mouthporn.net
#chemistry of love – @sarahthecoat on Tumblr
Avatar

SarahTheCoat

@sarahthecoat

mostly Sherlock. The New Semester my dreamwidth
Avatar
reblogged

Henry’s deduction explains why John is no longer dating in THoB

If you’ve read my last post, you will remember that I was thinking that Sherlock is especially despondent at the begging of THoB because John no longer has a girlfriend, i.e. isn’t smoking.  It helps Sherlock to sublimate his own desire if John is dating, like it helps him sublimate his desire to smoke if Henry smokes in front of him.  

Henry, however, hasn’t had a smoke since the night before and is himself very hard up for a smoke.  Like, John who hasn’t had a girlfriend since the last episode.  Now, something SCARED Henry into coming to Sherlock fast, really fast, so fast that he has had no time to smoke.  Something happened (last night i.e. last episode) that scared Henry (John).  

We can look at Sherlock’s deduction of Henry as a deduction of why John is no longer dating.  This would also be supported by John’s unusual behaviour in requesting that Sherlock not do this deduction, at all.

So, Henry has had a coffee with no milk.  For John that means he has attempted to have relationships with women.  If you look at the drink code we can see that this is corroborated.  Henry/John has used a napkin to mop up both coffee and ketchup.  Now, ketchup was only been mentioned once before, in TBB.  Sebastian wears a tie with pink and blue, reminiscent of the bisexual pride flag colours.  He mentions that Sherlock could always tell whom, ‘you’d been shagging’, at university.  He could read who you were into sexually/emotionally.  This upset him.  As he prepares to have Sherlock deduce him he jokes that Sherlock can probably tell he has travelled because his tie has a ketchup stain from a ketchup you can only get in Manhattan.  Now…  In TBB I think there’s a theme of people who are queer travelling abroad to have affairs and possibly a secret gay life.  Sherlock might know that Sebastian is bi because of something he did in Manhattan; because something stained his tie in Manhattan.  Could this be a reference to semen/oral sex?  I dunno.  Note that this is not Sherlock’s deduction but what Seb fears Sherlock may deduce: that he’s bi.  But, whatever it is, it is repeated here in THoB.  Ketchup, maybe it’s the semen stain on your tie that shows your classmate at university that you’re into guys, too.  I think that, ‘ties’, on the show denote emotional connections and if you’ve got seminal fluid on your feelings well, this could show that Seb’s feelings emotional and sexual can be towards men: something he didn’t want Sherlock to see so easily and certainly not to discuss publicly.

The coffee stain could represent Henry’s drinking the coffee, going for opposite-sex relationships.  The ketchup stain could betray his true feelings towards other men: he’s attracted to them.  So, Henry is bi: his napkin will, ‘mop up’, coffee and ketchup.

There is also ketchup around Henry’s lips and on his sleeve from his cooked breakfast that he had on the train, this shows he wiped his mouth with his sleeve, a gesture suggestive of oral sex,

So, he’s eating something (a sexually symbolic act) and he’s on a train (a phallic symbol par excellence) and it’s left visible staining.  The nearest thing those trains can manage: probably a sandwich, that was disappointing.  So he drinks a coffee which represent women and eats a sandwich with ketchup which represents men.    

So Henry is in a hurry to get on a train and eat anything, he’s hungry for food and really needs to be on this train.  Basically, something scares John into running towards the train and while he’s on there he might as well try to enjoy something to eat.  If the train is sex and the food is feelings then we see John get scared of his feelings for Sherlock and jump head-long into dating (sex, the train) and while he’s on there he tries to have feelings but it’s a disappointment because you can’t get anything not-disappoinintg feelings(food)-wise on a train.  So, John is rushing into sex with possibly men and women according to this ketchup/coffee thing and is finding no meaningful connection with either because he’s just rushing into sex to get away from his feelings for Sherlock that scare him.

A woman sat across from him gave him her number and got off.  Then he mopped up the coffee with the napkin smudging some of the numbers.  He then got out a pen and rewrote the numbers, however after wiping his nose with the napkin at Baker Street we cannot be sure if he’s still interested in her.  Here we see Henry being very ambivalent about calling this woman.  He is interested enough to keep the napkin, then careless enough to smudge the numbers, then interested enough to restore the numbers and then again careless enough to smudge them again.  It’s like he’s trying to care, he’s making an effort and then when he’s distracted his true colours come out and show that he doesn’t really care that much.  This sounds so much like John and Jeanette in THoB: he’s trying to make an effort, playing the boyfriend role at the Christmas party and yet eventually the truth comes out, he doesn’t even know if his girlfriend has a dog or what.  She walks out, he says he will call her, she says no and he seems to accept that as the inevitable outcome.  So, he’s trying though he knows that he will eventually fail by sabotaging the relationship and he doesn’t even really care despite his own efforts to do so.

Henry’s fingers have nicotine stains.  There are signs, physical signs that Henry wants to smoke.  His fingers betray his desire.  Notice how sexual this looks when Sherlock deduces it: Henry’s wide-open eyes, his wide-open mouth,

John’s fingers betray his stress, at times, too.  Sherlock has known this since he met him.  Can Sherlock tell when John is aroused and in need of, ‘a smoke’?  Maybe it’s these tells that drive Sherlock even more crazy with desire.  Perhaps if John satisfies his own sexual impulses then Sherlock is not bombarded with these signs of sexual tension from him that drive him crazy.  Note John’s hand after he accepts going on Sherlock’s case for him,

John suggests to Henry that what he saw is not real, it’s his imagination.  This could be how he feels about the incident at Battersea, maybe it wasn’t real, after all.  This could be John trying to tell himself it was nothing.

Henry says that The Hollow made him feel afraid and strange (queer).  Talking to The Woman frightened John.  But then something even more frightening happened.  He saw footprints whereas John heard footsteps when Sherlock got The Woman’s text and his location was revealed.  This is what scared John and made him stop dating just like this is what scared Henry and made him not smoke for many hours.

The footprints were of a, ’gigantic HOUND’, we find out as Sherlock moves closer and closer into the foreground, looming over John and Henry.  This reinforces the idea of Sherlock as The Hound, 

…the thing that scared John.  He will be John’s hound later, at the lab, when he decides to see if he can stimulate John.

As soon as he realises that the word, ‘hound’, is odd he decides to take the case.  Subtextually, as soon as he realises that John stopped dating because he heard Sherlock at Battersea he decides to look into that.  But, no, in fact, as soon as he realises this he decides that JOHN must take the case.  This is something that John needs to figure out for himself.  He needs to understand it too but this is about John’s feelings, it would behoove John, himself, to know what’s going on with this.

What is the point textually of saying to John and Henry that he’s not coming but that John is and then to say, ‘j/k, I am coming!’?  I don’t know.  But, in the subtext, I think it’s pretty cool to think that this is Sherlock realising that John had this epiphany that John needs to face this first and then Sherlock will face it, too.  They both need to understand this situation separately.  This is why this episode shows them both struggling with their fears in such a separate way: John at the lab and Sherlock at the moor.

If John just ate at home, he would have had a satisfying breakfast.

YES!  I love this comment!  <3  Just look at him in ASiB,

I love this! What do you think about Sherlock saying to Irene “The chemistry is simple and very distracting” when talking about love? I’ve taken that to mean, since he’s already talking about John, Sherlock has noticed John’s chemistry before and it’s devastatingly distracting. (He can’t be referencing Irene, he just figured her out) Which is why we see him SO JITTERY at the start of THoB - Sherlock figured out that Irene was in love with him, and he overheard her telling John that, which means John’s distracting chemistry must be intended for him as well.

Another thing that’s been bothering me that your post reminded me to ask - Do you think there’s a reason every person who wears a tie also wears a tie pin even though the one person who NEVER wears a tie once seen doing so does not have a tie pin? Sherlock has plenty of opportunities to wear ties considering the formality of his everyday attire yet he chooses not to. John wears them a couple of times, but not usually. Then we have Moriarty who always wears one along with a tie pin. I see this as how they are willing to communicate emotion - Sherlock never wears a tie but he does at John’s wedding and even though John has a pin Sherlock does not. That whole speech was Sherlock letting his emotions run free as he read a love letter to his best friend. The subtext in this show glorious.

Woa, nice catch!  The chemistry is distracting!  How distracting?  See Sherlock trying to not, ‘smoke’, in the beginning of THoB!

omg @the-7-percent-solution: tie talk!  This is so exciting for me!  I love your interpretation!  Does this mean that if you have a pin in your tie the pin is holding you back from speaking about your feelings?  John definitely can’t talk about his feelings for Sherlock at his wedding that’s for sure.

I think in my interpretation of ties on Sherlock the ties are symbolic of your feelings, you know your, ‘ties’, to people.  Sherlock, ‘doesn’t wear ties’, because he doesn’t, ‘get involved’.  So, just the fact that he’s wearing a tie at the wedding confirms Mycroft’s statement that he’s involved.  Then I think the pin I would interpret as a commitment, to be, ‘pinned down’, is to be held down, to be immobilised.  John’s tie pin at his wedding is black, which I think looks sort of terrible aesthetically but symbolically I think it’s like marrying Mary is like his own funeral.  That commitment would certainly keep him from speaking out, too.

Anyway I really like your idea that Sherlock can only share his feelings while wearing a tie, that’s actually beautiful.

Now, the question is: if a tie means a relationship and a pin means a commitment, then who is Moriarty wearing a pin tie for?  Sherlock?  Someone else?  I have this little idea that he’s secretly been with Mary all along.  Especially after that incident with the gum in the courtroom.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

another from s3 semester, it is so exciting to read again and this time reblog! i am guessing this might have been written shortly before the phone=heart was #confirmed, and of course well before @sagestreet 's follow the dogs series, but those references absolutely work with the interpretations here!

Avatar
reblogged

A drop of blood on the doctor’s bust …

Toby the bloodhound follows the scent of a blood drop, found on the smashed Thatcher bust of Dr Barnicot. 

TBC below the cut ….

Avatar
lukessense

@ebaeschnbliah not a 100% sure about this, but maybe the a-ve is supposed to be read separately as in a and -ve. -ve could be an abbreviation for negative energy in a exothermic reaction which would fit the hydrogen and/or theme of explosives as h=enthalpy ? Sorry I didn‘t pay a lot of attention at my thermodynamics class, but I found two separate pages where the -ve was used to describe the negative energy in exothermic reactions (x) (x).

Edit: It could also be about blood types: group A -ve being the negative rhesus factor (x) (x). Makes more sense tbh, especially considering Mary’s pregnancy.

And the structural formulae look like threads around a globe don’t they? And blood=information but also blood=life lives right?

Thank you @lukessense​ for this interesting addition. A blood type description makes indeed a lot of sense. The globe-like structure reminds me also very much of a certain decoration object, Irene has on her table in ASIB. (X)

I‘m very intrigued by the blood type description in this context, especially considering that Toby looses the trail.

About the crystal/globe-like object: also looks a bit like a flame to me? And also reminds me of the single apple on CAMs desk. Just freely associating here…but yes the general direction or overarching theme seems clear.

@lukessense​  It will turn out that it is Ajay’s blood on the doctor’s bust.

SHERLOCK: “Then our suspect must have cut themselves breaking the bust.”

And this is a piece of dialogue that immediately reminds me once more of Irene Adler in ASIB, when she admires Sherlock’s cheekbones: “Look at those cheekbones. I could cut myself slapping that face. Would you like me to try?”

The masks that crumble and fall in TST are Sherlock’s masks. And when Sherlock looks at the doctor’s smashed bust in the plastic bag, the audience sees that mask literally crumbling down his face. This could indicate that the ‘bust smasher’ belongs (metaphorically) to the same ‘group’/’family’ as Irene Adler does … the ‘H-Group’.

Like Irene, Ajay is closely linked to Jim as well … by the dialogue, the torture scenes, his desire for revenge, the confrontation beside a pool, the joint fall into blue water, the sign of the Ypsilon that represents the YOU. And right from the start of the episode, it is Jim whom Sherlock expects to be involved in the theft of the Black Pearl and the smashing of the plaster busts. 

Jim on his part is linked to John … by the secret middle name Hamish (scottish form of James/Jim) but also by the dialogue:  “It’s always YOU. John Watson, you keep me right.” 

Sherlock is the one who smashes the last bust, who drops the final facade with his own hand. Viewing Mary as Sherlock’s facade, as part of himself, it makes sense that she sacrifices her own life, when Vivian Norbury pulls the trigger to shoot Sherlock … at the end of an episode, that revolves around broken masks,

Vivian … who occupies a minor position in the governemt, but always wanted to be a field agent, has a rather sweet tooth, frequently enjoys a glass of wine, is cleverer than most and outsmarted them all … appears to be a mirror for Mycroft. Mycroft (the brain, logic and reason), who tries in an last attempt to ‘override’ Sherlock’s desire to connect with his burried emotions again, to break all the masks that present him as the cold, reasoning thinking machine. A Janus-faced brain … full of desire but also full of fear. If one wants too much, one might have less. “John or James Watson? Saint or Sinner? James or John? The more is Less?”  

H … for Hamish or Hydrogen, AMO or AMMO … both could be true in each case, because all of it is quite explosive ….

A different kind of smashing, but some thoughts I was having today crystallised around this post - all of these smashes are important, and tie Ajay as you’ve pointed out into everything that’s going on. I’ve written a bit about them being like the walls in his mind he needs to break down (final one is the ludicrous fake wall from TFP) but I was thinking about a more literal smashing in TAB that we could possible link in - the idea of the glass house? I’m p sure we’re all aware this is a Victorian euphemism at this stage, but glass is something that is pretty smashable and is normally used as a metaphor for female empowerment, which is tied into queer empowerment throughout TAB. Glass ceiling/glass house? And don’t forget the smash sound effect that they hear whilst in the house…

Avatar
sarahthecoat

oh, this is getting interesting! i like the idea of norbury as a mycroft mirror!

Wow, yes - interesting! I think that’s an excellent chain of inferences @ebaeschnbliah, @lukessense and @thewatsonbeekeepers: Blood type -> cut -> bust -> cheekbones -> smashing of facades, walls and glass. And also Ajay -> Ypsilon -> YOU -> James -> Hamish -> John. There’s a lot of smashing in both TAB and S4, that’s for sure. I had never thought of Vivian Norbury as a mirror for Mycroft (=brain) but that seems to make a lot of sense @ebaeschnbliah. It also reminds me of @sagestreet‘s meta about Vivian representing what John might become if he keeps up the straight facade; his “dystopian choice” (X). And, connecting it to canon in that meta, that means that “If Watson chooses his heterosexual side, then Holmes takes drugs”. And John will choose his hetero side if Sherlock keeps denying his own emotions. So the facade needs to be smashed and broken; Mary needs to take the bullet and Mycroft’s influence over Sherlock needs to be beaten back.

yes! also i can’t help seeing those molecule diagrams as bubbles. it’s just a goofy thing, i wonder how intentional. probably not super important!

@sarahthecoat for me they look like little globes which would fit the loose thread in the world (TST). But as @ebaeschnbliah mentioned, there are other objects on the show that look similar and bubbles…make me think of balloons as well.

@possiblyimbiassed yes everything seems to be thoroughly connected on this show, a whole web of connection with one loose thread. Norbury as a mirror for John, yes she does seem to have some similarities with him, but many mirrors on the show mirror several people right? And in the end everything seems to lead back to Sherlock and his love for John. At the center there is always Moriarty, Sherlock’s sexuality which also lies ‚hidden’ within John. So for me this blood-connection is again a proof for that. The blood-trail that Toby is following belongs to Ajay but the characteristics don‘t exactly match him do they? Whiskey, the dichotomy of caffeine and the relevance of blood type read more like John to me, because he‘s the one standing between coffee and tea (at least his representation on the show as Sherlock‘s love interest/mirror does). Of course other characters also drink whiskey and even Sherlock is confronted with the choice ‚coffee or tea?‘ on TLD, but this choice is not one that‘s actually concerning Sherlock alone but him in connection with John (with the facade Mary gone choosing coffee would’ve been another mechanism of repression but Sherlock chooses tea). So the blood leads to Ajay -> Moriarty -> John, yet again. And even if we look at the blood from a different point and read it as something connecting Mary, Rosie and John, it would make sense. Mary and Rosie are very present as Toby follows the trail and we know that Mary considered Ajay as a part of her family (a.g.r.a). And Ajay only cut himself and left the blood-trail because he smashed the Thatcher-bust, a symbol that’s actively connected to Mary via a transitioning shot in TST. So we‘ve got another connection to this villainous web, even though it‘s only villainous, because the brain (and metatextually ACD via Dr. Watson) created it that way. Seems like Sherlock tries to decipher all the connections of this spider web but the big problem is the loose thread that endangers the stability of the web, especially if a certain wind arrives that might blow the whole web away?

And there’s Toby as well. Toby is a bloodhound …. a hound. As such, Toby can also be counted as part of the ‘H-Group’. First he isn’t moving. But once he finally starts to move, Toby becomes quite fast. And although he loses the trail in the end … a drop in a puddle, a tree in a wood, a single note in a bookcase, one information inside a mind palace … Sherlock still finds his way to Ajay at the pool.

JOHN: You just like this dog, don’t you? SHERLOCK: Well, I like you.

And right from the start, the hound is connected to both characters … Jim and John. In ASIP the barking of a dog arouses John from his Afghanistan nightmare and announces the pink lady’s case, which is sponsored by Jim, who is chained to a wall, with an iron collar round his neck, in a padded cell deep inside Sherlock’s mind palace in HLV. Something wants to break free … tearing down facades, walls and even elephant glass ….

a drop of blood in a puddle, or a pebble on a beach.

and they are #confirmed, Following a Dog, which is #confirmed, equated to Sherlock Liking John.

Avatar
reblogged

How he did it ….

When a drop of chemistry brings the blood to a boil

Sherlock BBC, The Great Game:  How Ian Monkford, banker of some kind and city boy, froze some of his blood, faked his death and went on hiatus to Columbia … with the help of …

January, 2021

Avatar
lukessense

@ebaeschnbliah that‘s what I remembered! Ah memories, tricky things. Good to know :)

Avatar
gosherlocked

So this is the moment that will be repeated in every intro until the end of S4. As if Sherlock was starting a chemical reaction the moment John entered his life. :))

@gosherlocked it looks like we‘ve got two similar experiments. A drop of a red fluid (looks like blood) in a petri dish in ASiP where Sherlock adds some kind of clear fluid as John enters, but we don‘t see a/the chemical reaction. It’s hard to tell if Sherlock is using the two fluids that are presented so prominently in this scene (the brown one which looks like watered down blood and the bright blue one) (x). In TGG there is a drop of frozen blood in a petri dish which starts to boil as soon as Sherlock adds another kind of fluid, this time a clear chemical substance with label. This is after Sherlock met Jim from IT, examined the shoes of Carl Powers and while solving the case of ‚Janus Cars‘. Or how @ebaeschnbliah put it: when the transport was set in motion (x). Seems like the experiment ‚evolved’ just like Sherlock did. At least that’s how I would understand it now. Still a beginner at deducing here.

Avatar
reblogged

‘Dust is eloquent’, Sherlock explains to John and Mrs. Hudson in TRF while he searches for the hidden spy camera. Dust is important because dust can talk and tell you everything you need to know … just like the noises in ASIB (X). If one knows how, like Sherlock Holmes, one can read dust like an open book. And what’ s more, it is simply impossible to fake dust. Throughout the story told in Sherlock BBC the topic of dust turns up several times. 

TBC below the cut …

Avatar
sarahthecoat

AH, yes, the absence of something is certainly as important as the presence. (ACD SILV, the dog that didn't bark in the night, was a key clue)

Dust=victorian fog, interesting idea. So the dusty 221b in TEH warns us of the regression into heteronormativity of s3-4, even while the gay subtext under all that dust intensifies. The "chemistry" is still there under the "dust".

Avatar
reblogged

Packed-up chemistry …

Impressions from Sherlock BBC,  The Reichenbach Fall & The Empty Hearse

By the end of TRF Mrs. Hudson describes to John and the TV audience what they, and John, can observe with their own eyes - two years later - at the beginning of TEH. 

September, 2019

Avatar
gosherlocked

Love this, @ebaeschnbliah, the chemistry never left the flat. It has always been there, waiting for the boys to return.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

Wow, yes.

Avatar
reblogged

… once Sherlock had been …

-  ‘I’m clean. I don’t even smoke.’ tells Sherlock in ASIP.  The message is clear: Sherlock is clean at the moment, but once he had been a junkie … addicted to drugs and there are still ‘danger nights’ when the risk of a relapse threatens. 

-  ‘Once, in the early days, Sherlock had been an emotional child’ … Mycroft tells in TFP. But then Sherlock changed and became very different. 

Erus got locked up behind elephant glass, Jim chained to the wall of a padded cell like a hound from hell and a mask, a facade, a guardian created and married to the (traditional) friendship … to guard the ‘one fixed point in a changing age’ … because otherwise …. ‘mE and Jim will get on like a house on fire’ ...

September, 2019

Avatar
gosherlocked

This is great, @ebaeschnbliah. Suppressing, abstaining from, chaining your unwanted feelings, hiding them in deep water, in a well for example … And another thought: this image reminds me of Sherlock and Jim in the adjoining cells in TRF, but here Eurus and Jim are even closer, facing each other. Another progression, I would say.  

And it also reminds me of the things that should not be hidden behind glass but used, just as Sherlock’s feelings do.

Wonderful addition, @gosherlocked  Here’s the scene in question. You are right, one can easily assume that there isn’t a stone wall but elephant glass between them. :)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

yes!

Avatar
reblogged

SCANDINAVIAN  REFERENCES

________________________________________________________________

In Sherlock BBC - and also a little bit outside of it 

While writing on DISTRACTION & CONSEQUENCES and CABIN ON THE MEADOW, involving Phil with his ‘explosive’ car and the Hiker with the bashed-in head, I couldn’t fail to notice that Phil’s unmoving car is a SAAB … which is a Swedish brand. 

According to the informations given during the promotion campaingn for the Escapre Room, TheGameIsNow, Sherlock lives currently in Sweden. Since these aren’t the only occasions where Scandinavian regions are mentioned in Sherlock BBC, the suspicion inevitably arose that those references could be of some importance. Reason enough to make another little list. :)

TBC below the cut ….

Wow - this is an impressive collection @ebaeschnbliah! I had forgotten about the SAAB that backfired in ASiB and the Icelandic wool in TEH. And the spy Greta Bengtsdotter in TST implying “daughter of Benedict” (or even ‘daughter of Bang who plays Dracula’) is really funny! :)) “Greta” means “pearl, by the way - and her story appears very close to Sherlock’s hunt for the Black Pearl of the Borgias. The name Bengtsdotter did puzzle me a bit when I first saw it, though, for sounding a bit farfetched and old-fashioned. As far as I know, the tradition of composing children’s family names from their father’s name with the addition “-son” or “-daughter” is no longer in use in most of Scandinavia (I believe it mainly ceased sometime during the 19:th century) but still alive on Iceland. Nowadays the “-son” names are still very common, but they’re passed on as they are without changing each generation. What’s not common is the “-daughter” form, since women also bear the “-son” names. Which brings the result that “Bengtsson” generates over 12 million hits on a Google search, while “Bengtsdotter” renders only half a million. 

Not much more to add except one thing. In FINA, after telling Watson about Moriarty, Holmes talks about retiring from crime-solving: “Between ourselves, the recent cases in which I have been of assistance to the royal family of Scandinavia, and to the French republic, have left me in such a position that I could continue to live in the quiet fashion which is most congenial to me, and to concentrate my attention upon my chemical researches.” (In Victorian time, the kingdoms of Sweden and Norway were united). But before that, says Holmes, he must free society of Moriarty. Apparently, the Scandinavian king had payed Holmes enough money to quit crime-solving and focus on chemistry (not sure why he would like to do that, though). This sounds a bit different, however, than in the suicide-like note he later left to Watson at the Reichenbach: “I made every disposition of my property before leaving England and handed it to my brother Mycroft.” No more plans for retirement there, as it seems. I’m not sure what this might mean, only that there’s an actual reference to Scandinavia in canon’s The Final Problem as well.  

Avatar
tildathings

In nowadays Sweden both a baby girl or boy can get a sir name like Svensson, Anderson, Pettersson or Magnusson because it’s the baby’s father’s sir name. 

The change from every generation changing the sir name after the father’s first name stoped in late 1890-1910. People started to move to towns because of work. The knowledge of witch family the person come from and who for example Anders Svensson father wasn’t important any longer. 

Funny thing from my father’s family. Some years ago I started doing my family tree. 

After sometime I found out that in my Father’s Family three names were repetidly used for 250 years! 

The boys were named; 1. Sven. 2. Erik. 3. Mattis 

The girls were named: 1. Katarina. 2. Matilda. 3. Erika

Therefore my father hade four father’s named Sven Svensson and one Erik Svensson! 

This isn’t uncommon in the Scandinavian Family name tradition. 

Say the Svensson family lived at a farm in the village Lit. Everyone in that village and the nearest village around knew that Svensson’s lived there. 

Erik Svensson must then be the second son in that family and therefore gave him a bit of social standing or if the family had bad reputation, not so good chances for work. Mattis becomes often a soldier because then he got somewhere to live and work. 

Oh, sorry this becom a long interruption on this post. https://ebaeschnbliah.tumblr.com/post/185056754939

Thanks @possiblyimbiassed for adding another Schandinavian reference from canon. Especially the connection between The Final Problem and Holmes considering to ‘concentrate his attention upon chemical researches’ (chemistry) made me smile. :))))

@tildathings  Thank you for more interesting informations about Scandinavian name giving. Better than any research is always a firsthand-account and the history of names is a fascinating topic. No need to appologize at all, this ‘interruption’ is very welcome. :))))

@ebaeschnbliah I didn’t even think of the chemistry metaphor - how could I miss that? :)))  Another thing that strikes me is that this Scandinavian connection apparently stretches from FINA (Scandinavian royal family gives Holmes a lot of money) over the hiatus and into EMPT (Sigerson the Norwegian spy has been traveling around). What was it all about? But then, if you take the modern title “A Scandal in Belgravia” and skip some letters but keep the order, you get “Scandin……avia”. Coincidence? Maybe I’m getting a little obsessed now, but the TFP Viking played by musician Paul Weller and the link in your post to his music video “Pick it Up” with Martin Freeman not only made me laugh; it made me think “isn’t this about some poor devil trying to put together IKEA furniture but getting frustrated?” Or John Watson trying to ‘move on’ during the hiatus :))))

And now in our hiatus, after all these Scandinavian hints, we have this “Sherlock-is-in-Sweden-on-some-frivolous-case” in The Game Is Now. Why is IKEA mentioned among Sweden’s natural resources? And what ‘frivolous’ things is the guy doing? I’ll look out for him, in case he passes by. ;)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

RB for discussion.

Avatar
reblogged

John’s wedding is a crime scene - Part III

I’m sure I’m far from the first one to suggest this; I know a lot of people have discussed it years ago, but it hit me so hard now while re-watching the stag night scenes in TSoT, that I just can’t get it out of my mind: This is not some random apartment of a dead man; the crime scene of the Mayfly Man is actually 221B!  If you like, this can be seen as Part III of my earlier meta series called “John’s wedding is a crime scene and Sherlock is the victim”. You can find the first two parts here (1) and here (2).

You don’t believe me? OK, let’s do a crime scene investigation à la Sherlock and sample the different clues here:

Hmm, well, I do see a wallpaper with a pattern of large flowers on it…

…and I also do see a leather sofa with Sherlock on it:

Yes - nice, isn’t it? John really seems to appreciate it. ;) But this meta is going to hurt, so if you’re not up for it, please don’t read further.

Avatar
raggedyblue

Very good @possiblyimbiassed! between what does not make much sense reading the blog and thinking about the Show is why  after a first appointment, pleasant but not conclusive, the nurse should know where is the man’s apartment. She explicitly says she came out with a ghost, literally someone who is already dead. According to the landlord a week ago (4 years). But dying means falling in love. And it’s something that happened to more than one woman. John “Three Continents” Watson has gone from a girl to an another not being able to make a commitment because he is already dead / in love. Sherlock can see what the man / John has done, but he can’t understand why. Perhaps he can’t understand how a straight  and moral man like John can be so frivolous at the same time. Until at the wedding he meets Sholto, in all respects a man. Not you, not you, not you, tells to every single woman. Because finally the concept of man enters in the messy equation that is John’s love life. And along with this, the realization of what could have been, every damn time and especially if a nurse had not entered their lives. The coincidence that a crime happens to a wedding in which Sherlock Holmes participates is remarkable and improbable (even if yes, one should be wary of coincidences and never discard the impossible, I know), but above all it is strange that, present a woman with a turbulent past and threatening, the  crime is about John Watson’s past. Regarding the possibility of the feasibility of the murder I can’t say much about the technician. But I’ve already seen it in another show, which obviously is not scientifically indicative. A woman hit with a sharp knife in her side, feels an indistinct pain, but continues to walk, sit down, smile and eventually die. All this in an episode of Vera in which Alistair Petrie appears …. mhhh. John and Sherlock are stuck in a deadlock, they’re in the same prison. Together. We have already seen Sherlock in the same cell (in adjoining cells, but at some point the impression is that they are the same) with Moriarty, homophobia / homosexual desire. Now Sherlock is realizing that John is stuck in the same cell (closet) with him.

However, I am not entirely convinced that the stag night was something more. It’s possible that all the clues you found ( @possiblyimbiassed damn brilliant, I’m speechless) can refer to something that could have happened if the nurse had not arrived. Sherlock’s awareness of what he has / lost, because John has always been in love with him. Unrequited love hurts, but requited but not realized love destroys us by its nonsense.

I was thinking, giving a completely metaphorical reading of the stag nigth, maybe we could go even deeper. It is said to be “drunk on love”. A metaphor perhaps more widespread because it is older than that between drugs and love. It’s always about chemistry. And the stag night took place, explicitly, retracing the places of the crimes they have solved, retracing their dates, their history together, the stag.es of their falling in love. Finally the story how the two are falled in love

Avatar
sarahthecoat

yes!

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

CHEMISTRY OF LOVE

i took a gander through my “chemistry of love” tag, and though i didn’t find as much as i had hoped (maybe there’s another tag i used but can’t recall atm) it did cause me to think again about whenever drugs or poison or medicine turns up in the show. I think there may be some nuances yet to be worked out, but i think it is a metaphor for love or feelings. Love could be a nice thing, or it could be scary and destructive. I think that’s why we sometimes see medicine, sometimes poison, sometimes “recreational” drugs.

ASIP, Lestrade (a sherlock mirror) has seen sherlock with john, and he notices something is different. So he organizes the “drugs bust” to test his observation. (and a house is a metaphor for the self, so on one level, lestrade in 221b is sherlock trying to figure himself out) He finds the pink case (yes sherlock is gay) and the eyeballs (eyes=seeing & observing, also “the windows to the soul”). “It stops being pretend if they find anything”, ie any concrete evidence that sherlock is in love. The squad was in the kitchen, did someone also check the bedroom? John “he doesn’t feel things that way” can’t believe sherlock could be a junkie (romantic) and sherlock shows off his nicotine patches. He’s protected from feelings by this special method. But then sherlock runs off with the cabbie (a john mirror) to test his wits/luck against the poison pill. Love is a vicious motivator, dangerous! But of course john saves him with his dick gun.

TBB, soo lin (a sherlock mirror) used to carry drugs for a cartel, but did her best to escape that life. Maybe sherlock was in love once before, but he’s doing his best not to be now. (remember how he hid that boner sword under his chair)

TGG medicine or poison, or poisoned medicine? it’s so hard to know, if love is safe, how much love is safe, is the right kind of love ok but could it be hiding the dangerous kind? (Botox is a paralytic)

ASIB, irene (sherlock’s libido) knocks him right out with a bad case of the feels. yet whatever she does, what we see is that sherlock and john are in love with each other, but not talking about it. Trying to communicate with music, booze, and so on isn’t getting through. Oh, and mycroft gives sherlock a cigarette. Maybe this is the brain trying to test, if just a little of this “safe” kind is ok.

THOB, the whole thing with the “fear drug”, is the poison in the sugar, the experiment in the locked room, the analysis, where is it coming from, how is it getting in, is it really excreted so quickly? The lab vs dewer’s hollow, leaky pipes vs pressure pads, this whole episode is a bonanza of metaphors and subtext, i can’t even. Yeah, i know, @sagestreet , the maggie thing with the homophobia, but that’s only one angle. ALL these metaphors seem to operate from multiple angles.

TRF, mercury poisoning, poisoned candy :( Love is the dangerous disadvantage, safer to be a fake.(food=intimacy, especially chocolate!) I think this might be the pinnacle of what i got SO tired of when i watched House, that idea that “i can’t do my job properly when i’m in love”.

TSOT, cigarettes in the Hamish montage, but tucked into the slipper under the sofa. “It’s SO hard not smoking”, sherlock is trying so hard not to have feelings. :( And we get that Hug during the wedding.

HLV, the drugs den, the lab test, denial even though he tests positive, it’s “for a case”. Then in hospital he’s “hooked up to the good stuff”. I think sherlock is no longer able to pretend he’s not in love, even if he’s afraid john doesn’t love him back, or would be angry to learn of it. John has his “not gay” facade (“mary”) with him everywhere, though he doesn’t seem happy with it/her. But maybe if john just saw how heartbroken (shot in the heart) sherlock really is, he would love him back, with “the good stuff”? (lots of mirrors in this: for molly or janine, read john, or at least a mind-stage experimental version)

TAB, overt references to “drugs”, sherlock is trying to find a way to talk to john, i think he is a lot closer to just accepting that he’s in love, and that it *might* not be fatal, and *probably* john would save him with his dick gun again.

TST, the “natural high”, and being open to working with “mary”, ie, he’s going to love john even if john’s “not gay”. (that facade falls at the end, though john is angry at first)

TLD, “off his tits”, ie sherlock accepts that he loves john, whether or not john is still clinging to the “not gay” facade. (john’s anger is a scary emotion) but we do get The Hug.

TFP, i just don’t remember well enough, are there any references to drugs, medicine, or poison? Seems like the water=feelings metaphor is so overwhelming in this one, plus all the guns and blowing stuff up, maybe that was enough to be going on with. “Mary” brings back that line about the “junkie” (romantic).

I only watched s3 about two-three times, and s4 once, so i expect others will have a lot to add.

The metas i reviewed briefly were by @ebaeschnbliah , “under the microscope part 2”, “investigations” and “love is a burning thing”. I feel sure that at the very least, there is something in @sagestreet ’s and/or @possiblyimbiassed ’s metas about the medical angle, but i have to get back to the yard work since there is finally a nice day!

@sarahthecoat it makes a lot of sense. The fact that Lestrade also has the same patches shows how the work is a shield that Sherlock “married to my work” uses to protect himself (work is the antidote for the sorrow, and love is often connected with pain ). Lestrade is not only a mirror for Sherlock, I think he represents “the work” itself. And when Sherlock comes back from the Fall Lestrade is smoking, it’s a weakened armor, and Sherlock himself tells him that cigarettes will be his end. Mycroft smokes too light cigarettes, but the three times we see him smoking are three times when he worried about Sherlock. The care will not be an advantage, but it is inevitable.

In TFP Sherlock is drugged by a poisoned dart shot by Eurus. A reference to SIGN when the part of rational Sherlock, Thaddeus Sholto, the chemical misanthrope, as opposed to the bohemian twin, is killed by a poisoned dart (x). A reference also to the cupid arrows. Sherlock has just chosen John on Mycroft, the love on his cumbersome intellect.

yes! Lestrade=the work, love how these characters are working double or triple time, as mirrors and metaphors!

I had forgotten the poison dart in TFP, but that’s great, “euros”, sherlock’s repressed emotions, drug him, not unlike irene=sherlock’s libido did.

OH, and i just remembered the way john was drugged in TEH, when he was kidnapped. HMM, is that about john’s emotions, or about what sherlock thinks or fears about john’s emotions, or about sherlock’s feelings for john…

That’s definitely a pattern @sarahthecoat !! The chemicals (of love/emotions) on the losing side make him weak as long as he doesn’t acknowledge them! They cross his paths in many different ways and forms.

One you didn’t mention and which I find quite important is TD12. The drug of oblivion which turned up in the episode of a Sherlock Holmes who thought to have lost his John Watson forever! Who says: “Anyone ever ‘opt’ to remember?” A Sherlock Holmes who wants to forget about everything in good life! TD12 is depression i.v.! The dying detective it is…

oh right, td12! I guess cos i only watched TLD once, and that wasn’t directly used on sherlock, though it could have been. Interesting, to link it with depression, which is something that can happen when you turn anger inward, and feel unloved.

What a wonderful explosion of chemical metaphors! :)) Nice sleuthing, @sarahthecoat, @loveismyrevolution and @raggedyblue (and I love that it actually reflects canon too, @raggedyblue) !!

@sarahthecoat: About metas with a possible medical angle, maybe you mean my addition to @ebaeschnbliah‘s meta “Under the microscope part 2”? I talked a bit about the actual chemistry involved in love, the various hormones that affect the brain:

And I think Sherlock is very wrong about one thing: The chemistry of love is not ‘incredibly simple’ - I believe any scientist in the field could testify to that. The glycerol molecule is a wonder of simplicity in comparison to the complex mix of oxytocin, vasopressin, adrenaline, dopamine, norepinephrine, phenylethylamine and other hormones involved, just to mention a few. I also think it’s noteworthy that the ‘chemistry of love’ involves some of the same substances in the human body that are affected by Sherlock’s use of cocaine.”

I also talked about the glycerole molecule and the sugar-coating of poison (homophobia) in TRF, and of Sherlock lab-testing the sugar in THoB for cocaine, but getting nowhere because the substance was rather connected to fear than euphoria. You can also find some chemistry links in that same addition (X).

As for TD12, I think it can mean alcohol, since that’s the most common method of ‘forgetfulness’ - something John uses quite a lot. And Faith’s visions while affected by TD12 had a similar colour as a glass of whiskey. We discussed it here. And yes, @loveismyrevolution; I think it’s applicable to depression as well.

ah, thanks for those links! TD12=alcohol is a very interesting connection, and yes, john does drink, possibly to forget.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

CHEMISTRY OF LOVE

i took a gander through my “chemistry of love” tag, and though i didn’t find as much as i had hoped (maybe there’s another tag i used but can’t recall atm) it did cause me to think again about whenever drugs or poison or medicine turns up in the show. I think there may be some nuances yet to be worked out, but i think it is a metaphor for love or feelings. Love could be a nice thing, or it could be scary and destructive. I think that’s why we sometimes see medicine, sometimes poison, sometimes “recreational” drugs.

ASIP, Lestrade (a sherlock mirror) has seen sherlock with john, and he notices something is different. So he organizes the “drugs bust” to test his observation. (and a house is a metaphor for the self, so on one level, lestrade in 221b is sherlock trying to figure himself out) He finds the pink case (yes sherlock is gay) and the eyeballs (eyes=seeing & observing, also “the windows to the soul”). “It stops being pretend if they find anything”, ie any concrete evidence that sherlock is in love. The squad was in the kitchen, did someone also check the bedroom? John “he doesn’t feel things that way” can’t believe sherlock could be a junkie (romantic) and sherlock shows off his nicotine patches. He’s protected from feelings by this special method. But then sherlock runs off with the cabbie (a john mirror) to test his wits/luck against the poison pill. Love is a vicious motivator, dangerous! But of course john saves him with his dick gun.

TBB, soo lin (a sherlock mirror) used to carry drugs for a cartel, but did her best to escape that life. Maybe sherlock was in love once before, but he’s doing his best not to be now. (remember how he hid that boner sword under his chair)

TGG medicine or poison, or poisoned medicine? it’s so hard to know, if love is safe, how much love is safe, is the right kind of love ok but could it be hiding the dangerous kind? (Botox is a paralytic)

ASIB, irene (sherlock’s libido) knocks him right out with a bad case of the feels. yet whatever she does, what we see is that sherlock and john are in love with each other, but not talking about it. Trying to communicate with music, booze, and so on isn’t getting through. Oh, and mycroft gives sherlock a cigarette. Maybe this is the brain trying to test, if just a little of this “safe” kind is ok.

THOB, the whole thing with the “fear drug”, is the poison in the sugar, the experiment in the locked room, the analysis, where is it coming from, how is it getting in, is it really excreted so quickly? The lab vs dewer’s hollow, leaky pipes vs pressure pads, this whole episode is a bonanza of metaphors and subtext, i can’t even. Yeah, i know, @sagestreet , the maggie thing with the homophobia, but that’s only one angle. ALL these metaphors seem to operate from multiple angles.

TRF, mercury poisoning, poisoned candy :( Love is the dangerous disadvantage, safer to be a fake.(food=intimacy, especially chocolate!) I think this might be the pinnacle of what i got SO tired of when i watched House, that idea that “i can’t do my job properly when i’m in love”.

TSOT, cigarettes in the Hamish montage, but tucked into the slipper under the sofa. “It’s SO hard not smoking”, sherlock is trying so hard not to have feelings. :( And we get that Hug during the wedding.

HLV, the drugs den, the lab test, denial even though he tests positive, it’s “for a case”. Then in hospital he’s “hooked up to the good stuff”. I think sherlock is no longer able to pretend he’s not in love, even if he’s afraid john doesn’t love him back, or would be angry to learn of it. John has his “not gay” facade (“mary”) with him everywhere, though he doesn’t seem happy with it/her. But maybe if john just saw how heartbroken (shot in the heart) sherlock really is, he would love him back, with “the good stuff”? (lots of mirrors in this: for molly or janine, read john, or at least a mind-stage experimental version)

TAB, overt references to “drugs”, sherlock is trying to find a way to talk to john, i think he is a lot closer to just accepting that he’s in love, and that it *might* not be fatal, and *probably* john would save him with his dick gun again.

TST, the “natural high”, and being open to working with “mary”, ie, he’s going to love john even if john’s “not gay”. (that facade falls at the end, though john is angry at first)

TLD, “off his tits”, ie sherlock accepts that he loves john, whether or not john is still clinging to the “not gay” facade. (john’s anger is a scary emotion) but we do get The Hug.

TFP, i just don’t remember well enough, are there any references to drugs, medicine, or poison? Seems like the water=feelings metaphor is so overwhelming in this one, plus all the guns and blowing stuff up, maybe that was enough to be going on with. “Mary” brings back that line about the “junkie” (romantic).

I only watched s3 about two-three times, and s4 once, so i expect others will have a lot to add.

The metas i reviewed briefly were by @ebaeschnbliah , “under the microscope part 2”, “investigations” and “love is a burning thing”. I feel sure that at the very least, there is something in @sagestreet ’s and/or @possiblyimbiassed ’s metas about the medical angle, but i have to get back to the yard work since there is finally a nice day!

@sarahthecoat it makes a lot of sense. The fact that Lestrade also has the same patches shows how the work is a shield that Sherlock “married to my work” uses to protect himself (work is the antidote for the sorrow, and love is often connected with pain ). Lestrade is not only a mirror for Sherlock, I think he represents “the work” itself. And when Sherlock comes back from the Fall Lestrade is smoking, it’s a weakened armor, and Sherlock himself tells him that cigarettes will be his end. Mycroft smokes too light cigarettes, but the three times we see him smoking are three times when he worried about Sherlock. The care will not be an advantage, but it is inevitable.

In TFP Sherlock is drugged by a poisoned dart shot by Eurus. A reference to SIGN when the part of rational Sherlock, Thaddeus Sholto, the chemical misanthrope, as opposed to the bohemian twin, is killed by a poisoned dart (x). A reference also to the cupid arrows. Sherlock has just chosen John on Mycroft, the love on his cumbersome intellect.

yes! Lestrade=the work, love how these characters are working double or triple time, as mirrors and metaphors!

I had forgotten the poison dart in TFP, but that’s great, “euros”, sherlock’s repressed emotions, drug him, not unlike irene=sherlock’s libido did.

OH, and i just remembered the way john was drugged in TEH, when he was kidnapped. HMM, is that about john’s emotions, or about what sherlock thinks or fears about john’s emotions, or about sherlock’s feelings for john…

That’s definitely a pattern @sarahthecoat !! The chemicals (of love/emotions) on the losing side make him weak as long as he doesn’t acknowledge them! They cross his paths in many different ways and forms.

One you didn’t mention and which I find quite important is TD12. The drug of oblivion which turned up in the episode of a Sherlock Holmes who thought to have lost his John Watson forever! Who says: “Anyone ever ‘opt’ to remember?” A Sherlock Holmes who wants to forget about everything in good life! TD12 is depression i.v.! The dying detective it is…

oh right, td12! I guess cos i only watched TLD once, and that wasn't directly used on sherlock, though it could have been. Interesting, to link it with depression, which is something that can happen when you turn anger inward, and feel unloved.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

CHEMISTRY OF LOVE

i took a gander through my “chemistry of love” tag, and though i didn’t find as much as i had hoped (maybe there’s another tag i used but can’t recall atm) it did cause me to think again about whenever drugs or poison or medicine turns up in the show. I think there may be some nuances yet to be worked out, but i think it is a metaphor for love or feelings. Love could be a nice thing, or it could be scary and destructive. I think that’s why we sometimes see medicine, sometimes poison, sometimes “recreational” drugs.

ASIP, Lestrade (a sherlock mirror) has seen sherlock with john, and he notices something is different. So he organizes the “drugs bust” to test his observation. (and a house is a metaphor for the self, so on one level, lestrade in 221b is sherlock trying to figure himself out) He finds the pink case (yes sherlock is gay) and the eyeballs (eyes=seeing & observing, also “the windows to the soul”). “It stops being pretend if they find anything”, ie any concrete evidence that sherlock is in love. The squad was in the kitchen, did someone also check the bedroom? John “he doesn’t feel things that way” can’t believe sherlock could be a junkie (romantic) and sherlock shows off his nicotine patches. He’s protected from feelings by this special method. But then sherlock runs off with the cabbie (a john mirror) to test his wits/luck against the poison pill. Love is a vicious motivator, dangerous! But of course john saves him with his dick gun.

TBB, soo lin (a sherlock mirror) used to carry drugs for a cartel, but did her best to escape that life. Maybe sherlock was in love once before, but he’s doing his best not to be now. (remember how he hid that boner sword under his chair)

TGG medicine or poison, or poisoned medicine? it’s so hard to know, if love is safe, how much love is safe, is the right kind of love ok but could it be hiding the dangerous kind? (Botox is a paralytic)

ASIB, irene (sherlock’s libido) knocks him right out with a bad case of the feels. yet whatever she does, what we see is that sherlock and john are in love with each other, but not talking about it. Trying to communicate with music, booze, and so on isn’t getting through. Oh, and mycroft gives sherlock a cigarette. Maybe this is the brain trying to test, if just a little of this “safe” kind is ok.

THOB, the whole thing with the “fear drug”, is the poison in the sugar, the experiment in the locked room, the analysis, where is it coming from, how is it getting in, is it really excreted so quickly? The lab vs dewer’s hollow, leaky pipes vs pressure pads, this whole episode is a bonanza of metaphors and subtext, i can’t even. Yeah, i know, @sagestreet , the maggie thing with the homophobia, but that’s only one angle. ALL these metaphors seem to operate from multiple angles.

TRF, mercury poisoning, poisoned candy :( Love is the dangerous disadvantage, safer to be a fake.(food=intimacy, especially chocolate!) I think this might be the pinnacle of what i got SO tired of when i watched House, that idea that “i can’t do my job properly when i’m in love”.

TSOT, cigarettes in the Hamish montage, but tucked into the slipper under the sofa. “It’s SO hard not smoking”, sherlock is trying so hard not to have feelings. :( And we get that Hug during the wedding.

HLV, the drugs den, the lab test, denial even though he tests positive, it’s “for a case”. Then in hospital he’s “hooked up to the good stuff”. I think sherlock is no longer able to pretend he’s not in love, even if he’s afraid john doesn’t love him back, or would be angry to learn of it. John has his “not gay” facade (“mary”) with him everywhere, though he doesn’t seem happy with it/her. But maybe if john just saw how heartbroken (shot in the heart) sherlock really is, he would love him back, with “the good stuff”? (lots of mirrors in this: for molly or janine, read john, or at least a mind-stage experimental version)

TAB, overt references to “drugs”, sherlock is trying to find a way to talk to john, i think he is a lot closer to just accepting that he’s in love, and that it *might* not be fatal, and *probably* john would save him with his dick gun again.

TST, the “natural high”, and being open to working with “mary”, ie, he’s going to love john even if john’s “not gay”. (that facade falls at the end, though john is angry at first)

TLD, “off his tits”, ie sherlock accepts that he loves john, whether or not john is still clinging to the “not gay” facade. (john’s anger is a scary emotion) but we do get The Hug.

TFP, i just don’t remember well enough, are there any references to drugs, medicine, or poison? Seems like the water=feelings metaphor is so overwhelming in this one, plus all the guns and blowing stuff up, maybe that was enough to be going on with. “Mary” brings back that line about the “junkie” (romantic).

I only watched s3 about two-three times, and s4 once, so i expect others will have a lot to add.

The metas i reviewed briefly were by @ebaeschnbliah , “under the microscope part 2”, “investigations” and “love is a burning thing”. I feel sure that at the very least, there is something in @sagestreet ’s and/or @possiblyimbiassed ’s metas about the medical angle, but i have to get back to the yard work since there is finally a nice day!

@sarahthecoat it makes a lot of sense. The fact that Lestrade also has the same patches shows how the work is a shield that Sherlock “married to my work” uses to protect himself (work is the antidote for the sorrow, and love is often connected with pain ). Lestrade is not only a mirror for Sherlock, I think he represents “the work” itself. And when Sherlock comes back from the Fall Lestrade is smoking, it’s a weakened armor, and Sherlock himself tells him that cigarettes will be his end. Mycroft smokes too light cigarettes, but the three times we see him smoking are three times when he worried about Sherlock. The care will not be an advantage, but it is inevitable.

In TFP Sherlock is drugged by a poisoned dart shot by Eurus. A reference to SIGN when the part of rational Sherlock, Thaddeus Sholto, the chemical misanthrope, as opposed to the bohemian twin, is killed by a poisoned dart (x). A reference also to the cupid arrows. Sherlock has just chosen John on Mycroft, the love on his cumbersome intellect.

yes! Lestrade=the work, love how these characters are working double or triple time, as mirrors and metaphors!

I had forgotten the poison dart in TFP, but that's great, "euros", sherlock's repressed emotions, drug him, not unlike irene=sherlock's libido did.

OH, and i just remembered the way john was drugged in TEH, when he was kidnapped. HMM, is that about john's emotions, or about what sherlock thinks or fears about john's emotions, or about sherlock's feelings for john...

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

CHEMISTRY OF LOVE

i took a gander through my “chemistry of love” tag, and though i didn't find as much as i had hoped (maybe there's another tag i used but can't recall atm) it did cause me to think again about whenever drugs or poison or medicine turns up in the show. I think there may be some nuances yet to be worked out, but i think it is a metaphor for love or feelings. Love could be a nice thing, or it could be scary and destructive. I think that's why we sometimes see medicine, sometimes poison, sometimes "recreational" drugs.

ASIP, Lestrade (a sherlock mirror) has seen sherlock with john, and he notices something is different. So he organizes the “drugs bust” to test his observation. (and a house is a metaphor for the self, so on one level, lestrade in 221b is sherlock trying to figure himself out) He finds the pink case (yes sherlock is gay) and the eyeballs (eyes=seeing & observing, also “the windows to the soul”). “It stops being pretend if they find anything”, ie any concrete evidence that sherlock is in love. The squad was in the kitchen, did someone also check the bedroom? John “he doesn't feel things that way” can't believe sherlock could be a junkie (romantic) and sherlock shows off his nicotine patches. He’s protected from feelings by this special method. But then sherlock runs off with the cabbie (a john mirror) to test his wits/luck against the poison pill. Love is a vicious motivator, dangerous! But of course john saves him with his dick gun.

TBB, soo lin (a sherlock mirror) used to carry drugs for a cartel, but did her best to escape that life. Maybe sherlock was in love once before, but he’s doing his best not to be now. (remember how he hid that boner sword under his chair)

TGG medicine or poison, or poisoned medicine? it’s so hard to know, if love is safe, how much love is safe, is the right kind of love ok but could it be hiding the dangerous kind? (Botox is a paralytic)

ASIB, irene (sherlock’s libido) knocks him right out with a bad case of the feels. yet whatever she does, what we see is that sherlock and john are in love with each other, but not talking about it. Trying to communicate with music, booze, and so on isn’t getting through. Oh, and mycroft gives sherlock a cigarette. Maybe this is the brain trying to test, if just a little of this “safe” kind is ok.

THOB, the whole thing with the “fear drug”, is the poison in the sugar, the experiment in the locked room, the analysis, where is it coming from, how is it getting in, is it really excreted so quickly? The lab vs dewer’s hollow, leaky pipes vs pressure pads, this whole episode is a bonanza of metaphors and subtext, i can't even. Yeah, i know, @sagestreet , the maggie thing with the homophobia, but that’s only one angle. ALL these metaphors seem to operate from multiple angles.

TRF, mercury poisoning, poisoned candy :( Love is the dangerous disadvantage, safer to be a fake.(food=intimacy, especially chocolate!) I think this might be the pinnacle of what i got SO tired of when i watched House, that idea that "i can't do my job properly when i'm in love".

TSOT, cigarettes in the Hamish montage, but tucked into the slipper under the sofa. “It’s SO hard not smoking”, sherlock is trying so hard not to have feelings. :( And we get that Hug during the wedding.

HLV, the drugs den, the lab test, denial even though he tests positive, it’s “for a case”. Then in hospital he’s “hooked up to the good stuff”. I think sherlock is no longer able to pretend he's not in love, even if he's afraid john doesn’t love him back, or would be angry to learn of it. John has his “not gay” facade (“mary”) with him everywhere, though he doesn't seem happy with it/her. But maybe if john just saw how heartbroken (shot in the heart) sherlock really is, he would love him back, with “the good stuff”? (lots of mirrors in this: for molly or janine, read john, or at least a mind-stage experimental version)

TAB, overt references to “drugs”, sherlock is trying to find a way to talk to john, i think he is a lot closer to just accepting that he’s in love, and that it *might* not be fatal, and *probably* john would save him with his dick gun again.

TST, the “natural high”, and being open to working with "mary", ie, he's going to love john even if john's "not gay". (that facade falls at the end, though john is angry at first)

TLD, “off his tits”, ie sherlock accepts that he loves john, whether or not john is still clinging to the “not gay” facade. (john's anger is a scary emotion) but we do get The Hug.

TFP, i just don't remember well enough, are there any references to drugs, medicine, or poison? Seems like the water=feelings metaphor is so overwhelming in this one, plus all the guns and blowing stuff up, maybe that was enough to be going on with. "Mary" brings back that line about the "junkie" (romantic).

I only watched s3 about two-three times, and s4 once, so i expect others will have a lot to add.

The metas i reviewed briefly were by @ebaeschnbliah , "under the microscope part 2", "investigations" and "love is a burning thing". I feel sure that at the very least, there is something in @sagestreet 's and/or @possiblyimbiassed 's metas about the medical angle, but i have to get back to the yard work since there is finally a nice day!

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
raggedyblue

Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side.

Absolutely, @raggedyblue  A chemical defect and the chemistry of love …. and in TST Sherlock answers when asked:

SIR EDWIN: You’re high as a kite! SHERLOCK: Natural high, I assure you. Totally natural. 

When it comes to Sherlock’s OD on the plane, my bet is still on an overdose of emotions. After all, he deduced himself into love only one episode prior to HLV. We see him then high at the beginning of HLV, though he doesn’t display significant symptoms of it. Neither does he on the plane. Sherlock only changes between different levels of his mind palace. At the end of TAB he leaves the plane, sober and functioning, like a man who never had an ‘almost lethal’ overdose. And no one reacts on that persumed overdose anyway in a way which could be called ‘normal’. Not the ‘constantly worrying’ brother and not the professional doctor and ‘best friend‘ either. 

And then TLD comes round, presenting a Sherlock who is so high, he is on the verge of dying …. well, well .. with his facade gone, all his emotions are finally on the loose ….. and Mr.Sex plays the stationmaster …. tick, tock, tick, tock ….

I really can’t say that I was in any way disappointed with S4 and especially not with TFP. Quite the contrary, quite the contrary …. :))))

Avatar
sarahthecoat

ah, wow, yes, wasnt it @sagestreet ? or @possiblyimbiassed ? who wrote something about that, maybe in one of the medical/drugs metas... I like applyng the "chemistry of love" metaphor to HLV and TAB, as well as TLD. As you point out, nobody reacts to sherlock's "drug use" as if it was a real thing. I now wonder if john taking sherlock to "pee in a cup" in HLV, was either a metaphor for john trying to figure out if sherlock really does "feel things that way", or sherlock trying to run such a scenario. And then (via mirror molly), john gets angry at him when he "tests positive" for love. It's their mutual "he doesn't love me back" miscommunication, which is much more intense since that glance exchanged at the end of the reception in TSOT. yikes.

Avatar
reblogged

________________________________________________________________

Investigations …..

Sherlock BBC,  The Hounds of Baskerville

________________________________________________________________

Avatar
gosherlocked

His eyes!

Avatar
raggedyblue

now I can’t link photos, but I looked a bit around and in all the photos of people using similar microscopes, no one had eyes lit (in fact probably one would be blinded more than having increased visibility). Apart from making us enjoy Ben’s eyes, don’t they also look like small projectors? @ebaeschnbliah @gosherlocked @possiblyimbiassed

@sherlockshadow

Wow! @raggedyblue  I took a lot of screenshots from that scene, a lot more than those in this post, I had a hard time to select the most beautiful ones (as always :) …. and it never struck me that floodlighting Sherlock’s eyes in that way could be a strange or maybe even a bit unrealistic occurence. But you are right, it seems indeed odd to have the own eys lit while looking into a microscope. And it’s even more conspicuous in a story where eyes generally play such a big role as in Sherlock BBC. 

‘Small projectors’ …. is someone/something looking back at Sherlock? This is an interesting thought. In this episode Sherlock is investigating the ‘Hound’ and the scene above is the moment when he discovers the hidden truth about the synthesized drug, created to produce fear. In Henry’s case this fear is used to prevent him from remembering that, what he once witnessed.

On a metaphorical level, where Henry Knight is Sherlock’s mirror and represents that what happened in Sherlock’s past, Sherlock takes - in this scene - his first glimpse at his own trauma. 

Or the other way round ….. the past/the trauma is staring back at him …. the hound, the monster, the ghost, the demon, the devil …. that, what will turn later in the story into the ghostly bride, the buried skeleton, the insane ‘other one’ . 

Memory starts stiring and Sherlock is, for the first time, aware of it …. and panicks? …..

Or Sherlock just realized that he is actually staring at the chemistry of …. love? ….

Just some thoughts that came to mind immediately. :)

The chemistry of love - beautiful reading! And kudos to @raggedyblue for pointing out the odd lighting of the eyes.

Ok … I just realized that this is not the scene where Sherlock finds the coded informations about the HOUND drug. Seems I was a bit hasty, sorry. The discovery of the fear-drug happens a little bit later when Sherlock is able to break into the secured documents. In the scene above Sherlock stares at the sugar from Henry’s kitchen. He is so sure to discover some chemical residues of a drug here but finds …. nothing. 

Sherlock actually stares at ‘nothing’ related to a dangerous drug …. or at ‘no-one’ or ‘nobody’ …. one might say. Well, no-one or nobody …. is NEMO …. isn’t it? 

DONOVAN: He doesn’t have friends. So who are you? JOHN: I’m … I’m nobody. 

Well, this is another lovely metaphor, I think. :)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

oh, what an interesting discussion! It’s been a long time since i looked through my dad’s microscopes, and this one is a lot more recent but it does seem odd to have that much light coming up out of the eyepiece. Do we have anyone in fandom with lab experience? It does suggest the projector lights aimed at the viewer that become such a hallmark of s4.

Honestly, nothing jumped to my mind when I saw these pictures, but since we’re talking about it…

1) Yeah, the amount of light projected by the microscope seems legit (there’s usally a way to adjust it on microscopes, btw) but the fact that the whole scene was shot in a dark room was very clearly intentional (you’re supposed to be able to look into a microscope in a well-lit lab, afterall). TPTB wanted these twin lights to be visible, I think.

2) They remind me of 2 other scenes in the same episode :

2a. the scene where Henry freaks out because something on his yard accidentally triggers the two blinding garden lights

Which would reinforce the idea of Sherlock and Henry being mirrors,

(as if this^^^^ shot wasn’t enough lol)

which in turns has very interesting implications concerning Sherlock’s past - I agree with @ebaeschnbliah​ that there’s something in Sherlock’s past that traumatised him and gave him is very peculiar views on love and relationships (that it’s destructive and hurts people, which is why Sherlock is terrified of them). 

I mean, since drugs = emotions and sugar = food = sex/intimacy, how typical that Sherlock would first think to look for a hallucinogenic substance in food, instead of a airborne chemical designed to hurt people and manufactured during pseudo scientific experiments by a lunatic…

So something happened to Sherlock when he was young, that his traumatised mind twisted it into something else, like Henry with H.O.U.N.D. 

Incidentally, the fact that there are clear parallels between H.O.U.N.D. and conversion therapy (they’re linked to margaret thatcher, they had detrimental effects on the mental health of those who were exposed to it, 1986 was not a good year for those who wanted them)  makes me believe that Sherlock’s parents are monsters that sent their child to CT (probably in the US, since UK’s laws regarding homosexuality seem practically idyllic - I mean, the gay inkeepers are married in an episode that aired before gay marriage was legal in the UK, iirc).

2b. the scene where Sherlock finds out about Project H.O.U.N.D. in Major Barrymore’s office.

Notice the small rings of light in Sherlock’s pupils? They’re not from the computer he’s supposed to be using. Actually, these rings are a well-known effect produced by special lighting equipment used in film making, called ring lights. The light rings in Sherlock’s eyes indicate that he was acting this scene while facing something like this (camera included in the middle of the ring) :

So yeah. That was very intentional, because these rings of light in Sherlock’s people break the fourth wall by revealing that this was all filmed, not real. 

As to what that means… maybe the light in Sherlock’s eyes indicates whether or not he’s following the right lead? I mean, the light is kind of unfocused when he’s looking for a drug in the sugar, but really precisely inside Sherlock’s pupils when he’s on to the truth with H.O.U.N.D.

@ebaeschnbliah​ @sarahthecoat​ @raggedyblue​ @gosherlocked

Spy!John speculations below :

Thanks for your detailed answer @a-bit-not-goodd   That’s a lot of intersting stuff to think about and the movie you mentiond - Splendor - sounds really great. :)

wow, very interesting!

Avatar
reblogged

________________________________________________________________

Investigations …..

Sherlock BBC,  The Hounds of Baskerville

________________________________________________________________

Avatar
gosherlocked

His eyes!

Avatar
raggedyblue

now I can’t link photos, but I looked a bit around and in all the photos of people using similar microscopes, no one had eyes lit (in fact probably one would be blinded more than having increased visibility). Apart from making us enjoy Ben’s eyes, don’t they also look like small projectors? @ebaeschnbliah @gosherlocked @possiblyimbiassed

@sherlockshadow

Wow! @raggedyblue  I took a lot of screenshots from that scene, a lot more than those in this post, I had a hard time to select the most beautiful ones (as always :) …. and it never struck me that floodlighting Sherlock’s eyes in that way could be a strange or maybe even a bit unrealistic occurence. But you are right, it seems indeed odd to have the own eys lit while looking into a microscope. And it’s even more conspicuous in a story where eyes generally play such a big role as in Sherlock BBC. 

‘Small projectors’ …. is someone/something looking back at Sherlock? This is an interesting thought. In this episode Sherlock is investigating the ‘Hound’ and the scene above is the moment when he discovers the hidden truth about the synthesized drug, created to produce fear. In Henry’s case this fear is used to prevent him from remembering that, what he once witnessed.

On a metaphorical level, where Henry Knight is Sherlock’s mirror and represents that what happened in Sherlock’s past, Sherlock takes - in this scene - his first glimpse at his own trauma. 

Or the other way round ….. the past/the trauma is staring back at him …. the hound, the monster, the ghost, the demon, the devil …. that, what will turn later in the story into the ghostly bride, the buried skeleton, the insane ‘other one’ . 

Memory starts stiring and Sherlock is, for the first time, aware of it …. and panicks? …..

Or Sherlock just realized that he is actually staring at the chemistry of …. love? ….

Just some thoughts that came to mind immediately. :)

The chemistry of love - beautiful reading! And kudos to @raggedyblue for pointing out the odd lighting of the eyes.

Ok … I just realized that this is not the scene where Sherlock finds the coded informations about the HOUND drug. Seems I was a bit hasty, sorry. The discovery of the fear-drug happens a little bit later when Sherlock is able to break into the secured documents. In the scene above Sherlock stares at the sugar from Henry’s kitchen. He is so sure to discover some chemical residues of a drug here but finds …. nothing. 

Sherlock actually stares at ‘nothing’ related to a dangerous drug …. or at ‘no-one’ or ‘nobody’ …. one might say. Well, no-one or nobody …. is NEMO …. isn’t it? 

DONOVAN: He doesn’t have friends. So who are you? JOHN: I’m … I’m nobody. 

Well, this is another lovely metaphor, I think. :)

Avatar
sarahthecoat

oh, what an interesting discussion! It's been a long time since i looked through my dad's microscopes, and this one is a lot more recent but it does seem odd to have that much light coming up out of the eyepiece. Do we have anyone in fandom with lab experience? It does suggest the projector lights aimed at the viewer that become such a hallmark of s4.

Avatar
reblogged

UNDER  THE  MICROSCOPE  -  PART  TWO

________________________________________________________________

Another episode, another case, other shoes … or more precisely …. footprints of shoes. In TRF Sherlock’s focus is on the chemical traces preserved in the footprints left behind by the kidnapper of Max and Claudette Bruhl. This time though the examination takes place in Bart’s lab.

Avatar
sagestreet

I’ve been meaning to reblog this for ages, @ebaeschnbliah, seeing as we messaged about it extensively a few weeks ago. Sorry for taking so long. This meta (together with its two sibling parts: x and x) is really interesting.

Good catch about the chocolate thing. NO WAY that’s a coincidence. I mean, there’s a substance that is both like chocolate and like nitroglycerin?…Nice!!!:D That substance can be either sweet or explosive (or both)…Well, that’s love, for sure! Very, very nice metaphor, Mofftiss. And well done, @ebaeschnbliah.

I do have a problem with the whole chemistry/substance/poison metaphor, though. (I think I have expressed my skepticism when we were exchanging messages about this topic a few weeks ago).

The problem I have with it is the fact that it’s not a very consistent metaphor (at least, so far, I still have trouble to sort it into a consistent pattern). 

You know that I like metaphors that can be extended and found throughout the entire show, metaphors that mean the same thing wherever they turn up, metaphors that makes sense in the same way no matter where in the text they can be found and that make sense from every angle, connecting to and entwining with every other metaphor organically.

And that’s where I’m still struggling with the whole chemical substance/poison metaphor.

There are times where this metaphor very clearly and unequivocally means: love (just as you pointed out above).

Like when Sherlock refers to the “simple and incredibly destructive chemistry” of love in ASiB.

But there are other instances where the chemistry/substance/poison metaphor doesn’t work as a love metaphor at all. That’s where the problem arises:

In THoB, for example, the substance that’s hidden behind the password ‘Maggie’ (symbolically under Thatcher’s name!) is most certainly not about love because Thatcher was obviously not showering gay men with love. AT ALL. The H.O.U.N.D. substance is definitely a metaphor for state-sponsored homophobia (airborne and ubiquitous as it is). Margaret Thatcher wasn’t exactly emitting love for gay men back in the 1980s. Which, sort of, seems to be the point of the entire episode for Mark Gatiss, who is airing his personal grievances a bit there (not that that’s not understandable; we all do that sometimes, after all.:)) But I would argue that that’s what the episode is all about at its very core.

And that’s where the whole metaphor falls flat, unfortunately.

So far I haven’t managed to come up with a comprehensive theory that encompasses all the mentions of chemical substances, poisons etc. and unites them all into one all-encompassing metaphor. I feel like I’m still stumbling around the edges of this one. 

The mention in THoB is particularly curious since it doesn’t fit the pattern at all. *scratches his greying head*

Avatar
sarahthecoat

@sagestreet i wonder if what seems inconsistent is like the "baby switch", where the context contributed to the meaning. In this case, is it possible that in certain contexts, "chemistry"=love, and in others, =poison? I agree that the metaphor needs to have a consistent pattern, maybe it's just a little more complex. Phone=heart and drinks code also turned out to have some nuances.

Avatar
reblogged

UNDER  THE  MICROSCOPE  -  PART  TWO

________________________________________________________________

Another episode, another case, other shoes … or more precisely …. footprints of shoes. In TRF Sherlock’s focus is on the chemical traces preserved in the footprints left behind by the kidnapper of Max and Claudette Bruhl. This time though the examination takes place in Bart’s lab.

Avatar
sarahthecoat

oh, another good one! I think the "mask" of enrobing chocolate is the goal of the chemistry deduction, and putting "pgpr" in that particular place on the screen, where it comes between the boys, when it could be anywhere... bit suspicious. Then the connection to nitroglycerin and drowning an explosion, yes i can see why they would want to work that in!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net