mouthporn.net
#spoilers – @orangedodge on Tumblr
Avatar

i'm not sure what goes here

@orangedodge / orangedodge.tumblr.com

Avatar

HOTD finale leaks, Daenerys and TPtwP, retcon?

Okay. So this is something that is just irritating as hell right now. Currently some Jon fans (and I am one myself too--to some extent-- so this is not coming from a Jon hater) are really unhappy that the leaks show that Daemon already saw centuries ago that Dany will be the The Prince that was Promised. They are alleging that this is somehow a retcon of the original. To them, here is my question: Original what? Show or Book?

In the show, there is no clear Prince that was Promised. The last time the Prophecy is mentioned is in 7x02 when it is clarified that it is nuetral with respect to gender. It never shows up in season 8. Nor do the events of season 8 give us any further clue on the prophecy. Every plan made by Jon and Dany failed to stop the Night King in 8x03. By the end of the episode both Jon and Dany are in hopeless situations. Only the surprise attack by Arya (of all people) defeated the Night King after he had, by all rights, won. Arya, of course, if we follow the show's narrative was prepared by the Lord of Light (and knew nothing about any of this) and had nothing to do with Jon and Dany. Not even the show claimed that Arya was the Prince that was promised.

In the books, there is no case for claiming that this is a retcon in any way. In fact, by the end of Book 5 (the last one so far released), Dany is the most obvious candidate for the position. We have the red priests proclaiming it (btw they are also proclaiming it in the show, recall Kinvara). Maester Aemon, who seems to have spent his whole life looking for the fulfilment of the prophecy and is an expert on it also identifies Dany. The signs are all there ('dragons from stone' etc.). Born amidst 'salt and smoke' (Dragonstone), 'bleeding star' (red comet) and so on.

So what gives?

I should also point something out that is essentially stated again and again as if it were established canon:

That Jon IS THE SONG OF ICE AND FIRE, becasue he is THE SON OF ICE (Stark) AND FIRE (Targaryen). It seems that the ones who make this argument think that repeating it often enough and loudly, along with derisive dismissals of those who do not agree with them is sufficient to make it a canonical fact. However, none of this changes the fact that THIS IS AN UNCONFIRMED FAN THEORY.

I will be the last to deny that there is evidence poiting towards Jon as well. However, as of ADwD, Jon and Dany are the only plausible characters who can be TPtwP. To make either fit, some parts of the prophecy need to be interpreted metaphorically (with there being canonical support for such metaphorical interpretations, no less) while the others fit literally (for example, 'sword' has to be given a metaphorical interpretation for Dany, while she fulfils the part about awakening dragons from stone literally). If one of them is the one, it can hardly be called retcon.

Avatar
orangedodge

If we take creator statements to be truthful, specifically that "Aegon called his dream the Song of Ice and Fire" came directly from Martin, then would that fan theory not already be essentially debunked? If it's just the in-universe name for Aegon's visions, then we're not looking for a specific person or event, and identifying Jon (or anyone else) as "the ice and fire" makes no actual sense.

Avatar

“Stay together. You always did better that way.”

One thing this episode did well to highlight was how truly alone in the universe Ahsoka and Sabine have made themselves, once robbed of each other for support. There were hints in previous episodes, such as when Sabine froze up during Ahsoka's space walk, when she thought her hurt, or in Ahsoka's initial refusal to accept help on what was clearly not a solo mission. Tonight, in the fourth episode, the fear broke through, and allowed Elsbeth to triumph over them despite her agents being consistently outmatched.

The moment Shin arrives at the star map, Ahsoka is overcome with unbearable doubt and self-recrimination, believing herself to have failed another companion. She stops fighting to save everyone, and resolves instead to die there and then as yet another (former) Jedi giving her life in service to the Republic. By the time Sabine arrives and Ahsoka realizes her mistake, it's too late. Spiritually she is already defeated, and has concluded she can only hold Baylan off long enough for Sabine to destroy the map, sacrificing both her own life and that of the very friend the Force had just returned to her.

But it didn't have to go that way. Sabine stood ready to shoot Baylan in the back of the head. He cannot defend himself from Sabine while Ahsoka controls his lightsaber, nor can he finish off Ahsoka when Sabine would just kill him in the process. Baylan is not a hothead who would force the issue one way or another. He is not a fanatic that would give his life only to take one of theirs. Time was on their side to stall, and allow Ahsoka a moment to catch her second wind. Every second that passes with the map free of the pedestal, is one where their position grows stronger. Instead she falls.

Without Ahsoka, it became impossible for Sabine to defeat Baylan alone, but her position wasn't hopeless even then. Destroying the map as Ahsoka asked would guarantee her own death, and there was surely no certainty that she would even be able to finish the job while a rogue Jedi master was trying to stop her. But there was equally no guarantee that Baylan would be able to stop her before she could destroy the map.

Baylan hesitates, and stops advancing once the threat is made. He knew there was great uncertainty, that he might not be quick enough to stop her (otherwise he, a telekinetic wizard, would not bother trying to talk her down instead of just trying to take it!)

Time was again on the New Republic's side. Sabine knew Huyang was signaling for help. And Sabine should have known that Hera would never abandon her, regardless of the Senate's orders. Every second that she stalled Baylan would be one that drew Phoenix Squadron closer to their location. She was not bound to choose between death and surrender.

Instead she lets herself think “Ahsoka is dead,” just like Kanan, and Ursa, and Aldrich, and Tristan, and that she was finally truly alone. She becomes vulnerable to Baylan's counter offer of “well, what about your foster brother? What about Ezra Bridger?” It doesn't even occur to her that Hera is still here, until she was directly confronted with how giving in has only placed new lives in danger. It was just over already, without Ahsoka there.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
figonas

I’m sorry but you all aren’t listening, lyctorhood itself is not the “indelible sin” and you can pry this theory from my cold dead hands, honestly, maybe not even then. TazMuir herself could not dissuade me until she explicitly tells me otherwise. My proof for this you ask? Pyrrha’s conversation with Varun in NtN chapter 9.

But let’s backtrack for a second. John has stated that the resurrection beasts are after him and the lyctors for committing the indelible sin of lyctorhood, and as such the lyctors can never return to the Dominican System for fear of drawing the RBs back to the Nine Houses. I’ve never believed this was true given the fact that John is always the greatest common denominator when it comes to the presence of an RB and there’s no mention of an RB going after a lone lyctor. Sure, lyctors have been killed fighting resurrection beasts but there’s a huge difference between being caught in the crossfire and starting a firefight. For me, Nona the Ninth only reinforced that what we’ve been told is the “indelible sin” is either John misunderstanding the RBs (doubtful) or lying for his own purposes (more likely).

In chapter 9 of NtN, Nona recounts the story of her disastrous beach trip and towards the end of this recitation Nona says that Pyrrha;

“…crossed to the taped-up window, bottle and glass in hand. To Nona’s awe, she twitched the blackout curtains aside—stood bathed in the hyper-blue light from the sky as Nona held her breath—and she said to the window, “Here’s to Camilla Hect, yet another of devotion’s casualties,” and knocked back the glass. Then she said to the light, quite gently, “No, I don’t blame you, man … He was always looking for things to throw himself on.”

Pyrrha stands in front of Nona, bathed in the light of Varun the Eater, and proceeds to have a conversation with it. We only get one side but based on the context of the last line, “No, I don’t blame you, man … He was always looking for things to throw himself on.” Varun seemingly apologizes to Pyrrha for killing G1deon. It’s proven later on in the book that Varun can speak to Nona, and while it could be argued that since G1deon is dead and his soul is gone the “indelible sin” has been undone this still begs the question; why would the punisher apologize to the sinner?

If Varun and the other RBs are hunting the lyctors to dole out justice for their sins why would they apologize for doing the very thing they sought to do unless that wasn’t their true intent. The “indelible sin” is not the consumption of another soul, it is the consumption of a specific soul. It is John taking Alecto into himself, not being able to house all of her and instead making an exchange. Housing a piece of her in him, and a piece of him in her. Splintering the soul of a great and terrible force into manageable parts. Which explains Varun’s ominous presence hanging over the planet in the first place.

If RBs are hunting Lyctors there are no lyctors on this planet. Palamedes has not consumed Camilla’s soul, G1deon is gone, Harrow is in the River, Gideon is thumbtacked to her dead body, the only soul of any significance to Varun is Nona. Later on in chapter 13 Varun, by way of Judith, says to Nona;

“…what they did to you and what they wrung from you and what shape they made you fill—we see you still—we seek you still—we murdered—we who murder—you inadvertent tool—you misused green thing—come back to us—take vengeance for us—we saw you—we see you—I see you.”

And in chapter 27,

“….what did he do to you, to make you this way.”

What did HE do to you!!! what did HE do to YOU!! To give John credit he doesn’t deserve he may not realize it himself but the RBs have been looking for Alecto this whole time. They don’t want the lyctors, they want what John stole, they want the piece of Alecto inside of him. Want to make her whole again, their misused green thing. She’s almost there. She has her piece back from harrow’s body, united with the piece of her hidden in the locked tomb. She only has 1 piece left to collect. And god knows what will happen when the green and breathing thing is whole once again.

I think you’re absolutely right, and John more or less admits it at the end of Harrow the Ninth, when he comes back from the dead:

“God said, “It was a lovely bit of work on Mercymorn’s part. She must have been training for thousands of years, to bring that off. But I didn’t get to where I am by being able to die, you know?”
The Lyctor said, “The Resurrection Beasts-”
“Can’t kill me.”
“You acted afraid-”
Acted is operative. But this is not an FAQ.”

John’s been lying about the Resurrection Beasts from the beginning, because here’s his first and oldest Saint who clearly believed that the RBs were a threat. The RBs were always coming after John and John alone, because he was the one who killed them and transformed and imprisoned their (sister? fellow planet? not sure how the RBs exactly relate to Alecto and one another). He lied about the “indelible sin” in order to keep the Lyctors feeling guilty (because that’s a good lever to motivate them to do what he wants) and keep them close to him rather than going off on their own in the Dominican System or elsewhere. He’s been lying about the Heralds - I doubt they affect him in the slightest - and the RB’s madness effects in order to get his Lyctors to kill the RBs for him. And on and on. 

Now, the interesting question is: why does John not want to get his hands dirty? Why does he insist on “rip[ping] the very fingers from my hands...throw[ing] them into the jaws of the monsters who hunt me”? (Note: “me,” not “us.”) After all, we know the RBs can’t hurt him and John’s certainly powerful enough to go toe-to-toe against an RB, so I don’t think he’s withdrawing out of caution or cowardice. It could be that he’s using the RBs as a way to bump off his Lyctors, but he’s strong enough to do that on his own, so I don’t think that’s it.  I see two possible explanations. One is that John doesn’t want to fight the RBs, because the main method the Lyctors have gravitated towards of going into the River to fight the spirit of the RB while their cavs animate their bodies against the Heralds might give the game away vis-a-vis Alecto being John’s cavalier. The second is that John isn’t afraid of the RBs, but rather the process of dragging them into the depths of the River is dangerous to him because of the stoma, as their connection to Hell might not kill him but seems like it could definitely imprison him. (Maybe this has something to do with the Tower and the emergence of the devils, but I’ve got no idea what.)

Avatar
Avatar
raptorific

I’ve been reading those Locked Tomb books you hear about on the news, I’m on the second one right now and like. You know those married couples who need a divorce but have a kid instead and then use that kid as their pretext to stay together even though they hate each other? Now imagine that instead of having a kid, they adopted the two meanest girls at your high school, and instead of being a married couple, it’s one of those Toxic Polycules you hear about from the Pacific Northwest who put an ad in a queer housing group on facebook that’s like “you will live in a broom closet and all dishes will be your responsibility. Scorpios need not apply.” This is what every scene with John and the Lyctors is like.

Avatar
orangedodge

It’s like that but also one of the two girls joins the polycule, and the other was already having a torrid affair with one member’s estranged wife

Avatar

I think that was a really brave storytelling choice from the FFXIV team, with that level 83 trial. Even with all of the last expansion behind it, by going that far so early there's a real risk of alienating the playerbase if what comes next isn't flawless. A less confident group of writers and game developers would have concluded Endwalker there, and shifted the rest of the story into future patches.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
hoepunkausta

I think it’s interesting that Watts proposed to Cinder the idea that she isn’t worthy of this power and now Cinder is probably thinking about that. She really is.

Avatar
orangedodge

And he allows that she deserved it, which I think contributed to her hearing him out and thinking it over. That framing suggests recognition that it’s hers, that she’s labored for it, and she’s earned it. But at the same time he makes the case that she’s misused it, making herself unworthy of it. Worthiness of her magic, unlike the right to possessing it, is a continuous endeavor. 

When Fria first woke up at the end of v7 up we saw a tremendous explosion of energy, and a winter cyclone reaching far up into the sky above Atlas. While Cinder is on the rooftop with Watts, thinking back to the suffering she’s endured, it’s happening on a backdrop of a firestorm struggling to emerge around her. It’s the seasonal opposite of the snowstorm that signaled Fria’s awakening, but its not able to reach the same heights. That’s either Cinder struggling to demonstrate that she’s no less worthy than the others, and failing, or a subconscious acknowledgement that she already knows she’s not. 

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
sniperct

of course the question I have now is when was that set, shortly after ROTS or malachor

was he looking for rex too?

Avatar
orangedodge

I’d go with after Malachor. I saw the red reflection near the eye piece of his helmet as a visual callback to his exposed face when Ahsoka broke his mask, and the bird cry, whether that was a Convor or not, seems intended to be suggestive of one. It’s also more haunting if this is immediately after she vanished before his eyes in an ancient doomsday temple, for him to only then find the decades old wreckage of their ship, and the graves of all the troopers they knew, resting alongside Ahsoka’s own figurative grave.

Avatar

About that season 2 tease...

I've enjoyed the Mandalorian very much so far, and think Jon Favreau has done a splendid job in developing it. I've really liked what Dave Filoni has done in his stewardship of the Star Wars TV universe as well, and I still wish they'd been put in charge of the films. But barring the possibility of a huge second season reversal and misdirect, I cannot fathom the narrative intent behind establishing "the Purge" as a tragedy that occurred after Rebels, instead of during the Empire's early occupation. Again, perhaps it's only a misdirect, and Moff Gideon acquiring the Darksaber is not proof that the Empire defeated Bo-Katan and destroyed Mandalore a second time. But as that is definitely what the showrunners want the audience to take out of the season finale, let's go over a few of the horrible implications that arise from assuming its truth:

1. It retroactively validates all of Sabine Wren's worst instincts, and says that she was wrong to ever place her trust in outsiders, to believe in the Rebellion as a cause, or to live her life according to the morals her foster parents instilled in her. Instead, basic storytelling logic now implies that her downfall came in choosing not to be a monster, and that if she had followed her Imperial training and committed war crimes, and left the Rebel Alliance to its own fate instead of continuing to work with them, her civilization would have survived.

2. It makes the entire leadership of the Rebel Alliance, from Mon Mothma down, look unforgivably callous to the needs of the only people who have ever bothered to show up for them. The Alliance was trapped and in danger of failing years before Rogue One when the Mandalorians risked everything, and endangered the success of their own resistance movement, to save them. All throughout the back half of Rebels, the Alliance is consistently willing to use the Mandalorians as a shield against the Empire, while being reluctant to let even five people volunteer to help them in return, and now we're left with the implication that it was the only assistance they ever gave them at all. It was one thing to have the political heads of the Alliance prevaricate and show reluctance to commit to their own values, when people like Leia, and Jyn, and Hera were always going to be there to force the issue anyway. But are we now to assume that even they only make those gambles for other Rebels?

3. It casts a shadow over all of Filoni's other work. The Mandalorians have been with us since the beginning of Clone Wars, and their fate has been the longest running subplot, throughout three full shows, spanning more than a decade of film and animation. What did it matter, if they all died anyway once they'd outlived their usefulness to the Rebellion? Who should care that Sabine watched over Lothal for Ezra, if she lost everything she fought for in the meantime? Why bother watching the upcoming Clone Wars revival, detailing Ahsoka's liberation of Mandalore, if LucasFilm wants us to think that this is where it all inevitably ends up? Their tale of persistent defiance and finding a way to always survive and rebuild has its own merit, but at some point the characters that the audience has actually spent years and years getting to know deserve to share in some of the fairy tale optimism of the setting.

I wouldn't even call this turn "bad writing" because it actually does a lot to explain why precisely no one seemed to care when the New Republic fell in the sequel trilogy. The New Republic being the extension of the Rebel Alliance, if this is the level of care they showed to their earliest supporters, what good were they to anyone? To repeat, I just do not understand the intent behind this decision at all, or why Filoni and Favreau would want for it to define the tone of their story.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
yocalio

Why am I getting like all optimistic again? Someone knock me down or reaffirm my optimism because my poor woman’s heart can’t take what they’re doing to my bb girls on this stupid ass show.

 I gotchu, one of the leakers did a Q&A like 30 minutes ago and just reaffirmed everything. Jon takes the black. King Bran. Jaime literally dying in Cerseis arms. Humanizing Cersei.

Just, the worst of the worst imaginable. There ya go. I’ve knocked you down. Don’t watch this travesty.

I read of FF that the leaker that got everything right has provided pictures to the mods. They also state that Dany won’t accept the bells of surrender and will start the pillaging. So there’s no hope.

Avatar
orangedodge

“They also state that Dany won’t accept the bells of surrender”

As opposed to what? She’s already accepted two surrenders and a truce.

Avatar
reblogged

Glad y’all made up, but the real question from me is…. is Nora going to continue to live in 2019? Is the time line just like not gonna get messed up anymore than it already has (which was not a lot considering the amount of time that she has been there.) Is future Iris not looking for her, does she not notice her absence???

Avatar
orangedodge

If I correctly understand the literary reference in “the girl with the red lightning,” they seem to be suggesting that she’ll stay.

How’d they describe their time travel mechanic? “The more you break the rules, the less they apply to you,” IIRC?  She’s already gone back and forth in time so many times, and in different ways, and while recording her memories for herself in her diary and with Gideon, that it probably doesn’t matter any more.

Avatar

What was going on with Rhaegal? Did Jon really abandon a live dragon to hit the streets? Was Rhaegal meant to be concussed or something, or did Jon think he’d be faster... on... foot...?

ETA - I guess it was necessary for the contrast of Jon’s final, futile, race to the godswood, weighed against Arya’s sudden arrival, that he not have a dragon at his side. But you’ve all told me for years now that he’s the ultimate snow clown and I’m sorry to say I never fully realized it until now.

Avatar

IDK if this was just me, but did anyone else read an intentional criticism into Jon’s final march? We see him walking past Jaime, Sam, everyone, one by one, knowing that they’ll die if he doesn’t save them, just to get to Bran. He’s the only one who made that choice. Dany refused to value Bran over everyone else when she joined the battle alongside the Unsullied and the Northmen. Jaime and Brienne refused to make that choice when they kept fighting for the keep, instead of retreating and abandoning their men. Arya ultimately didn’t either, she fought for the people still alive in Winterfell, who were depending on her, until she finally had a straight path to end the war.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net