mouthporn.net
#short but relevant rant after reblog – @lilietsblog on Tumblr
Avatar

Aremo Shitai Koremo Shitai Onna no Ko ni Mietatte

@lilietsblog / lilietsblog.tumblr.com

Wow, it's been like 10 years since I updated this. Neat. I've made a dreamwidth blog just in case tumblr dies. I think dreamwidth is neat. My username on Discord is Liliet#1061 (and no I don't intend to update it, they're asking but they haven't tried to force me yet). My username on reddit is LilietB. Read PGTE. Homestuck is great. Peace and love on the planet Earth. I'm Ukrainian. Wish us luck.
Avatar

i think we all know this one person…

Avatar
parenyzia

Yes and we probably know a LOT more girls who have self esteem issues that we KNOW we shouldn’t be making fun of because it hurts their feelings

I’m the girl with the cat in the last panel. Totally me 24/7.

Avatar
lilietsblog

the "fat" girl is in the wrong because she complains around her friend. She might not understand that what she is is called thin, but there's no way she couldn't make an objective comparison to her friend and understand that saying all this stuff is a bit insensitive. Either she just doesn't look at her friend / notice her feelings / generally notice her at all, or she's doing this on purpose to show off and drive the point home that she is thinner and her friend will never be loved by anyone ever. Possibly also manipulative/abusive on purpose, as in "you are an ugly piece of trash no-one wants except me, love me, praise me, I'm the best thing you are ever going to have in your life". I mean this is AT BEST a very stupid friend who doesn't pay attention to the others and mind their feelings not even the least bit. At best.

Avatar
reblogged

Glitter is a bad idea. Glitter is always a bad idea. Unless you have some way to 100% seal that shit to the page, glitter is 5000% a bad, awful, terrible idea. If you ever wonder whether or not you should use glitter, the answer is no, plus a punch in the face. Your face. You deserve it for thinking about using glitter. There is never a good time to use unsealed glitter, because it is impossible for all of the glue to hold the glitter and for you to pour that glitter only on the glue. That glitter is going places, primarily everywhere other than where you want that glitter. The nature of glitter is destruction, complete and total destruction. Never use glitter. 

Avatar
lilietsblog

This page is the proof that Condesce is the best character in all Homestuck. You know what she does not give a shit about? Destruction. She is childish and immature and likes pink and glitter even though it destroys stuff... she is VERY DANGEROUS not despite, but BECAUSE of these traits, and I get sad when people think that her revealed zero-fucks-given attitude somehow softens her and maes her less scary instead of more )=

You know who is more scary than a trained cold-blooded assassin or a skilled politician? A murderous psychopath with enormous power and barely anything to hold them back because everything they loved was destroyed.

Yeah.

Avatar
I want to get across that bisexuality isn’t just a transitional state from being straight to gay, or that, you know, you just help out when the homosexuals are all busy.

Alan Cumming on NPR

I just laughed so hard at this that I felt like I needed to record it somewhere.

Actually, bisexuality is this magical and wonderful state where you can be attracted to anyone regardless of gender and are only picky based on conscious personal preferences (if you look enough, you can see hotness in anyone, if you want to, that is), and just do not understand what folks talk about when they say "monosexuality", and even asexuality is easier to grasp than being attracted to an androgynous individual as long as you think it's a girl but suddenly stopping being attracted as soon as you realize it's a boy or however the fuck monosexuality works.

Avatar

I seriously cannot grasp why people take this as a prophesy that John will die by the end of the comic, for good.

This is Doc Scratch speaking of the idea of John dying for good, because nothing lasts forever (he would know). This is Doc Scratch speaking of John’s character, the all-knowing narrator telling us that he’s pretty damn sure that John could never, ever play the role of the bad guy. The next page goes on to say that even if Doc Scratch himself tried to teach him how to be evil, it’s entirely possible that it wouldn’t work.

Let that sink in for a moment.

Now that you might have a greater appreciation of John, and no longer fear that John dies at the end, carry on.

THANK YOU GOOD FRIEND

The one problem with this is that Scratch doesn’t say if. He says when. That suggests that it is a thing that is going to happen in a comprehensible timeframe, rather than a possibility or concept.

It could be sloppy semantics, but it’s enough to worry many. 

Avatar
lilietsblog

I think we'd actually have more reason to be worried if he said "if". That would mean that he was talking about something that might or might not happen within the scope of this story. Homestuck may or may not end with John dead; that's what "if" would mean. But he says "when", directing us to the fact that EVERYTHING eventually ends in one way or the other. My relationship with math is best described as kismessitude; yet I truly love the theory of probability. It's just math, and it tell us that however low is probability that John will die in a single stretch of time, as long as it is not zero (and it is not zero since he is, in fact, mortal under certain conditions), it will increase with time. Probability that John is dead within the year? Low. Probability that John is dead in one hundred years? One hundred times bigger. And if we take the concept of eternity, of infinite time, we go into limits, and the limits say that as time passed reaches infinity, probability of John's death reaches 100%. That John will eventually die is a mathematical certainity as long as it is possible in principle. And you know, I think it's very in-character for Doc Scratch to make references to mathematically certain outcomes rooted in the concept of infinity that are at the same time absolutely irrelevant to what's happening. To say a thing that will disturb and upset people while misleading them and yet being absolutely, 100%, mathematically true. Scratch doesn't spoil things, so I don't think he would refer to John's demise with "when" instead of "if" if he were talking about something uncertain; but I think even more important is that now John is unhinged from the narrative. The way I understand this power, Scratch might know what John was "supposed" to do, but what John is actually going to do now that he can change things from what they were supposed to be is way beyond his knowledge. The guy didn't even know about Mindfang's cue ball; how can he know something so indeterminate?

Avatar

Lisa Simpson at Stuff-n-Hug

This really says a LOT

simpsons is so next level

I took my girls shopping for some summer clothes Saturday. T-shirts, jeans, shorts. They both love Marvel and superheroes and transformers and Hogwarts and stuff like that. Not so much pink and pretty stuff. They’ve both grown so much that this was the first time we were shopping in the grown up women’s section. Boring selections when it comes to t-shirts. Flowers and zebras and butterflies.

But what was making it near impossible was that all the t-shirts, the few they kinda-sorta liked, had either low/wide cut necklines or were extremely tailored for nipped in waists with little cap sleeves and short hemlines. Showing way too much skin for their ages as far as we all were concerned. So we headed over to the men’s section. A whole WALL full of properly cut tees with great designs on them!

They ran over and started hunting up things they liked. Two women were stocking shelves. 

"You know these are MEN’S shirts."

"The girl’s section is over there."

"There’s not gonna be any Princesses over here, darlin’."

"These shirts are for the boys."

"This isn’t going to fit you right, honey."

I ignored the first time one of them said anything. Just told the girls what sizes they needed to look for and that they could each pick five shirts. But the women kept interrupting me. I tried to stay polite. “Yes, I know this is the men’s department.” But they kept making comments.

Finally I was getting mad. I told them we didn’t need any help. My girls were allowed to wear whatever they liked and they didn’t like the shirt designs in the women’s section and I didn’t like how low the necklines were.

Instead of just noticing that I was getting fed up with their “help”, they started arguing with me! One of them told my oldest, who is conventionally cute and skinny and starting to fill out (but still only 12), that “Oh that’s just because he’s your daddy. He doesn’t understand that a girl wants to show off for the boys!”

That was the last straw. I’m afraid I totally lost my temper. I told them (amongst a few other choice words) that they’d better walk away and come back to finish restocking the shelves once we’d left the area or I’d get the manager.

I try hard not to be rude to sales people and people in the service industry. That’s a difficult and thankless job. But for fuck’s sake! The first few comments were bad enough, but trying to undermine my moral authority with my kids? All in the name of  gender and sexuality policing. They couldn’t get past the idea that my girls might prefer t-shirts that had “boy” designs on them and that didn’t hyper-sexualize them. The idea was abhorrent to them and they had to interfere and then KEEP interfering.

Once our sales “help” was gone, the girls found a bunch of shirts. Captain America, Minecraft, Doctor Who, Batman, Avengers. All the stuff they’re into. I mean, they also like MLP and Littlest Pet Shop and soft fluffy stuffed animals and Monster High dolls. We hit the toy section too for some of that stuff cos they brought their saved-up allowances with them. 

At least we didn’t get any “help” in the shoe section. They’d’ve had a cow again cos while the youngest found a cute pair of pink and purple sneakers, I ‘let’ the oldest go to the men’s section and find a cool pair of dark blue and grey ones. (and omg their feet are huge! youngest wears a women’s size 9.5 and oldest wars a men’s 8. FFS, I wear a men’s 8.5. Their feet are almost as big as mine! How’d that happen?)

I hate this gender policing shit and won’t put up with it at all. I always feel for kids whose parents enforce this shit. I see it at stores when a girl or boy strays outside the lines, too often the parents are the one who pull them back into their place and it makes me sad.

Like, their friends who are boys, when they’re over at our house, they sit there and play with the girl toys as much as the boy toys. One of the boys loves playing LPS with my youngest, making up stories and stuff. The first time I walked out into the playroom and saw, he got so nervous and tried to say that he was just doing it to be nice to her. I told him that it was fine. He could play with whatever he wanted to and I wouldn’t tell anyone. Word got around to the other boys I guess cos now they all play whatever and don’t stop if I “catch” them.

I get shit from my mom about it too. I’m trying to make them into little boys. I shouldn’t have bought them trucks and toy swords when they were little. The oldest needs to learn to start wearing dresses now not just blue jeans. Why did I ‘let’ her get her hair cut short? I need to put the youngest on a diet and make her wear training bras. Why do I let them play with boys? etc etc etc. 

*eyeroll.gif*

I just find it so hard to believe that it’s the 21st century and people are still getting their knickers in a twist over this kind of thing.

Avatar
lilietsblog

The T-shirts. Oh my god, the t-shirts. The few decent ones I have are presents/hand-me-downs from relatives that I have no idea where are from, and when I tried to find similar ones to buy, there weren't any. Just one that was halfway decent, and even then it was made of completely different fabric. I haven't really considered going to the men's sections in the market (it's huge, everything is far away and it's incredibly easy to get lost), but I will next time, because girly stuff is seriously unwearable. What's wrong with normal thick cotton, crew neck, dark color and images of wolves, crows, at least cats? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THICK COTTON AND CREW NECK WHY CAN'T I FIND ANYTHING. Oh my god.

Avatar
We think of men as antiheroes, as capable of occupying an intense and fascinating moral grey area; of being able to fall, and rise, and fall again, but still be worthy of love on some fundamental level, because if it was the world and its failings that broke them, then we surely must owe them some sympathy. But women aren’t allowed to be broken by the world; or if we are, it’s the breaking that makes us villains. Wronged women turn into avenging furies, inhuman and monstrous: once we cross to the dark side, we become adversaries to be defeated, not lost souls in need of mending. Which is what happens, when you let benevolent sexism invest you in the idea that women are humanity’s moral guardians and men its native renegades: because if female goodness is only ever an inherent quality – something we’re born both with and to be – then once lost, it must necessarily be lost forever, a severed limb we can’t regrow. Whereas male goodness, by virtue of being an acquired quality – something bestowed through the kindness of women, earned through right action or learned through struggle – can just as necessarily be gained and lost multiple times without being tarnished, like a jewel we might pawn in hardship, and later reclaim.
Foz Meadows (Gender, Orphan Black & The Meta of Meta)
Look at your stories - don’t just count who gets to be the hero and the villain (what kind of hero? what kind of villain?); count who gets the redemption arcs.
(via notsosilentsister)

Just wanted to throw it out there: what if this is the reason Vriska gets so much hate? Both for things she actually did and for receiving too much attention from the narrative? Because we are not used to female characters getting full-blown redemption arcs?

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

so youre saying davesprite would survive?

Believe so! After theoretically raising alt!Calliope, I don’t see any particular reason to off him.

In other words, Davesprite survives till the end and Dave doesn’t. Use that in your shipping math, I guess. (Especially if you figure Davesprite wouldn’t be acting a single parent…)

Avatar
Avatar
lilietsblog

Aaaand this post sums up all that I don’t agree with in romspec. Two words: shipping math. Also, Dave isn’t likely to permadie, not in this comic, this ain’t no Loophole.

But most importantly shipping math

Isn’t your belief that a main character absolutely cannot possibly die for good in this comic just as “stupid” as mine that the ones who survive are likely to find love???

(“But I think MY assumption fits with existing story inertia and themes!” Hi pot, I’m kettle. Have we met?)

The reason I brought up “shipping math” with Davesprite in particular is the theory that he’ll raise a child, alt!Calliope. As common as single parents are in this comic, I still don’t think it’s out of line to wonder if a mother figure is part of the equation.

(I’m reminded that I haven’t yet responded to the anti-Romspec counter-rants you and another person made; I’ll pencil that into my schedule again.)

1. My belief that no-one will die. I wrote two separate posts on this. And I do think my position is more solid than yours. Of course I'm not an authority to you, just like you are not an authority to me. We can discuss this OR agree to disagree. I'm fine with either one (though I admit I'm flattered when you respond to me, I admire you a lot for all your non-romance-related theory stuff, even if you don't make the distinction). 2. I get why you brought up "shipping math", it's because you think this is applicable. I dislike the concept, ok? I don't think math in homestuck ever added up and I don't think it will at the end. I guess this was less for you and more a clarification for myself and my followers (I did publish it on my blog). 3. I'll be very glad if you respond to my earlier post, and that other one too. I like thinking about things, and thinking goes best when you verbally spar with someone. Here's hope you feel the same (=

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
myed89

Oh Hans.

Avatar
ging-ler

oh no please im not supposed to feel bad for him but

Okay first if all how dare you

No but like, this would have been an incredible backstory. Especially with the whole being the youngest sibling thing and the always forgotten about stuff, it would have been great to see this played out in the movie. Like, even at the beginning. Imagine a short scene at a ball before the accident happened where Hans’ family is there and Hans tugs on his mom’s dress because he’s too small to reach the sandwiches on the table and his brothers won’t help him and his mom just laughs with the other royals who then walk away and then she leans over and says this.

MEANWHILE ELSA AND ANNA ARE USING ELSA’S POWERS TO GET THE CHOCOLATE DOWN FROM THE DESSERT TABLE COMPLETELY UNAWARE OF THE CHILD TRAUMA/ABUSE HAPPENING ACROSS THE BALLROOM

This was one of the things I was annoyed about in the movie, actually.  Of course, because Anna fell in love with another dude, Hans has to be evil.  That’s the way that Disney (and other kids shows, let’s be fair) ties up ‘love triangles’.  People can screencap frames where Hans blinks wrong all they want, but I thought it was really out of left field- and yet 100% predictable because Kristoff exists and it’s an easy way to tie off that thread.

You know what I would have loved?  I would have loved a Hans who wanted to love Anna.  Like, a Hans who had to marry her and be with her for power reasons, inferiority complex reasons, literally ALL THE SAME REASONS, but instead of being completely, predictably, villainous in it, I would have liked it if he wanted to love her, but he just didn’t.  Just couldn’t feel that way.  If he leaned in and kissed her and nothing happened.

He pulls away, Anna looks up at him in horror, and it’s still a lie and still a betrayal, but instead of having the black and white Hans and Kristoff, you’ve got a little more of a human element- motivated by greed and ambition and therefore still somewhat reprehensible, but ultimately sympathetic.  More assassins from the weasel guy try to kill Elsa, Hans maybe helps them out of spite because he can’t marry Anna now, and at the end of the movie, he goes home to a family who doesn’t have space for him- and maybe Anna and Elsa ask him to visit and he goes to escape from that and finds friendship rather than the romantic love he was looking for but he realizes that all he wanted was someone to appreciate him and HAPPY ENDINGS FOR EVERYONE OKAY why not that Disney, huh.

Avatar
teamponytail

OMG that was EXACTLY what I wanted to happen when I first watched the movie (I was spoiled beforehand) and I was SOOOO disappointed when they went the full-on Evil Fucker route.

Avatar
lilietsblog

I actually left the room when watching it with my brother (I do that a lot with movies) because it was OBVIOUS Hans’ kiss won’t help her, it went against everything that happened and I was glad that it was because this movie and Disney in general need more sister love. But I hoped it would be Hans kissing her and it… just not being true love. Meeting someone who understands you and can be a friend for the first time in your life oh and also they are opposite gender =/= true love. Elsa understood that without suspecting Hans of villainy, and the villainy wasn’t really needed. Although it drove the point of “don’t instantly trust someone you have literally just met with everything” home pretty nicely… I still wanted it to be the way described here

I agree that it would have been pretty great for something like that to go down… If this movie wasn’t still supposed to be understandable to children. Maybe Pixar wasn’t giving kids enough credit, but it’s important that kids can be capable of seeing the point of the film. They made it more obvious because kids don’t know to look for that.

Well, I just wish the point they were making was less "some guys are bad" and more "sometimes there is no villain". They were doing such a good job of keeping the movie villain-less, like there was that one Weaseltown guy but he was a joke and the events would probably have unfolded exactly the same without him, and Elsa is not a villain and not even an antagonist in any meaningful sense of word, and their parents don't exactly meet the traditional definition either... And then BAM - "oh right, we were making this confusing for kids, they need someone to hate HERE HAVE HANS". Even though the whole mess isn't his fault and his villainy was kinda accidental to the whole thing, the only real impact on the plot he had was enabling Anna to save her sister and thus herself. Nah.

Avatar
Avatar
myed89

Oh Hans.

Avatar
ging-ler

oh no please im not supposed to feel bad for him but

Okay first if all how dare you

No but like, this would have been an incredible backstory. Especially with the whole being the youngest sibling thing and the always forgotten about stuff, it would have been great to see this played out in the movie. Like, even at the beginning. Imagine a short scene at a ball before the accident happened where Hans’ family is there and Hans tugs on his mom’s dress because he’s too small to reach the sandwiches on the table and his brothers won’t help him and his mom just laughs with the other royals who then walk away and then she leans over and says this.

MEANWHILE ELSA AND ANNA ARE USING ELSA’S POWERS TO GET THE CHOCOLATE DOWN FROM THE DESSERT TABLE COMPLETELY UNAWARE OF THE CHILD TRAUMA/ABUSE HAPPENING ACROSS THE BALLROOM

This was one of the things I was annoyed about in the movie, actually.  Of course, because Anna fell in love with another dude, Hans has to be evil.  That’s the way that Disney (and other kids shows, let’s be fair) ties up ‘love triangles’.  People can screencap frames where Hans blinks wrong all they want, but I thought it was really out of left field- and yet 100% predictable because Kristoff exists and it’s an easy way to tie off that thread.

You know what I would have loved?  I would have loved a Hans who wanted to love Anna.  Like, a Hans who had to marry her and be with her for power reasons, inferiority complex reasons, literally ALL THE SAME REASONS, but instead of being completely, predictably, villainous in it, I would have liked it if he wanted to love her, but he just didn’t.  Just couldn’t feel that way.  If he leaned in and kissed her and nothing happened.

He pulls away, Anna looks up at him in horror, and it’s still a lie and still a betrayal, but instead of having the black and white Hans and Kristoff, you’ve got a little more of a human element- motivated by greed and ambition and therefore still somewhat reprehensible, but ultimately sympathetic.  More assassins from the weasel guy try to kill Elsa, Hans maybe helps them out of spite because he can’t marry Anna now, and at the end of the movie, he goes home to a family who doesn’t have space for him- and maybe Anna and Elsa ask him to visit and he goes to escape from that and finds friendship rather than the romantic love he was looking for but he realizes that all he wanted was someone to appreciate him and HAPPY ENDINGS FOR EVERYONE OKAY why not that Disney, huh.

Avatar
teamponytail

OMG that was EXACTLY what I wanted to happen when I first watched the movie (I was spoiled beforehand) and I was SOOOO disappointed when they went the full-on Evil Fucker route.

Avatar
lilietsblog

I actually left the room when watching it with my brother (I do that a lot with movies) because it was OBVIOUS Hans' kiss won't help her, it went against everything that happened and I was glad that it was because this movie and Disney in general need more sister love. But I hoped it would be Hans kissing her and it... just not being true love. Meeting someone who understands you and can be a friend for the first time in your life oh and also they are opposite gender =/= true love. Elsa understood that without suspecting Hans of villainy, and the villainy wasn't really needed. Although it drove the point of "don't instantly trust someone you have literally just met with everything" home pretty nicely... I still wanted it to be the way described here

Avatar
reblogged

Why some people seem so sure that Gil and Tarvek intensly hate each other to the point they would happily stab each other in the back just to get rid of the competition to Agatha’s hand? Just like the whole rest of their complicated relationship didn’t exist at all.

It’s not hate, it’s hurt

Avatar
lilietsblog

…hate? There are people who missed the entire castle arc? Wow, sucks to be them

To elaborate on this… remember how they first met in the castle arc? GIl kept describing what a horrible snake Tarvek was, but as soon as he was in danger, easily agreed to a horribly dangerous and painful procedure with ridiculously low chance of success to try and save him. This is not the only piece of evidence, but it’s one I clearly remember because it’s my favorite. I suspect that they care about each other way more than they do about Agatha, but she’s a person who they both care about and value more than their lives (so for both of them helping her means doing service to the other one) AND a good focal point for their rivalry. They are both good people and would never treat Agatha as just an object, but I seriuosly suspect they would be less all over her without each other. And that at least part of their visible affection for her is their way of showing affection for each other: there are so many reasons they can’t show it to each other directly, so Agatha ends up a nexus of that. And I really think that their childhood friendship is more important to them than romantic/sexual attraction to a girl they both just met. That, too

I’m not really sure that agree with here. I do think that Gil/Tarvek bond is just as important and strong as bond of either of the boys with Agatha and it is certainly based more on the conflict from their childhood on Castle Wulfenbach that purely the competition for Agatha’s hand. But I wouldn’t say that said that they care less for her than for each other.

Both Tarvek and Gil fall in love with her independently and both are fairly quickly head over heels for her, before they even knew that the other one would be involved. It’s the most evident in Gil’s case - his first reaction after their kiss is trying to elope with her to get married, when he thinks she is dead he goes through a serious depression, and after the timeskip these are Agatha’s likenesses that are all over the place. But Tarvek is just as much in love with her, even if he shows it in different ways: he became ready to toss away all his plans for her, even if it means resigning from the Lightning Throne, something he was breed and groomed for.

I’m not saying that Gil and Tarvek don’t care for each other - they obviously do (the resurrection chain is just one example), it’s just that their relationship is different from these between them and Agatha and just as important.

Well, yes, just as. I couldn't express it properly in my post, I guess... I don't think their love for Agatha isn't real or something. I just think that their relationship with Agatha has been affected by their relationship with each other no less than their relationship with each other has been affected by their relationship with her, and it's kinda obvious it was. I'm just saying it works both ways, always, and romantic relationships are no more special and unique than friendships.

Avatar

Feminist: Misandry doesn’t exist.

Me: Men get sentenced to longer prison terms for the same crime.

Feminist: That’s misogyny, because women aren’t seen as a threat.

Me: So is black men being sent to jail longer an instance of black privilege, because white people aren’t seen as a threat?

Avatar
lejacquelope

I am African American and I take issue with what you posted.

Particularly THE PART WHERE YOU THOUGHT OF THAT POINT BEFORE I DID

DAMN IT.

Avatar
lilietsblog

first, misoginy and racism aren't exactly the same. Yes, the misconception about black people, as far as I know, is that they are dangerous and irrational, while misconception about women is the opposite. Second, why do people think that misoginy and misandry are opposed? I mean, I can see how their proponents can be opposed, if they want to only fix the stuff that hurts them and keep the stuff that benefits them Doesn't work that way, though. Yes, sexism hurts both sexes. Society has higher expectations of men than women, and it is a double-edged sword. Women get less credit for awesome things they do and less punishment for horrible things they do. This is bad, and this needs to be fixed. Both of these things. They are both sexism.

Avatar
West Hollywood gay bar The Abbey recently decided to ban straight bachelorette parties. Their decision, according to Abbey owner David Cooley, is a form of political protest.

A gaybar bangs annoying bachelorette parties from their premises, not just because they are fucking annoying and treat the place like a freakshow and a petshop, but also because it’s pretty fucking rude to celebrate your marriage in a place where the overwhelming majority of the clientele and staff are denied that right themselves.

The comments section are full of straight women whining about “perfect examples of modern misogyny”.   Yes, you heard it here first: straight, middle class, white American women are far, far, far more oppressed and have less legal rights then gay men.   Gay men don’t understand what it’s like to be discriminated against, not like the poor straight women who have to go take their bachelorette party somewhere else instead of flaunting it to men who are denied the right to say “I do” OH MY GOD THE MISOGYNY WON’T SOEMONE PLEASE THINK OF THE MIDDLE CLASS WHITE WOMEN?!?!?! 

yes people in the comments are actually calling this discrimination.  

Avatar
lilietsblog

ok guys hey there guys, gals, whoever this is not important this is not what either party is against either gay men or women assaults on cosplayers, feminism activists, trans people and others; death threats, abuse, rape culture, legal obstacles and prosecution in different countries those are the things that matter bachelorette parties in a gay bar? are not for either side

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

"Men need feminism because when a young boy was raped they helped him and men only told him to 'man up'" *looks to the post about the mom raping her son with a bunch of apologist feminist comments*

There are feminists and then there are the feminists.

-The Non-Binary One

Avatar
Avatar
lilietsblog

Don't put them all in one pile, and don't think tumblr activists have anything to do with actual real life movements like, at all ever they are not the same thing they are not even near

Avatar
reblogged

She’s fourteen, and she already feels like shit for being born white and cis.

Fuck tumblr.

Avatar
explosives-b

this makes me sad more than anything. The fact that people feel guilty for existing is sad.

oh poor white cis people grow the fuck up; this site is one of the only places where minorities can vent and stupid cis people are offended just stop

No, here’s the fucking thing. This site isn’t for one group of people. It’s a fucking blogging site. For EVERYONE. You tell people not to be ashamed of what they fucking are, but only of its what you want? That’s pretty fucking disgusting. If you want equality, you don’t preach hate, because hate breeds more hate. That 14 year old isn’t your oppressor. She has done nothing wrong to be forced to hate herself, and to hate what she was born in. Grow the fuck up.

And if your response to someone being shamed into self-hatred over their identity is to mock them further, call them stupid, and imply that anyone who thinks that shaming people isn’t okay is immature and bigoted, you might be a douchebag.

Avatar
lilietsblog

Holy shit. Tumblr is just… just… augh. No wonder some people here claim they are “anti-feminist” or anti-whatever, if who claims to be this whatever are people who _insult_others_based_on_gender_race_orientation_ and think themeselves activists of the cause of equality. I just… augh. I can’t handle this much stupidity.

Also, why do I keep thinking of people who type such insults here as boys? This is an absolutely wrong approach, I shouldn't let my prejudice and normativity influence my opinions... but honestly, girls' bullying looks different, just straight-up insulting people is what boys are taught to do in our society. And Dahni wonders why Kankri the tumblr parody dismisses feminism as if it's a non-issue while pursuing all the other cases with wild abandon! "Nah, that's girl problems, no big issue"

Avatar
reblogged

She’s fourteen, and she already feels like shit for being born white and cis.

Fuck tumblr.

Avatar
explosives-b

this makes me sad more than anything. The fact that people feel guilty for existing is sad.

oh poor white cis people grow the fuck up; this site is one of the only places where minorities can vent and stupid cis people are offended just stop

No, here’s the fucking thing. This site isn’t for one group of people. It’s a fucking blogging site. For EVERYONE. You tell people not to be ashamed of what they fucking are, but only of its what you want? That’s pretty fucking disgusting. If you want equality, you don’t preach hate, because hate breeds more hate. That 14 year old isn’t your oppressor. She has done nothing wrong to be forced to hate herself, and to hate what she was born in. Grow the fuck up.

And if your response to someone being shamed into self-hatred over their identity is to mock them further, call them stupid, and imply that anyone who thinks that shaming people isn’t okay is immature and bigoted, you might be a douchebag.

Avatar
lilietsblog

Holy shit. Tumblr is just... just... augh. No wonder some people here claim they are "anti-feminist" or anti-whatever, if who claims to be this whatever are people who _insult_others_based_on_gender_race_orientation_ and think themeselves activists of the cause of equality. I just... augh. I can't handle this much stupidity.

Avatar
reblogged

maybe I should just make a ‘why you should be more worried about John Egbert than Dave Strider’ post

but I don’t want to stir up unnecessary panic and I think he’ll probably be ok in the end too

they’re all gonna die a little bit, I just think...

Avatar
lilietsblog

I'm just in awe of how washed out the term "perma-death" becomes. Knight to D6 says that Dave will die for good, forever, and never come back, get erased from reality the way doomed!John was. Technically, likely Heroic death for John can also be called perma-death... except it isn't, what with the Ring and Jane's resurrection and just generally the themes of the story. I'm not even "worried" about it at this point... it'll likely happen, yeah. No big deal. He'll join Jade and Calliope and maybe help them move freely around the Furthest Ring while still remaining concealed... good idea, btw

Avatar
reblogged

Rogue: One who Invites Theft of (Aspect) or one who Invites Theft through (Aspect)

Rogues have problems coping with their Aspect or the lack of it, thinking they don’t have it in them or that they can’t handle it, causing them to give it up too...

Avatar
lilietsblog

I don't think the word "steal" is any better than "relocate" in implying personal growth, to be honest. I still like "allocate", "relocate" and "distribute" a lot better thematically. They make sense as the opposite/other half of using. These verbs don't only work on their own, they should work for inversion as well. For example, Karkat's inversion for most of his session. Did he steal anytihng? DId he let anyone steal anything from him? No, he was _distributing_ goals and directions, while also giving up his own freedom. Oh, and Roxy DID, in fact, go for Dirk - remember how she talked to Jane about how she felt guilty about it? She did, it's just that he's, well, gay, so he never reciprocated in any other-than-purely-friendly way. She's a lot different from Nepeta from the start!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net