Last week they said the doctor is canonically trans. This week they say the doctor is canonically gay. And next week? You’re not gonna believe it but rumor has it they’re gonna say the doctor is canonically black
I am drawing people with different features, which were requested to me, so people can see themselves in art and feel valid and seen. more art in #reqbodyposi hashtag
#reqbodyposi art compilation. there is much more! look in the tag.
Requests here are:
1. A powerchair user
2. A girl with lupus and a rollator
3. No-op transmasc person with psoriasis patches on their forehead + a double chin
4. An autistic transmasc guy
5. A person with prosthetic arm
6. Trans man pre top surgery with acne
7. Someone in emo or scene fashion with an IV (and maybe a leg brace and acne
8. A short fat latina, late-40s ish, greying hair? with a large chest and glasses.
9. Someone who has one eye that droops closed more than the other
10. A midsized girl with broad shoulders and wider hips
I don’t think The Good Place gets enough credit for the diversity of its cast. The main romantic lead is a black man from Senegal who is allowed to be as nerdy as he wants. In fact, his nerdiness is the saving grace of the main character. The character that is often considered to be the pinnacle of beauty on the show is a woman of Indian descent who is not super light skinned. Another character is a Filipino man who, while incredibly stupid, can be incredibly perceptive and offers loving emotional advice and is described as incredibly sexually-desirable. The all-knowing judge on the show, considered to be the most powerful character as of the season three finale, is a black woman. The main character is canonically sexually attracted to both men and women and (while it hasn’t been canonically confirmed yet) is probably at the very least bisexual, if not pansexual. She also regularly talks about how she loved to sleep around and is never slut-shamed for either her sexuality or her fondness for sex. And that’s just in the core cast. There’s also a black female neuroscientist who gets several episode long arcs in both season 3 and (about to be) season 4. Not to mention the supporting cast and guest characters feature several people of color, while the main villains are mostly old, white men.
And all of these characters are actual characters! Even the small parts where a side character may only be in an episode or two results in really developed and fleshed out characterizations. Also, the characterizations don’t fall into the trap of stereotypes to make them more likeable!!
But while all of this diversity is amazing, the show also manages to make it feel organic. There’s no tokenism or show-boating. It’s never a “look, the main love interest is a black man!!!!! We’re so woke!!!!!!!”. It’s genuine diversity built from a place of love and understanding and idk, I just think that the show deserves a lot of credit for taking such an amazing concept and using it to build such a diverse world with such in depth characters. It’s a nice change.
Not to mention it’s a philosophical masterpiece that’s obviously written by philosophy and ethics enthusiasts, and has some deep philosophy jokes that you’ll only get after studying philosophy… which you’ll probably want to do after watching The Good Place.
And all of this stuff is mainly discussed by the aforementioned POC in the show.
There’s a female lead, sure, but instead of being the often annoying “white savior” the show flips that trope around (or throws it out I can’t decide which is more apt) and makes her into the audience surrogate. She’s the “white student” if you will, who is learning how to be a better person from a black man.
Go watch The Good Place dammit. It’s great, AND it’s a philosophical masterpiece.
There are some very self-aware moments about their casting policies, but instead of being preachy, they’re hilarious. Like this one:
Hey! I know this is a popular version of the post because of the additional commentary and the funny screencap but please look through the notes to reblog op’s edits and clarifications!! Or at least share this version with the screenshots!
(Also wanted to add that Janet, D'Arcy Carden, is Jewish!)
isn't the g_d character actor also jewish as well as Black? and the the writer or director or something is jewish...
like there's a reason for the philosophy and ethics stuff... this is a very jewish show.
it's obvs not perfect but if you know where they were coming from, some of the stuff they got right makes sense
I am overjoyed to officially announce that Knit One Girl Two, my lighthearted Jewish f/f romance about an indie dyer who falls for the wildlife painter whose art inspired her latest round of sock club, is now for sale in paperback with a gorgeous wraparound cover by Jane Dominguez. Of interest if you are looking for non-tragic Jewish fiction, or romance between Jewish characters of different levels of observance.
Also included in the book are Fearless (another print debut) about a newly-out band mom swept off her feet by the dapper butch music teacher from her daughter’s school while everyone is snowed in together at the All-State hotel, and “Your Name is Love”, a short story from the Mangoverse series about a royal guard who sets up an elaborate scavenger hunt date for her wife, complete with riddles, clues, and lots of emotional warmth.
This is an intensely lighthearted, feel-good collection with a common theme of women reconnecting with art, music, etc. from which they had drifted for a variety of reasons including depression and work/”life” getting in the way. (And 5 of the 6 main character women are Jewish, the exception being Lana from Fearless.)
The paperback is $9.99; there is also a $2.99 eBook version that will save you some money from buying the eBooks separately. Here’s a PDF link for that if you prefer to avoid the Big Site. By the way, the print version is large-print (18-pt Corbel on cream paper) in case that information is helpful.
By the way, I highly recommend @mickeycookies, who drew that wonderful picture of Clara and Danielle at the top of this post, if you are in need of a commission. I was blown away when I opened my email.
Please share, if you are a fan! <3
[Image one: Absolutely stunning art of indie yarn dyer Clara Ziegler and Danielle Solomon, the stars of Knit One, Girl Two. Clara, on the left, is a thin young woman wearing a sleeveless pink flannel shirt and bluejeans; Danielle, on the left, is plump, and wearing dangly open-avocado earrings with a swooshy green dress to match. They are leaning against each other, foreheads touching, eyes closed and smiling, arms around each other, and it is heartwarming and pretty and lovely.
Image two: Full book cover for the paperback version of Knit One, Girl Two and Other Stories by Shira Glassman, with cute art of Clara and Danielle kissing on the cover, as well as a tuxedo cat being a little bit of a smug pest with a ball of yarn. End ID.]
<3_<3
THIS ART MADE ME CRY HAPPY TEARS AT HOW CUTE IT IS
I’ve said it before and I will SAY IT AGAIN Knit One, Girl Two changed my life and having the opportunity to own a physical copy??? on MY bookshelf????? dont mind if I do!!!!!!
Aww yay this is so sweet! 💕🧶
I’m gonna bring my copy in to work with me so I can read it on my break and cheer myself up if I’m stressed <3
ig: artqueerhabibi
on the other side of the Javert Can't Be Black Discourse, im honestly not a fan of how he's like the only black character! the villain (even if he is redeemed)! the one who seeks to uphold status quo, pretty violently!!! imo it's less that he CANT be black and more like jesus christ he shouldn't, at least not be the only one
Oh, I’m totally with you on that. Even granted that Javert is more of an antagonist than a villain, and a really good and complex role that many people find relatable, it’s still really uncomfortable and Not Great that Javert and the Thenardiers–all centrally antagonists– are the first main POC-cast characters we’re getting, and the only ones for several episodes. But the arguments against Historical Accuracy still need to be dealt with;there’s no need to erase the real, historical presence of black people in France to discuss the questions of modern casting. I’d like people to realize that , if anything, there’s room for a lot more diversity in this story, not a need to eliminate what we’ve already got. Here’s hoping that at least Archie Madekwe’s Courfeyrac and Erin Kellyman’s Eponine later get a good chunk of screentime!
The Big Questions: Is there more truth in Shakespeare than the Bible?
Akala, Rapper, Writer, Academic and founder of the Hip-hop Shakespeare Company.
Prof Stanley Wells, the world’s leading Shakespeare scholar.
So, I’m going to get personal. Quite personal. I don’t normally make a big thing of this but:
I remember spending so much time as a child struggling with the simple act of pouring a glass of pop from a two liter bottle. It wasn’t because I couldn’t lift it. It was because my brain couldn’t, wouldn’t tell me when I actually had the neck of the bottle above the glass. I remember tears of frustration and the determination to complete what is, for most people, a simple task.
I remember the hours I spent performing the simple task of throwing a ball against a wall, over and over and over until I could actually tell where it was in relation to my hands.
I remember despite that always being chosen last for PE. I couldn’t catch a ball unless it was in that predictable pattern. Much of the time, I still can’t. If you toss me something, chances are I will close my hands somewhere it isn’t and it will fall to the floor.
“Butterfingers.” That’s what they called me on the playground. “Butterfingers.” The teasing. The bullying, because to everyone else it was easy. The knowledge there was something wrong with me. We didn’t have a fancy term for it in 70s and 80s Britain.
But there was something wrong with me. Was and is. Most people don’t notice. I don’t ask for any kind of special treatment and I can pour you a bottle of wine as long as I concentrate on the task. I couldn’t keep bar, because I would never be fast enough, but I manage. I manage because I don’t want people to treat me differently. Because “butterfingers” is often better than “disabled.”
I just got finished watching the first episode of the new series of Doctor Who. And yes, perhaps the best line in it was “Does it suit me?”
But for me, the line that made me want to jump out of my seat and squee was “He has dyspraxia.”
Because I have dyspraxia. And it’s not fun. And there are kids even now growing up with that “butterfingers” epithet. “He can’t ride a bike.” (I can, but it took me a bit longer to learn).
I’m 45 years old, and for the first time, I hear the words on TV about a fictional character “He has dyspraxia.”
As I said, this is something I keep quiet. But I’m looking at the character of Ryan Sinclair and going. You know what?
I have dyspraxia.
And Chris Chibnall and Toisin Cole just gave all the kids out there who can’t pour into a glass, who’s brain just won’t make that coordination, who are frustrated to tears by video games…
He just gave us OUR Companion. He gave us our hero.
And yes, I just looked up. Somebody has put a list of Dyspraxic Characters.
Under Potential Dyspraxic Characters there is a list. It’s a short one.
Under Confirmed Dyspraxic Characters it says a very sad “None to report yet.” (which will be fixed, I believe, when the writer of that blog goes through the episode).
I don’t know if Ryan Sinclair is the first explicitly dyspraxic character on TV. But he could be.
And I’m willing to speak out to make sure that Chris Chibnall and Toisin Cole know just how much that means. How much it would have meant to me when struggling to learn to ride a bike to see a character with those issues climbing a crane. Being a hero.
THANK you Doctor Who team. From me and from all the “butterfingers” kids out there.
hey asking for a friend but uh. what’s it gonna take for fandom to relearn the difference between “canon” and “word of god”?
★ canon = the text itself; the show/movie/book/comic; the actual up-on-Netflix content; anything a casual fan would reasonably interact with ★ word of god = anything else, i.e. interviews with cast/crew/showrunners; DVD commentaries; comments from the crew on social media or at cons; literally any written or verbal remarks about the text made by writers or showrunners or actors
word of god does not equal canon, and yet i increasingly see fandoms conflating the two and acting like word of god comments from The Powers That Be count as canon and are equivalent to canon footnotes to the text and i’m. NO. listen. it’s not. that’s not what canon means, and word of god comments should not be treated as part of the canon text. this isn’t just me being a pedantic text purist, this has actual negative consequences for shows and fandoms and people’s experience of the stories, i mean:
- it privileges the creator’s interpretation of the text as the only “correct” one. death of the author? no one’s heard of her. writers and showrunners get to tell fans how to interpret the text, and a solid 80% of fandom is going “okay, if you say so!”
- it stifles fandom debate and analysis, because fan analysis of the text at hand is rejected outright by other fans on the basis that “well the showrunners said it’s like this”
- it contributes to fandom bullying, in which word of god comments are used to harass people who have the audacity to want to interpret the work differently, or who disagree with the powers that be, or just don’t want to consider those comments at all in their understanding of the story
- word of god comments may be confusing; they may change over time or contradict earlier statements; they may even contradict the text itself. all of which leads to fans frantically trying to reconcile word of god comments with actual canon, rather than going “okay fuck this, it doesn’t make sense so i’m disregarding it”
- again: this only creates more arguments in fandom; if creators say x at one point, and y at another, you end up with more fandom slap-fights over which comment was the ‘correct’ one and which interpretation ‘wins’
- it encourages lazy and unsatisfying storytelling. if fanon will accept word of god comments as canon, showrunners develop an attitude of “it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t make sense, we can just handwave it in an interview”
- this results in poor writing, or important plot points being explained in word of god comments rather than in actual canon
- this in turn makes the story confusing and incomprehensible to anyone who’s not knee-deep in fandom. casual fans, kids, someone bingeing the series 5 years from now on crunchyroll… they’re not reading the interviews or tweets or watching the comicon panels. those viewers still need to be able to understand the story, and we are slip-sliding towards a creator-fandom model in which they won’t be able to, because word of god comments run the risk of becoming required reading for understanding the story
- this has serious implications for how stories handle representation: if fans start accepting word of god as equivalent to canon, it means shows can keep canon rep (particularly queer rep) vague and ambiguous, and prop it up with word of god comments that “confirm the representation”. there’s no incentive to actually commit to unambiguous, clear canon rep if stories can lean on word of god to compensate for the utter lack of actual diversity in the canon text itself
the canon text has to stand alone. word of god should serve as a trove of fun trivia or behind-the-scenes tidbits about the writing process; it is not supposed to be a substitute for clear, concise, and comprehensive storytelling. a story that doesn’t make sense unless you’ve read 8 different explanatory interviews by the writers is badly written. showrunners who treat interviews as a place to offload all the character development or plot explanations they didn’t bother to include in the actual text are lazy hacks who are bad at their jobs.
word of god can be handy and fun and informative, and for people who are interested in creator comments or interviews there’s no harm in paying attention to that stuff. but it’s not canon. the canon is the text itself. anything else is supplementary to that, and fans are absolutely allowed to disregard anything not in canon if they choose.
and with anything published by a corporation – such as all tv shows ever – there’s likely to be pressure put on writers and actors to say things that the corporation thinks will appeal to the mainstream. or, as OP says, to use offhanded mentions in interviews as a substitute for actual representation, because joe random trump voter needs to be able to say dumbledore isn’t really gay or they might organize a book burning.
the fact that the book burning would be great publicity, and trumpkins have this weird tendency to buy things to destroy as a poorly thought out protest, does not seem to have occurred to mainstream media moguls.
Yeah for big projects it’s often not that they’re “lazy hacks who are bad at their jobs” but frustrated writers trying to do what they can within the limits executives put on them. We’ve seen this for years: the likes of Joss Whedon and Rebecca Sugar have to threaten to quit to get a queer kiss onscreen … but if you’re not on their fame level you often have no leverage at all. (Note I have strong, angry feelings about Joss Whedon now but that doesn’t erase what he did years ago to get that kiss on prime time.)
Don’t make things easier on those executives. Demand better, demand more, and vote with your dollars. Support shows and networks that include canon representation and don’t do this shit. Ignore shows that try and weasel their way out of confirmations, queerbait, and relegate such things to hesitant interviews. There is more media than ever before now, you can be picky, and you should.
New York City! I’m a deaf filmmaker, playwright and performance artist. I am available and looking for opportunities to give workshops or talks in NEW YORK CITY on October while I perform at the New York International Fringe Festival for my show. Please message me or contact me through my website http://www.SabinaEngland.com
Thank you! 🙏🏽😎 Video by SuperSisters (East End of London, UK) about my works
Reblogging again for more exposure. Please feel free to share my website and works with any event organizers or organizations in New York City. Thank you and have a good day.
Many thanks to Women Cinemakers for featuring me and interviewing me in their new Special, which just came out today. I am on page 164, and I talk about the process of filmmaking and how I made “Deaf Brown Gurl.”
make playable characters disabled you cowards
Where is the fishperson romance for dark-skinned Black women?
- Where are the stories about vampires and werewolves vying for a dark-skinned Black woman’s love and affection?
- Where are the stories about faeries whisking dark-skinned Black women away to a magical place far, far away?
- Where are the stories about dark-skinned Black women being wooed by gods and demigods?
- Where are the stories about dark-skinned Black women being loved and desired after by aliens, angels and demons?
I mean, I know why there is such a paucity of these stories (it begins with “miso-” and ends in “-noir”), but I’m interested in delving the ways that it manifests in how we conceptualize and talk about this type of story, or at least examining these types of stories from a Black feminist or womanist lens. I tried broaching it a few times (though with a heavier emphasis on the gothic heroine as protagonist) but the responses have been scant, almost as if people are afraid of looking deeper.
Tagging @elfyourmother, @idreamtofmanderleyagain, @alwaysatrombonist, @undertheteacup for reasons.
Y’know what? Lemme ask a better question: When does Bella Swan or Sookie Stackhouse or Clary Fairchild get to be Black? Or are such characters even possible without being white?
I think it’s less of a question of these characters being possible, but these characters being accepted by non black audiences, and hell even black audiences is heavily in question.
The feedback I get when I write black women who aren’t #strong black women makes it pretty clear that people want black women in the media they consume to fit into an archetype they are comfortable with. I have literally been told I am degrading the race because sometimes I write black women who share a number of traits with me.
And this is unfortunate, because there clearly is at least somewhat of a market for all the facets of our Humanity as black women, as illustrated by a romance novelists like Alyssa Cole and the like. I had really hoped that Sleepy Hollow was going to give us this in Abbie Mills, but we all see where that went.
A lot of these characters are supposed to be relatable to the average reader, and the average reader or viewer is of course assumed to be a white person, and a whole lot of white people have not been socialized at all to be able to relate to black women.
And further, black women are not aspirational, so why pin your wish fulfilment on a black female character?
Gonna respond to this and the following by @elfyourmother (go to bed!) since they share a theme of wish fulfillment.
maybe part of it is also that fantastic romances even more so than regular ones are just so nakedly about wish fulfillment, and that’s not something we’re ever allowed to have as black women. we’re not supposed to have wishes or dreams of our own, just facilitate other people’s. sometimes as literal magical negroes, if we’re about fantasy.
The point about such characters being relatable and aspirational, and how often dark-skinned Black women stand in stark contrast to that, is an interesting one.
Now I wonder how putting dark-skinned Black women at the center of these stories change their meaning. How does the story change when the main character is a dark-skinned Black woman and not some pale, willowy white girl?
Reblogging for Just Getting Up Tumblr
Writing x Characters When You Aren’t x, A Masterlist
x: a variable used to represent something unknown.
We’ve seen an influx of questions about how to write stories based around characters of color, disability, non-binary, etc. when the author does not fall into these categories. Rather than have these posts take over the site, we’ve decided to compile a list of resources to help our fellow writers become more educated about writing what they do not immediately know. However, this list is not the end-all-be-all of knowledge; one should always try to learn from someone with first hand experience in any topic. The world is constantly growing and changing, and because of that, there will always be more to learn. The admins at Plotline Hotline want to help writers form respectful, informed, and realistic characters that broaden the narrow range we see in literature today.
*Be wary that some of the topics listed below contain sensitive material. Reader discretion is advised.*
As always, the links I found to be especially apt will be in bold. Topics are listed alphabetically, excepting the “other” section.
Culture
Disability
Social Security Disability: List of Impairments, Medical Conditions, and Problems [List] (United States)
Writing Blind Characters [List]
Diversity
Diversity, Political Correctness and The Power of Language
Diversity Book List [List][Books]
Gender
Illness
The Spoon Theory - Also pertains to disibility
Neurotype (Including Mental Health)
Race
Religion
Sexuality
Overview of Gay and Lesbian Parenting, Adoption and Foster Care (United States)
Other
I hope that this list will provide topics a writer may not initially think to research when writing. If there are any resources that you think would be fitting for this list, please let us know! We want to have as many helpful sources as possible to maximize learning opportunities.
Stay educated,
xx Sarah
Representation matters
Description: Making Representation Obvious
Sometimes you have to code characters, either because the terms they use to describe themselves don’t exist (like secondary world fantasy), or because they haven’t found the words themselves yet (undiagnosed illnesses and disabilities). But if at all possible, you should make it clear who these people are and own that you’re putting them in the story.
Even if you actively can say that somebody is part of a certain group, you still have to make sure you’re not -washing them in the narrative. Be it whitewashing, straightwashing, abledwashing, or any sort of situation where you say one thing, but the story itself doesn’t reflect that.
Here are some things to consider that will help you make it obvious that…
This character is PoC
Describe:
- Skin tone (just don’t use food metaphors)
- Hair texture/colour (especially black hair)
- Most commonly eaten foods at home
- Microaggressions
- Cultural clues that they would have (either assimilated or not, because both will have tells)
- Their opinion of white people/things outside of their experience
This character is LGBTQA+
Describe:
- Who they’re attracted to (or lack thereof)/past crushes (or lack thereof)
- Their circle of friends (seriously, we travel in packs, I know like five straight people)
- For trans characters: hormones, binders, packers, breast forms, tucking. Also, for more subtle clues, pronoun asking, euphoria at gender affirming things (like them being proud of their particularly dapper, feminine, or ‘I have no idea what gender that is but I like it’ style), dislike of off-gender things (like complaining about somebody getting them something that doesn’t match how they like to present)
- The actual orientation that they are, for crying out loud
- Their opinion of straight people/things outside of their experience
This character is disabled
Describe:
- Their disability. Preferably in the actual labels, or make up your own labels for a secondary world fantasy
- Any mobility, hearing, or speaking aids
- Behaviours that come with the disability (ie- stimming such as rocking or flapping for autistic/ADHD people, navigating through appropriately wide paths for wheelchairs/walkers, sitting on one side of the group conversations to make sure their good ear catches it, etc)
- Levels of aid needed and any accommodations
- Avoiding things that trip them up (like somebody autistic not wanting to go where it’s crowded, a wheelchair user avoiding curbs, a Deaf person making sure there’s a sign language interpreter at a concert, somebody with celiac avoiding gluten like the plague)
- Plan cancelling because it’s a bad day, or having to leave early because the environment is bad
- Medications, doctors, etc, if applicable
- Self care rituals for after a long day or during a flare up
- Their opinion of abled people/things outside of their experience
This character is mentally/chronically ill
Describe:
- Their symptoms, from good to messy, consistently
- Their energy levels, as many of us use the spoon theory
- Self care rituals they practice during flare ups or after hard days
- Medication, doctors, therapies, etc
- Cancelling plans because a bad day came up, or having to leave early because the environment is bad
- Triggers and their individual reaction to their triggers
- Their opinion of well people/things outside of their experience
And so on. These lists are not meant to be exhaustive at all, but they are meant to get you thinking about how you need to go about describing representation.
One thing to note: you can go about establishing representation in one of two ways. Either have the characters noting their differences, or them nothing others’ differences. Neil Gaiman’s Anansi Boys describes white skin when it appears, because within the narrator’s world, black skin is the norm. But others note their own differences. It’s all about their character.
Either one requires a lot of careful thought and sensitivity readers, but both are valid* options for owning** representation.
Followers, feel free to add more!
*Do be aware that some groups are chronically under-represented when it comes to the actual word of their identity. Bisexual people hardly have characters say the word as their identity. Autistic people also hardly have characters say the word as their identity. Be very careful of not having characters talk about themselves if the group is prone to being coded but not explicitly represented
**You have to actually own it and say they’re that when people put all the clues you left together
Thanks for reading! If you liked this content, please consider supporting me on patreon. It’ll get you access to a bunch of cool stuff!