mouthporn.net
@mathsbian on Tumblr
Avatar

gay math nerd

@mathsbian / mathsbian.tumblr.com

Meg (they/she) | 28 | aspec sapphic+nb4nb (aka bi), polyam/ambiam, nonbinary, disabled, nd
aesthetic sideblog @asmolpastelace
Let me know if you need anything tagged for filtering purposes, I can’t promise I’ll be perfect with it but I want to try and keep my followers from being unnecessarily triggered if I can
Do not message me asking me to signal boost something for you if you haven’t interacted with me before.
Avatar
Avatar
mathsbian

I haven’t seen this one yet so

Disabled friends and tumblrites all: do your best to stay alive. The fight will be very hard for some of us, if certain plans go into action and our cost of living goes up while benefits go down, but we have to try.

We’ll crawl up the Capitol steps again if we have to. But we have to stay alive to make it there.

Non-disabled friends and tumblrites all: check on your disabled friends in the coming months. Keep an ear to the ground for news about changes to Medicaid, Medicare, SSI, SSDI, Food Stamps, the ADA, the ACA, “pre-existing conditions” 🤢, and discrimination protections. Ask them how you can help when you learn of new problems they are facing, especially systemic ones. Offer to help them figure out how to start applying for more aid or benefits, or what other resources are available in your area. Make sure they’re eating and getting to their appointments when you can. Contribute to mutual aid funds when you can.

Avatar
reblogged

Here is a skill that many of us are going to need for survival: how to tell if someone is offering to let you lie.

The tip-off phrase is "If [circumstance] was true, then we/I could do [helpful thing.]" This is not a guarantee that the person is offering, but it should tell you "I am being informed of a way to improve things."

Your confirmation phrase is "What documentation would that require?" This is essentially asking them "if people come asking me to prove this, will I be able to? Or will they not come at all?"

The answer you are hoping for with the confirmation phrase is "Just tell me if it's true, and I'll put it on the form." Note that this is not a direct instruction to lie, because they can't tell you that.

If they didn't mean to extend an offer to lie or this is a situation where they can't, then they'll list off something like your paystubs or your birth certificate. Your response back in that case is "Thanks, I'll tell my friends who qualify." This clears you of any concerns that you may have been considering lying.

The more complex answer is when they answer by giving you a form on the spot. Your job, in this case, is to scan the form and see if what they are asking you can be meaningfully verified by an official source.

Things that can be verified by an official source include, but are not limited to, your age, legal sex, income, veteran status, and place of residence. It's not generally a good idea to lie about these on official documents.

Be smart, and be practical. Do what you need to in order to stay alive, and keep an ear out for the people offering to help you do so.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
sasskarian

It's almost like people didn't give a shit about the welfare of anyone but themselves

Avatar
mathsbian

Also like people were relying on their own party and Facebook echo chamber to know the policies of the person they’re voting for. Or maybe some FOX, too. He really knew what he was doing apparently back in 2016ish when he started the fake news bullshit.

If they literally never saw an anti-Trump ad and never read any of the “liberal media’s” articles about what his policies would do, they literally wouldn’t know some of this shit. Maybe this will teach some of them that they do need to listen to the news again?

(My whole family voted for Trump on the basis of the economy and the abortion ban and maybe some of the anti-lgbtq youth stuff. When I asked about Project 2025 and how it would take away everything keeping me alive and the tiny bit of independent that I am, and also make it so other women couldn’t leave guys like my mom left my dad, they all said that it wasn’t real because Trump’s official statement is that he hasn’t read it and had nothing to do with it, even though literally everyone involved in writing it is either a former Trump staffer or a likely appointee for this term. I got so upset about it my mom later made me go get a psych assessment because I was “acting paranoid, maybe even psychotic”. I haven’t had the stomach to bring any of the shit up like a guy who doesn’t trust science being in charge of the HHS and the bullshit with Musk and the DoGE 🤢 or the tariffs. If they decide I’m listening to fake news again I don’t want to get sent back to the hospital, I’m homeless and sleeping on my mom’s couch right now so she has a lot of control over me despite me being nearly 30 fucking years old.)

Avatar

This is incredibly ironic considering the majority of proponents of TMA/TME language are also the same people arguing against transandrophobia/transmisandry because "androphobia/misandry isn't real".

Avatar

just a handy little info chart on the spectrums of sexuality.

[ID: a poster that reads "These spectra are all different." Below are four arrows, up to down, each labeled with a different sexuality spectrum.

Sexual attraction

  • Top: allosexual - often experiences sexual attraction (a feeling of wanting to have sex with a specific person)
  • Middle: grey-asexual - rarely experiences sexual attraction
  • Bottom: asexual - never experiences sexual attraction
Notes for sexual attraction:
  • There are other types of attraction and corresponding spectra. See: romantic, platonic, aesthetic, sensual
  • Asexuality can shift over time. See: aceflux

Libido

  • Top: high libido - often or strongly experiences libido/sex drive (a feeling of wanting sex, but not directed at a specific person)
  • Bottom: low libido - rarely experiences libido
Notes for libido:
  • Libido can change greatly due to mental health, life circumstances, and various other factors

Sex favourability

  • Top: sex favourable - sex is appealing and enjoyable for them
  • Middle: sex indifferent - does not particularly like or dislike sex
  • Between middle and bottom: sex averse - dislikes sex and finds it not appealing
  • Bottom: sex repulsed - finds sex repulsive or disgusting
Notes for sex favourability:
  • There are other spectra of favourability. See: romance favourability, touch favourability
  • Sex favourability can depend on context. See: aegosexual
  • Sex favourability can shift over time. See: sex fluid

Sex positivity

  • Top: sex positive - believing that "sex is good and people can do what they want"
  • Middle: sex neutral - no particular stance on sex
  • Bottom: sex negative - believing that "sex is bad and sex should be restricted"
Notes for sex positivity:
  • The other spectra are about things the brain/body does. Sex positivity is about ideology

Any combination is possible. Now you know these things exist. If you want to learn more about something, look it up.

End ID]

Certified Sex Ed Post!

Avatar
Avatar
curioscurio

this is crazy bc I remember when i was in school, if a guy had spare tampons in his backpack he was deemed the most universally popular guy by every single woman in school. The rizz you get from having tampons on you as a man is immeasurable.

Avatar
nalgetss

Most of my friends since i was like 14 have had periods and they mostly stick to two brands, the day i started carrying them on my backpacks i unlocked a level of loyalty and care i could not articulate if i had a poetry degree. I met my soon to be wife because that day i was the only person around her who carried pads and she has never stopped telling people about it, i'm getting married because of the immeasurable rizz given to me by openly carrying pads as a dude

Avatar
Avatar
apolladay
Anonymous asked:

Do you think that My Immortal is real?

  • Yes, that was someone's genuine attempt at a fanfiction, and the Tara Gillespie persona is also real
  • Yes, but some or all details of the Tara Gillespie persona were made-up
  • No, that was a genius act of trolling
  • Something in between
  • What's My Immortal?

* Yes, that was someone's genuine attempt at a fanfiction, and the Tara Gillespie persona is also real

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
apolladay
Anonymous asked:

Have you ever started dating an established friend and are you queer?

  • Yes, multiple times, I'm queer
  • Yes, multiple times, not queer
  • Yes, once, I'm queer
  • Yes, once, not queer
  • No, queer
  • No, not queer
Avatar

If your democrat friends start muttering about stolen election conspiracy theories, the time to have a sit down with them and express your concerns is NOW, while you still have a chance to reach them, not 6 months from now when they're fully conspiracy-pilled.

Here's some of the talking points and why they're bullshit:

  • '10 million votes don't just disappear!' -> Joe Biden's 81 million votes were a statistical outlier, sparked by the recent experience of the Trump presidency. The democrats failed to maintain that sense of urgency, but Harris still got more votes than Hillary Clinton, more than Obama and more than any previous democratic candidate. These numbers are not weird at all.
  • 'The Republicans tried to infiltrate election- and vote counting organizations!' -> yeah, they did, and yet hundreds of independent legal observers didn't see anything go wrong enough to raise any alarms. Independent exit polls are also very consistently similar to the counted votes. Tons of international organizations specialized in this stuff observed the election and didn't see a reason to raise the alarm.
  • 'But I know a dozen democrats whose mail-in votes were not counted!' -> In any election a certain number of votes are registered as invalid because something was wrong with the ballot. In a country the size of the US, that translates to many thousands of votes. The internet allows these people to find each other, creating the false impression that a suspiciously large group of voted was not valid.
  • 'Musk used Star Link to mess with electronic voting!' -> Electronic voting machines are not connected to the internet and dozens of independent media have already debunked this myth. It is absolutely impossible to use Star Link to fake election results.
  • 'There is voter disenfranchisement!' -> This is true. This has always been true, for every election. It's an issue worth talking about but it's not a special secret conspiracy that's unique to this election.

But just as importantly as the facts: sit down with your friend and talk about the anxiety that's behind their conspiracy leanings. Acknowledge their pain and fear. Help them find ways to feel less powerless and regain their sense of agency. Take them to a mutual aid event, involve them in a fundraising event for a marginalized group, invite them to a local community effort. If they spend more time feeling connection and empowerment and less time doom scrolling online, they're far more likely to stay in reality.

Avatar
beskad

This this this

I worked as an election judge across multiple polling locations and election types in my state from 2018-2023 (presidential primary and general elections, midterms, and special elections like for the school board etc.)

US elections are extremely secure. There are so many safeguards in place. Everything is double and triple counted.

The number of ballots electronically counted by the box are checked against the number of physical ballots at the end of the night, and also the receipt papers that individuals exchange for their ballot. All three of these counts MUST MATCH. Sometimes you're off by 1 number and it means everyone stops and triple counts these papers until you find the error (human error, it's been 16 hours and two pieces of thin receipt paper were stuck together and the second person to recount finds it and everyone cheers because thank fuck, it means no one dropped anything on the floor anywhere.)

There are eyes everywhere and there's a deliberate mix of poll workers across political parties/affiliations. It's simply not possible to alter even 1 ballot at 1 polling place, much less thousands.

Unfortunately, Donald Trump won this election. If there was interference, it was NOT at the voting booth. That's simply not possible. The "interference" (if you can even call it that) comes from right wing propaganda convincing stupid and/or hateful and/or selfish people to vote for him.

Avatar
hachama

In 2016, we had 60% turnout.

In 2020, we had 66% turnout.

It's too early to know what this year's number is, but I bet it's around 60%.

Trump got 1.5 million more votes this year than he did 4 years ago, which is more or less in line with population growth.

His base showed up. Harris's base didn't. That's it. There's no deep mystery here, just the usual disenfranchised minorities and disinterested populace.

When turnout is high, Republicans lose. When the electorate stays home, Republicans win. This is simple math that has been true my entire adult life, and yet every 4 years, like clockwork, people ignore it.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

not a hate anon i just genuinely am confused about your url being mathsbian when yr bi

1. Why is it confusing when someone identifies with both terms?

2. I only experience attraction to women and nonbinary people, but not just femme nonbinary people. I’m sapphic in a very lesbian sense and first identified as a lesbian after figuring out I was arospec and ace and definitely not into men, and nb4nb; which is two kinds of attraction, and thus fits in the bi umbrella. I was incredibly loathe to take on the label of bi, because the entire time I was convinced I “had” to give up lesbian if I did, and now I’m not stressed out at all about my identity.

3. Lesbian originally meant any woman who had sex with other women. Not necessarily exclusively. Bi women were part of the lesbian community until the lesbian separatist movement in the 1970s, which was mainly about straight white women who swore off all relationships with men for political reasons speaking over actual sapphic women. Sappho of Lesbos herself is famously bisexual, not homosexual. And the slurs that get thrown at bi women are all the same ones thrown at lesbians. Bi women don’t have “their own” terms like femme/butch because, up until the 70s, they were all the same community. (You might also notice that gay men use femme/butch. They’re just queer terms to describe a queer relationship to gender presentation.)

Avatar

so Trump being a felon isn't actually the problem. you guys understand this right. it's the thing he did that got him charged with a felony that is upsetting, not the fact that he is technically a criminal. felons are not inherently worse people than non-felons. becoming a felon did not make him any less qualified than he already was. there are a quite lot of felons who would do a much better job at being president than Trump

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
ms-demeanor
Anonymous asked:

Some people on the left are discussing whether the left is kind enough to me. Especially after the results of the election like lots of men of some demographics voting for Trump. Do you have any thoughts on that? Seems more about women should be nicer to men in some people’s opinions. And I am not sure about this discourse

i think that the social atomization that contributes to the radicalization of young men also contributes to, like, tradwifery and the radicalization of young women so I think that people are looking at a deep systemic issue with a shallow lens.

I don't think this is so much an issue of people being "nice" but of spaces making people feel *valued.*

The right-wing space full of toxic masculinity where people call disaffected young men "brother" isn't comforting just because people call you brother, it's because they're framing disaffected young men as valuable members of society who have been dismissed and degraded by the left. It tells them they're important and have worth and are necessary for the future of the world just because of who they are.

Of course they're getting called pussies and cucks and are being bullied in that space, but they're also being told that if they perform a certain standard of masculinity they are the future of their nation/race/species/family/etc. The toxicity of that space isn't something that makes them question their value, or whether or not they're a good person, or if they have something to offer the world. It is something they endure to prove that they are a member of the in-group, and that they belong, and that they do have value and are a good person.

So, there are people dunking on that post because it does kind of read like "i was almost eaten up by the alt right because women weren't nice enough to me" and to an extent i think that it was ungracefully worded. But i also think that it's addressing something that a lot of people feel in a lot of political spaces.

I do not think that whatever the hell we consider "the mainstream left" in America is particularly welcoming to anybody. I think that it very superficially values diversity while not actually valuing people. I think that it says "You are important! And that's why I need you to donate three dollars to my campaign to prevent the Republicans from harming [your identity group]! I am asking for your help as a senator, a mother, and a person who wants to defeat my opponent in two to four years."

I think that what a lot of people are looking for is not acceptance or niceness but is a community and i'm not at all surprised that people feel like they're not getting that from democrats/the mainstream left/whatever.

I mean. My real response to this is:

I don't think that the *actual* issue is that men don't feel welcomed by "the left," I definitely don't think the issue is women being insufficiently nice to men, I think the issue is that all of us are little cogs in a capitalist machine and actually there's very little out there that is saying to anyone "you are worth more than your productivity."

And it turns out that people will put up with huge amounts of abuse if the abuser makes them feel like they belong. People getting sucked into the alt-right pipeline because it is "nice" to them are exactly analogous to people who get sucked into cults because the cult provides community and affirmation and a sense of belonging.

Anyway, I am once again and as always begging people to put together or join any kind of at-least monthly meetup based on your specific interests. Start a radio club. Start a quilting circle. Put together a free store at the park once a month. Literally join a drum circle. Participate in a community garden. Start a walking club with your neighbors. Go to events at the library on weekends.

As a side note: there absolutely are lefty spaces that function by making people feel worthless or feel like bad people. They tend to have high turnover, short lifespans, and explosive fallout. These are shitty spaces and if your participation in a space is primarily motivated by some combination of guilt and self-flagellation, you should leave that space.

Avatar
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net