Pick a train and let it take you to a random wikipedia page
Train 10 has pulled into the station
@lilietsblog / lilietsblog.tumblr.com
Pick a train and let it take you to a random wikipedia page
Train 10 has pulled into the station
*BDSM meaning having any amount of kinks/non-vanilla sexual interests.
This is the funniest selection bias I have ever seen
It's baffling to me that this is asking for a SINGLE answer. I'm pretty sure that it's not an uncommon condition to own multiple cats from different sources...
damn bro it was a tie 😭
welp, time to make a new one that lasts longer
Counterpoint: whatever wants you to let it out is at least currently contained. Something that wants you to let it in is implied to be free to seek further points of ingress, and now YOU are trapped and can't just make distance from the container as in the former case
i want 60 thousand votes by next thursday
almaost twre…
Good poll for the fanfic website. Cant wait to see the result
reblogs for greater sample size always appreciated
fuck it let's try this again
This misses the point. It's not whether walruses exists. It's whether walruses leave the arctic regions, pass through a climate that would kill them because they're evolved to nap on ice blocks, somehow make their way to my yard, come up the stairs, and KNOCK. Even without the knocking, that's a lot of impossible.
A squirrel? No shock. Possum? It's happened. Corvid? Perfectly rational. Bear-- well, okay, but I'm gonna scream and run. Deer-- now we're getting into weird territory, because they may be around all the time, they don't do THAT. Kangaroo? Now we're moving into "this is impossible", despite the fact that Kangaroos definitely exist.
It's not "earth animal that exists vs. mythical creature that doesn't" and never has been. It's "an earth animal what cannot possibly be there vs. a creature that you may or may not have believed existed previously."
This is definitely a push poll by the way. This is how politicians gets results that say "85% of my constituents want this passed!"
Because they do not word the answers in a neutral manner, in a DELIBERATE attempt to skew the results the way they want. They ignore the real reason people answered the way they do (I know walruses are not in my area, I do not know the territorial range of a mythical creature) in order the force their own personal reasoning onto the poll answers.
Which is fine for a dumb little poll but you need to understand it's deceptive.
....you know, that's actually a valuable addition.
also, specify in tags how long im curious!!
I love how people who have been here for EXACTLY ten years don't exist in this poll. 2014 is not valid
mb i forgot to put that as an option. also unless you've joined exactly today, it is still over a decade so like
Yeah the math works out technically. Like if you joined right this minute just wait a minute and then post. However I contend that "everyone who joined in 2014 is banned from this poll" is the funnier interpretation
Ok, so I've read everyone's tags and notes on my previous poll. I've taken them into consideration and I'm now prepared to offer.…
what do i click if i was googling a fandom thing (not google images! text google!) and it brought me to a tumblr blog and I just kind of stuck around