mouthporn.net
@sapphic-shakespeare on Tumblr
Avatar

Gay(er) Shakespeare

@sapphic-shakespeare / sapphic-shakespeare.tumblr.com

WLW/NBLW are good, Shakespeare is good, what're you to do? Trans friendly blog
Avatar
Avatar
surlifen

NO ONE knows how to use thou/thee/thy/thine and i need to see that change if ur going to keep making “talking like a medieval peasant” jokes. /lh

They play the same roles as I/me/my/mine. In modern english, we use “you” for both the subject and the direct object/object of preposition/etc, so it’s difficult to compare “thou” to “you”.

So the trick is this: if you are trying to turn something Olde, first turn every “you” into first-person and then replace it like so:

“I” →  “thou”

“Me” →  “thee”

“My” →  “thy”

“Mine” →  “thine”

Let’s suppose we had the sentences “You have a cow. He gave it to you. It is your cow. The cow is yours”.

We could first imagine it in the first person-

I have a cow. He gave it to me. It is my cow. The cow is mine”.

And then replace it-

Thou hast a cow. He gave it to thee. It is thy cow. The cow is thine.”

Avatar
some-stars

This is perfect and the only thing missing is that when “thy” comes before a vowel it’s replaced by “thine”, i.e. “thy nose” but “thine eyes.” English used to do this with my and mine too (and still does with a and an).

Avatar
fremedon

The second person singular verb ending is -(e)st. In the present tense, it works more or less like the third person singular ending, -s: 

  • I sleep in the attic. Thou sleepest in the attic. He sleeps in the attic.
  • I love pickles. Thou lovest pickles. He loves pickles.
  • I go to school. Thou goest to school. He goes to school.

The -(e)st ending is only added to one word in a compound verb. This is where a lot of people make mistakes:

  • I will believe it when I see it. Thou wilt believe it when thou seest it. He will believe it when he sees it.

NOT

  • *thou willst believest it! NOPE! This is wrong

If you’re not sure, try saying it in the third person and replacing the -(e)st with -s:

  • *He will believes it when he sees it. ALSO NOPE! 

In general, if there’s one auxiliary, it takes the -(e)st ending) and the main verb does not. If there are multiple auxiliaries, only one of them takes -(e)st:

  • I could eat a horse. Thou couldst eat a horse. He could eat a horse.
  • I should go. Thou shouldst go. He should go.
  • I would have gone. Thou wouldst have gone. He wouldst have gone. 

You can reduce the full -est ending to -st in poetry, if you need to drop a syllable:

  • thou sleepst, thou lov'st.

In some common words–mostly auxiliary verbs, or what you might have learned as “helping verbs”–the ending is always reduced:

  • I can swim. Thou canst swim. He can swim.

Sometimes this reduction takes the last consonant of the stem with it:

  • I have a cow. Thou hast a cow. He has a cow. 

Or reduces the -st down to -t:

  • I must believe her. Thou must believe her. He must believe her.
  • I shall not kill. Thou shalt not kill. He shall not kill.

However! UNLIKE the third-person singular -s, the second person -(e)st is ALSO added to PAST TENSE words, either to the past stem in strong (irregular) verbs or AFTER THE -ed in weak (regular) verbs: 

  • I gave her the horse. Thou gavest her the horse. He gave her the horse.
  • I made a pie. Thou mad’st a pie. He made a pie.
  • I wanted to go. Thou wantedst to go. He wanted to go.

This is different from the third person!

  • *He gaves her the horse. He mades a pie. He wanteds to go. SO MUCH NOPE!

It’s not wrong to add -(e)st to a long Latinate verb in the past tense, but it’s unusual; it’s much more common to use a helping verb instead:

  • I delivered the letter. (Great!)
  • Thou deliveredst the letter. (Not wrong, but weird)
  • He delivered the letter. (Great!)
  • I did deliver the letter. (Normal if emphatic, or an answer to a question; otherwise, a little weird.)
  • Thou didst deliver the letter. (Great!) 

And a couple last things:

1.) Third-person -(e)th is mostly equivalent to and interchangeable with third-person -s:

  • I have a cow. Thou hast a cow. He hath a cow.
  • I love her. Thou lovest her. He loveth her.
  • I do not understand. Thou dost not understand. He doth not understand.

HOWEVER! Third-person -(e)th, unlike -s but like -(e)st, can, sometimes, go on STRONG past-tense verbs:

  • I gave her the cow. Thou gavest her the cow. He gaveth her the cow.

This never happens with weak verbs:

  • *He lovedeth her. NOPE NOPE NOPE!

And even with strong verbs, from Early Modern (e.g., Shakespearean) English onward, it’s quite rare. But you will see it from time to time.

2.) In contemporary Modern English, we invert the order of subjects and auxiliary verbs in questions:

  • Will I die? I will die. 
  • Has she eaten? She has eaten.

If there’s no auxiliary, we add one–do–and invert that:

  • Do you hear the people sing? You (do) hear the people sing.

In Early Modern English, this process was optional, and mostly used for emphasis; all verbs could be and were moved to the front of the sentence in questions:

  • Hear ye the people sing? (Or singen, if we’re early enough to still be inflecting infinitives.)

Do-support was also optional for negatives:

  • I don’t like him. I like him not.
  • Thou dost not care. Thou carest not.
  • She does not love thee. She loves thee not.

3.) Imperative verbs never take endings:

  • Hear ye, hear ye!
  • Go thou and do likewise!
  • Give me thy hand. Take thou this sword. 

4.) Singular ‘you’–that is, calling a singular person by a plural pronoun–arose as a politeness marker; and ‘thou’ fell out of use because it eventually came to be seen as impolite in almost all contexts. In general, once singular ‘you’ comes into use, it is used for addressing

  • people of higher social status than the speaker
  • or of equivalent status, if both speakers are high-status
  • strangers
  • anyone the speaker wants to flatter

‘Thou’ is used for

  • people of lower social status than the speaker
  • family and intimate friends
  • children
  • anyone the speaker wants to insult

It is safer to ‘you’ someone who doesn’t necessarily warrant ‘you’ than to ‘thou’ someone who does.

5.) And finally, that ‘ye’? That’s the nominative form of you–the one that’s equivalent to ‘I’ or ‘we.’ 

  • I  → thou → he/she/it  → we → ye → they
  • Me → thee → him/her/it → us → you → them
  • My → thy → his/her/its → our → your → their
  • Mine → thine → his/hers/its → ours → yours → theirs

Any time you’re using ‘thou’ for the singular, the second person plural– ‘y’all’– declines like this:

  • ye:  Ye are all a bunch of weirdos.
  • you: And I love you very much.
  • your: This has been your grammar lesson.
  • yours: This grammar lesson is yours. 
Avatar

1,000 Follower Analysis Post:

Something that I've thought about for years is the significance of Mercutio's death. Why is he the first to die?

First, let's examine Mercutio himself:

He is not a Montague OR a Capulet. He is a kinsman of Prince Escalus of Verona, like Paris. But like Paris, he has chosen a side in the ongoing war between the Montagues and the Capulets, which goes to show just how much the feud affects the people of Verona when even people outside the families are involved.

Mercutio is one of Romeo's closest friends, possibly even the closest after Romeo's cousin, Benvolio. He's carefree, fun loving, and is the dream role of basically every queer Shakespeare fan.

Before I talk about him more, I want to mention a little theory of mine. Maybe call it a philosophy:

See, back in 2015, my brother and I saw Kenneth Branagh's 'Romeo & Juliet', and something that really bothered me about it was that almost everything was played for drama, even the famous 'Bite my thumb' exchange, which in my opinion was a huge faux par and made for a boring production.

The first two acts of R&J is rather funny, and plays out very much like one of Shakespare's comedies, even though the play begins by outright telling us that the two titular characters will ultimately take their own lives. In fact, the first half is hopeful, with the friar believing that the union between the two leads will result in the end of the war between their families. I believe the comedic nature of the first half is essential, and to remove it is to rob a performance of impact.

Now, I can come back to Mercutio and finally make my point: Mercutio's death is what sets off the tragedy, and marks the end of the lighter first half.

Because Tybalt kills Mercutio, Romeo kills Tybalt. Because Romeo kills Tybalt, he is banished. His banishment leads his mother to die from grief and Juilet to go to friar in a panic when her wedding to Paris is set. Friar gives Juilet the death-like sleeping potion... you get the idea.

Before Mercutio's death, there very well may have been a chance for Romeo and Juilet to be happy. I'm not here to argue about whether or not they would have worked out in the long run; that's not really my point. My point is there was hope of them working out pre-Mercutio death, which dwindles as the plot progresses.

I think it's also important that the first to die is not actually part of either family. Notice how, other than the titular characters, the first and last characters to die are not Montagues or Capulets, but outsiders, and better yet, kinsmen of the Prince.

The Prince himself even says at the end of the play that due to him "winking at their discords," he, along with the two families, has lost loved ones. That's what he means when he says, "All are punished."

So, why does Mercutio die first?

  1. Kill off comic relief to signal tone shift.
  2. Kill off a non-family member of either side to show the effect the feud has had on the rest of Verona.
Avatar

iam Leen from Palestine, Gaza, and I need help to get out of the war. We have a war of death and hunger for the sake of my children

‏Relly Need Your Help To Evacuate Them To A Safe Plece As Soon As Possible Outside Gaza

.Thank you so much for your stand beside people in need .

❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚

To donate please click here

To donate paypal here

❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚

Accounts that have verified my account

vetted by 90-ghost here

vetted by northgazaupdates here

vetted by apollos-olives here

vetted by Watermelon here

vetted by opencommunion here

vetted by vetted-gaza-funds here

vetted by ibtisams here

vetted by dreamveluv here

Avatar

Hello, Leen. I hope all will be well for you and your family soon.

Avatar
Avatar

iam Leen from Palestine, Gaza, and I need help to get out of the war. We have a war of death and hunger for the sake of my children

‏Relly Need Your Help To Evacuate Them To A Safe Plece As Soon As Possible Outside Gaza

.Thank you so much for your stand beside people in need .

❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚

To donate please click here

To donate paypal here

❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚❤️🖤🤍💚

Accounts that have verified my account

vetted by 90-ghost here

vetted by northgazaupdates here

vetted by apollos-olives here

vetted by Watermelon here

vetted by opencommunion here

vetted by vetted-gaza-funds here

vetted by ibtisams here

vetted by dreamveluv here

Avatar

Hello, Leen. I hope all will be well for you and your family soon.

Avatar

Some fun details from the Globe's Much Ado About Nothing:

  • Beatrice caught an orange on a knife (at the peformance I watched, it took three tries, but she got a big applause when she finally got it.)
  • For the masquerade party, Hero was dressed as a devil and Margaret as an angel.
  • Other costumes: Don Pedro was a lion, Benedick was a pigeon, Claudio was a bear, Don John was a cat, Barachio was a bull, Antonio was a butterfly, Leonarto was a frog/ toad and Beatrice was a leopard.
  • Benedick made audience members take an oath with him to not marry, then after the whole 'easedropping' scene, he had to go explain himself to them.
  • When Beatrice came to invite him to dinner, he was nervously rearranging oranges.
  • Beatrice laughed at Benedick's letter when she read it.
Avatar

Favourite Shakespeare's Comedies

After my other poll, I am going to be specific. There shall be a battle of the favourites!!

For-

  • Two Gentleman of Verona (comment 🐕)
  • Winter's Tale (comment ⌛️)

For the love of Shakespeare, please reblog for a better analysis

Avatar

It took a while, but since we had work done on the bathroom, I was able to convince Mum to make it Shakespeare themed! I even bought the Yorick toilet brush ages ago with this in mind.

We used old programs my nana had collected over the years, as well as one from the Richard III I saw in 2022, and various bits of art from the RSC and beyond.

Fun fact: The soap is red, but it shows more pink when you dispense it.

-Kit

Avatar
[Pre-play, at Wittenberg]
Rosencrantz: Why are you ignoring Horatio?
Hamlet: I’m playing hard to get. Guys dig that.
Rosencrantz: Uhm, I don’t think Horatio is the kind of man who finds that attractive.
Guildenstern: Yea, why would you even do that? You’re already hard to want.
Avatar
Avatar
hamletgay

people give hamlet grief for being indecisive but to be entirely fair to the guy, he does get around to killing someone. like he has two major hangups, ‘can i trust this ghost’ and 'does sending claudius to heaven count as revenge’, both of which are pretty reasonable, and once he’s cleared those hurdles the next thing he does is stab someone through a curtain. and idk about you but i feel like 'accidentally killing your ex-girlfriend’s innocent father’ is enough to make you think twice about your next murder attempt, even without the distraction of being exiled to england, tricking your ex-best friends into sending themselves to their deaths, and getting kidnapped by pirates

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net