mouthporn.net
#loki series – @rekaspbrak on Tumblr
Avatar

They're gazebos!

@rekaspbrak / rekaspbrak.tumblr.com

But he knew well enough / 26 / genderfluid / queer
Avatar

thanks to my rewatch of Loki I’ve just been reminded how much I’m annoyed by (mostly) fellow Lokius shippers that insist Sylvie is problematic, abusive, toxic, rude to Loki and that she only used Loki for her own gain.

(And that’s coming from a person who also enjoys Lokius and I’m tired of fellow shippers pretending it’s not misogyny when it actually clearly is)

Are we really in any position to claim any of that when Mobius did the exact same if not even worse things to Loki?

Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, Loki was indeed used by him. The sole reason why Loki is alive, the sole reason why Mobius recruited Loki was for his own benefit. He needed to apprehend the variant that posed a threat to the stability of the multiverse and was eliminating their forces. Coming across Loki was a happy accident and in it, he saw the opportunity to finally capture that variant. Sure, he might have been fascinated by Loki’s nature and perhaps even harbored hopes that this partnership might work out for him even better than anticipated, but the main and primary reason why he even recruited him was to use him.

In fact, he explicitly stated in subsequent episodes that if Loki refused to cooperate, he wouldn't hesitate to prune him. He warned Loki that his survival hinged upon his willingness to comply.

He can be ruthless and manipulative to get what he wants and will not hesitate to take any means necessary to reach his goal. Mobius was not reluctant to strike at Loki's most vulnerable areas.

He’s smart enough to identify Loki’s weaknesses, and one of them is his affection for his mother. When he told him Loki killed his mother, while not entirely incorrect since Frigga’s death was an unintentional consequence of Loki’s actions, he aimed to shatter Loki emotionally and provoke a reaction. It's a classic tactic of emotional manipulation designed to coerce Loki into compliance.

He used a similar strategy in episode 4 where he deceived Loki, manipulated him into thinking that Sylvie, someone Mobius suspected Loki had grown close to, had been killed.  Then, he proceeded to taunt Loki, who was visibly distressed by his lies, all in an effort to provoke a response from him.

The finale made it evident that Mobius lacks physical combat skills, rendering him incapable of directly engaging in fights. Therefore, to gain an advantage over Loki, Mobius relies on identifying his vulnerabilities and exploiting them.

He can use the TimeTwister for when Loki misbehaves and controls him like a dog, or, he can throw him in a memory loop cell, subjecting him to both verbal and physical abuse for an indeterminate period, so basically someone else does that job for him.

That action in particular is something I noticed a lot of you tend to ignore. At this point, Mobius and Loki had already formed a camaraderie. It might not have been a full-fledged friendship just yet, but they were clearly on their way to becoming friends. Mobius was hurt that Loki decided to stab him in the back and destroy his trust in him by doing the exact thing he shouldn’t - running off with the Variant, even if that was for a good cause.

For Loki, Mobius risked a great deal: his own job, the friendship and trust of Ravonna, the trust placed in him and even Ravonna by the Time Keepers, and possibly even his own life. He had enough faith in Loki to believe that Loki wouldn't betray him and run off at the first opportunity.  And Loki betrayed that trust when he went after the mysterious Variant.

When Loki and Sylvie were captured by the TVA, it wasn’t jealousy that Loki had feelings for Sylvie that drove him (even though we like to headcanon that, we have to keep in mind Loki and Mobius’ relationship wasn’t written as romantic). Instead, it was his anger and resentment that stemmed from placing so much trust in Loki, only to have him do the very thing Mobius had believed he wouldn't.

Then, despite the fact that there was already some camaraderie between them, and despite the fact that Loki genuinely meant well, Mobius in his anger, completely dismissed the possibility of Loki being honest with him. He outright declared that he no longer needed Loki and, to make matters worse, he threw him into the Time Loop cell where he knew Loki would endure repeated instances of physical assault.

I know that some of you like to argue, “oh, well at least he didn’t choose a worse memory! He clearly cares about him then!” but honestly, that’s just very questionable and just....uh?

The reason Mobius selected that memory was because he knew Lady Sif would inflict repeated physical pain upon Loki and because of what Lady Sif says to him during that loop. She hurls insults at him, calling him a "conniving, craven, pathetic worm" and that he deserves to be alone for the rest of eternity.

Mobius made the conscious decision to throw Loki into the Time Loop cell, despite the budding friendship between them, despite the budding trust, despite everything that happened and was perfectly fine with that.

It wasn't because Mobius was manipulated by the TVA or forced to do this; he did it of his own accord. He chose to punish Loki and because he wanted to use him, break him to extract info out of him. Because he refused to believe Loki’s words.

I’m shocked that so many of you overlook that and pretend it didn’t happen, because as much as I love Mobius and their dynamic, what Mobius did in that particular episode alone was more severe than anything Sylvie did to Loki throughout the entire season.

In the span of a few minutes, Mobius:

  • insulted Loki, called him an asshole, bad friend and compared him to a cockroach
  • mocked his feelings to provoke him
  • lied to him that someone Loki cared about had been killed, manipulating his emotions for a reaction
  • despite Loki’s genuine intentions, he refused to listen to him
  • he bluntly stated that Loki was no longer of any use to him 
  • he threw Loki into a place where he would endure physical, verbal, and emotional abuse, intentionally subjecting him to suffering
  • through his actions, Mobius reinforced the idea that Loki deserves to be alone, (just as Loki was in the process of forming actual, meaningful relationships with at least two people; Mobius and Sylvie, Mobius goes and punishes Loki by reminding him he deserves to be alone)
  • and despite all of that, he still expected Loki to provide him with information, meaning he did all of that because he still intended to use him for his own benefit

Eventually, Mobius did go on a bit of a personal investigation and discovered that Loki had been telling the truth. However, by the time he discovered the truth, the damage had already been done, and Loki had already been hurt.

In short, he made a conscious decision to hurt Loki in every way imaginable to get what he wanted. 

The series showed that Mobius was aware that there was a possibility that Loki might be telling the truth. However, his anger, stubbornness and unwavering certainty in his own righteousness blinded him from considering the possibility that Loki could be right.

Again, I like Mobius very much and I like Lokius as well, but jesus christ guys, some of you need to take a step back from solely blaming Sylvie as the worst person ever when Mobius did the exact same things. If not even worse, because unlike Mobius, Sylvie at least never manipulated Loki into thinking his feelings were invalid, never claimed that his mother had died because of him, never tricked him into believing that someone he cared about had been murdered.

Sylvie never subjected Loki to a memory loop filled with continuous verbal insults reminding him that he is oh, just the worst and that he deserves the life of loneliness for the rest of eternity, all the while he also suffered physical pain.

You’re free to have personal preferences and to dislike a ship or a character, but for the love of Lord stop claiming Sylvie is abusive and toxic and what not, when our own ship is just as flawed if not even more flawed. 

Sylvie did this, she did that, but where’s that same vitriol for Mobius? Why are you only coming after the woman? They both did bad shit that hurt Loki, but some of you only see Sylvie’s actions and pretend Mobius was nothing but supportive of Loki the entire time, which is wrong and disgusting. No, Mobius and Lokius is not better than Sylvie and Sylki and it’s time for some of you to accept that.

I like Mobius and I like Lokius but I’m tired of being called a misogynist because of some of you who cannot accept the fact that Mobius has committed and inflicted just as many (if not more) morally questionable things as Sylvie.

And the worst thing is that those who call this misogyny are actually right.

Mobius is a good, compelling character and will likely prove to be a good friend to Loki in Season 2, but he’s not innocent either. He can be manipulative. He can be horrible. He can be brutal to get what he wants. Yes, even to Loki.

Even Loki acknowledged that, so why can’t you?

Avatar

Look, I know our opinions regarding the show all vary, but I’d really, really prefer if people cooled down a bit and stopped harassing creators and everyone involved in the show.

You have issues with the show? Cool, that’s understandable. But you can be respectful towards everyone involved and stop tagging them in hateful/mocking tweets or messages.

But now Kate’s turned off her replies, Natalie spoke of how much people harassed her because certain people twisted her words in that one printed interview and spoke of how Kate advised her (and Sophia) to just mute/filter certain words/accounts, Sophia gets so much hatred thrown at her just for retweeting a fanart, not to mention the writers etc.

This fandom is currently a mess.

But that’s for another post.

What I’m trying to say is, the writers for the second season of the show will remain pretty much the same, as Eric has already confirmed they’re working on the show.

All this venom thrown around and at them and their colleagues and friends could backfire on us in the worst way possible.

Think about it. Do you really think they will feel inclined to listen to us and what we want to see in second season if the fans constantly harass them and the cast involved?

Honestly, I could see them do the exact opposite of what we want to see in second season, out of spite alone.

For example, they could totally go “you harassed me and my friends for weeks/months and now you expect me to comply and listen to your demands of what you want to happen in next season? Ha! Joke’s on you.”

For all we know all this harassment could lead to them minimising Mobius’ role in second season.Or they could really twist the knife in and have Loki interact/find Mobius only towards the end of the season and he truly spends his entire season searching for Sylvie. Maybe we can truly kiss goodbye to a happy jet ski ending.

Michael already said they will not bend to fan service, because they have their own story to tell. And after all this hate thrown at them, I feel like chances of them giving us some sweet, sweet fan service are basically at 0%.

The writers are still interacting with Loki/Sylvie shippers, but aren’t interacting with Lokius shippers at all. This alone should worry us, especially with second season on the horizon and the writers being the same. 

Like just...chill okay? You’re free to dislike the show for variety of reasons, but for the love of everything, stop harassing the people involved!

Because at this point I’m truly afraid they’re just going to completely sideline Mobius and his friendship with Loki in season 2 and that’s definitely now what we want to happen, right?

Avatar

look, I love Loki and Mobius but saying that Loki and Sylvie were portrayed as having a strictly platonic/sibling-like dynamic in episode 3 and that they did a whole 180 with romance in episode 4 is just...not it

the moment I first watched that episode I raised eyebrows at certain scenes because the way they were framed, shot, it was very suggestive and pointed towards marvel exploring their dynamic in a different way.

this happened exactly 5 minutes into the episode 3, after Loki ran after her. before this scene, Sylvie checked him out and then slowly leaned into his personal space, put her hands around his neck (which we know she didn’t have to bc she can enchant without literally breathing into someone’s mouth), all while both of them were panting. the way this was framed, the soft background light illuminating the room, their silhouettes forming a heart...all this made me go “wait a moment” upon first watching it, because this is not how you want to portray a sibling-like dynamic. this had very obvious romantic undertones

like, we all adore the famous lokius tie-fixing scene, right? so saying that that scene was filled with romantic/sexual tension, but this one with Sylvie enchanting Loki is just ‘classic sibling behaviour, no tension or chemistry whatsoever here’ is kinda hypocritical and that’s a lot coming from someone who favors lokius.

and even later on, they talked about love, love is hate, love is mischief, they dropped the subject but Loki, unprovoked brought it up again.

which not only was a huge foreshadowing but also a hint that this convo about love would have some deeper meaning later on in season. and it did. why would two characters who were set to have sibling type of dynamic insist on talking about romantic love (yes, it was romantic because their love convo started because of that old woman), if marvel didn’t have certain other plans for them?

I don’t think I even have to bring up the serenading scene because that one moment was sus from the start as well. I know people try to pass it off as a platonic/sibling moment because Loki tried to remind Sylvie of home yada yada, but if it was intended to be platonic, why did they have Tom (a class A actor who knows full well how to emote) as Loki stare at Sylvie with completely besotted look in his eyes.

there were some scenes that were more subtle like “you’re my way.”, the fireworks between them, Loki saying “love is a dagger” to Sylvie and then a few moments later using that very same dagger to throw it at her to save her, the way certain scenes were framed etc, but some of these scenes were straight up loud. even in the interview after this episode came out, Michael Waldron said that this was intentionally filmed as the most romantic episode of the season, and it was based off Before Sunrise (two people meeting and getting to know each other, spending the night together, talking and exploring the city, falling in love in a couple of hours)

like, close your eyes for a moment and imagine Loki saying “you’re my way” to Mobius, or Mobius trying to enchant him the way Sylvie did, Loki and Mobius discussing love the way he did with Sylvie, Loki serenading a song to Mobius instead of Sylvie...

we’d be having a blast right? we’d definitely view those scenes very differently then. and that’s the trick, because our favouritism of a certain ship sometimes clouds our deduction of what’s truly happening on screen. 

why do you think there were so many “don’t ship these two!” posts after episode 3 came out? because people noticed this developing chemistry. You can look up reaction vids on youtube, or even actual reviews or articles that came after this episode came out. “are they falling in love?” “is this headed towards romance?” “wow, flirty Loki” were some of the most spoken words.

so saying “everyone saw them as siblings” is simply not true. it was there, very, very openly so, when even those who were objectively watching the show without any shipping goggles on noticed that. 

same goes for those who say “yeah but Sylvie and Loki were just bickering and fighting all the time so that must mean they had a sibling like dynamic.”

ummm, sorry to break it to you, but two people meeting each other, starting off as enemies (?), fighting/bickering but ultimately falling in love is one of the most common tropes. 

and let’s not pretend there aren’t other mcu canon couples who started off pretty similar.

Tony and Pepper bickered all the time. Are they siblings too?

Gamora and Peter bickered/fought but ultimately fell in love. Are they siblings too?

point is that no, Loki and Sylvie were never portrayed as having sibling like dynamic, and no matter what you ship,be it lokius, lokixravonna, lokixcasey etc, you can admit that (trust me, it will feel good, therapeutic almost), and it still doesn’t invalidate your chosen ship. like, take off your shipping goggles, do a rewatch and try to not let your favouritism of a certain other ship cloud what’s in front of you.

saying the romance came out of nowhere, that they had no chemistry, not even the slightest hint of it is just deluding yourselves at this point and let’s not do that. with second season coming in two years there’s a huge chance we’ll be doing plenty of clowning later on.

Avatar

I saw lots of “we were promised a love story between Loki and Mobius and Marvel queerbaited us” takes lately - especially on twitter and, uh, that’s not the case?

Michael Waldron never queerbaited us with ‘love story between Loki and Mobius’. 

That quote was taken out of context. In the actual podcast interview (Vanity Fair 3.6.2021) he was talking with an interviewer about how his friend gave him an advice how “every story is a love story in a way”  - because it’s true

This is the transcript: 

I: “I was talking to someone much smarter than me who was just talking about how every story, should be a love story. That Wandavision is so compelling because it’s a love story and, this is at the beginning of Falcon and the Winter soldier, he was saying,’Falcon and the Winter soldier should be a love story about Sam and Bucky, it doesn’t have to be romance, it can just be about, you know, these two characters coming together.

MW: “I think that’s great, James Poncel, who’s one of my friends and collaborators, he said that before and it stuck with me that every love story is a love story or something like that, and it’s true. And that can be a story between a father and a son. Goodwill Hunting is a love story between Matt Damon, Robert Williams’ characters. So I’m always looking for that.

MW: I think Mobius was always, uh, we knew so much was going to ride on casting that character because you know he serves as kind of the face of the TVA and in a way, and as you can see from the trailers somebody that was gonna have a lot of interaction with Tom and his energy was gonna have to complement Loki's energy in a compelling way. They had a relationship obviously, from Midnight in Paris, they've worked together on that for a little bit and they instantly clicked creatively and so, you know, that, I would say Mobius and Loki, that's one of the love stories that you might see in Loki for sure. Although if you print that the fans are gonna, like, take it the wrong way-”

I: “No, no, I won't, I won't, I won't put it that way. Don't worry.”

MW: “I know our fans-”

I: “In that context I know what you mean. I mean, you referenced 'Catch me if you can' before. And I would consider 'Catch me if you can' a love story between Tom Hanks' character and Leonardo Dicaprio's character.”

MW: “Exactly. Right.”

This isn’t queerbaiting. I’m queer myself and I understood where he was coming from perfectly. A love story doesn’t have to be romantic. It can be familiar, it can be platonic, it can be paternal etc.,  and his “wrong way” wasn’t him saying that shipping two male presenting characters is ‘wrong’. He was trying to, albeit a bit clumsily, clear up what he said so that his quote wouldn’t be taken out of context/misinterpreted and give fans like us a false sense of belief that we will get an actual romantic love story between Loki and Mobius.

Because like it or not, he IS right. Fans misinterpret a lot of things they read on the internet - thanks to certain sites twisting words (I’m looking at your MCU Direct) or straight up clickbait articles who post unfounded rumours.

Remember that “Loki willl have male and female love interest” rumour? It came from Daniel Richthman’s ‘rumours’ section of his Patreon. Daniel is a scooper and unfortunately has a very bad track record when it comes to actual plot details so it had a 99% chance of being wrong - yet people saw that rumour being picked up by large twitter accoungts and media and started taking it as an official/confirmed fact that came from Marvel. And now we have people claiming “Marvel promised us a male and female love interest for Loki”. No, they didn’t,

I, for one, appreciate the fact that Michael tried his best to not raise our expectations regarding Loki/Mobius. Because Loki and Mobius were never meant to be a romantic relationship from the start.

Falcon and the winter soldier was accused of queerbaiting bi Bucky and SamBucky and the Loki team wanted to avoid that and I appreciate that.

Kate said that Loki and Mobius have a paternal kind of relationship and I can definitely see that and you know, I dig it. In canon, Mobius does seem like a parental type of figure towards Loki and even told him that he sees him as a scared little boy. 

I like Loki/Mobius as much as the next person, but at the end of the day it’s a fanon pairing, and it was never meant to be canon so saying they queerbaited us with this ship so we would watch the show is inaccurate.

Avatar

since we’re probably going to see multiple timelines branching off from the moment Loki escaped with the tesseract, meaning we’re probably going to see multiple versions of Loki going forward from that moment, what if in one of the timelines set years into the future, Loki’s back on asgard, he’s king,he’s settled down, married Sigyn and has had a child/ren with her - Narfi and/or Vali and for once life’s good for him

my heart would both swell with happiness and also shatter if we got at least one of the children Loki had with Sigyn, because we all know that that happiness doesn’t last :(

the mcu already introduced three of Loki’s famous kids, Sleipnir, Hela and Fenrir and none of them were his children or were related to him at all, so I’d really love to see a timeline where Loki actually is a father and how that’d impact him

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net