Random Thought Before Bed: Oscar Buzz
Well, the nominees for the 92nd Academy Awards have been announced, and the mainstream entertainment media has been spilling gallons of ink over all of the perceived upsets, snubs, and omissions. Personally, I’ve grown desensitized to such debates (the industry should be able to honor the accomplishments of its various artists without resorting to self-congratulatory back-patting—but I digress); I do, however, have some thoughts on a few of the big contenders:
- Yesterday, I would have argued that Parasite had the prize for Best Foreign Language Film in the bag; now that it’s also competing for Best Picture, though, I’m not so certain. The dual nominations could very well end up splitting the vote, weakening the film’s chances in both categories.
- In my ideal world, The Lighthouse would take home the statue for Best Cinematography (the cramped 1.19:1 aspect ratio created a palpably claustrophobic experience; I can’t recall another movie released this year that so elegantly conveyed its tone and atmosphere through visual style alone)... but here in reality, I think 1917 is going to win for sheer ambition. And it would hardly be underserved: the simulated “single take” is clearly stitched together, but the effect remains undeniably impressive—especially since Roger Deakins somehow manages to make every image breathtakingly beautiful despite the obvious challenges involved in maintaining the illusion.
- I’m extremely pleased with The Irishman’s multiple nominations... but I’m shocked that it’s being considered for Best Visual Effects. What exactly is the Academy recognizing? I adored the film (in fact, it’s quite possibly my favorite of 2019), but even I have to admit that the digital de-aging was mediocre at best.