mouthporn.net
#sherlock holmes – @micaathogwarts on Tumblr
Avatar

Dragon of Xadia

@micaathogwarts

Avatar

Why media has always to "fix" asexual/aromantic characters?

(this is a little rant. I don't wanna seem rude or trying to ignore certain identities so please read till the end. maybe I am just overanalysing things but...)

When a character shows little to no interest in love matters there is always a common pattern in their evolution. First they are ridiculed or treated like a child. Then their arch and growth is shown through "fixing" them: they start to catch feelings, get in relationship and so on and that becomes a methaphor of their maturity, healing or "regaing humanity".

I am thinking of BBC Sherlock that after stating many times that he doesn't want nor like those kind of relationship he kinda "regains humanity" by actually engaging with Irene. Watson litterally tells him to go out whit her, like if without romantic/sexual love his existance would be wasted.

I am thinking of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. His friends always make fun of him for his approach to relationship. Then magically he has sex with Amy as a way of showing he is matured and had a "fundamental human experience".

I am thinking of Will Byers that in a season doesn't understand why all his friends are falling in love. And in the following season the show makes clear that he is not heartless but actually he is in love with his friend. (I know he is supposed to be really young, is still a good representation and his asexuality/aromanticism was just a not-so-wide-spread headcanon....but the way all of that is portait still fit this annoyng narrative)

I am thinking of people saying Loveless or even Heartstopper by Alice Oseman are childish and immature or irrealistic.

And I know that asexual people can have sex, aromantic people can be in relationship, demisexuals and demiromantics exist and all of this is valid but I am tired of seeing that a "full no" is never a really valid option in media. A person who doesn't want no kind of relationship is always shown as a flawed starting point in need of fixing. And then, eventually, they will grow, make up their mind, fall in love, realising they where just holding back, scared or in need to explore themselves.

Avatar
Headcanons: Aro/Ace
This is just a random list of characters I headcanon as aro and/or ace. I may update it in the future.
  • Charlie Weasley [Harry Potter] : aroace (this should be considered canon)
  • Luna Lovegood [Harry Potter] : ace and panromantic
  • Draco Malfoy [Harry Potter] : ace and demiromantic (I have 0 evidence of this but I like to think he trully loved only Astoria that way. Plus the oversexualisation of him on tiktok makes me really uncomfortable)
  • Bow [SPOP] : ace and biromantic
  • Adora [SPOP] : ace and homoromantic
  • Double Trouble [SPOP] : Aroace (why otherwise would they choose a green lizard as ultimate form?)
  • Toph [Atla] : Aro
  • Zuko [Atla] : Ace (is disperatly in love with Mai, but he is not very good with romance)
  • Claudia [Tdp] : Ace
  • Lemony Snicket [asoue, atwq] : ace and demiromantic
  • Ellington Feint [atwq] : aro
  • Sherlock Holmes : aroace (This one too should be considered canon)
  • Merlin [Merlin] : ace and panromantic
  • Wonder Woman [DC] : demisexual and biromantic
  • Kuzco [the emperor's new groove] : aroace (or gay, but there is no way he's straight)
  • Elsa [Frozen] : aroace
  • Merida [Brave] : aro
  • Yelena Belova [mcu] : aroace (canon?)
  • Wanda Maximoff [mcu] : ace, biromantic
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net