mouthporn.net
#gems – @poetofthepiano on Tumblr
Avatar

Close-Reads

@poetofthepiano / poetofthepiano.tumblr.com

A collection of analyses on my current fixations. I go by Nes.
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Someone else may have already asked this, but where do you think Lars got his fancy new outfit? Were he and the Off Colors interacting with other alien races? They wouldn't have come from Gems, since they don't actually wear real clothes...

He stole it from Gems!

Recall that Jasper wore a cape in The Return as well. We can infer that capes were either a status symbol or a means of intimidation. Though Jasper was never poofed in the episode, she was able to remove the cape with no issue.

It further reinforces the idea that capes weren’t “clothes” as much as they were statements. When we look at the cape that Jasper, and now Lars is wearing, we see an exaggeration of the high collar in both capes. I don’t think that’s a coincidence. 

*Edit: Okay, a total misread on that question. I missed the word “outfit” there. I would say that some form of “clothes” also exists for Gems; the cape is a start after all. But I wouldn’t put past the idea that other aliens exist in that universe, since it’s already been established in Jungle Moon. For me, it’s a bit too convenient though that we now have two planets whose most dominant inhabitant are both bipedal and humanoid in form, and then a third unknown planet is thrown into the mix with much the same characteristics. 

While parallel evolution is possible, given the vastly differing environments on other planets (and the fact that like Gems, these other aliens may not even be organic), I don’t think it’s likely that Lars and the other Off Colours had encountered alien life as advanced.

What might be likely are two theories. First, that they were stolen from Gems. Emerald does say that the Off Colours impersonated imperial officers. Aside from shapeshifting to look like them, I assume some material trappings like capes were involved, and it wouldn’t be too far a stretch to look into clothes as well if they were worn for particular occasions only. Second, that Lars’s clothes were deteriorating– and they weren’t in great shape in Lars’ Head– and they got materials from Homeworld and other planets and made clothes.

I don’t think the latter is too much a stretch. I mean, the Off Colours built a car-ship hybrid from scratch, solely guided by Lars’s memory, and programmed it to display English words. Making clothes doesn’t seem too far off from there.

Avatar

From what you said about Peridot in Back To The Kindergarten, could this mean that Lapis is like the Kindergarten, being a wasteland that cannot be healed or fixed and there is nothing Peridot or Steven can do to help her at all or only in that moment?

Avatar

Hi there! I’d say that’s a bit of an extreme conclusion. The main point of the post was that things just couldn’t go back to exactly the way they were or be the way we want them to be Because as careful as we are about how we handle our actions, there is always a bigger situation and context we can’t control.

Lapis is like the Kindergarten. She’s had experiences that have made it difficult for her to trust people easily, and immediately go on the defensive and avoid getting tangled up in more conflict to survive. In the same way the Kindergarten has been drained of its minerals, Lapis is tired. She’s tired of fighting, tired of running, tired of always feeling unsafe.

She took really well to farm life because it was consistent and quiet. In that environment and on her own terms, she was able to develop her relationships, enough that by her next flight, she was willing to take Peridot, Pumpkin, and the barn with her. This is the same Peridot whom she hated at first. That sense of relationship, or even just plain attachment to other individuals and the memories they made with her, even after a bad start, would have been much more difficult for the Lapis we saw in Ocean Gem. 

The Kindergarten can never go back to the green, earthy space that it was before the Gems arrived. The same minerals that allow for organic life to thrive were absorbed by the gems who were growing there. It does not mean that nothing good can ever happen in the Kindergarten. It could be repurposed in so many ways. One personal headcanon of mine is that eventually, the Kindergarten becomes a new place to live, filled with life that was largely absent from it. Though at present, it cannot be considered a place where things are born, it can still serve other purposes and be other things, when its context is taken into account.

In short, things change and we can’t expect them to be the same as they used to be, but it doesn’t mean they lose all potential to change again. 

Avatar

Hey Poet, I'm not entirely sure if I send this ask before or only ever thought about it. Iirc you thought it would infatilize Pink to consider her the youngest, which would potentially not be constructive for the plo (and it would make her less equal I think?) But now with the timeline hint from the art book, Pearl's ambiguous loyalty (and former owner) Pink's seemingly close connection to Earth, but her (White) base of operation being on the moon... I think a worthwhile case could be made -c-

Avatar
patchwork-rabbit said: I accidentally refreshed the page and forgot where exactly I left of. But eh, my point being, when a game is made it is for a reason and they enter the world fully formed already knowing their purpose. A Diamond is there to rule, so why leave a Diamond without something to rule. It would also give more reason to connect WD with HW and explain why PD only had one planet (and some starter subjects from the HW Kindergartener), she simply was the most recent addition

Hi there! I haven’t actually seen the artbook, so I don’t know about the new hints of information. I do have a theory that ties together why things are the way they are. It comes in several parts though. 

First, It’s very difficult to argue that at one point there were not four Diamonds, because if Diamonds can be “created” with the technology that was had when the gems came for Earth, then the concepts that Diamonds were irreplaceable, that shattering a Diamond was the worst possible crime, that the Diamonds deserved a position over all the other gems, wouldn’t make much sense. 

Even if it were incredibly difficult to create a Diamond, it doesn’t make a lot of sense why three all-powerful, eternally living beings would want to create a fourth, who could possibly take power away from them. Because gems don’t age, they don’t physically tire. As long as the empire is running and new gems are being made, each Diamond could technically be “in charge” of dozens of planets. Considering the utilitarian and pragmatic approach of gemkind, it just doesn’t make a lot of sense to use up so many resources for a Diamond, when a whole lot of other gems could be created in place.

Second, we’re given several indicators that the Diamonds have an equal sharing of power. The relationship among the Diamonds is one of them. The way that they mourn over PD presents the latter as someone with agency, an equal, and not a child who doesn’t know what to do. Presenting PD as someone who was temporally younger is problematic because it does infantilise her, and that takes away the responsibility and weight of her actions in the story, whatever they may be. It shifts a lot of the burden of responsibility to the other Diamonds, and given the damage done to Earth and the other Gems in the process of taking the colony, it doesn’t feel like the blame should be shifted to “badder” characters.

There’s a huge potential for talking about the Diamonds as a varied class (and the paradox of their insisting every gem in a class is replaceable) when we toss in PD as a developed individual, and not as a tabula rasa child relative to her peers.

Instead, I posit that the Diamonds each had particular roles they played to make the Gem civilisation function the way it did. 

That’s third. I offer an alternative theory for why PD had only one colony. It’s rather clear that her domain was that of military management. The gems who were “hers” are by and large quartzes, and as early as The Answer, the Rubies we see don’t have a Diamond insignia on their uniforms. It shows that in the period after PD’s shattering, the military was left without a commander. 

It can’t be said though, that a standing army did not exist prior to Earth, because the gems had been conquering planets for a while by then. They had protocols and formations and battle tactics. We see as much when we consider Centipeetle and her crew deployed among others. They had codes, plans, and a system, that could not have been created on the fly. 

Earth was an ideal colony because of its ability to produce Quartzes. Recall that gems pride utility and efficiency. It would make sense then, that Earth was to be groomed as a training ground for new soldiers. Like any city, it would have other facilities like Spires and Communication Hubs, but by and large, the main focus for Earth was to build Kindergartens, and that’s what made it so contentious.

Prior to Earth, there may have been colonies that were more suited to the roles of the other Diamonds.

Finally, contrary to the idea WD wasn’t involved with Homeworld, WD’s role was what connected all of Homeworld. Not just the Homeworld planet, but all of the colonies, all of the ships, and all of the satellites. It would explain why warp pads, communication towers, and the Moon Bases are in her colour, and it would explain why she holds the giant planet in the mural.

While there can probably be other theories that explain the Diamond dynamic, I rather like this one, because it highlights the themes we’ve seen of Homeworld. I’m always open to new information, though, and I’ll be the first to admit theories aren’t set in stone.

Avatar

Some Thoughts: The Zoomans

Anonymous said:  what do you think its going to happen to the zoomans?

I think we all want to see the Zoomans free. Freedom would mean being able to self-determine, from their own life paths to the small choices of when to eat and sleep.

We know from the episode The Zoo, though, that it’s not going to be as simple as opening the doors and telling them they’re free. They have a very different conception of what a good life is, and what freedom means.

When we look at the Zoomans, we have to consider that they have been raised generation after generation in a very particular way. Consider also that the human beings first taken by Homeworld were not only living in a very different society from the one we have now, which also had very different conceptions of who deserved freedom and what it looked like. Moreover, for nearly 6,000 years, the Zoomans were born and raised in the facility, with no idea that a place like Earth exists.

I want to cover how the Zoomans got to where they are now, and the role Homeworld played in “creating” the environment, and the people seen in the episode. In this post I’ll also discuss how the Zoomans might feel and how they’ll eventually attain freedom in the sense we define it.

With that said, let’s get started!

1.  The First Zoomans

One thing that I think should be pointed out off the bat is that the first Zoomans were taken from a particular point in human history. In the 5,000 years since the war, humankind had begun to come together from small pastoral and agricultural communities and established the ancient civilisations, specifically those of the Fertile Crescent, such as Ancient Sumer.

At this time, up until the Enlightenment Period and Scientific Revolution, the human worldview was largely that of Cosmo- or Theo-centrism. Their lives were dictated by patterns in nature, and the concept of a good life was to be in harmony with nature or what the gods wanted. 

This was a time in which there weren’t a lot of choices about what life profession one could take, or who one could marry. Most of these were inherited from one’s parents and decided by the community. 

In fact, it’s much closer to the rigidly stratified social structure found on Homeworld, in which one is essentially born into a job and social roles. It was a time in which some groups weren’t recognised as “human” and equal to the others, again similar to Homeworld.

The idea of a state guaranteeing civil and political rights didn’t come until relatively recently, and in a lot of places, democracy is an even more modern idea. 

As such, the first Zoomans would be quite familiar with routine and some vague higher force instructing them on how best to proceed in life. We can assume that the technology at the Zoo hasn’t advanced very much since its creation, if only because it’s in the outskirts of gem territory, where no one really visits. From here it can be assumed that the way things were done in the past is quite similar to what we see now, in a largely unchanged formula.

It’s not to say that the first Zoomans would have been completely comfortable or didn’t try to fight back. After all, they were being taken from their communities, the very centre of their lives. They had established lives back home that couldn’t be replicated by Homeworld. But, what happened next could have been rationalised by their worldview.

So what happened next exactly?

2. Reverse-engineering the human world

Avatar

Mortality in SU: I wonder if the moral delemma regarding resurrection is going to pop up in a future episode. It may be too heavy a subject even for this show, but...I imagine a moment involving mass HUMAN death that leaves Steven a mess of guilt and hysteria. He remembers his resurrection power, but both Lion and Lars block his path. Steven lashes out at them for stopping him...until Lars reminds him of who he's talking to, and that he won't be able to claim ignorance this time.

Avatar

I would like to not see more mass death in SU, if only because we’ve felt individual deaths, and they’re so powerful. The very concept of all the potential relationships someone could have, being lost, all the things they’ll never get to see, do, or experience, as well as all the relationships they did have, and the things they did do. It’s such a heavy thing. I think it’s sufficient to take those feelings and try to fathom what that might be like for hundreds if not thousands lost. Because mass death already happened in the war. To say that the weight of the gem lives lost isn’t worth as much as a human life lost seems to defeat the message that the lives of human beings and gems are equal and that one shouldn’t try to minimise the worth of the other.

As dramatic as a scene like that would look, Steven already knows he shouldn’t go around bringing people back to life. He realises it the moment Lars is reanimated. We have been building up from arc after arc in which we are told over and over that violence is not the answer, and that death is a very weighty thing. To have Steven react in a manner that makes him want to bring people back not only removes the weight of their deciding to stand up for their own planet (because they can just be revived), but also backtracks any internalisation Steven had on the gravity of what he’d done (and Rose’s realisation of the same sort), when he has always tried to learn from his experiences.

At present, we’re already grappling with questions about humanity, such as whether Lars is still human, or he’s in limbo like Lion. I think it would do a lot more to try exploring those questions rather than reiterating the same point made in Lars’ Head.

Avatar

On the Ending of Off Colors

There are some moments which are really telling. This one in particular, after Lars is injured says a lot about gem physiology and consequently gem culture. Gems often come off sounding dismissive and callous towards human needs. In the first season of SU, the gems would leave Steven alone and go on missions for days, their refrigerator usually left empty. 

What I think needs to be said is how much we take for granted that the things we value are in huge part a consequence of our being human also as defined by our physicality. As we move away from limiting the definition of humanity by certain arbitrary physical attributes, we can’t ignore our having a physical form that is organised in a certain way, which perishes after a certain time.

And so to gems, a technically immortal race of born adults and no metabolism, human life, which looks so similar to theirs, is easy to subsume as like their own. But it’s not. Leaving Steven behind for days or weeks would have been a blink of time to them, but not to Steven, as in Cat Fingers. Not having to eat or sleep is a reasonable expectation for gems, but not human beings. 

So the things we value, like the briefness of life, is a function of the way we experience time. The reason we get sentimental about objects is because they are in part what helps sustain us, by helping us acquire food or shelter. Going past that, seemingly useless objects (like an old book or watch) are meaningful precisely because they are markers of our being able to live beyond subsistence level. 

It sounds a lot like our species has built itself around food, and it sort of has. Intensive agriculture, population growth, and the formation of large societies all happened at around the same time. Agricultural surplus was what allowed people to specialise into other tasks. Our society is built the way it is because of our physiological needs.

So when Lars slams into the rock pillar and doesn’t immediately get up, Steven immediately runs to his side in panic. The gems behind him don’t yet know that such an injury could prove fatal. To them, it might mean getting poofed for a bit, or not getting poofed at all. Even though gems feel sensations, including physical pain, pain serves only as a signal that there is danger. It isn’t usually an indicator of their own impending demise.

I liked how the ending of Off Colors felt so ambivalent. On the one hand, we have the successful defeat of the robonoids. There should be reason to rejoice.

Yet upon seeing Steven’s face and his fear and sadness and panic and terror at what happened, to Lars, the gems immediately grow sombre. And this is, to me, an important development.

Even though they come from a culture that shrugs off pain, and by extension is well-acquainted with a lot of physical interaction we’d consider rough and violent,” they empathised. In front of the Off Colors is a completely alien being, completely unlike them. They don’t understand how he works or what’s really happening to him. Death takes a very different form in gem society. Nonetheless, they mourn him, even though they knew him only a short while. They see Steven and feel for him. 

I would say the ending of the episode remains ambivalent. On the one hand, Lars is alive and appears not to suffer physical harm.

On the other hand, and Steven was right to point this out in the next episode, he wasn’t brought back wholly the same as when he left, and Steven didn’t know if he had the right to do that.

Human life is fragile and death goes into that fragility. We don’t know how Lars will age from now on, if he does. We know already that he doesn’t really feel human hunger. His metabolism, which includes the breaking down of cells that ultimately lead to death, could have slowed or stopped altogether.

Instinctively, the choice might be to live, no questions asked. But in this case it wasn’t even Lars’ choice. I’m not saying he should have been left for dead, but I am saying that part of what our society values is choosing how we get to live our lives, and sometimes our deaths. That is why some people choose to sign “Do not resuscitate” forms. 

It’s ambivalent because we’re happy Lars is back. We still consider his humanity intact and he retains all his memories, feelings, and even the greater part of his appearance. At the same time, though, he’s not quite the same as a human being. He’s now somewhere in the middle of organic and gem life, just like Lion. His interactions with the world and others, his values, may change because of the change in his physiology. And it’ll be okay, but it’s going to take work. It’s just not as clear-cut as we thought things would be.

Here I want to bring back the idea of empathy, similar to the kind shown by the Off Colors. They’re called such because they can’t serve the purpose they were designed for. Lars is one of them, not because he’s a different colour now, but because he’s not exactly the human being he’s supposed to be.

But the episode wants us to feel like his humanity is still there. And I think that’s where empathy comes in. If our only metric of humanity was a series of actions and appearances that would mean someone was human, then we’d always find exceptions to the rule. 

Lars’s was an extreme case, but I think it serves the point being put out by the story. There is something else, something we see in others that makes us recognise them as human. And it should be there, regardless of the physicality we tend to see first. That is how we can talk about the humanity we see in the Gems and how they are many times in the show, humanised.

Avatar

Speculation: Tiger Philanthropist

Anonymous said: On IMDB several new gems, including ones with male voice actors, are listed for Tiger Philanthropist. In addition to Bismuth. Any thoughts on that?

(For those interested, I found the page here)

[Edit:] IMDb is a site that anyone can edit and while I know that a lot of people know that, some people may not and I don’t want to mislead anyone with this post. Whether or not the information is true, it was fun to speculate on it. But really, the only source we can trust is the Crew and sometimes CN. 

And because some people may find this material very spoiler-y, (I know I did! But I’m too far down the rabbit hole now) I’ll be tagging this as spoilers and introducing a spoiler banner with my predictions for Tiger Philanthropist. But I’llm mostly be talking about my theories on how the episode will pan out.

The summary for this episode is: Steven tries pro-wrestling.

1. Bismuth

I’m assuming then that Steven moves over to a new wrestling league, because he and Purple Puma have won the Beach City Circuit and other cities have underground circuits as well. So it’s like moving up to a bigger contest.

And since they’re going to be competing with the best of some other towns, they’re going to need a team. Who else would love wrestling? Bismuth. Because Bismuth is still struggling between that line of Crystal Gems as warriors and Crystal Gems in a new kind of warfare, the not-so physical.

Like Amethyst, her pent up physical stress finds wrestling as an outlet. When they go off to another city circuit, their opponents are none other than Panda, Grizz, and Ice Bear (whose voice actors are mentioned in the cast), probably in human form with Bear-themed wrestling personas, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they were bears.

2. The Appearance of Crazy Lace

There’s another Crystal Gem we’ve heard before in the cast of characters: Crazy Lace Agate.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
troffie

Here are some drawings from “The Zoo”. Ages ago, Rebecca pitched The Zoo to Lamar and I as this absolute utopian, hippie society full of beautiful and healthy people with no concept of pain or sadness. So we went to town drawing as many different kinds of hot people as possible! 70s sci-fi, hippie communes, The Time Machine (1960), The Footlight Parade (1933), and the Centaurette sequence from Fantasia were all influences for this episode. 

It was interesting and fun to depict humans who had somehow been appeased enough to coincide with the gem idea of perfect order and routine. I loved writing their eerie, almost understandable optimism, that ultimately gets destroyed in the hilarious ending scene by Lamar. Overall a really fun episode to work on, J10 and Y6 are easily some of my favorite characters in the show <3

Wow! I really like the backstory behind this :D

Avatar

Foreshadowing from Steven’s Dream

The foreshadowed moment of Greg’s abduction leads me to wonder whether other details about the movie they watched are also relevant. 

“They only kidnapped cows because they needed milk for their cereal planet.”

And we already know that the gems are running low on resources and their planet is starving. Perhaps, as I’ve been suggesting for a very long time now, the key is to work together. In the same way cereal and milk are complements, the end goal might really be for organic and gem life to co-exist to make a delicious breakfast.

Avatar

How do you think Andy would react if Steven and the Gems told him how they saved the Earth and the number of times Steven has nearly died?"

Avatar

If this scene in Gem Harvest were any indicator, he wouldn’t take it too well, I think. 

At the start of Gem Harvest, Andy viewed Steven as totally human. Even after seeing him pull out the shield, he was only considering how being a gem manifested in Steven. He’s fine seeing the gems do dangerous things because he still sees a clear divide between human beings and gems, and he sees Steven firmly on the human side. Like, Human with Gem Abilities, not human-gem hybrid.

And also, it’s clear to the cast of characters that all gems are adults. They never talk to the gems as if they’re children, which is why Andy was quick to ask which of the gems was Greg’s wife. No one was ruled out as a suspect.

On the other hand, Andy sees Steven as a child. And it’s not that children aren’t capable, but children can be easily pressured to copy or do things that might hurt them without fully knowing the risks yet.

It’s also a good play on the trope of “cool uncle lets you do crazy stuff.” I’d say Andy would give Steven and Greg and earful. Then Greg would explain the magical destiny. And Andy will have none of it. Only after they quiet down and Greg and Andy are alone will Greg explain how he felt when he realised the danger Steven was in too. Then he’d probably bring up the events of Ocean Gem and House Guest.

Because Steven will always be Greg’s son. And Greg knows that even if he can’t always understand why Steven does the things he does, he can try to be there for him and support him and try to minimise the risks as much as possible. Greg steps in when he feels the risks towards Steven are non-mitigable, like in Space Race. But overall, he is trying to gauge Steven’s abilities in a field he can never be part of. 

That’s something I feel Andy can relate to.

Avatar
reblogged

What is it with gems stealing babies? It's happened with baby Sour Cream and Steven. It's hilarious but also scary for the adults in the audience

Avatar

I think it was scary for Steven too. He seemed genuinely surprised while hearing about it in Three Gems and a Baby. And I liked how he didn’t mince words and said, “You kidnapped me!?”

In the same way, when Rose takes baby SC, it could have been played for laughs, but I like how Greg gave a pretty serious (for Greg) reproach as well. I guess some character-building moments need a moment of peril. And what could be more perilous than a ‘napped baby?! 

Avatar
Avatar
jayalaw

I’m wondering if it merits further analysis. Gems don’t seem to have an idea about stealing people being wrong.

I’m thinking it’s because the concept of ownership for gems is very different. Most things they need they materialise on their own, if not store in their gems. But the things they need to do their jobs seem to be communal, within their teams. Or at the least they’re provided for by Homeworld, like Peridot’s limb enhancers. 

Coming from a context like that, it seems they wouldn't spend a lot of time thinking about private ownership, since their race doesn’t survive on material possessions. So the repercussions of taking something that isn’t theirs might not be at the forefront of their minds.

Also, what Rose said about having difficulty wrapping her mind around babies being people? I think that applies here. I think gems expect “individuals” to be able to talk and defend themselves. At least, that’s how gems are born. Something that can't speak for itself probably doesn’t merit an individual to them.

Avatar

What is it with gems stealing babies? It's happened with baby Sour Cream and Steven. It's hilarious but also scary for the adults in the audience

Avatar

I think it was scary for Steven too. He seemed genuinely surprised while hearing about it in Three Gems and a Baby. And I liked how he didn’t mince words and said, “You kidnapped me!?”

In the same way, when Rose takes baby SC, it could have been played for laughs, but I like how Greg gave a pretty serious (for Greg) reproach as well. I guess some character-building moments need a moment of peril. And what could be more perilous than a ‘napped baby?! 

Avatar

On Gems and Colour

(i hope it’s ok to ask through submission, because i’d have to split it up into several asks)
I’m not sure it can be called a theory, but i’ve been thinking about how much gems can and cannot influence the color pallet of their pysical forms.
Tbh i don’t remember if you were the one making a post about this, but i remember someone pointing out the fact that there seems to be a difference in color shades and/or intensity depending on the age of the gems. I’ve been looking through your Ruby posts again and you said that in Hit the Diamond it was Leggy’s first mission, so she’s probably the youngest. Leggy is the darkest of the Ruby squad. Then there’s Eyeball who is the oldest (if i remember correctly) and her colors are the most faded. So, this is something they probably don’t have any control over. Then there’s the thing that gems are usually similar colored to their Diamond or share a color in some variation with them. (eg: Peridot – YD, Sapphire – BD, Rose - PD) My theory (kind of) is that Pearls are the only ones (maybe Bismuths too) that can change their colors according to their Diamond (or whoever their respective owner is). Real life pearls do shimmer in all kinds of colors after all. This would explain why our Pearl looks so different from Blue and Yellow Pearl, who stick strictly to the color of their respective Diamond. Could it be that our Pearl changed her color pallet to show that she doesn’t belong to anyone? I think this might be another way to show her struggle of understanding change (as seen in Three gems and a baby) and her willingness to try for Rose. We’ve seen Amethyst change the color of her clothes multiple times, but her color pallet always stays the same. Pearl on the other hand is the only one who uses very different colors. Looking at her everyday outfits from before Steven was born up until now, she seems to move further away from pink everytime, and her current outfit even has quite a lot of yellow in it. She is basically a mix of the colors of Y, B and PD.
So, to conlude, I think Pearls can change their colors more drastically than other gems (and even if all gems can, none do it except Pearls)
Can I get your thoughts on this? Did I miss something here?

Hi there! Of course you can send in submissions, and thank you for your comprehensive submission here :D

If I could summarise your main points, it’s that:

  • Gems’ colours fade as they age and they can’t control it
  • Gems’ colours reflect their diamond and faction 
  • Except Pearls, who may be able to control their palette after regeneration

I think these are really interesting ideas! :D 

1. Fading Colours

So far our only glimpse at gems of the same type is the Ruby Squad and our own Ruby. And you’re right in pointing out Eyeball has a lighter colours compared to the other Rubies. Leggy is the Newbie and has the darkest, almost purplish coloration. Navy, whom we’re assuming is young as well, has a lighter purple to her, while Doc, Army, and our Ruby have similar colours. 

I like this idea because it shows that even if gems don’t physically, there are still signs of their years passed. And you’re right in saying gems can’t seem to control that. When gems regenerate, they maintain their colour palette and can’t change things like the colour of their skin.

I feel this can be broken down into two ideas. First, not all gems of the same type come out exactly the same. There will be little differences. Just like how some of the Rubies are more on the orange-red end of the spectrum while others are on the violet-red of the spectrum. 

When we talk about intensity of colour though, that’s interesting too. In fact, Eyeball supports this statement in Bubbled. When she and Steven are careening through an asteroid field, Eyeball is still outside the bubble and she’s running, jumping, and dodging asteroids for her life. 

At one point, she gets tired and pants: I think I'm losing my lustre...

Which is said in the context and tone of most people going, “I’m getting too old for this!”

So gems do have a concept of ageing in the form of losing their lustre. And it may be true that after facing a lot of battles or just being exposed to the elements a lot, a gem can have a lot of very small scratches, that make it appear dull, unlike the scratches on a phone screen after a lot of use. 

But it’s very subtle, because gems, in reality, don’t actually age. They do feel time passing and the weight of the years on them though, and it would be interesting if it manifests in their physical appearance as well. 

2. Reflecting their Factions

This is a topic that I’ve covered on the blog before, but it’s worth discussing again! Gem colours reflect the colour of their factions. It makes sense that in The Answer, Sapphire and the other gems aligned with Blue Diamond are different shades of Blue, even in their silhouettes. 

One new thing to bring up is that we see some gems who are a definite mix of two Diamonds’ colours. I will be the first to say that Quartzes come in all colours, and that the gem colours in the show are definitely partly based off the kind of material the gem incubated in.

Nonetheless, it’s interesting that, say, the Kindergarten Control Room and Hand Ship are green, even though they’re areas for Yellow Diamond. That Peridot, the embodiment of technological development under YD’s faction, is green means that there might be room for collaboration between diamond factions in post-war Homeworld, particularly between Yellow and Blue Diamond.

3. Pearls’ Colours 

This is something I also agree with! That Pearls cut across factions (gems of any faction seem to be able to own Pearls, who are given as merit awards) means that they might not be made with a particular colour in mind. When we see Pearl in The Answer, her colour is stylised as a light blue-green. And we get hints of that now when she blushes. But you’re absolutely right in saying that she has yellows, greens, and even pinks in her colour palette and these are things that she adds on as she regenerates. There was even a time Pearl had purple leggings in her leg warmers phase.

And it would mean that Pearls may come from the white faction. They’re malleable and sort of start out with a template, much like the White Diamond is a template or the archetypal diamond. As such, they’d be given the ability to change colours more easily than do other gems.

It’s also worth noting that Pearls are created through organic means, so they aren’t like other gems. That could be the key to making them able to change colours. 

Avatar

The scene where Pearl almost, and I mean really almost rips Steven's gem from his body, what do you think made her stop? I know in the episode she said "I just can't. This is what Rose wanted" and all, but again, none of them knew anything about a baby, how to hold it or take care of it or what Steven needed but she still stopped herself from doing it. Why?

Avatar

That’s a good question! 

In this ask I discussed why Pearl was going to do it, and I think this is a good follow-up why Pearl didn’t do it.

The context Pearl is coming from is just as you said. She doesn’t know how a human baby works. But she does know how gems work. And what we’ve seen is that gems can power things like mirrors, pillows, and even buildings.

And when you take the gem out of the object, them should reform in either its corrupt or uncorrupted form. Rose wasn’t corrupted prior to having Steven, so by Pearl’s logic, she should reform right away, and the baby, much like the mirror or the pyramid, would “deactivate.”

1. Pulling out the gem might not have brought back Rose

First, we don’t know if that’s really the case. If Rose could be brought back simply by poofing Steven or extracting his gem, it would cheapen the grief  and mourning everyone went through, including Steven. The transfer was more than just copying Rose’s DNA. There was some recombination that allowed the resulting being to become Steven.

Pearl and the other gems showed that they weren’t completely certain of what Rose did to have Steven. They were never given a formal explanation for who Steven was. I think to some extent, even Rose didn’t know if Steven would ever manifest being a gem, further proof that his rose quartz stone isn’t “the same” as it was when it was Rose’s. That’s why everyone erred on treating him as an ordinary human baby.

That would lead to her hesitation. What if she pulled out the gem, and what came out wasn’t Rose? What if nothing reformed at all? That’s where the “Rose wanted this so much,” argument comes in. Pearl wasn’t completely sure her plan would even work, and it wasn’t worth stacking the odds against the possibility that Rose’s one great desire would be destroyed in the process.

2. Steven is alive

Notice also that the other things we’ve mentioned, powered by an embedded gem, were just that, things. If you deactivated a mirror, or ripped a pillow, or caused a building to disappear, that doesn’t destroy the potential of those objects to self-actualise because they never had the capacity to self-actualise in the first place. They were vessels to channel the ability of certain gems.

Recall what the Crystal Gems fought for. They didn’t want Earth because of its resources, but because of what it stood for. Choices, change, individuality. Things that a living thing should definitely have options to. 

Pearl’s hypothesis was that the baby Steven was around Rose’s gem, preventing her from reforming, much like how Lapis was trapped in the mirror. 

But the gems know enough about human beings to know that they’re alive. That the equivalent of deactivating a human being is death.

It’s a risky move, because as much as Pearl wanted Rose back, I’m certain she didn’t want to do harm to someone they were only starting to grasp was completely unaware of their context, someone who wasn’t Rose. She would have been hurting another individual who was totally innocent in Rose’s passing.

And I believe Pearl of all people, would draw that line because she herself had her entire life dictated by someone else at one point. Who was she to make choices for another living thing when that was the very thing she herself wanted to escape? 

That’s why she stopped herself. It’s layers and layers of reasoning and subtext and gut feelings on her part. I think it captures the complexity of a dilemma and making decisions.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Hi! I can't help but noticing that the strawberries are really big at the gem battlefield, and not consistently big either, some are huge and other just normal. Do you think this could be an effect of the lightbomb mutating not only the gems?

Hi there! 

I think the mutated strawberries are partly from gem interference and partly from natural selection. The Earth-science explanation is lies in the way Pearl described the field back in Serious Steven.

Unbelievable, this was once a Gem battlefield, now it’s wild strawberries as far as the eye can see! Oh, that’s what I love about the Earth! Maybe this will be a light mission after all.

We get the impression that everything the battle completely decimated whatever life was living on the fields. But there is some benefit in the overturned and trampled up soil. There’s a possibility that all the fighting unearthed old topsoil and brought more mineral-rich soil to the surface. 

When the battle was over, the gems left the fields totally untouched, and if Pearl’s efforts in Buddy’s Book were any indicator, the CGs also stopped humans from entering old gem spaces. Some species, maybe small mammals or birds which ingested strawberries, that chanced across the field, would, as living things do, deposit the seeds of the berries they’d eaten.

Left alone, with lots of space to grow and no competition, the strawberries could easily grow huge. In the same way insects that were around during the time of the dinosaurs were huge, some spanning up to 2 feet, because they had no natural predators that readily preyed on them.

Given the emptiness of the fields, and how we see only butterflies when Steven first visits, I doubt the strawberries had a lot of competition. From there, natural selection would work its course over thousands of years. Pollinators may have favoured larger berries, as they were more eye-catching, and succeeding progeny would be larger and larger.

Where I think Gem influence comes in, aside from digging up the soil, is in the light that was unleashed by the bomb. We know that sunlight is what kickstarts the photosynthetic process, and that gems can produce their own light. The light we see may have switched the plants’ photosynthetic gears into overdrive. Evidence of this is that, strawberries grow on vines. But in the show, the strawberries are seen growing on very lush and thick bushes. 

More foliage means more sites for photosynthesis, speeding up the growing cycle of plants. And that’s we notice in a lot of gem-only locations, like in Island Adventure, where the plants are huge compared to the people. 

As to why this is happening to only gem-restricted areas, I’d point to human beings as competitors. 10,000 years ago, early man first switched from hunting and gathering to food production. That means by the time war broke out, over 5,000 years ago, people were already farming. 

Our crop cycles, consumption, and conversion of agricultural land into residential areas would have severely limited the super-growth of plants the way they did in non-human inhabited areas.

Avatar

Character Analysis: Connie (Part 1 of 4)

Part 1: Connie’s Role in the Series

Anonymous said: What is your character analysis on Connie?
Anonymous said: Could you do a character analysis on Connie, as well as any predictions and/or foreshadowing you have regarding her?
Anonymous said: How do you think Connie's character will develop throughout the series?

As the questions suggest, I’ll be writing this post as an analysis on Connie. It will focus mainly on her role in the show from a narrative standpoint through looking at how she’s changed throughout the series. 

When considering Connie, I often think of juxtapositions between her and other characters. It’s not that she doesn't stand as her own character, really. It’s just there’s so much more depth to her when she’s considered in light of other characters. In light of the mixed reactions Connie has been receiving in the series, I think it’d also be more interesting to look at the feedback other characters have received in the series. 

I wouldn’t want to drag this introduction out any longer, so let’s get started!

1. Connie was never presented as “just a side-character”

One thing to look at when exploring how Connie’s character will develop is to look at where she’s been. The way Connie was introduced, she seemed to fill the role of the side-character trope. She was introduced without much exposition, even if her bracelet in Steven’s freezer was seen in an earlier episode. And in Bubble Buddies, her first appearance, she had a character arc that was resolved in eleven minutes while at the same time being the convenient somebody who helped Steven learn a new ability, the bubble. 

In any other teen-hero show, this is all standard practice. But we know now that Steven Universe plays up these existing tropes only to completely turn them around. Steven began to introduce her more and more to his life as a gem, with her next appearance being Lion 2: The Movie. And in hindsight, that is the episode that cements her being a permanent, plot-relevant character in SU. Lion took her and Steven to Rose’s Armoury. 

At that time in the series, we don’t really consider the relevance of this. We more of consider this momentous because we’re learning something about Rose, and making the connection that Rose was somehow tied to Lion. A number of factors make Connie’s invitation there a big deal. 

First, Lion is finicky. He doesn’t listen to anyone, not even Steven sometimes. It takes a lot of coaxing to get him to do something he doesn’t want to do. Recall in the episode that Steven is asking for him to take them to the cinema. Instead, they’re warped over to Rose’s hidden armoury. This means Lion, knowingly and willingly wanted to bring Connie to Rose’s Armoury. Lion doesn’t just let all of Rose’s skeletons walk out of the closet either. There seems to be a time and place when Steven is considered ready and these secrets reveal themselves, courtesy of Lion.

This means Lion wanted Connie to know about the armoury, and it plays out later on in the show because the wielder of Rose’s sword is none other than this character.

Second, the armoury is an important part of Rose’s history, and the gem history that is tied to her. By taking Connie to the armoury, Lion was introducing her to the lore that was Rose Quartz and the gem war. It foreshadowed how fighting, though not ideal, could not completely be divorced from the history of gems, and likely the situation she would be finding herself in. Connie had to learn how to fight, and deal with the aftermath of being conditioned to be a fighter. We see in Sworn to the Sword and Mindful Education that the fighting mentality within the context of gem culture has its effects on individuals, effects that Connie had been feeling.

Finally, Rose’s Armoury was a secret. No one else knew about it before Lion 2. The only one who knew where it was, was Pearl. And Pearl knew how to get there only through a perilous cliff-scaling journey. It shows how personal that place was. After Rose’s passing, it would make sense that Steven inherited the armoury, and Pearl was always planning to take him to the secret location anyway. But Lion’s intervention allowed Steven to discover the armoury on his own terms. 

In Rose’s Scabbard, the way Pearl introduced the armoury was through all of the formal names every piece of equipment had. She was simultaneously revelling in the memories she had with Rose. Had Steven discovered the armoury in this manner, it would have been another piece of Rose. It wouldn’t have felt totally like Steven’s. And he discovered it with Connie. 

Connie prompted the discovery of the weapons and armour. And I think that has bearing in how we’re going to see her in the show.

2. Connie has always tried to be part of the main group

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net