Magic and Moonlit Wings

Stop sexualizing my body stop shaming my body stop policing my body

BREASTS ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREASTS ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREAST ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREASTS ARE FUCKING SEXUAL ORGANS!!

WE DONT LET MEN WALK AROUND WITH THEIR DICKS OUT BECAUSE ITS A SEXUAL ORGAN!!

GET THE FUCK OVER IT YOUR FEMALE BREASTS ARE

source: X

Ahem.

BREASTS ARE NOT SEXUAL ORGANS YOU INCONSIDERATE DICK!

Breasts are mammary organs, meaning their true and primary purpose is to nurse babies.

I’ll repeat that for the slow people in the class, you warthog-faced buffoon.

Breasts are mammary sacks. They are meant to feed babies, just like a cow’s udder. They aren’t sexual organs. They aren’t classified as such in biology texts (certainly none of the ones I checked out to answer this post)

Men have breasts, you pile of refuse. Their breasts are smaller than women’s, but they possess the same mammary glands and, properly stimulated, can produce milk. Men can get breast cancer. They can develop larger breasts due to excessive hormones. Their breasts are exactly like a women’s breast, except that since their testicles produce testosterone in high degree, they don’t have enough female hormones in their bodies to start lactating.

So, you pile of putrescence, you’re probably thinking, “If breasts aren’t sex organs then how come guys get horny looking at them and women get turned on by playing worth them, huh?”

The answers to both are so terribly simple that you might just be able to follow them if you pay attention, pig.

Men are enticed by breasts because they’re not allowed to see them. Women are sensitive because stimulation triggers two responses - bonding hormones and lactation.

In case you’re too simple to get this, I’ll break it down further for you. In cultures where breasts are viewed daily, they don’t do much to get a guy hot and bothered. There are hundreds of paintings from the renaissance period and earlier depicting women nursing babies, especially images of the Blessed Virgin nursing Christ, and none of these have ever been considered provocative, because that’s what boobs are for. Meanwhile, in cultures where everyone from baby sister to great-great grandma walk around topless because the weather will kill them otherwise, dudes don’t get raging erections every time they see a breast. They don’t find boobs enticing the way men do in America, where boobs are considered shameful and need to be hidden.

As for women getting aroused by their boobs being played with, you brainless donkey, a woman’s body responds to get nipples bring touched by flooding her body with bonding hormones that help her attach to get babies - you know, the people her breasts are actually supposed to be used by - and hormones that get her glands making milk. Also, please note that many women with large breasts don’t feel any stimulation when fondled, meaning they aren’t sensitive enough to get off on having their boobs played with.

Do me a favor and GET THE FUCK OVER YOURSELF YOU PURITANICAL ASS! My breasts are NOT SEXUAL ORGANS. They are lactation organs designed for my use and my baby’s use. Not for any man’s use or pleasure.

You inconsiderate space herpe.

This is one of the fun things about being trans. You start HRT and then you start to get breasts, and you get to see at what point it goes from acceptable to not. Like, if people think you’re male it’s totally okay. If you have a little sag it’s okay, too, because lots of men have saggy chests. Then little by little other people get uncomfortable until you reach that imaginary point in which your pecs are now breasts and suddenly they are sexual and dirty and put those away this is a decent place.

Our society is fucking stupid, y’all. This post is 10/10, though.

Pardon the language, but this needs to be heard.

Bullshit along the lines of @orihime-strawberry-love‘s ignorant comment are why I started using the joke tag “tw: visible female nipple” whenever I reblog an art piece that has one (or more) visible nipple on a (presumably) female figure.

It’s funny how u think I’m dumb, but I gave a link to a well respected scientific journal and @tazzygal didn’t have any sources there are no sources anywhere outside of tumblr posts that support her argument and that’s clearly fucking obvious who is scientifically right and its me. Feminist truly don’t understand biology it’s sad and you’re all gonna die off one day I can’t wait.

After further research, I admit you are technically correct if by “sexual organ” you mean “a body part which forms or alters at puberty in response to reaching sexual maturity”. That said, male nipples are also sexual organs, so the double standard of what exposure is acceptable is still inherently unfair. Furthermore, male body and facial hair is also a sexual organ, and by that standard I jokingly posit that we should require men to shave to keep things modest and decent.

But if by “sexual organ” you meant “a body part the only evident purpose of which is sexual stimulation during foreplay and intercourse”, which is the usual complaint about nipple exposure (and I apologize for generalizing you into that category of complainers), than the male nipple applies and the female nipple does not.

According to Harvard, “the brain is the most important sex organ”. I guess that means zombie movies should be censored for being too raunchy.

Isn’t this just the most erotic thing you’ve ever seen? (Image source) No wonder our skulls get in the way and censor it.

In closing, I do not believe that passive-aggressive implied death threats via commentaries on everyone being mortal are an appropriate or mature response to a disagreement.