Caitlyn Siehl (via notstrongonlyaggressive)
Andrea Gibson. from “Pole Dancer,” Pole Dancing to Gospel Hymns (via lifeinpoetry)
Mo Nyamweya, In which we are too much for each other (via moygay)
Azra.T “not leaving your heart wide open was the most cowardly thing you’ll ever do” (via 5000letters)
tw graphic battle: [malfoymannor vs. ohhelga]
theme one, round one : the hale family
SHAMELESS MEME | [1/4] otps- Kev & Veronica
maggie and i are gonna get married and when maggie and i get married we're gonna play the best music to ever when maggie and i get married bc maggie and i are getting maried
If you needed a damn book series about a wizard and his groupies to teach you about love and friendship because you couldn’t learn about it the old fashion way through nature or nurture, then you have serious issues.
Hi! Major Potterhead here with some university and a few child psychology classes under her belt. I noticed you had a little trouble keeping your silliness out of the Harry Potter tag. It’s fine! Sometimes people make mistakes, happens to the best of us. But I just wanted to address your point because I think it kind of stinks. You tried to slip in the nature vs nurture argument to make the post seem a little more valid but you failed :(. Implying books have no business shaping or are irrelevant to our human experience is a little ignorant. Part of the nurture side in “nature vs nurture” is environmental factors, specially “observational learning”, which comes from watching peers and parents, and more “static” things, like TV, the internet, and yes, books. Some children are blessed with parents who can afford them tons of TLC, while others have parents who are distracted by life and depend on those “static” things to act as a makeshift babysitter. This isn’t the child’s fault, it does not mean they have “serious issues”. It means they’ll learn with the tools they are given. Of course it’s ideal to learn about love and friendship from the people surrounding you, but it’s not always realistic, so having something like Harry Potter is extremely important. They’re easy reads with very clear, meaningful messages. Learning the value of a true friend or the importance of sticking to your beliefs from “a wizard and his groupies” is not very different than learning the Pythagorean theorem in a text book at school. Except the former will do you worlds of good later on in life, while most of us can’t even spell the latter without looking it up, let alone remember what the hell its significance is.
tl;dr: Psychologists have recognized the usefulness of learning about basic humanity from books, when will you?
Hank Green (via wanderingshadow)