mouthporn.net
#medieval poc – @lookatthewords on Tumblr
Avatar

The Friendly Black Hottie.

@lookatthewords / lookatthewords.tumblr.com

Hey. I’m Colette. The ripe old age of 20-something. I write stuff and things. WritingWithColor is my diverse writing advice blog. I'm all about PoC, particularly Black + Woman of Color Issues, Writing, Diverse Beauty, Art, Self-Love, and funny ish.
Avatar
reblogged

Black Hair in History

Anonymous said: What are some types of historical hair styles for black hair?

My, what a broad question. Which time period, and where? There’s really too many to cover, and Black people have been wearing their hair is so many ways throughout history, from natural fros to braids, twists and dreads, crimping, relaxing, conks, jheri curls, and so on…but here’s some ideas from different periods, which definitely can’t embody all the styles per times!

Ancient Egypt, Africa (I, II)

USA,1914 (I, II)

USA,1970s (I, II)

USA, 1980s-1990s

More resources:

~Mod Colette

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
belakqwa

I’m against putting POC characters in tales of European origin, because, y’know, historical and ethnic accuracy is an actual thing. It’s folklore and it comes from this or that European culture so, yes, accuracy IS a thing. BUT. I’m all for making more movies based on mythology and folklore of other cultures, for example, African or Native American ones. This I support, it would be a great thing. Because, in all honesty, no one needs Black or Asian Cinderella, that’s just stupid (and, yes, inaccurate). but everyone needs more tales about a child lost in the forest meeting spirits and forest gods. Or at least lets make a movie using an Asian variant of Cinderella fairy tale, there’s more than one, y’know? Because I’m all for accuracy and I’m all for representing more than one dominant culture in multicultural society.

Are you for real? I bolded the above statements because you know what?

*I* needed a Black Cinderella. And I bet a lot of readers here did, too. We still do.

Because of colonialism, most of us have been force-fed European history, mythology, fairy tales, and Medievalism; told it’s the best, the highest, the only. It’s everywhere we look: movies, cartoons, books, tv shows, and we’re told that this is something you are required to learn, and in some cases, the only context you’re allowed for your imagination, but it’s not really for you. It’s not about you. Because you aren’t “Historically Accurate.”

That can go to hell and so can you. Because you know what? Our histories, once again, because of colonialism, kidnapping, enslavement, genocide, are marginalized, misunderstood, and misrepresented. They’re stolen from us and given to white people considered “more qualified” to tell them, and they make millions of dollars off of those misrepresentations. Entire libraries and histories were purposely, methodically burned in order to disempower people of color. These stories, when they survive, are made illegal to teach, specifically because they empower people of color! People of color are removed from their own stories and their own contexts and replaced with white people, because Ridley Scott “can’t mount a film of this budget, where I have to rely on tax rebates in Spain, and say that my lead actor is Mohammad so-and-so from such-and-such.I’m just not going to get it financed.”

You claim you’re all for accuracy? And yet, a “Black or Asian Cinderella” is in your words, “just stupid”??? None of these women are “Accurate” to base a Cinderella on??

All of these women are just automatically disqualified from having their own Cinderella Story because of their races? No matter how “Historically Accurate” they are?

I think we can have both, all, and more. We can tell our own stories, make our own media, AND have a Black AND and Asian AND a Native American AND a Pacific Islander AND a Latina and any other Cinderella we choose. Our stories are worth telling, and for some of us, whose cultures have been crushed by multiple genocides, who have been colonized, who have had our imaginations replaced with Eurocentrism, we are allowed and entitled to our own Cinderella stories, whatever new and beautiful form they take.

I'm gonna write my tome of fairy tale retellings with all WoC protagonists and you [le racists] will deal.

Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc

"The only plausible explanation for these findings is that a considerable number of transoceanic voyages in both directions across both major oceans were completed between the 7th millennium BC and the European age of discovery." I'm sorry, but that's some of the stupidest shit I've ever heard. From an academic standpoint, the mere idea of ancient Egyptian sailors visiting the western hemisphere is laughable right off the bat. Do you really believe this stuff?

Avatar

I always really wonder what kind of reaction people are expecting when they send messages like this. Are my feelings supposed to be hurt? It’s not like I wrote that paper.

I don’t even have to check; the quoted sentences are from an article from the Sino-Platonic papers, related to the Warring States Project at University of Massachusetts at Amherst. The whole point of the project and the format change of the publication to open access was as a challenge to academic gatekeeping, with a focus on unconventional research.

If anyone would like to read all 273 pages of Scientific Evidence for Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Voyages to and From the Americas by John L. Sorenson and Carl L. Johanssen, you can do so.

Not sure where you’re getting the “ancient Egyptian sailors” thing from. But it’s a sad academic world indeed if saying that no one ever traveled across the Atlantic ocean in this particular 2,000+ year span, NO EXCEPTIONS EVER!!! is perfectly reasonable, but saying that it’s possible that someone may have done so since that is a massive amount of time is “laughable”.

But hey, who am I to challenge the assumptions and easily-memorized generalizations you’ve accrued in your undergrad education? I’m sure you’ll go quite far without ever questioning what you’ve learned from your textbooks, which of course could never possibly have some kind of agenda like a free tumblr blog does. ;) Yay! you win! Enjoy your life full of self-satisfaction over your extremely narrow, yet widely accepted worldview.

Avatar

Not to mention “wah wah its so stupid” isn’t an argument at all.

Which I’d only really point out if it wasn’t so obvious that johnconley expects me to be very emotionally invested in their personal approval of things I post.

I’m pretty sure that part of the point of colonization in the first place was the end result that your great great grandchildren can stomp around like Godzilla yelling “COLUMBUS DISCOVERED AMERICA NO EXCEPTIONS” and receive near-universal applause for doing so, or at least an A+ in Intro to World History class. And then you get to call anyone who questions this rather questionable narrative “laughable” and “the stupidest sh*t [you’ve] ever heard”.

I mean…that’s the point of invading a continent and burning their histories, and then literally forcing the people there to rewrite their history with your approval and supervision, right? You get to control what is “acceptable” history, and what is “the stupidest sh*t [you’ve] ever heard”.

It doesn’t matter whether or not “wah wah it’s so stupid” is a real argument.  You can go your whole life without ever questioning it or challenging it, and you’ll be rewarded. And if you’re white, you get the added self-esteem boost of “only white people ever did anything worth mentioning in History classes.” And actually enforce this narrative by making it illegal to teach anyone otherwise.  What’s not to love?

You get to push everyone else’s history out of the way, make them electives, call them nonsense, and laugh at them. You get to marginalize other narratives.

That’s not news to me. This project is about questioning these narratives, and coming to my inbox to inform me that you learned NOT to question these narratives isn’t something I’m obligated to give a crap about. In no uncertain terms, everything about the original message says “I have already made up my mind”. My reaction is, “good for you; I’m still interested in learning something new.”

You’re right, of course, “wah wah it’s so stupid” is NOT an argument. And I don’t think it was meant to be one, either. So maybe we should all think about what it is meant to be, instead.

White supremacy, indeed.

Avatar

I'm confused about what Beethoven was doing in the black composers post. He was German.

Avatar

By golly gee! I keep forgetting that Black people didn’t exist until the Fresh Prince of Bel Air came on television! Or that Black people existed in anywhere else than Africa even with slavery going on :) My apologies.

Anyway, here’s proof that Beethoven was Black:

"… Said directly, Beethoven was a black man. Specifically, his mother was a Moor, that group of Muslim Northern Africans who conquered parts of Europe—making Spain their capital—for some 800 years.

In order to make such a substantial statement, presentation of verifiable evidence is compulsory. Let’s start with what some of Beethoven’s contemporaries and biographers say about his brown complexion:

(Louis Letronne, Beethoven, 1814, pencil drawing.)

"Frederick Hertz, German anthropologist, used these terms to describe him: ‘Negroid traits, dark skin, flat, thick nose.’

Emil Ludwig, in his book ‘Beethoven,’ says: ‘His face reveals no trace of the German. He was so dark that people dubbed him Spagnol [dark-skinned].’

Fanny Giannatasio del Rio, in her book ‘An Unrequited Love: An Episode in the Life of Beethoven,’ wrote ‘His somewhat flat broad nose and rather wide mouth, his small piercing eyes and swarthy [dark] complexion, pockmarked into the bargain, gave him a strong resemblance to a mulatto.’

Beethoven’s death mask: profile and full face

C. Czerny stated, ‘His beard—he had not shaved for several days—made the lower part of his already brown face still darker.’

Following are one word descriptions of Beethoven from various writers: Grillparzer, ‘dark’; Bettina von Armin, ‘brown’; Schindler, ‘red and brown’; Rellstab, ‘brownish’; Gelinek, ‘short, dark.’

In Alexander Thayer’s Life of Beethoven, vol.1, p. 134,  the author states, “there is none of that obscurity which exalts one to write history as he would have it and not as it really was. The facts are too patent.” On this same page, he states that the German composer Franz Josef Haydn was referred to as a “Moor” by Prince Esterhazy, and Beethoven had “even more of the Moor in his looks.’ On p. 72, a Beethoven contemporary, Gottfried Fischer, describes him as round-nosed and of dark complexion. Also, he was called ‘der Spagnol’ (the Spaniard).

Other “patent” sources, of which there are many, include, but are not limited to, Beethoven by Maynard Solomon, p.78. He is described as having “thick, bristly coal-black hair” (in today’s parlance, we proudly call it ‘kinky’) and a ‘ruddy-complexioned face.’ In   Beethoven:  His Life and Times by Artes Orga, p.72, Beethoven’s pupil, Carl Czerny of the ‘School of Velocity’ fame, recalls that Beethoven’s ‘coal-black hair, cut a la Titus, stood up around his head [sounds almost like an Afro].  His black beard…darkened the lower part of his dark-complexioned face.’

  Engraving by Blasius Hofel, Beethoven, 1814, color facsimile of engraving after a pencil drawing by Louis Letronne. This engraving was regarded in Beethoven’s circle as particularly lifelike. Beethoven himself thought highly of it, and gave several copies to his friends.

Beethoven, the Black Spaniard

Avatar

They whitewashed BEETHOVEN?  O_O

Thank you, history/fact-checking Tumblr.

I now feel the need to go burn every white-skinned image of Beethoven I can find.

Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc

Anonymous Portuguese Artist

Saint Iphegenia

Portugal (18th Century)

Oil on Canvas, 110 x 75 cm.

AROUCA., Museu de Arte Sacra.

Inscribed in cartouche beneath the saint’s feet: “SAN TA IFIGENIA PRINCEZA NUBIA CARMELITA, ADUOGADA CONTRA OSINCENDIOS.”

The legacy of this remarkable black saint, whose story of persecution and victory begins in ancient Nubia, found its ultimate fulfillment in her role as a spiritual guide to her fellow black Africans in their own trials during the Atlantic slave trade. In this painting, the holy virgin Ifigenia (“born strong” in Greek) wears a nun’s habit and holds a miniature church surrounded by flames. The inscription below attests to her Nubian origins and declares her official role as a protector against the ravages of fire.
The story of St. Ifigenia goes back to the earliest days of Christianity. According to an apocryphal account, during a mission of evangelization to Nubia (then called Ethiopia), St. Matthew defeated evil sorcerers and converted the king and his court to the new faith. The zeal of his daughter Ifigenia was especially strong, and with Matthew’s encouragement she founded a convent of 200 women. When she refused the advances of her uncle Hirtacus, he tried to burn down the building. Matthew miraculously diverted the flames to the palace, soon ending the despotic reign of the usurper and ushering in a period of prosperity under Christian rule.
Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc
this was taken at the Museum of London, Docklands - it has a large section about London’s role in slavery, and how slavery contributed to modern racism. 

I think that a lot of museums are finally starting to try and take a more proactive stance on how they present their exhibits and information about them.

For more on this kind of arrangement, I high recommend taking a look at these submissions from xanthy-m on the Swedish Historical Museum:

Avatar
sourcedumal

Oh what was that about black ppl in England not being present?

Since BEFORE THE 1500s?

MEANING DURING THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD

So yall “historically accurate” fuckers can be quiet

Avatar

I’ve seen a few fashion posts trying to expand the “Marie Antoinette is not Victorian” rant, but this stuff can get complicated, so here is a semi-comprehensive list so everyone knows exactly when all of these eras were.

Please note that this is very basic and that there are sometimes subcategories (especially in the 17th century, Jacobean, Restoration, etc)

Avatar
medievalpoc

And people wonder WHY I complain about History/Art History periodization. Note how much overlap there is to the above “eras”, and how many exceptions and extensions there are to these categories.

Oh, and by the way…

Tudor:

Elizabethan:

Stuart:

Georgian:

Regency:

Victorian:

Edwardian:

Because you wouldn’t want to be historically inaccurate.

Holy shi—the middle lady in the Victorian pic looks like my godmum! And the lady, on the right, in the Edwardian one looks almost like she could pass as one of my relatives!

…this is so eerie…but cool.

^^And that’s a big part of the reason why I do this. Everyone should be able to see images like these and feel like they, too, are a part of history.

People can quibble about minutiae as much as they’d like, and I honestly don’t mind the discussion, but when it comes down to it, medievalpoc is really about making an immediate visual impact that has changed how I view history, and I hope the same can be said for people who read these posts.

Avatar
reblogged

What was the most difficult but in the end most rewarding thing about writing the Glamourist series? (Or any individual book?) Any regrets, or anything you'd change post-publication?

Avatar

Breaking my own preconceptions that Regency England was an all-white landscape. I’d totally bought into the white-washing of history and then contributed to it with the first two books. 

In Shades of Milk and Honey, I wanted to have a diverse cast but how could I possibly do that in a small English town in 1814. Oh… I don’t know, maybe by actually representing the people who lived there? In Sanditon, Jane Austen’s unfinished novel, she has a ton of West Indian characters. Looking at the records of births, marriages, deaths, household staff… just actual history instead of what I thought I knew, would have shown me that people of colour lived throughout the British Isles.

In Glamour in Glass, I did the same darn thing. How could there be people of colour in Belgium in 1815? Maybe because they were still there from 1658 when Brueghel was doing etchings? 

What amazes me is how hard it was to break that preconception, even after I became aware of it. Without a Summer, I set in London so I could have a broad and diverse cast. 

Then, when I wrote Valour and Vanity, I finished and realized I’d defaulted to an all-white cast again. It’s set in Venice! A major crossroads, with a seriously diverse population. So I had to go back in and do some rewrites to make it historically accurate.

I imagine I’ll have to be rooting those preconceptions out of myself for the rest of my life. They were deep-seated and continue to be fed by the popular media — often not through malicious intent, but because creators been caught up with the same base of assumed, erroneous knowledge.

So yes, difficult, but definitely rewarding. The books are better for it. 

Part of the reason I enjoy writing historical fantasy is because of the tension between real history and the imagined. Those stresses allow us to see the strain in the fabric of our own society. I find that really exciting. 

Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
medievalpoc

Possibilities

Today on medievalpoc we brainstormed historically accurate Asian women as Robin Hood in Medieval England, with possible Trotula the Medieval gynecologist as a Merry Woman, touched on 30 ways to become An Immortal from a non-Western perspective (including eating mermaid meat!), revisited the accurately diverse demographics of the Caribbean and possibilities thereof (including LGBT pirates), saw some average peasants of color from the Renaissance doing their peasant thing, learned about the legendary beauty of an enslaved man named Paul in Pre-Revolutionary France, attempted to clarify the sociopolitical nuances of terminology, religion and race in 16th century Spain and Portugal, and called out Gilgamesh for being a raging tryhard.

^ In one day. Which is kinda the point here-and why I can be pretty critical of how we see the same things over and over and over in Medieval style fantasy media.

No writer or creator is limited by history or “historical accuracy”.

Anything you can possibly imagine has a historical precedent.

I find that prospect absolutely thrilling, and I hope you do, too.

I want to reblog this again for Fiction Week, because I think many artists, writers, and other creators limit themselves because of assumptions they hold about the past, what is “believable”, what is “true”, what is “historically accurate”.

Too much of what we think we know boils down to assumptions we’ve made, or things we have been told by others and believed, internalized, and replicated through our art. Or ideals and aesthetics are shaped by our culture, but we are also the shapers of culture, and we can break the loop.

I really do believe the possibilities are limitless.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
medievalpoc

Fiction Week!

lookatthewords submitted to medievalpoc:

Fiction Week Book Rec: Faerie Blood by Angela Korra’ti So I just want to talk about this lesser known gem, Fairie Blood, by Angela Korra’ti. I don’t quite recall how I stumbled upon it, but i’m 100% glad I did.

"I was on my way home from work, biking along the Burke-Gilman trail, when a troll decided to eat my face."

I was hooked by that first line and just as engrossed through the entire book. It starts off, as you can see, with a troll trying to eat Kendis Thompson’s face.

In fact, there’s all sorts of magical creatures that Kendis can suddenly see and have somehow decided to notice her too, or rather attack her. And it’s because of one thing: her faerie blood is awakening. And now there are dangerous Fae out there who simultaneously want her… and want to kill her.

This book is incredibly well-written and charming and I didn’t want it to end! It’s urban fantasy, with a pleasant current of action and a dash of romance that’s incredibly cute yet chaste (hot protective gentlemanly Scottish dudes…how can you not love that?!) Plus! It’s pretty all around diverse with a cast of PoC characters and also a gay couple, one being an Asian man of color. Oh and Kendis is a Black WoC.

Overall I highly recommend this book for a semi-light, very fun read. Plus Book two is in the works so look out for that!

As for where to buy it, right now the ebook is on Amazon, Barnes & Noble and a few other places for 99 cents!!!

Amazon Kindle
Barnes and Noble
Google Play
Kobo
I really do hope ya’ll decide to check Faerie Blood out. It’s incredibly deserving of our love!
Avatar

Before I say a word, know that I’m not a racist. I simply think that changing the ethnicity of classic characters just to prove how not racist you are is a cheap thing for production companies to do. I mean, Lancelot was not an African. Not in one story or piece of art was he depicted as anything but an English born white man. Do you have any idea how rare Africans were in England in those days? Only just recently has the first skeletal remains of a black man been found and from the condition of them, he was most likely a slave and not treated very well. I know Lancelot isn’t real. Unlike Mulan, he really is from a fairy tale… but c’mon. I know I may sound like I’m taking this stuff too seriously, but why bother getting into a TV series if you’re not going to let yourself really get into it.

Isn’t it hilarious when you think about the fact that Lancelot didn’t exist? You know who else didn’t exist? Basically every character in this series! Do you know what else didn’t exist? Magic…magic totally didn’t exist. And people couldn’t turn into dragons. And there are no such things as wraiths. There’s a lot about this show that could be complaining about, but you’ve chosen to complain about the fact that Lancelot isn’t white. 

Dear self-proclaimed non-racist, if in a fantasy series, with magic and dragons and entire universes existing through portals in hats, you find it more unrealistic/unbelievable that Lancelot is played by a person of colour, what do you think that makes you? 

I don’t see as many complaints when history’s completely white-washed and characters who should be people of colour aren’t played by people of colour. I don’t see anyone complaining because Jesus is usually depicted by a blonde-haired blue-eyed white dude even though there was no way in hell he was white. Just because Lancelot’s always been depicted as someone white doesn’t mean it should stay that way, (especially when you consider the fact that people of colour are severely underrepresented in entertainment). The story of King Arthur is a legend that has been interpreted many different ways through many different lenses and in fact, there are a few black characters who do appear in the legends. There are even artistic depictions of at least one knight as a black man: 

[Art by Pavel Tatarnikov]

There might not have been very many Africans in England and Wales, but contrary to popular belief, black people didn’t suddenly appear on earth as downtrodden slaves. There were significant numbers of black Africans who went to Europe during the 15 century onward. Also, ever heard of Moors? They ruled parts of the Iberian Peninsula for 700 years (from 8th-15th centuries). North Africa was very prosperous and advanced in comparison to England during the middle ages. There are plenty of depictions and mentions of wealthy blacks in actual European history. There are also depictions of people of colour in popular stories (Shakespeare’s Othello for instance).

Simply because there was a skeleton of one black man found in England that indicates that he was likely poor, doesn’t mean every black person in England (during whatever time period you’re invoking to support your ill-formed ideas) was poor. There is historical evidence of wealthy people of colour from various time periods in England and even though European history tends to be depicted as completely white in general—it wasn’t. That sort of thinking doesn’t even make any sense when you consider that there were Africans in ancient Rome. It doesn’t make any sense when you consider that there was plenty of trade happening between European countries and African countries for centuries—honestly, these continents are not that far apart at all (Strait of Gibraltar).  

In addition, slavery as we think of it did not exist until the trans atlantic slave trade, and though there were systems of slavery in various parts of the world—including England, they weren’t race-based. 

Next time you launch a complaint like this, perhaps you should spend a little time actually googling for historical reference? I mean, not that it matters since as we’ve established, Lancelot didn’t exist and there are people who turn into wolves and dragons on this show. I’m sure your delicate sensibilities will be just fine. 

Thank you for this commentary. (And Palamedes, Safir and Segwarides were PoC in arthurian legends).

Bloop bloop bloop!

Reblogging for commentary

And for a Lancelot I’d actually want to watch.

One additional comment: Lancelot got treated really badly on Once Upon A Time. He appeared in only a few episodes and was then killed off-screen. Considering how few PoC there are on the show (off the top of my head, I can only think of two: Sydney/Genie/Magic Mirror and Anton the Miniaturized Giant), it would be nice to bring him back, either through some miraculous resurrection or in further flashbacks.

Avatar
medievalpoc

I think this is an old post, but I just wanted to add a few things on Sir Morien and Black British history.

In the Arthurian canon, written at the same time as the rest of the Arthurian Romances, there is an entire Romance devoted entirely to a Black Knight (very specifically Black), Sir Morien.

He was all black, even as I tell ye: his head, his body, and his hands were all black, saving only his teeth. His shield and his armour were even those of a Moor, and black as a raven…
Had they not heard him call upon God no man had dared face him, deeming that he was the devil or one of his fellows out of hell,
for that his steed was so great, and he was taller even than Sir Lancelot, and black withal, as I said afore…
When the Moor heard these words he laughed with heart and mouth (his teeth were white as chalk, otherwise was he altogether black)…

And yet, even some students of Arthurian Literature have never heard of him. As for artwork depicting these characters in the Middle Ages, here is a Black Knight in a Medieval fresco showing scenes from the Arthurian Cycle:

This seems to be a case in which a show loosely based on historical fiction is considerably less racially diverse than the actual Medieval texts on which it is based. And considerably less diverse than the society that produced it, too.

FYI, the OP’s assertion that Black people in England, specifically, were “rare” isn’t super accurate, nor is the claim that they were poor or enslaved:

One of the richest inhabitants of fourth century Roman York, buried in a stone sarcophagus with luxury imports including jewellery made of elephant ivory, a mirror and a blue glass perfume jar, was a woman of black African ancestry, a re-examination of her skeleton has shown.
Now, 16 centuries after her death, her skeleton is helping prove the startling diversity of the society in which she lived.
"We’re looking at a population mix which is much closer to contemporary Britain than previous historians had suspected," Hella Eckhardt, senior lecturer at the department of archaeology at Reading University, said. "In the case of York, the Roman population may have had more diverse origins than the city has now."

Those people didn’t just evaporate when modern historians decided a new “period” of history has begun about a century later.

There’s plenty of documentation of Black individuals living their lives in the early and “High” Medieval Period in England, in both art and documents:

So when poc characters are white washed we’re supposed to sit and smile like good little minorities because just maybe the white actor was THE better actor, despite that crazy thing called structural racism (and casting calls that EXCLUDE minorities), but if a non fictional charscter is race bent NOW we have an issue with representation in Hollywood?

As soon as OP said “I’m not a racist”, it was a wrap.

Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc

Contemporary Art Week!

These paintings represent a modern study in dichotomy and perception from a historical context using portraiture as the interpretive engine.
I often use the image of the black woman in unaccustomed/atypical context; derived to create a visual tension between historical fact, misinformation and myth. The viewer is lured into the possible narrative of the depicted figure by her beauty, strength and grace; however immediately enters an intellectual menagerie where they are confounded by the disconnected visual clues. Is she slave or slaveholder? Is she captive or free, is she servant or served? Is she factual or fictional in a historical context? All of these questions and more provide basis for the individual viewers journey of allegorical interpretation.
The images are imbued with cultural and ethnic symbolism that provides insight into the historical context of the painting. Yet, the icons, combined with my personal visual vocabulary, may remain unseen or misread by the “unknowing” eye; the eye that never learned the historic bases for all the possibilities in the lives of these women. In a society that often make instant cultural judgements based on visual cues that are often stereotypical, but not always, I feel offering ethnic imagery that defies common visual library of the modern citizen may challenge each individuals biases and foregone conclusions of their own notions of what race represents in history and therefore in humanity.
The images beg the question: Is “Truth” self-evident? Who’s “Truth”? How does knowledge, experience and perception of one’s “self” determine what is evident? If the view of oneself is skewed is it possible to see another clearly?

This person is amazing!

Avatar
Avatar
medievalpoc

Hello, I found it historically ironic (and wondered if you had any thoughts/knowledge on the matter) that the film Belle is regarded as in some way addressing the liberty of Africans, when the director has the same name (Asante) as a tribe of Africans which built an empire founded upon the buying and selling of slaves, not only to Europeans, but also to other African tribes. Do you have any historical light to shed on that?

Avatar

Did you really just send me a message saying that because Amma Asante, the director of the recent film Belle, has a surname derived from the name of the Ashanti/Asante people of Ghana and/or the Ashanti Empire/Asanteman, a matriarchal society who did in fact practice slavery, this somehow undermines what you perceive is the theme of “the freedom of Africans” in the film.

This “question” is like a turducken of racefail. As if the implication that because slavery existed as a human practice for millennia in many parts of the world, that somehow ameliorates the atrocities of colonization and/or European enslavement of African people isn’t bad enough, now we’re pretending that this makes a period film about a British aristocrat “historically ironic” because of the director’s last name?

I can only marvel at the amount of mental backflips you must have done to arrive at anything remotely resembling this conclusion, and observe that you apparently made a blog just to send this message. People can say what they like about “feeding the trolls”, but the truth is, there are a lot of people who actually think this way. This is how far white supremacy will go to try and discredit or somehow invalidate a film that has a Black woman protagonist, especially because it was created by a Black woman.

In conclusion, i think we’ve all learned we need to go see Belle.

Avatar
Avatar

At Her Majesty’s Request: An African Princess in Victorian England

Walter Dean Meyers

In 1849, a young African girl came within moments of being sacrificed in the bloody Dahomian ritual called the “watering of the graves.” But Commander Frederick E. Forbes, the young British captain of the HMS Bonetta, intervened, provoking Dahomian King Gezo to offer the girl as a gift to Queen Victoria instead. Forbes named the girl Sarah Forbes Bonetta and took her back to England, where she became Queen Victoria’s protege. Walter Dean Myers discovered the kernel of Sarah’s story in a bundle of original letters he purchased from a London book dealer. From these letters, along with excerpts from Queen Victoria’s diary, newspapers, and Forbes’s published account of the Dahomans, Myers pieced together Sarah’s life. In his unembellished narrative we learn about Sarah’s capture by the slave-trading Dahomans; her rescue by Forbes; her life in England under the Forbes’ care; her regular visits to the Queen; her stay at a missionary school in Sierra Leone and abrupt return to England; her marriage and early death. Yet, as horrific and miraculous as the events of Sarah’s life are, Myers can only pose questions about who Sarah really was (“What were her dreams for her own future…? What images came to her as she rode in the pony cart with the royal children? How often did she think of Dahomey? Of King Gezo?”). Sarah’s chatty, unprovocative letters, which hint at the upperclass Englishwoman she became, reveal nothing about her African heritage or about the traumatized girl she must have been (Myers could not even discover her African name). Ironically, this seeming weakness proves the ultimate testimony to Sarah’s life-the very absence of her voice bears undeniable witness to her story.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net