Interiorblink
&. 𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬.
( various fluffy dialogue prompts so soft, so sweet, just for you! )
- ❛ i just wanted to make sure you’re okay. ❜
- ❛ there it is, there’s that smile! ❜
- ❛ you got me flowers? ❜
- ❛ i’m not afraid of you. ❜
- ❛ aw, did you miss me? ❜
- ❛ you’re lucky that you’re cute. ❜
- ❛ wait, you think i’m cute? ❜
- ❛ you’re not alone. you never were. ❜
- ❛ i don’t think i’ve ever seen you smile. ❜
- ❛ good morning, sleeping beauty. ❜
- ❛ it’s better with you here. ❜
- ❛ don’t worry, i’m staying right here. ❜
- ❛ you’re welcome to stay, if you want. ❜
- ❛ don’t be a stranger, okay? ❜
- ❛ i haven’t laughed like this in a long time. ❜
- ❛ hold still. this might sting a little. ❜
- ❛ you can hold my hand, if you want. ❜
- ❛ i knew you would be here. ❜
- ❛ i just wanted to say thank you for protecting me. ❜
- ❛ before you do anything, try this and tell me what you think. ❜
- ❛ wow i really can’t speak, huh? must be because of how pretty you look. ❜
- ❛ we can order pizza, watch a movie, whatever you want. ❜
- ❛ what, am i not allowed to look at you? ❜
- ❛ i’m not giving up on you. ❜
- ❛ is that my shirt? ❜
- ❛ this is a good look for you. ❜
- ❛ pinky promise? ❜
- ❛ c’mere, you. ❜
- ❛ honey, i’m home! ❜
- ❛ you remembered? ❜
- ❛ you’re my family too. ❜
- ❛ let’s go somewhere, just you and me. ❜
- ❛ i’m here for you. don’t forget that. ❜
- ❛ you’re the only thing that matters. ❜
- ❛ was that your first kiss? ❜
- ❛ i was worried something happened to you. ❜
- ❛ your heart is beating so fast right now. ❜
- ❛ relationships are built on trust, and i trust you. ❜
- ❛ you always see the good in people. even me. ❜
- ❛ do you think the moon is jealous of how pretty you are? ❜
- ❛ nope, puppy dog eyes aren’t going to work this time! ❜
- ❛ thanks to you, i know what it means to love again. ❜
- ❛ how about a kiss before i go? ❜
- ❛ i’m just glad you’re okay. ❜
- ❛ here we are, home sweet home. ❜
- ❛ thanks for being here with me. ❜
- ❛ seeing you happy is all that matters. ❜
- ❛ keep it. it looks better on you. ❜
- ❛ i couldn’t stop missing you if i tried. ❜
- ❛ you feel like home to me. ❜
Writing a novel when you imagine all you stories in film format is hard because there’s really no written equivalent of “lens flare” or “slow motion montage backed by Gregorian choir”
You can get the same effect of a lens flare with close-detail descriptions, combined with breaks to new paragraphs.
Your slow-motion montage backed by a Gregorian choir can be done with a few technques that all involve repetition.
First is epizeuxis, the repeating of a word for emphasis.
Example:
Falling. Falling. Falling. There was nothing to keep Marie from plunging into the rolling river below. She could only hope for a miracle now, that she would come out alive somehow despite a twenty-foot drop into five-foot-deep water.
Then there’s anaphora, where you write a number of phrases with the same words at the beginning.
There were still mages out there living in terror of shining steel armor emblazoned with the Sword of Mercy.
There were still mages out there being forced by desperation into the clutches of demons.
There were mages out there being threatened with Tranquility as punishment for their disobedience, and the threats were being made good upon.
Mages who had attempted to flee, but knew nothing of the outside world and were forced to return to their prison out of need for sustenance and shelter.
Mages who only desired to find the families they were torn from.
Mages who only wanted to see the sun.
This kind of repetition effectively slows the pace of your writing and puts the focus on that small scene. That’s where you get your slow pan. The same repetition also has a subtle musicality to it depending on the words you use. That’s where you get the same vibe as you might get from a Gregorian choir.
Damn I made relatable reblog- bait post and writer Tumblr went hard with it. This is legitimately very good advice.
For more neat tricks (aka figures of rhetoric) like epizeuxis and anaphora, read THE ELEMENTS OF ELOQUENCE by Mark Forsyth. It’s both educational and delightful, not to mention overflowing with wry wit. Great book.
Holy shit.
These sound like techniques for making prose have more in common with poetry, or even with music. I just put the book on hold at the library!
Romance Writing Resources
- Basic Tips to Write a Healthy Relationship
- Tips for Long-term Relationships
- What being in love looks like
- Writing kiss scenes
- Romantic Couple Development Questions
- 36 Questions that Lead to Falling in Love
- An article going into more detail about the above 36 Questions
- Springhole.net romance resource page
~~~
~Grand List of Writing Resources~
where will you sleep tonight?
fantasy characters: “Geez”
me: who the fuck spread Christianity there
this two-years-old shitpost just gained a hundred notes who the snickerdoodles dug it up
W H A T
In moments like this I always fall back on the fact that they also aren’t speaking English because they don’t have England or the many languages and conquering peoples that contributed to the creation of the English language and therefore the work must be a translation into recognizable terms in our world’s terms. Call that Tolkien Brainrot.
Corners of Boston.
Hi!
I hope i don't bother you with this long ask, but do you have any tips on how to become good at writing meta?
I like to read discourses/discussions in tumblr and learn from them but i still have trouble writing my opinions or even replying to arguments, english is not my first language but i read a lot of books and i don't have trouble understanding them i rarely come across a line that needs to be translated and so far it only happened with classics.
Someone suggested that i should always practice automating new vocabularies but i find myself forcing them alongside my childish writing and it turns out bad.
In other words, i don't have trouble when speaking, hearing or reading english but when it comes to writing i always get stuck.
Yes!!! I do!!!
Based on your writing in this ask, I don't think that your grammar or vocabulary would be an issue. Meta and analysis is much more reliant on critical thinking and being able to come up with questions that you can then investigate. tbh, anyone who would criticize your grammar instead of your actual thoughts isn't worth your time.
***I'm going to use a bunch of examples of fandom arguments or metas that I have seen, but I don't necessarily agree with them. I am just explaining how they work.
***One more thing, this is generally about developing and supporting arguments - analysis of a text is a separate though related thing and I have a post in my drafts about that. I will try to get that finished by the end of this week!
- Make your argument clear. Complex grammar isn't necessary. All you need to do is make sure that you are using modifiers or hedging or contextualizing your claims. So for example, if I said "I think that characters will die in acotar5", that's super vague. What characters? Why? How? The conversation is dead before it starts. However, if I said "I think that Lady of Autumn will kill Beron in acotar5", that's put some parameters around my argument and now I have somewhere to start. I know what kind of evidence I will need. I know what characters I will need to consider. Also think about contextualizing, like "well if X happens, then this other thing is possible." Absolute statements (e.g. "Sarah has never written a logical magic system") will get you into trouble because they are easy to pick apart. Even if they are mostly true.
- Have evidence! I always have the ebooks because they are easily searchable. You could also mark up your book, if you think you'll need that info a lot. I like to use colored tabs in my physical books, and sometimes I write notes in the margins. I got used to marking as I went when I was in university, noticing themes as I went along.
- More on evidence: something that is just as important as having evidence is knowing how to use it. I see a lot of posts that are 20% writing, 80% screenshots from an ebook. NO. DO NOT DO THAT. Why? Because we've read the damn book. We know what it says. If I wanted to read the book again, I would read it again. That's not why I am on tumblr. The reason you are writing a post is because you have an argument. What is that argument? How are you interpreting that scene? What do you think is the meaning behind a piece of dialogue? Throwing a quote at your audience and hoping it sticks is not effective use of evidence. You've got to explain how and why you are using it.
- Still related to evidence, is make sure that the evidence both means what you think it means, and that it supports the argument you think it supports. If you have evidence that is supposed to support one interpretation of the text as being more reliable than another (e.g. what a lot of the ship war arguments are doing right now), then you will need a lot of evidence that can be interpreted the same way. For example, I believe that Azriel has never truly been in love, and I have a collection of evidence that together supports that interpretation, even if on their own those quotes could be interpreted differently.
- Think about the implications of your arguments. This means that if you say "Elain is sus", then you need to think about how her being sus would then impact the characters around her. How would that change the way we interpret her behavior? How is that related to what we currently know about her motivations and wants and needs and values? I went through this process in this post about whether or not she knows how the mating bond. I took someone else's argument, thought about who Elain is as a person, thought about the people closest to her, and what the implications of that argument are. We can't just say something like "Elain doesn't fit in with the Night Court" without then looking at her relationships and comparing them to other relationships, comparing her current relationships with her past behavior, etc. Basically what you're doing is testing the argument in different contexts and seeing if it still makes sense.
- And yes, be respectful. People will misunderstand you. Sometimes unintentionally, sometimes just to be assholes. But we can't control their responses to us. Just on a basic level though, the moment someone feels attacked, they shut down. Conversation over. (The only exception to this is if the person is bullying, being racist, ableist, etc. Then fuck being respectful.)
Side note three, the stuff about evidence is one of the main things I teach my students and it's not an easy skill to master. It takes time.
Let me know if that helps! You do have to get into a rhythm and it takes a lot of practice. Like a lot a lot. But you can say things that are wrong and that's fine. If someone is rude to you in response, block them. The end!
So good.
Just adding on to say that language acquisition is hard and if you know more than one then you’re already a pretty incredible person. As leslie said people criticising grammar are not worth it and I say - can go **** themselves.
I feel like we often forget the way language progresses. The art of taking a text (not in native tongue) and reading it, analysing and interpreting it, and then writing it for an audience is not easy. And argument is more developed and specific compared to having a conversation. Just as writing a report or assignment would be harder than writing in the group chat. And anyone who feels like they aren’t good at writing remember it’s just one specific thing and we only get better by trying and practising and giving things a go.
short fic challenge
Write a fic of no more than 2000 words for each of the following prompts. Post each one as a standalone story. If you wish, gather them together in a series or a collection, but do not post them as chapters of a single fic.
- A conversation you wish had happened in canon.
- An expression of love (romantic, platonic, familial - you choose)
- Character meta
- Episode meta
- That emotional moment that you can't find a plot for.
- A scene fully without context.
- The meeting part of a meet cute AU.
- A shocking announcement (or the reaction to it)
- A missing moment from canon.
- An alternate ending to an episode or scene.
- Someone just having the worst luck.
- An exchange of gifts or mementos.
- That great line that you can't find a plot for.
- The aftermath of a scene you'll never actually write.
- The scene that will give you, personally, the most joy.
Minimum length: 10 characters (as required by the AO3 posting form)
i am very tired of the idea that if your question is unresolved and unanswered that means that sjm doesn't think about her writing
like
yeah some of the issues with acotar have to do with sjm potentially not thinking through plot and world building holes but a lot of the time it's more that we/fandom/you have just interpreted something differently from how the author meant it? like the way that Nesta's arc ends up revolving around physical exercise and didn't delve into her being an alcoholic or addicted to sex is different from how many of us envisioned it but like
the text explicitly addresses those things? and it's literally not sjm's fault or a crisis of her being a bad writer when character arcs do not resolve the way you wanted them to?
there are valid things to critique ofc, but the line between that and "well this didn't work out the way i wanted or envisioned so sjm is a shit writer" is...thinner and thinner these days.
like. i personally hate gwynriel as a ship and have a lot of very valid reasons for why i personally think they wouldn't work irl but...if/when they do I'm not going to sit there and say SJM "wrote Az's arc incorrectly" or whatever. like. she is just going to write it the way she envisions and....just because it doesn't add up to who I understand him to be doesn't like.....mean she didn't plan it correctly or carefully
I always have questions about things, it’s just how my mind works. In general I think it’s important to remember that she might have the answers and she might have written them down - we just don’t know. Everyone has this deficient type of thinking, if it’s not in the book then she hasn’t even thought about it.
So going back to my neverending world building questions. If I was been given world and magic answers that didn’t relate to my ‘romance novel reading/interpretation’ I would be annoyed. If it was just thrown in to show the audience - hey I’m so clever look at this thing I did! - I would be mad. I would be asking her editor why they didn’t cut out the words that weren’t relevant to the story in the moment. Big reveals wouldn’t be revealing if we already knew how everything worked and it would be a boring story.
I don’t think we give SJM enough credit because a lot of people think it’s fun to hate on popular authors. I’m not saying she’s perfect either, I just think sometimes as a fandom we can get a little extreme in our generalisations about what someone is or isn’t doing in their books.
The Weaver’s Lament
Hope you like this, a little fictional song/poem for the weaver to sing/recite at her loom. This is my first go at something a little more creative, so hopefully you enjoy it - Renee :)
A Tale from a time long forgotten…
The Weaver’s Lament
I formed in the darkness from desire and lust Spent most of my time avoiding kings and dust. Preening, exploring and finding my way I learned of escape and sent spiders that day.
Wed to a brother, the oldest of three This was not the life I wanted for me Creature of Darkness and Death incarnate Soul stealer, sin eater, life falls, before it.
The three kings ruled and dominated the land Blistering cold , frost, barrenness came from their hand Fearful and tired of being trapped I waited and watched, then I snapped.
Jumping from realm to realm until I found A place that was bright and light and full of sound. Glittering light fell and scattered on dark stone The world I was now in, would be my new home.
• An Oxford comma walks into a bar, where it spends the evening watching the television, getting drunk, and smoking cigars.
• A dangling participle walks into a bar. Enjoying a cocktail and chatting with the bartender, the evening passes pleasantly.
• A bar was walked into by the passive voice.
• An oxymoron walked into a bar, and the silence was deafening.
• Two quotation marks walk into a “bar.”
• A malapropism walks into a bar, looking for all intensive purposes like a wolf in cheap clothing, muttering epitaphs and casting dispersions on his magnificent other, who takes him for granite.
• Hyperbole totally rips into this insane bar and absolutely destroys everything.
• A question mark walks into a bar?
• A non sequitur walks into a bar. In a strong wind, even turkeys can fly.
• Papyrus and Comic Sans walk into a bar. The bartender says, "Get out -- we don't serve your type."
• A mixed metaphor walks into a bar, seeing the handwriting on the wall but hoping to nip it in the bud.
• A comma splice walks into a bar, it has a drink and then leaves.
• Three intransitive verbs walk into a bar. They sit. They converse. They depart.
• A synonym strolls into a tavern.
• At the end of the day, a cliché walks into a bar -- fresh as a daisy, cute as a button, and sharp as a tack.
• A run-on sentence walks into a bar it starts flirting. With a cute little sentence fragment.
• Falling slowly, softly falling, the chiasmus collapses to the bar floor.
• A figure of speech literally walks into a bar and ends up getting figuratively hammered.
• An allusion walks into a bar, despite the fact that alcohol is its Achilles heel.
• The subjunctive would have walked into a bar, had it only known.
• A misplaced modifier walks into a bar owned by a man with a glass eye named Ralph.
• The past, present, and future walked into a bar. It was tense.
• A dyslexic walks into a bra.
• A verb walks into a bar, sees a beautiful noun, and suggests they conjugate. The noun declines.
• A simile walks into a bar, as parched as a desert.
• A gerund and an infinitive walk into a bar, drinking to forget.
• A hyphenated word and a non-hyphenated word walk into a bar and the bartender nearly chokes on the irony
- Jill Thomas Doyle
sees people are reading my old fics on AO3
waking up to sweet comments on Ao3 is the best feeling - it just is
types of writing sessions
- got on computer, looked at document, was like “fuck this shit” and got off
- wrote like 150 words that consist of bloating the existing useless conversation or scene even more
- wrote SO MANY WORDS but it was because you were so desperate to escape the Bad Part
- wrote SO MANY WORDS but it was because you were so desperate to get closer to the Good Part
- got on your document, ran into research issue, spent like an hour on Wikipedia, ah shit
- the somewhat satisfying “fixing everything I hated about the scene I wrote the day before” session
- decent amount of progress that took like 3x longer than it should have because you were repeatedly distracted
- In The Zone and completely absorbed, just BLAZING through a few thousand words, probably close to the ending, probably listening to playlist
- Not actually a writing session, just listening to playlist
- the session where you write like a paragraph, suddenly realize the unfixability of your current plot predicament, and cry
- that weird session where you don’t have much time and you’re super tired and you write like a page but you reread it the next morning and holy shit these words came from the fingers of god why is it so good
- that session that is purely just navigating the boring shit of getting from one scene to the next and it sucks but you leave off on the cusp of something interesting and it feels good
- the satisfyingly exhausting session where you write the Good Part and you’re confident it came out pretty well and you’re full of thoughts and stuff about where things are going next but you need to let them rest
- get on computer, write exactly one sentence, get off computer. Now you can say you wrote today
absolutely true and valid every one of youse