Rem Koolhaas in Jorge Otero-Pailos, “OMA’s Preservation Manifesto” from Preservation is Overtaking Us, 2014
Henry Zimmerman, “On Creativity,” c. 2013
Rem Koolhaas, "On the MoMA Charette," 1997
AP Studio Art Exam
The AP Studio Art Exam evaluates High School students based on three objective criteria:
- Quality: Overall Significance of the Works
- Concentration: Ability to Explore an Idea
- Breadth: Ability to Use a Variety of Artistic Techniques
The Category of Breadth is further subdivided into the following characteristics:
This evaluative criteria presupposes a defined scope of the creation of art itself, and curiously provides a critical filter to established artists on how to compare their works with others. Quality and Concentration seem to be innate criteria used by artists in the self-evaluation of their own work, but Breadth seems to be a category manipulated ad hoc relative to the given examination being undertaken by the artist. Thus, significant works of art, such as that of Ellsworth Kelly for example, may disregard many of these "Breadth" characteristics in favor of the specific introspection of an artistic idea. However, even the work of someone as abstract as Piet Mondrian can exhibit each of these characteristics to a surprising degree, which is nothing to say of the Old Masters, such as Johannes Vermeer or Caravaggio. However, like much of contemporary culture, we feel the need for several paradoxical situations:
- Objective Examination of Subjective Work
- Over-categorization and Over-classification
- Sequence of Predetermined Pedagogical Milestones
- Limited Conception of Artistic Paths
- Indifference to History and Theory
_