this is literally a shower thought so bear with me but in the continued effort to articulate What The Deal Is with the gender politics of the wot adaptation, i think one aspect of it is like, they’ve done quite a lot of work on masculinity and power, masculinity and emotion, masculinity and violence, quite a lot of important and transformative if still very unfinished work, that is, performed a kind of metatextual critique of masculinity, which the show then treats diegetically as the status quo, so that, diegetically, liandrin’s critique of patriarchy seems ridiculous, and would still seem ridiculous even if it were less heavily caricatured, even though it’s precisely (the non-caricatural real-world equivalents of) such critiques that made those reimagined masculinities possible in the first place.
The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992), dir. Brian Henson
‘… the continual discovery of fresh types of nonsense, unsystematic though their classification and mysterious though their explanation is too often allowed to remain, has done on the whole nothing but good.’
-- j.l. austin, how to do things with words (1962)
expansiverse complaint of the day is abaddon’s gate is a SLOG but it would be 100% less sloggy if a quarter of it were not bull constantly griping about alleged reverse racism
another point in favor of in lower decks is that its cute quirky inexplicably feminine robot character is ... peanut hamper
in Finland, it is illegal to kill a bear when it’s hibernating. If you ask a hunter why that is, a number of them will tell you it’s wrong simply because it is the law, and they don’t make a distinction between what is right, and what is legal. Most people like that are perfectly normal, decent and respectable people, just like the rest of us.
But if you ask people who think about things, the answer is vague. Killing a hibernating bear would just feel… impolite? You can’t fucking shoot a man when he’s sleeping, that’s just fucking rude. It’s just not the right thing to do.
Long before hunting laws were established in Finland, you couldn’t kill a sleeping bear, and what commands you is something older than law: tradition. Even at a time when hunting was a matter of life and death, and a bear fighting for its life is mainly a matter of death, you just didn’t kill a hibernating bear, you have to wake it up first. Hunters risked their lives, the lives of their brothers and everyone in the hunting party, who were friends, family and men that they loved, to give the bear a fighting chance.
In the modern time, the hunting season of bears is in the summer, for the warmest summer months. There are many reasons for why they are allowed to tread safely in autumn and to sleep in peace through the cold months, almost all of which are rational and scientific, and do not touch the old traditions.
Old faith says a living thing has many souls - henki, luonto, itse. Plants only have one - the one that wills them to grow. Animals have two, both the spark of life and nature that enables them to act. A human being also has the third, one that makes them a person, personality, itse, literally “self”. But the soul that travels in your dreams is not the soul that defines a human - animals have that one as well. When your dog runs in her sleep, her soul is elsewhere, where a dog is needed.
One’s waking soul is elsewhere when they sleep and dream. A bear’s soul is somewhere else when they are hibernating - there are two words for “hibernation” in finnish, one of which is talviuni, “winter sleep”, and that is the one that bears have - and if you kill a sleeping bear, their soul is not in the body, it is still out there, and it can find you, and as a revenge for killing its body, Ghost Bear will kill your entire fucking family.
hi it's giggle/ty anon again with the eaten ask: ok i'm SO late but i was wandering through your stor trakk tag, saw your laris/raffi mention, & had a brain jitter because it's ME, I'm trying to realize it (read: can't stop thinking abt it/Them)! all the bits you said (verity trauma hook-ups, Reunion, Z.V. PUZZLE, intelligence inverses) + any bits i can get in my claws (opp. loss & purpose, complicated caring, meeting in the middle + other treats) i'm losing my mind pls send help <3
ohhhhh buddy! i feel you! i feel you!! when you say ‘help’ i assume you mean ‘push me over the edge into full-time insanity’, becaue if that is not what you meant i cannot imagine why you would come to me, so friends, let’s all make sure we support anon with this problem! team laris/raffi get in here
today’s writing demon (picture them like these guys in augustine’s study*) is running a constant cost-benefit analysis in the background of my work on something that has been really challenging me in unexpected ways. what this analysis keeps repeating is the question of whether this degree of difficulty will be merited by the final product. one of its arguments is just simply that: this is too hard, and feels bad, and the end result will be so small by comparison to the effort that went into it. another of its arguments is a variation on the no one wants this theme, which is the (probably true) observation that the problems i am obsessed with solving are problems no one else is obsessed with in the way that i am. this demon is also teamed up with the demon whose job it is to constantly harp on how slow my progress always is, how unproductive i have always been: all this work, all this effort, for so little!
these little creatures of the mind (please look at them, and zoom in—their faces are incredible) are very good at disguising their arguments as absolute truths. and in some ways, they are: a very great deal more goes into most writing than can be seen in the final product, and accepting that is just part of the bargain (this is another perspective on the challenge of drafting that i was talking about the other day). and there’s a certain amount of loneliness built into that, too: i will offer the finished version of this thing to my very small audience, and they will read it or not, say something about it or not, and that will be it; meanwhile i will have done all this work in solitude. you can mitigate that a bit, if you, like me, are not of the monkish disposition that prefers work in solitude, by creating collective environments in which to work and share your thinking as you progress, but eventually no matter what you will arrive at the point where the work is just simply lonely. just you and your concept and the voice in your head saying ‘is this really worth all this trouble?’ it’s just part of the bargain. i hate it!
so what i am doing about it is telling you, so as to feel less lonely and also so as to distinguish between the little creature who tells me this is a fault in me and the reality that this is just what making is. and i am also showing you the devils in augustine’s library, for a treat.
----------
Labyrinthine times in bug land. So, I fought my way to the bottom of the Fungal Wastes without finding the cartographer. And if the mantis clan didn't want to be slaughtered to a bug, they ought to've offered me directions somewhere else. By the time I peeled the Mantis Claw off one or another, 900 Geo had amassed in my pocket and I wanted only one thing: enough charm slots to fit my old compass, my old Gathering Swarm, and my lovely new Dashmaster. So then I fought my way back up.
Once I'm confident, things generally go at a pace that doesn't stop to wipe off blood or pick up chump change. Neither do I really get a picture of the layout and route. After stumbling on (read: killing one of) what seemed to be harmless baby fungal balloons on my way up, I put them & their parents on the 'no kill' list together and kept going. I came out in... Queen's Station. Well, that's new. I proceeded cautiously at first, being on two health.
My intention was to find a bench, naturally. First door I go through, things begin sounding a little deep and watery, and once I see a jellyfish swanning limply around I put two and two together. The queen runs a strange station; despite myself, I'm entranced. The plan is if I hit 1 HP, I'll retreat. Funny thing, though. After I kill a medium jellyfish easily, it has a postmortem missile that does 2HP damage. Straight back to the bottom of the Fungal Wastes I go.
Nothing if not stubborn, I just climb out again. Try a different door and get a banker. Fuck bankers. Door number 3 gives me a Stagway, and I'm out of there. (Isn't the stag beetle so wonderful? Their deep voice and panting, the way their legs fly in all directions in the gallop. You really get the sense of this... Old thing, an alien life in the darkest tunnels, hearing the bell from anywhere. They never ask for anything. It makes me suspicious of this society. As do tolls for benches.)
Back to Dirtmouth with 1500 geo, I find I can afford one charm slot when what I need is two. To say I misremembered the prices would imply I remembered an actual figure. Numbers? Navigation? One thing I do remember is obstructions to where I want to go, and there was a spiky one in the blue tomb area that said "walljump me". So I go over there and do it. I had to look up 'Brooding Mawlek', because I did not read it during the fight. This is exactly the fight I wanted.
It counterattacks when struck. It eats 40 nail hits and is still alive(?!) The mortar-vomit attack appears almost impossible to slip between at my skill level. The first combat encounter to really kill me like Souls did. If we rewind back to my Souls days, we will see a worship of difficulty and a definition of 'cheese' that encompasses virtually anything that makes the game easier. How wonderful to've gotten a little wiser, now. I swapped in my focus-shell charm & parried the mortar with it.
Then, when that wasn't enough, I took it even further. I employed the ultimate in "have an easier time", actually, and stopped fighting the thing to go explore somewhere else a bit. First time doing that! Will write about it soon. Hope the more detailed format is okay; writing closer to the doing, so I recall more, and had fewer observations than usual. (Capital write-up will likely have more)
i have no brain but these are so soothing and wonderful to receive. i started a fresh run when you started messaging me about it and it is fun to see it through the anticipation of someone else getting to encounter each thing for the first time.
the stag beetle is one of my favorite things in any video game ever. ‘oh! this is a game about restoring public transit!’ was a key moment in my falling in love with it. (in the same way that dark souls is a game about repairing elevators, but more satisfying.)
i also feel grateful that something punished you for breezing through your hornet encounter in greenpath.
I know I make fun of Pliny the Elder a lot, but I genuinely can’t stop thinking about this approach to taxonomy:
[There is a fish called the tursio, which bears a strong resemblance to the dolphin; it differs from it, however, in a certain air of sadness, and is wanting in its peculiar vivacity.]
Like, imagine someone describing an animal to you, but the only information they’ll provide is that it’s sort of like another animal, but much much sadder.
How do you feel about what could have been with Worf+Selar?
i did not even know this was a thing but indeed, according to memory alpha:
Tracy Tormé wanted to develop a romance between Selar and Worf, but he was forced to drop the idea when the character of K'Ehleyr (also played by Plakson) was developed for "The Emissary". (Captains' Logs: The Unauthorized Complete Trek Voyages)
i ... want to know what the concept was? i both deeply hate and deeply love the whole k’ehleyr romance plot because on the one hand, worf is such a fucking edgelord but on the other, uh, k’ehleyr. she totally shows him up for and makes him out to be absurd because of what a fucking edgelord he is. but then of course it’s ridiculous that she should be sacrificed as she is to further ... what, exactly? what did k’ehleyr even die for? i really couldn’t tell you. not that i acknowledge that k’ehleyr is dead, mind you, but hypothetically speaking.
so i wonder if what we might have gotten with selar would have been oriented toward similar character work on worf (demonstrating that the rather severe downside of his whole honor schtick is an unsustainable inflexibility), and how you’d have to do that differently with a vulcan character. k’ehleyr’s let-the-world-burn approach to a life she lives as a one-woman melodrama is thrilling to watch, and makes an obvious foil for worf, but you can’t do that with a vulcan. ASSUMING (big assumption for any trek but especially s2 of tng) they didn’t just go down some horrifying pon farr path, it could have been really fun to watch plakson do the much more restrained but still camp as fuck withering vulcan routine that we love so much in selar, at greater length.
but honestly i’d rather have just had more selar without any romance plot to weigh her down, and especially not a romance with worf specifically. i deeply hate the worf who emerges in every romance he has with a woman, deeply hate whatever he’s meant to be an endless apology for in the stable of Shitty MRA Fallacies the Fuckin Incels Who Write Star Trek Can’t Get Away From, and deeply resent every minute of airtime sucked out of a female character’s story to further idealize his terrifying possessiveness and his programmatically ideological attitude toward relationships. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
the thing about b’elanna is that she is not really very volatile and not at all rebellious. she is in fact extremely oriented toward belonging to a structure and obeying its rules, very reluctant to act against structure and rules, very eager to follow and slow to resist authority. and we only seldom see her lose her temper unprovoked. but she is constantly, constantly told—mostly, though not exclusively, by men—that she is temperamental and difficult, and she has so internalized this that she will volunteer apology for her temper or for being difficult even as she is being deliberately provoked to anger by tom, or chakotay, or janeway, or whoever. voyager shows this process incredibly effectively, over and over, and even makes it part of her backstory with her shithead father, without ever appearing to notice what is actually taking place in these dynamics, much less turning a critical lens on them. a truly remarkable feat of oblivious storytelling.
(rape / trauma processing)
i want to clarify something i said yesterday, because after reading several of your (very lovely, very generous) responses i realized that i was conveying something i absolutely did not want to convey. in this post, i said of a piece of my own writing about sexual violence:
i am so convinced that it is wrong to have made this fictional character endure this fictional violence to satisfy a selfish objective
what i want to make clear is that when i said ‘i am convinced,’ what i meant is closer to ‘i have internalized this bad pseudo-feminist take to a degree that is harmful to me,’ not that it is what i believe from a reasoned moral standpoint. i absolutely do not believe that it is wrong or bad to create stories about rape, to project our own experiences onto characters in fanfic, or in any way to process experiences of rape (or any trauma) through making art about it. indeed it is obviously productive and necessary for many of us.
i wish i had been more careful in this instance because i very much do not want to reinforce those internalized beliefs for anyone else; on the contrary, i would like to be reliable as someone who consistently resists such things and favors truth-telling and embrace of difficult stories. while i sort of have to guard this space as one in which i can vent my own ill-formed concepts—this is essential to any kind of expression of experiences of emotional/cognitive disorder, including trauma—and to do this i have to kind of rely on long-term context to counterbalance my more disordered ideas, i also want to be responsible about how i frame them.
in that vein i want to share this set of anon asks, which are part of what prompted this post, as a reinforcement of what i really think here.
Persephone the Wanderer (II)
by Louise Glück
In the second version, Persephone is dead. She dies, her mother grieves– problems of sexuality need not trouble us here. Compulsively, in grief, Demeter circles the earth. We don’t expect to know what Persephone is doing. She is dead, the dead are mysteries. We have here a mother and a cipher: this is accurate to the experience of the mother as she looks into the infant’s face. She thinks: I remember when you didn’t exist. The infant is puzzled: later, the child’s opinion is she has always existed, just as her mother had always existed in her present form. Her mother is like a figure at a bus stop, an audience for the bus’s arrival. Before that, she was the bus, a temporary home or convenience. Persephone, protected, stares out of the window of the chariot. What does she see? A morning in early spring, in April. Now her whole life is beginning–unfortunately, it’s going to be a short life. She’s going to know, really, only two adults: death and her mother. But two is twice what her mother has: her mother has one child, a daughter. As a god, she could have had a thousand children. We begin to see here the deep violence of the earth whose hostility suggests she has no wish to continue as a source of life. And why is this hypothesis never discussed? Because it is not in the story; it only creates the story. In grief, after the daughter dies, the mother wanders the earth. She is preparing her case; like a politician she remembers everything and admits nothing. For example, her daughter’s birth was unbearable, her beauty was unbearable: she remembers this. She remembers Persephone’s innocence, her tenderness– What is she planning, seeking her daughter? She is issuing a warning whose implicit message is: what are you doing outside my body? You ask yourself: why is the mother’s body safe? The answer is this is the wrong question, since the daughter’s body doesn’t exist, except as a branch of the the mother’s body that needs to be reattached any any cost. When a god grieves it meas destroying others (as in war) while at the same time petitioning to reverse agreements (as in war also): if Zeus will get her back, winter will end. Winter will end, spring will return. The small pestering breezes that I so loved, the idiot yellow flowers– Spring will return, a dream based on a falsehood: that the dead return. Persephone was used to death. Now over and over her mother hauls her out again– You must ask yourself: are the flowers real? If Persephone “returns” there will be one of two reasons: either she was not dead or she is being used to support a fiction– I think I can remember being dead. Many times, in winter, I approached Zeus. Tell me, I would ask him, how can I endure the earth? And he would say, in a short time you will be here again. And in the time between you will forget everything: those fields of ice will be the meadows of Elysium.
not to jump down that rabbit hole in 2020 but Nicola Walker recently recorded a video for something and an eagle eyed someone spotted that she has a framed photograph of her silly bafta pics with Sarah Lancashire. so that's still a thing.
sorry i. she. what. yes of course you should tell me this. frankly i demand to know why i wasn’t notified sooner. in this the year of our lord twenty twenty, yes, i demand to be informed of these things! also she what!!!!
Are you gonna write another Laris fanfiction some time?
i think we can safely say this is a yes. i’m working on a very explicit laris/beverly story, which is about half drafted. i don’t believe in the term pwp, but it’s definitely a case where the porn is the plot; it’s kind of an outtake from ‘the smaller worlds.’ and there’s a ton of stuff that came up for me while i was writing that about her and zhaban and about romulan cultures past and present and about the tal shiar and about the qowat milat and all sorts of things that i really want to dig into but haven’t found the right angles on yet.
if there are specific laris-related things that you people want my take(s) on i will very happily entertain prompts for fic, headcanons, meta, etc — i can make absolutely no promises of any kind that i’ll be able to fill them but i would be interested just to have them!
The most powerful trio 🔥🔥🔥