrored in the scene with Molly who is even wearing the same jumper she wore when acting as a John substitute in TEH.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

wow, indeed, @ebaeschnbliah this is brilliant, and can i say how wonderful it is to have a new, major insight into a key element of the show, even this many years later! I think it also points up how important it is that molly is always there as a john mirror. Sherlock asking her for help, is him WANTING to ask john. You could almost re-visualize all his key scenes with molly, as scenes with john, except then the story would be over too soon! This also makes me want to re read @asherlockstudy ’s TRF/TEH metas, because of the insight into jim here, and in them. And @just-sort-of-happened ’s metas about sex vs romance.

Another brilliant discussion I seem to have missed long ago. :) Yes @ebaeschnbliah - I can only agree; Sherlock is asking himself a question about what to do. Or maybe it’s already hindsight and he’s trying to figure out what went wrong

In any case, the subtext reading makes a lot of sense. And I think you’re right, @ebaeschnbliah, that Sherlock presents three options to himself and tries to opt for the third, but I’d guess the ‘real’ events are actually not described at all, not in any of his three scenarios. Perhaps, as you say in your ‘The big question’ meta, he’s afraid of risking that his and John’s friendship might be destroyed by the options of Love and, in particular, Sex. Maybe in that moment, Sherlock couldn’t even imagine the Love option would work because it seemed too soppy and un-realistic to him? And the Sex option outright frightened him in its cruelty (=indifference towards John’s friendship)? So he (thought he) went for the brain option, the ’rational’ one. Except that’s actually the least realistic one - partly because this one meant the biggest and most outrageous form of betrayal and deception (which Sherlock might have realized if he’d used his empathy there, but he probably didn’t), and partly because - quite logically - this scenario didn’t take into account all the many things that were likely to just go wrong (as Fanclub!Anderson - another John mirror - points out). 

So - since Scenario #3 isn’t really plausible either, I believe what really happened (the text, not the subtext) might have been something slightly different. I think it’s interesting that The Fall, as we see it in TRF, isn’t actually confirmed by other media - why? It does say in these two news videos (X, X) which were embedded in John’s blog posts, that Sherlock Holmes jumped to his death from the roof of St Bart’s hospital. But nowhere does it say that John witnessed it, and John hasn’t written anything about TRF on his blog, except for the fact that Sherlock had saved two kidnapped children, and that he was now dead. And nothing whatsoever is said about Moriarty’s body. For all I know, John could just as well have received Sherlock’s phone call and then been told that Sherlock jumped to his death. And did the encounter with Moriarty on the rooftop even happen?

But the most interesting thing with the Love option depicted in TEH, in my opinion, is this: What is Derren Brown doing there? 

He’s playing a magic trick of suggestion on John, isn’t he? Just like Sherlock has been accused so many times of doing on people, and just like Sherlock (supposedly) told John that he was doing right before the Fall: 

And yet this Love option is dismissed in favour of the ‘brain’ one (sub-textually it’s Sherlock’s work - Lestrade - that dismisses it; “all that matters to me is the work”). But which one is more likely to succeed; a staged suicide involving a giant inflatable cushion unseen by both John and a sniper following him, a series of successive events that needed to happen exactly as planned without the slightest miscalculation, an extremely Sherlock-like, recently dead body, a skilled army doctor who lets himself be stopped from examining his best friend’s body and 25 homeless people helping out without being detected, or a simple, ‘magic trick’ performed on John? Balance of probability? So I think the ‘truth’ must have been different still. But I can sympathise with John on one point: how Sherlock actually pulled off this trick isn’t really that interesting; the important thing to figure out is why.

good to re read this, with the additional discussion. VERY interesting suggestion, that what we see in the episode isn't entirely corroborated, thus probably isn't "what really happened", but a metaphorical representation of what it felt like.

I remember reading a meta back in s3 hiatus, about "i owe you a FALL" meaning, not a fall off a cliff or building, but a fall in LOVE. SO many expressions use this kind of metaphor. falling in love, bursting with feelings, feeling the earth move (earthquake reference in TLD), fireworks. Even "magic" as a metaphor for the mystery of love. Then "on the rocks" for romantic strife, "crash and burn" for the end of romance, which sounds like what the girl on the plane is afraid of.

Avatar
reblogged

THE  BIG  QUESTION

________________________________________________________________

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF REICHENBACH

Some time ago I wrote about the three solutions presented in The Empty Hearse (Solutions or Choices) and about the possibility that those three explanations for the ‘fall’ represent actually three different choices for Sherlock to solve his problem. Let me phrase my former statement again:

Sherlock dismisses LOVE/Molly and SEX/Jim as fake and decides instead to team up with BRAIN/Mycroft.

But what is the cause for this decision? And if this is some kind of metaphorical equation Sherlock is experimenting on, what can be found on the other side of that equation? What exactly happens on Bart’s roof and why? Who is involved?

This is a metaphorical reading of events before, at and after Bart’s roof. It deals with the veiled surface level of the story, as I call it, based on the assumption that everything that is shown on screen, is told and coded by the ‘language of Sherlock’s mind’. 

Enjoy (this theory) if you like under the cut ..

Avatar
sarahthecoat

i finally had time to read this, wow! (was away from internet over the weekend) I love all of this, and nifty that "turner's masterpiece" and "mrs turner's married ones" can be metaphorically connected.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net