The Vigorous Nature of Seth's Coition

Before interacting with my posts, ask yourself, "is this something I should say to a beautiful woman with an insanely violent temper?"

"syntax error: unclosed if at line 56": perfect error message, tells me exactly what I need to fix and exactly where to look for it.

"memory write failure at address 0xeb008a": good error message. describes the problem well enough to enable troubleshooting by an experienced user.

"something went wrong, please try again": bad error message. does not tell me anything useful.

"oops! something blooped! 🙁": I will kill you with my bare teeth

jewels of opar

traditional ink, digital color. 2024

pink moon.

I feel like this is the kind of thing you only reblog if you have an aesthetic blog, which I do not, but goddammit I just love it when the moon lines up with stuff

dandelion sun~

I love everything about this.

@headspacedad Is this true? Because I love the concept of bunnies practically flipping the bird

this is TRUE!

Rabbits rely on body language for the majority of their communication.  They also rely on manners in a way that would make the Heian Era aristocrats look uncultured.  And you don’t get manner dictates like that without ALSO knowing how to be passive-aggressive with them. 

Rabbit flops are super vulnerable for a bunny.  Their stomachs are exposed and they’re in a position that means if danger shows up they have to waste precious seconds getting up before they can sprint for safety.  A rabbit flop means both ‘I’m so happy I can’t contain it’ and ‘I feel so safe I am going to be vulnerable and really let go’.  Rabbit owners love seeing it.  It means that your bun really does feel that safe around you.  It’s a pretty high compliment from an animal that knows everyone’s out to kill them.

However -

it can also be used passive aggressively in the ‘you mean so little to me you’re not even worth acknowledging as existing’.  It’s right on the same level as walking into a room and greeting everyone but one person.  An enemy rabbit would be a threat.  This rabbit?  This rabbit isn’t even important enough to be a threat.  They’re a nobunny and so I will flop because there is nothing in the area worthy enough to bother being aware of.

To humans it can look very much the same but trust me, the bunnies know exactly which is which.

In every culture men develops delusions of penis-stealing witches because penis witches were present in the evolutionary environment

Can’t believe I have a post on my blog yet again that boils down to “ancient Egyptians would have thought fucking the hybrid wolf-man version of Anubis that most people think he is was both gauche and illegal because they didn’t conceive of him as a wolf-man; they’d think you’re trying to fuck a dog”

You may also be wondering why I know so much about depictions of Anubis in furry art and it’s because friends who are furries send it to me to try to shock me. I am no longer shocked by the sight of Anubis erect and drooling like a canine while also looking at me with bedroom eyes. I wish I was.

#jokes on your egyptians loved fucking animals so much they drew pictures of it on their tombs #they're not gonna kinkshame anyone

As an Egyptologist I'm gonna pull rank on this one. So, source? Which tombs? The Giza ones? The ones at Beni Hassan? The Theban Tomb series? I'd genuinely be delighted to know where all this animal fucking is going on and from what period it dates to.

Multiple writings on the tomb depictions seem to trace back to Sexual Variance in Society and History by Vern Bullough, published in 1976. Unfortunately I can't get access without paying for it.

There's also this page from Bestiality and Zoophilia: Sexual Relations with Animals by Honi Miletski (granted, the myth of Cleopatra's bee vibrator has been thoroughly debunked by now, so I can't attest to the veracity of anything else written here.)

You'll notice none of that actually cites a tangible documented example. Not a specific tomb. Not a specific papyrus. Hardly even a specific time period. Like my guys when in Egypt's 4000+ year long civilisation was this taking place? Evidence for it should be well documented but it isn't an that should be sending red flags and warning lights flashing real hard.

That book, I'm afraid to say, is racist trash that seeks to paint the Egyptians in a bad light (degenerate animal fuckers) that cites more racist trash (Tannahill is a prime example because her sources, having looked at them before are just pulled out of her ass). I know I've come across people citing this at me before because I can see the 'fact' that Ancient Egyptian men tried to fuck crocodiles and quite frankly if you think about that for more than 10 seconds you'll realise that it's not even possible without actual death. There is no recorded instance of an Ancient Egyptian man fucking a cow. I believe in the Chester Beatty Dreambook (P.BM EA 10683), from the library of Qenherkhepershef, there's a dream interpretation for what a dream means if you dream of yourself fucking a cow and it was considered bad. But there's also one for If a man sees himself in a dream: seeing his penis erect (nḫt): BAD: this means victory (nḫtw) for his enemies**, so.... they're not exactly talking about reality. Nor did they with the Apis bull because that would have been like assaulting a form of the god Ptah on earth. Trust me.

I'm able to read hieroglyphs and know of no example of bestiality being recorded within a text. There's one legal text known as the Adoption Papyrus (P. Ashmolean Museum 1945.96)*** that states if a man's brother and wife do not accept the document commissioner's children (who are adopted) then 'may a donkey fuck you, may a donkey fuck your wife' which is a 'threat' and not an example of Egyptians willingly fucking animals. Also, as someone who has read a lot of Ancient Egyptian legal documents (because that's my specialism) there is no written law on bestiality because Ancient Egypt doesn't have a written legal code.

The goats at the temple of Mendes appears to be circular citation, as I've never once found in all my times dealing with this passage being cited at me any evidence that this happened at all other than tertiary sources telling me so.

I need people to repeat after me: If a book says that a poc civilisation engaged in acts that most would find abhorrent and does not cite a primary source (i.e. a specific papyrus/tomb/stele etc) but rather a bunch of hearsay from secondary or tertiary sources then what you're reading is likely wrong and also at the very least more than a little racist.

** https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA10683-3 and also; K. Szpakowska, 'Dream Interpretation in the Ramesside Age', in M. Collier and S. Snape (ed.), Ramesside Studies in Honour of K. A. Kitchen (Bolton 2011), 509-17.

*** Eyre, C. J. (1992). The Adoption Papyrus in Social Context. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 78(1), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/030751339207800112

Adelsteen Normann (Norwegian,1848-1918)

Sunset

Oil on canvas

i may not be gods strongest warrior but there is all sorts of bullshit that he makes me deal with and i hndle it not very well usually

Japanese Quail   Coturnix japonica   #245

Near Threatened