mouthporn.net
@my-jewish-life on Tumblr
Avatar

My Jewish Journey

@my-jewish-life / my-jewish-life.tumblr.com

| lvl25 | He/Him | Transguy | LGBTQ Safespace | Leftist | Converting to Judaism | MAGA not welcome
Avatar

On Twitter there are currently a lot of Christians and Muslims getting really angry about ways that Jews work around restrictions on work during Shabbat, and, like, honestly I do not understand why they care? Just a lot of non-Jews telling nice Orthodox Jews that they’re doing their religion wrong for no reason.

I saw the same posts and will try to sum up:

Basically people who believe in God tend to get offended when they discover that another religion who believes in the same God has a bunch of ridiculous ways they think they can trick him.

Like, a lot of Christian denominations don’t follow every rule in the Bible, but they’ll either say “We should follow that rule, and we’re trying ” or “We don’t believe we should have to follow that rule and here’s why”.

The whole concept that mainstream sects of Judaism officially approve the practice of trying to try to TRICK God is really bizarre and offensive.

Like, you clearly don’t believe God is omniscient or at all impressive if you think he can be deceived by some mortals hanging a wire around their neighborhood.

It also shows bad character to not just be upfront and say “okay, we don’t believe we should have to follow this rule and here’s why” and instead to try and be sneaky and deceitful. Religions are supposed to promote good character, especially honesty, so this is another reason why it’s very disturbing to a lot of people.

And then back to my first point about how this shows they don’t believe God to be much of a God at all if he can be so easily tricked, (either that or they themselves and their magic wire is superior to God!) which…it should be obvious why that’s so offensive.

I think it's really interesting that you assume we worship the same god, when your god was a Jewish man and our G-d is, well, G-d.

Setting that aside for a moment, you also make a number of other assumptions about our processes and motives because you neither know nor understand them.

Jewish jurisprudence, halacha, is a living process that takes what would otherwise be dead words on a page and makes Torah into a process rather than just a book. A holy book, but simply a book nevertheless. Humans were given the ability to think for ourselves and to reason solely at the pleasure of the Divine. There is a reason: we were meant to engage, not just obey.

What you describe here is a rather infantile relationship to the Divine, in that it's always daddy's rules forever and always and there's no questioning or conversation or relationship there - just blind obedience.

Unlike you, we have a mature relationship with Hashem that involves ongoing dialogue and discussion, far more like spouses than mere fiat from on high. (Luckily for Christians, there are grown-up versions of Christianity too; not for nothing is the church called the "bride of Christ" and I have met plenty of Christians who question and wrestle and engage in open and active dialogue with their God.) Judaism is a living faith that evolves over time, and Torah, while its words are fixed, reaches across time to speak to us in each generation. Each time period and place are going to have unique struggles, questions, challenges, and demands, and the Torah is able to meet us where we're at in all of them because we were given the ability to interpret its words in light of the current day.

There is no trickery going on here; we are simply having a living conversation with our Creator and we are doing so using the exact process He gave us!

Besides; if it were really supposed to be a game and a trick, why would we write down six thousand+ pages of this commentary on exactly how to follow these rules??

But of course that's not the point you're actually making here.

Whether you know it or not, the argument that you are making is rooted in supercessionism, this chauvinistic idea that Christianity has "replaced" the Jewish people and that your new covenant is more valid than the covenant followed by your own god.

It's this fascinating and profound insecurity that lies beneath so many of these accusations: you can't stand that Jews still exist and still keep the Torah using the halachic process of our ancestors all the way back to Sinai, because it reminds you that your supercessionist religion is built on a house of cards. Your predecessors added to the Torah, abandoned the actual law, and instead chased power, expansionism, and idolatry. Today's decent Christians are only barely starting to peel back the layers of garbage to understand the actual teachings of their god, and meanwhile they have to deal with clowns like you going around harassing Jews over a religion that they diverged entirely from 2000 years ago.

So yes, we engage in the process of Torah because we understand it and it is our sacred relationship with Hashem. You are only offended (on G-d's behalf, no less! Really interested in how you think that you are allowed to speak for G-d) because you don't understand and choose not to. Luckily as a non-Jew, interpreting the Torah is neither your duty nor your privilege.

Wow those comments sure are extremely fucking antisemitic. Like, just to be clear, the sneaky, deceitful, (cunning, conniving) jew who tries to find ways around (Christian) authority is a classic antisemitic trope.

She may be talking about God's authority this time, but that's also how Jews are portrayed wherever we settle. "They're not real Germans/Americans/whatever, they're just deceiving us and pretending to follow our laws to further wily Jewish agenda." Straight up nazi rhetoric.

Actually no, I want to double back to this cause I'm still pretty upset.

Every time you see a Jewish law that seems like a "loophole" to get around another law, just know there are a dozen halachic rulings they do the opposite. Rules that make things waaay more difficult just to remove even the slightest possibility of accidentally breaking the commandments.

Like, We started at "do not boil a kid in it's mother's milk" and extrapolated out until we got to have two completely separate sets of dishes and cookware and utensils and if you can afford it stoves and fridges and sinks to make absolutely positive that no possible meat (including poultry) could come into contact with a single molecule of dairy. Just to make sure you don't accidentally cook a piece of a baby goat in its mother's milk. This is called Syag la Torah (your transliteration milage may vary) which literally translates to building a fence around the law.

So no, halachah isn't all about tricking God to take the easy way out. Halachah is about examining every detailed facet of the law to make sure we understand it and are follow it correctly in every possible scenario and to prevent accidentally breaking it. And this process continues to this day to account for changing society and technology.

Avatar
vaspider

It's not a goddamned loophole. It's never a "loophole". It's defining the rule to within an inch of its fucking life, because we enjoy that and that's part of our relationship with G-d. And what's more, HE LOVES THAT ABOUT US.

Like, this is just pure Talmud, including the end quote from G-d, who is exclaiming in delight.

Avatar
reblogged

yesterday someone told me that the "rabbinic age is over" and the time for respect for rabbis has past and i was like i bet your shul is reconstructionist

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Jewish culture is learning about Jewish witches over the centuries and then dreaming a gritty reimagining of Hansel and Gretel where the witch was actually just trying to feed them but she’s Jewish so all the characters let their imaginations run wild.

Avatar
reblogged

My toxic trait is that I have very strong feelings about the tune to Lecha Dodi but the one I know is not the most popular.

Avatar

so, about goysplaining

Would you explain to a black person what is and isn't racism? To a woman what is and isn't misogyny? Would you dictate what's allowed to make trans people feel unsafe, and what isn't sufficiently transphobic? Say to a Democrat who vandalized a Trump 2024 sign that actually the fact that they got thrown into an almost-freezing river and were only allowed out after they yelled "Trump 2024!" was only fair, since obviously that's what they deserve for vandalizing? No?

Then why the fuck is it okay to do it for Jews?

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
redladypaige

So I've been hearing that there shouldn't be a country for the jews, that it should be like "other countries" and "be for everyone".

Ok, so your country that has separation of church and state, which days are the work week?

Mon-Fri? Huh? Why is that? Maybe to make it so people won't work on Sundays, and then, go to church?

In Israel, the work week is Sun-Thu. I don't know if Americans even know that.

Friday night to Saturday night is the Sabbath, so having these days off make it easier to observe.

Muslim countries, usually, have the workweek be Sat-Wed for similar reasons.

People are so stuck on their American Defaultism that they forget that so many things are structured on purpose to benefit different people.

So when people say that Israel should be abolished and there should be a "neutral secular state", what they mean is that it should be more like what they consider the "normal" and "default".

They act like there is a "one size fits all" culture, that anything else is some perversion for the ideal of what a country should be.

That's just one of many many things, cultural and religious, that makes Israel the only place in the world where jews can live without being an afterthought.

I have a lot of problems with Israel.

So many, many problems, especially with the government, and with what's to come with Trump's victory.

I genuinely hope for a change, for the end of suffering, for lasting peace and justice.

But I'm so done with people that have their country built to suit them telling me mine shouldn't exist.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Genuine question that I'm sure you get a lot but how can someone be both pro Zionism and pro Palestine? Everything I have read and consumed would make it seem as if they are the antithesis of each other.

This is in fact the first time someone has asked me this!! I'm so happy to be answering this tbh it's gonna be a nice note to end on (i'm going to sleep after this).

(I fell asleep before I finished lol, good morning)

So when people call themselves "Pro-Palestine", they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting on behalf of the civilians of Palestine, rather than in support of any particular military efforts (though pro-Palestine protests have horrendous track records concerning pro-Hamas demonstrations/speakers). When I call myself "Pro-Palestine", I am aligning myself with the civilians of Palestine and wishing for their suffering to end.

When people (generally Zionists) align themselves in opposition to self-described "pro-Palestine" people, they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting in opposition to a pro-Hamas group. This is because, as mentioned previously, the pro-Palestine movement has a horrendous problem with keeping pro-Hamas sentiments seperate from it.

When self-described "pro-Palestinian" people align themselves in oppsition to Zionism, they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting in opposition to an expansionist force that seeks to subjugate the Palestinian people; Revisionist Zionism and Kahanism, two offshoots of Zionism, are both anti-Palestinian in this sense, but the reduction of Zionism to these frankly fringe (though regrettably prominent in the current Israeli government) beliefs is incorrect and, in a lot of cases, disingenuous and/or actively malicious.

The generally accepted definitions of Zionism among Zionists are "the right of the Jewish people to return to, and form communities in, their ancestral homeland" and "the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancestral homeland". When I call myself "pro-Zionism", I am aligning myself with the belief that these rights are as inalienable from Jews as they are from any other indigenous group the world over; I do not believe they can expire, or be rescinded, or otherwise become invalid, for any reason.

As you can see, my beliefs that:

  • Palestinian civilians are experiencing a hardship that should by all rights stop immediately
  • Jewish people have the right to home, community, and self-determination in their ancestral homeland

are not at all in conflict with each other!

NB: This analysis applies only to people who are acting in good faith. There are self-described Zionists who subscribe to Kahanism/Revisionist Zionism, and many ostensibly "pro-Palestine" people who support Hamas. The world at large is very susceptible to propaganda spread by Hamas, because the world is antisemitic.

The two most common dogwhistles to watch out for are pro-Hamas dogwhistles:

  • Positive reference to "resistance" or "the resistance" — these are euphemisms for "terrorism" and "Hamas" or, more recently, "Hezbollah".
  • Negative reference to "the occupation", "the Zionist occupation", or "Zionist settlers" — there are illegal settlers in the West Bank, and I'd bet my life they overwhelmingly identify as Zionists, but these dogwhistles are code for Israel as a whole and the desire for it to cease to exist. When the illegal West Bank settlers are being discussed, specifying "the West Bank settlers" and/or "the West Bank occupation" is best practice.

I hope this helped!! I didn't want to just give you my definitions of the terms in question because that wouldn't really address why the stances of "Zionist" and "pro-Palestine" have become essentially diametrically opposed in popular discourse. As I said, this is not in fact a question I've recieved before & I really appreciate being asked <3

ALSO PPS: The reason I don't call myself a "Zionist" is because I am not a Jew. The conversation of Zionism was always meant to be an internal discussion between Jews, and I'm only aligning myself with it in order to show solidarity with a movement that is having its name forcefully and effectively blackened.

(Yes, this does in fact mean that non-Jews who call themselves "anti-Zionist" are essentially co-opting a Jewish word. Idk how to fix this either.)

Thank you so much for asking, have a great day!!

Avatar
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Genuine question that I'm sure you get a lot but how can someone be both pro Zionism and pro Palestine? Everything I have read and consumed would make it seem as if they are the antithesis of each other.

This is in fact the first time someone has asked me this!! I'm so happy to be answering this tbh it's gonna be a nice note to end on (i'm going to sleep after this).

(I fell asleep before I finished lol, good morning)

So when people call themselves "Pro-Palestine", they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting on behalf of the civilians of Palestine, rather than in support of any particular military efforts (though pro-Palestine protests have horrendous track records concerning pro-Hamas demonstrations/speakers). When I call myself "Pro-Palestine", I am aligning myself with the civilians of Palestine and wishing for their suffering to end.

When people (generally Zionists) align themselves in opposition to self-described "pro-Palestine" people, they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting in opposition to a pro-Hamas group. This is because, as mentioned previously, the pro-Palestine movement has a horrendous problem with keeping pro-Hamas sentiments seperate from it.

When self-described "pro-Palestinian" people align themselves in oppsition to Zionism, they overwhelmingly consider themselves to be acting in opposition to an expansionist force that seeks to subjugate the Palestinian people; Revisionist Zionism and Kahanism, two offshoots of Zionism, are both anti-Palestinian in this sense, but the reduction of Zionism to these frankly fringe (though regrettably prominent in the current Israeli government) beliefs is incorrect and, in a lot of cases, disingenuous and/or actively malicious.

The generally accepted definitions of Zionism among Zionists are "the right of the Jewish people to return to, and form communities in, their ancestral homeland" and "the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancestral homeland". When I call myself "pro-Zionism", I am aligning myself with the belief that these rights are as inalienable from Jews as they are from any other indigenous group the world over; I do not believe they can expire, or be rescinded, or otherwise become invalid, for any reason.

As you can see, my beliefs that:

  • Palestinian civilians are experiencing a hardship that should by all rights stop immediately
  • Jewish people have the right to home, community, and self-determination in their ancestral homeland

are not at all in conflict with each other!

NB: This analysis applies only to people who are acting in good faith. There are self-described Zionists who subscribe to Kahanism/Revisionist Zionism, and many ostensibly "pro-Palestine" people who support Hamas. The world at large is very susceptible to propaganda spread by Hamas, because the world is antisemitic.

The two most common dogwhistles to watch out for are pro-Hamas dogwhistles:

  • Positive reference to "resistance" or "the resistance" — these are euphemisms for "terrorism" and "Hamas" or, more recently, "Hezbollah".
  • Negative reference to "the occupation", "the Zionist occupation", or "Zionist settlers" — there are illegal settlers in the West Bank, and I'd bet my life they overwhelmingly identify as Zionists, but these dogwhistles are code for Israel as a whole and the desire for it to cease to exist. When the illegal West Bank settlers are being discussed, specifying "the West Bank settlers" and/or "the West Bank occupation" is best practice.

I hope this helped!! I didn't want to just give you my definitions of the terms in question because that wouldn't really address why the stances of "Zionist" and "pro-Palestine" have become essentially diametrically opposed in popular discourse. As I said, this is not in fact a question I've recieved before & I really appreciate being asked <3

ALSO PPS: The reason I don't call myself a "Zionist" is because I am not a Jew. The conversation of Zionism was always meant to be an internal discussion between Jews, and I'm only aligning myself with it in order to show solidarity with a movement that is having its name forcefully and effectively blackened.

(Yes, this does in fact mean that non-Jews who call themselves "anti-Zionist" are essentially co-opting a Jewish word. Idk how to fix this either.)

Thank you so much for asking, have a great day!!

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
woz_art: You deserve better, my Jews.

you need to click on this post to get the full majesty of him setting this art to the tune of “It’s Too Late” by (Jewish queen!) Carole King.

Avatar
reblogged

Just found out my cities big hannukah event is likely canceled. Last year they did it indoors with shit tons of security and it will probably be the same this year. I used to love going to the event. It was a massive celebration in the botanical gardens with food and music and all the fun stuff, and now its just an indoor gathering :(

I hate antisemitism for ruining the one annual event us Jews have in this city. Im probably gonna end up going 9 hours north to go to the Auckland one because they still did it last year and I would hate to miss my favourite event of the year.

I love it so much because its a chance to not only meet other Jews, but to bring my non-Jewish friends and share my culture with them.

I just hate that goyim can have massive parades throughout the street thar inconvenience everyone and have big Diwali and Eid events at massive stadiums that are postered eveerywhere to advertise, but Jewish people cant have this one thing. We have to go indoors and not tell anyone where its at and have insane amounts of security and everything.

I wish the world was safer for us. I just want to celebrate my second favourite holiday and have good food and hang out with friends while celebrating my culture yk?

Avatar
reblogged

Just found out my cities big hannukah event is likely canceled. Last year they did it indoors with shit tons of security and it will probably be the same this year. I used to love going to the event. It was a massive celebration in the botanical gardens with food and music and all the fun stuff, and now its just an indoor gathering :(

I hate antisemitism for ruining the one annual event us Jews have in this city. Im probably gonna end up going 9 hours north to go to the Auckland one because they still did it last year and I would hate to miss my favourite event of the year.

I love it so much because its a chance to not only meet other Jews, but to bring my non-Jewish friends and share my culture with them.

I just hate that goyim can have massive parades throughout the street thar inconvenience everyone and have big Diwali and Eid events at massive stadiums that are postered eveerywhere to advertise, but Jewish people cant have this one thing. We have to go indoors and not tell anyone where its at and have insane amounts of security and everything.

I wish the world was safer for us. I just want to celebrate my second favourite holiday and have good food and hang out with friends while celebrating my culture yk?

Avatar
Avatar
arrenkae

The way this otherwise universally accepted in leftist circles concept of "don't speak over members of oppressed minority groups, don't tell them what counts or doesn't count as discrimination against them, don't tokenize those who validate your opinions only to dehumanize those who don't" just flies out of the window when it comes to Jews

Avatar
Avatar
xclowniex

Leftists: Race theory is bad! It was founded by racists and has been perpetrated for racist thing.

That's why we created race theory two the electic boogaloo where we hate ethnoreligions and think they aren't real

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net