mouthporn.net
#elections – @lifeofkj on Tumblr
Avatar

Tumblngs of KJ

@lifeofkj / lifeofkj.tumblr.com

Hello! I am KJ, and this is my Tumblr. You may also know me as Owlmoose. Here you will find cute animals, fandomy things (mostly Critical Role, Dragon Age, and Marvel these days, but some Final Fantasy as well, plus other things that catch my fancy), and political stuff. Unrepentant liberal and feminist.
Avatar

Semi-regular political linkspam: Keep calling!

McConnell didn't have the votes ("You don't have the votes / You don't have the votes"), so the Senate healthcare bill got delayed. There's still a lot of public posturing and wavering, but you can bet once the recess is over, the GOP leadership will start wheeling and dealing to get to fifty. They have room to play with two no votes, so just like in the House, I suspect they'll give the two most vulnerable some cover (my money is on Collins and Heller), then twist arms for the rest. So we need to keep twisting back, and harder.

  • Osita Nwanevu wrote this long and excellent article about the history of US democratic primaries, with a thesis that (contrary to the narrative that BernieBros and others have been trying to push) racial and social issues have been keeping white working class voters away from progressive candidates since 1972. Not coincidentally, this was the first presidential election after the GOP adopted the "Southern strategy", Richard Nixon's plan to attract racist white Democrats alienated by the passage of the Civil Rights Act. Nwanevu is a little too quick to throw around the word "neo-liberal", but otherwise this is a fascinating look at history and trends.
  • It's easy to dismiss the various Twitter-tempests-in-a-teacup as distractions from "real" issues, but let's consider that Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski are accusing the President of the United States of blackmail, and that's not a small thing.
  • Not politics exactly, but a hot topic in tech lately is allegations of inappropriate behavior of venture capitalists toward women who are asking them for funding. This Guardian article uses one particular case as a jumping off point to talk about the problems with sexism and misogyny in the tech world. I also found this Facebook post to be a thoughtful response.
  • Speaking of Silicon Valley and its sometimes-toxic culture, this video from Fusion does a good job of why the resignation of Uber's ultra-bro CEO, Travis Kalanick, will not solve all the company's problems.
  • In voter suppression news, I was cheered to see so many states pushing back on or flat refusing the administration's request for voter data. And this hasn't been a particularly partisan response either -- only 17 states have Democratic Secretaries of State, but as of the most recent count, at least 44 states are refusing to cooperate, either wholly or in part. When the governor of Mississippi told Trump to "jump in the Gulf of Mexico", I figured that was pretty much the ballgame. Maybe there's some hope for the republic after all.
  • "I Don't Know How to Explain Why You Should Care About Other People" is an article that sums up a lot of my feelings right now, and a lot of other people's too, if the number of times I've seen it shared on social media in the last couple of weeks is any indication.
Avatar

Semi-regular political linkspam: Covfefe edition

Avatar

Semi-regular political linkspam: Catching up from being on vacation edition

I didn't take my laptop with me on my East Coast trip, mostly because I figured we'd be out and about a lot, especially in New York. I was mostly correct in this, so I fell a little behind on world events while I was gone, which is probably just as well.

  • I found this overview of the violent protest in Berkeley this Saturday to be a good and thoughtful summation of the situation. As usual, it's more complex than you might think from headline news. It's not really Trump supporters vs. anti-Trump; it's the latest evolution of a long-running conflict between the white supremacist right and the anti-fascist left, with the white supremacists using more moderate Trump voters as cover.
  • From The Nation, "Fear of Diversity Made People More Likely to Vote Trump." This is a nice way of saying that Trump voters were racist (or, to take it a little more broadly, xenophobic, but the poll discussed by the article asked questions specifically about race and racial anxieties). The article never comes out and uses the word "racist" but the implication is clear. I'm getting a little frustrated by the mainstream media's inability to call racism out by name, even left-leaning publications like The Nation, but at least they're still raising the issue.
  • Of all the various takes inspired by the United Airlines debacle last weekend, I was most interested in Vox's history of airline industry deregulation and consolidation, and how that's led to current miserable flying conditions. It also answered a mystery that has long puzzled me: whatever happened to America West? (Answer: they bought out US Air and kept the US Air brand, so through various mergers they're basically now American Airlines.)
  • From The Washington Post's Daily 202 newsletter, poll results show that the change in support for military intervention in Syria is driven entirely by a massive swing in Republican opinion. Only 22% of Republicans approved of potential airstrikes in 2013, when Obama sought permission from Congress to punish Assad for using chemical weapons against civilians; today that number is 86%. (Democratic opinion is nearly unchanged, from 38% to 37%, well within the margin of error on the poll.) But sure, tell me that their opposition to Obama was principled.
  • I really appreciated this interview with political scientist Marcus H. Johnson on the problems with Bernie Sanders and his approach to fighting Trump, and the problems with infighting in the Democratic Party.
  • As you might therefore guess, I'm not on board with primarying every moderate Democrat under the sun in 2018 (please stop making noises about Dianne Feinstein; I don't love everything she does, but she has serious seniority in the Senate, and she flexes those muscles when it matters). But there are exceptions, and it seems like these eight New York Democrats who caucus with the Republicans are prime candidates for some challengers.
  • It's a little too depressing to go back and chronicle the events that led up to the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court now that the damage is done, but I did want to share the article about his purported plagiarism, largely because it was a centerpiece of Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley's epic filibuster last week, which I caught part of. Merkely wasn't blocking any particular vote by speaking overnight; it was mostly a protest move. But I found his effort inspiring anyway.
  • Jill Filipovic on why it's a problem that Mike Pence won't eat a meal alone with a woman who isn't his wife. This is not an uncommon stance among a certain strand of conservative Christian -- it's known as the Billy Graham Rule, because the evangelist famously pioneered the practice when Christian leaders were getting caught in sex scandals. It's still offensive in that context, but when a world leader adopts the policy, it's flat out discrimination. What if Pence becomes president, and has to take a private meeting with Angela Merkel? Will he insist that his wife be in the room? It's a system-wide problem, too, as this survey of female Congressional staffers shows -- they report being routinely excluded from after-hours networking opportunities because it would require them to be alone with male members of Congress.
  • On the good news front, recent local elections in Illinois elected a record-shattering number of Democrats to office. Includes a video from Congresswoman Cheri Bustos, who runs a boot camp for people planning to run for office. It's called Build the Bench, and of the twelve alumni who ran in this cycle, at least eight of them won. This is exactly the kind of effort we need to be putting in, and I hope we see it spreading across the nation.
  • On that note, and related to my comments about primarying moderates above, here's a "List of Things Progressives Should Do Before Primarying Joe Manchin", moderate Democratic Senator from West Virginia. I'd add the caveat that if West Virginia progressives believe it's worth putting in the time and effort to mount a primary challenge to Manchin, then more power to them, and I'll support their efforts. (Same for Heidi Heitkamp, Joe Donnelly, etc.) But on the national level, I absolutely agree that everything on this list takes higher priority.
  • Jill Filipovic has been killing it in her editorials for Cosmopolitan lately, and this piece on abortion rights as a precondition for economic justice is no exception.
Avatar

Semi-regular political linkspam: State of the Onion

Anyone else think that they referred to last night's speech as an address rather than his first State of the Union as a ploy to keep expectations low? Just me? Okay.

  • If it was intentional, it sure seems to have worked -- mainstream media spent last night and today falling all over themselves to congratulate the president for his ability to read words off a teleprompter without melting down. Way to set a high bar, folks. At least some articles, like this commentary from NBC, pointed out his lack of substance and a fair number of the "alternative facts" contained in the speech.
  • Meanwhile, the known rabble-rousers at USA Today posted an editorial calling for Congressional Democrats to get serious about potential impeachment.
  • This week in "I Miss Jon Stewart": Stewart's appearance on Late Night with Stephen Colbert on Monday, 2/27, in which he compared the media's relationship with Trump to a bad breakup and advised them to move on. Nice analogy. I wonder how long they'll wait before taking it to heart?
  • A special election for three seats in the Connecticut state senate was a wash, with all three seats remaining in the hands of their original party, but both Democratic-held seats were won easily, while the race for the GOP-held seat was more competitive than it had ever been. Democrats also held a state senate seat in Delaware, won narrowly in 2014, by over 10 points on the strength of 33% turnout -- which is huge for a special election. There's plenty more of these coming, so keep your eye out. Here's an article about some upcoming US House races in Montana and Georgia -- the Georgia seat, especially, could be key to gathering momentum for the midterms.
  • I would say the dominos are falling when Darrell Issa -- terrible GOP rep from Southern CA, who led some of the worst investigations of Obama and Hillary Clinton, and was largely responsible for the California recall election that brought us the Governator, and who came very close to losing his seat in a district that Clinton won in 2016 -- is calling for a special prosecutor to look into the Russia shenanigans, but he walked it back just a day or so later, so.... *shrug* Talk is cheap, folks.
  • My main feeling about the election of a DNC chair is to be glad its over, so now the party can buckle down and get to work. But what really elevated the whole thing to a non-event to me was Tom Perez, immediately and without rancor, naming Keith Ellison vice chair to unanimous approval. This way, we get both of their voices in party leadership, and Ellison gets to keep his seat in Congress (although nothing prohibited him from staying on, he had promised to resign if he'd won). As far as I'm concerned, this is a win-win. As for the people who tried to turn this into a proxy battle to re-litigate the primary, meh. If you're leaving the party over this, you were looking for an excuse to go. See ya bye bye now.
  • One of the big stories last week was members of Congress ducking constituent town halls during their recent recess (mostly Republicans, but not exclusively -- I don't think Pelosi or Kamala Harris had one, and I know Feinstein didn't). Lots of folks are calling them out, but none better than Gabrielle Giffords.
  • Another thing you might have heard about was the Department of Education pulling guidance to schools that explicitly protected the rights of trans students. Bad as this news is, no laws have actually changed here, just the federal government's mandate to interpret them a certain way. The National Center for Transgender Equality provides a FAQ explaining what it all means.

Lastly, for today's bit of fun: here's a livetweet of a cow escape in upstate New York. Watch the gifs, revel in the puns, and read all the way down for a happy ending.

Avatar

Regular politics linkspams?

I've been thinking I'm sharing most of the best resources I find on Twitter and Facebook these days, and given the speed at which things have been happening since the election, good stuff sometimes gets lost in the social media firehose. If I noted the best of those links and posted them here, say on a weekly basis or so, would people find that useful and/or interesting? I'm a librarian; curating and sharing information is what I do. If I can take that task on in a way that helps people, I feel like I should. So I'll try this for now, but if folks have feedback or suggestions, definitely let me know.

And now for something completely different: NPR's Monkey See blog is putting together a Pop Culture Advent Calendar, sharing one perfect pop culture moment from 2016 per day. I love this idea, and perhaps in its spirit, I should make sure to include at least one happy or uplifting thing in each links collection. We can't have four years of unalloyed misery, no matter how bad things get -- that way lies burnout and despair. As I've said before, we need to take our bright spots where we can get them, even if it feels like trying to keep a candle lit against a firehose. This is my candle, and I will do whatever it takes to keep it burning.

Avatar
Avatar
judedoyle

So! As we all know by now, the most depressing portion of this election was realizing how many white women – 53%, or, a majority – went for the most anti-woman candidate this country has ever belched forth from its gullet. Yet this is totally in line with history to date. If you, a white woman, are appalled by this – and I sincerely hope you are – what can you do about it? I asked around, and here are some answers. 

Avatar
lifeofkj

I appreciate this article, with one important criticism: the conclusion says that we have four years to do this work, but that’s not correct. We have two. Flipping Congress in the 2018 midterm elections is a daunting prospect, but it’s still important that we try.

Avatar
Avatar
brutereason

I wonder from where so many Americans get the idea that voting is supposed to be some expression of your deepest, most beloved values and virtues rather than a pragmatic, political move meant to shift your country as much closer to your ideal as possible. This strikes me as another example of extreme individualism. Voting isn’t about *you*. It’s about your city, state, and/or country. It doesn’t have to feel transcendently good deep down in your bones. It just has to *do* as much good as you can do, in this particular moment in time.

Avatar
It’s hard to remember these days, but just a few years ago, everybody loved Hillary Rodham Clinton. When she stepped down as US secretary of state in January 2013 after four years in office, her approval rating stood at what the Wall Street Journal described as an “eye-popping” 69%. That made her not only the most popular politician in the country, but the second-most popular secretary of state since 1948.
The 2012 “Texts from Hillary” meme, which featured a sunglasses-clad Clinton scrolling through her Blackberry aboard a military flight to Libya, had given rise to a flood of think pieces hailing her “badass cool.” The Washington Post wanted president Barack Obama to give vice president Joe Biden the boot andreplace him with Clinton. Taking stock of Clinton’s approval ratings, Nate Silver noted in a 2012 piece for the New York Times that she currently held “remarkably high numbers for a politician in an era when many public officials are distrusted or disliked.”
How times have changed. “The FBI And 67 Percent of Americans Distrust Hillary Clinton,” booms a recent headline in the Huffington Post. Clinton’s favorability ratings currently hoveraround 40.8%. Bob Woodward complains that “there is something unrelaxed about the way she is communicating.” “Hillary’s personality repels me,” Walker Bragman writes in Salon.
How can we reconcile the “unlikable” Democratic presidential candidate of today with the adored politician of recent history? It’s simple: Public opinion of Clinton has followed a fixed pattern throughout her career. Her public approval plummets whenever she applies for a new position. Then it soars when she gets the job. The wild difference between the way we talk about Clinton when she campaigns and the way we talk about her when she’s in office can’t be explained as ordinary political mud-slinging. Rather, the predictable swings of public opinion reveal Americans’ continued prejudice against women caught in the act of asking for power.
We beg Clinton to run, and then accuse her of feeling “entitled” to win. Several feminist writers have analyzed the Clinton yo-yo. Melissa McEwan sees a deliberate pattern of humiliation, which involves “building [Clinton] up and pressuring her to take on increasingly prominent public challenges, only to immediately turn on her and unleash breathtaking misogyny against her when she steps up to the plate.”
If you find this hypothesis unlikely, there’s Ann Friedman’s explanation: Clinton makes people uncomfortable by succeeding too visibly. Clinton is trapped in “the catch-22 of female ambition,” Friedman writes: “To succeed, she needs to be liked, but to be liked, she needs to temper her success.”
Yet it seems odd that even when Clinton ascends to ever-greater positions of power—from first lady to senator, from senator to secretary of state—we start liking her again once she’s landed the job. It’s not her success that seems to arouse ire, but the act of campaigning itself.
This issue is not specific to Clinton. As Slate writer Jamelle Bouie has pointed out on Twitter, even progressive demigod Elizabeth Warren was seen as “unlikable” when she ran for the Massachusetts senate seat. Local outlets published op-eds about how women were being “turned off” by Warren’s “know-it-all style”—a framing that’s indistinguishable from 2016 Clinton coverage. “I’m asking her to be more authentic,” a Democratic analyst for Boston radio station WBUR said of Warren. “I want her to just sound like a human being, not read the script that makes her sound like some angry, hectoring school marm.”

i think i need to reblog this at least 5 times a day

Avatar
reblogged

Your husband is directly responsible for both DOMA and DADT, and you’ve not only defended this, but until recently you were against marriage equality, to say NOTHING about trans rights. you don’t give a shit about trans people, you just wanna get in on the trans voter’s good side by stealing our hashtag. 

Avatar
eighthdoctor

ok time for my favorite song “the queer community doesn’t know our history and we’re starting to suffer for it”

point by point, more or less:

  • DADT is an improvement over “we’re going to ask and if we have the slightest suspicion that you’re lying, dishonorable discharge pronto” (used in WWII) or “we’re not going to ask but we’re going to discharge you ANYWAY because you seem gay” (source). it was a compromise position by the clinton white house that was, at the time, a victory for the queer community.
  • Sanders didn’t tweet about TDoV?? Do you want politicians to talk about us or don’t you
  • DOMA was introduced and written by Republicans in both Houses, it passed by a veto-proof majority, which means that the president vetoing it would have been political grandstanding of a sort that wasn’t happening in 1996, and Bill Clinton said at the time that it was “divisive and unnecessary.” (source)
  • the goal, the only real goal in the 90s was “stop letting us die”. AIDS was still in full flow, AZT was on the market but it wasn’t working, not well enough, and the three drug therapy didn’t hit publication until 1996. we were dying.
  • basically NOBODY was talking about marriage equality in 1992-2000*. again, we were dying. the speed and success of marriage equality–nobody saw this coming. no one. i have queer friends in their 50s, they’re stunned that they were able to get married because it wasn’t supposed to happen in their lifetime. for that to happen in 12 years (2003-2015) was inconceivable.

* the issue came up in a hawaii supreme court case in 1993 that went in circles for years until hawaii passed an amendment in 1998 that banned same-sex marriage

so basically, you’re massively wrong, you’ve misunderstood the political situation in the 1990s, you’re using this to attack a candidate who is, if not perfect, certainly very good, and all while not applying the same standard to her opposition.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
elloellenoh

So important!! Please vote blue!

Avatar
siawrites

Considering [T]Rump will be the most likely Republican nominee?

Vote Blue.  For the love of god, vote Democrat.

I just had this conversation with a friend of mine on facebook. I love Bernie Sanders and want him to be our nominee, but it’s important to remember: When they were in the senate together, Clinton and Sanders voted the same way 93% of the time. That 7% does make a difference, but not so big a difference that I’d risk a Trump presidency.

Avatar
johnskylar

I would personally be willing to die on the hill of a Bernie Sanders run.

However, I vote my conscience, and my conscience says it would be wrong of me to ask my country to die on that hill too. If they wanted to, he would be nominee.

So I’ll be voting my conscience in the general, and my conscience says that Hillary Clinton is far better than the alternatives.

Like, if you live in a solidly blue/red state, then okay, opt out of voting. If you’re in a swing state? PLEASE do not do that thing.

No no no no. DO NOT OPT OUT OF VOTING.

Voting in down-ticket races is just as (or more!) important as voting for President. Even in a state that is primarily Democratic or Republican. Do you want your Congress-person to be a Democrat? You need to vote. What about your State Senator? The Mayor of your town? The guy running for dog-catcher? If you want to have any influence on local issues, you need to vote for those people. So even if you decide you can’t vote for the presidential nominee, show up to vote anyway. You can skip the box for president and vote for all the other races.

Voting matters. Show the fuck up.

Avatar
lifeofkj

Who controls Congress is, if anything, MORE important than who is president. And control of state legislatures matters so much -- would you rather have your state legislature raising the minimum wage or discriminating against LGBTQ people? Please don't sit this out. Vote third party or leave president blank if you must, but don't skip the down ticket races. Vote in every election, in every primary, every time. Please, please vote.

Source: mic.com
Avatar

There’s a lot of young people who are going to be eligible to vote in America during this election so in light of the fact that this website is currently thrumming with political interest I’d just like to remind them that abstaining from voting is not useful or radical, it’s playing right into the hands of the people who want this country to progress backwards. I can guarantee you that there will be an ENORMOUS conservative turn out and if the younger generation doesn’t match it it will literally be a disaster

Avatar
slashmarks

it’s well known in the US that democrats massively outnumber republicans; the reasons that republicans win election are a combination of gerrymandering and voter apathy from progressives who feel that their vote doesn’t make a difference.

it’s true that obama hasn’t fixed the united states, but if the republicans control the white house things will get worse.

Avatar
eighthdoctor

Also, while the presidential election is shaping up to be massively boring (it’s like 1992 all over again I’m already bored and I wasn’t alive in 1992) some things of note

Your state/county/city might have propositions/referendums/etc on the ballot. In 2012, Washington state legalized marriage equality, in large part because of massive young voter turnout (young voters are majority Democrat).

Your representatives ARE up for reelection and your senators might be. The President is the most visible aspect of our government, but Congress is what makes laws. Also, if you’re here for third parties, this is the highest level where they’re viable.

Your vote counts in the oddest ways. When it comes to primaries and caucuses, far fewer people (and far more extreme people) vote, and you can make a difference just by showing up. Also, the first election I really paid attention to was 2004. Again, presidential campaign, not so hot, but the Washington state gubernatorial race came down to 129 votes. Most of my fics are read by more people than that.

City councils! Police departments! Local government, yo! If your primary goal is to stop police brutality, that isn’t happening at the federal level. It’s happening city by city, and the way to affect change there is to vote for local officials who share your views.

School boards and university funding can also come out of elections. While not in all areas, you may be able to vote directly for school board members (not necessarily very useful for you but will help any younger siblings you have), and some places have votes on increasing taxes in order to lower university tuition.

I’ve missed some areas but in summary: You aren’t just voting for president. No matter how lackluster the two candidates are, there are many more things on the ballot that will directly impact your daily life.

If you will be 18 on or before Election Day 2016, are a US citizen, and have not committed a felony, you are probably eligible to vote. Your responsibility for the next 17 months is to register. If you don’t think you can, contact local or federal groups such as the ACLU, and they will try to help you.

Please, please do not let the presidential candidates keep you from voting. There are so many other things happening on the same ballot that you can affect.

Avatar
lifeofkj

I want to call something out from the above comment just in case you missed it: 

In 2004, the race for Washington state governor came down to 129 votes.

Do not let anyone, ever, make you think that your vote doesn’t matter.

The above post is a little old -- the general election is currently just under 7 months away -- but you still have plenty of time to register (in most states, it’s about a month before the election). And although many states have already had their presidential primaries, very few states have held their other primaries: governor, Congress, state legislatures, etc. So if you are an American citizen who will be 18 or older by November, don’t wait! Look into registration deadlines and primary dates in your state now.

Avatar
Avatar
wilwheaton

Aryeh Cohen-Wade had a scathing indictment of the GOP’s complicity in creating Trump and the current clown car of fail in their primary.

The whole thing is brilliant, but this: “They all know they can make a lot of $$$ by fooling frightened elderly white people–the raison d'être of Fox News.“

This is the crux of it. The GOP treats its base like marks in a long con, and Trump is the ultimate conman. He’s beaten them at their own game. He is the match that lit the trash pile they’ve been pouring gasoline on for 40 years.

Avatar
lifeofkj

This is a good analysis, but it misses a bit of historical context. The deeper roots of Trump’s candidacy go back to Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, which was a plan to lure racist whites opposed to integration into the Republican party. It took a couple of decades, but it worked -- too well. Now the GOP seems all surprised that the very racist and xenophobic attitudes that it’s been dog-whistling since the 1960s have taken over the party base, but they really ought to have seen it coming.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net