mouthporn.net
#loki – @lastoftheboyscouts on Tumblr
Avatar

Loving Your Work

@lastoftheboyscouts / lastoftheboyscouts.tumblr.com

Hey, I'm Barb and welcome to the trash heap. I cry a lot over fictional characters, and most of my faves are trash.
Avatar
Avatar
iamnmbr3

Thor: My brother Loki is adopted. He comes from another realm called Jotunheim.

Avengers: So how does the adoption process work on Asgard? Even here it takes years to complete all the background checks and paperwork. I imagine there it probably takes literal centuries. 

Thor: … There was no paperwork. My father found him while invading his native realm and since he was unattended, possibly because he had been abandoned to die or possibly because of the invading army, my father took him in the hopes he would prove useful.

Avengers: …. That’s not adoption. 

Avatar
worstloki

Thor: …yes it is

Thor: so anyway back to the story of how Loki overreacted and made a big deal out of it when he found out 🙄💁‍♂️

Legitimately my pet peeve to end all pet peeves how Marvel, as well as every article ever written about him, continually refers to Loki as Thor’s adopted/step/half-brother instead of a kidnapping victim, which is what he is.

Also, does Thor even remember all the times he said the Jötnar must be destroyed? Or did he just develop convenient amnesia as of his dramatic “change of heart” circa 2011? Is he so emotionally constipated that he genuinely doesn’t see how those memories would HAVE to affect Loki in hindsight?

#i just…#not that trauma as a result of finding out you were adopted after years of not knowing#isn’t a thing or isn’t valid#it definitely is#but just framing what happened to loki as him having been ‘adopted’#so grotesquely minimizes what was actually done#he was stolen from his homeland to be a political pawn#and literally whitewashed by his kidnapper#robbed of his native culture and heritage#and raised to despise the race he secretly belonged to#that’s a lot more than just ‘i’m upset because it turns out i’m not biologically related to the people who raised me’#that’s something marvel has never truly grappled with#and at this point i doubt they ever will (tags via @nikkoliferous)

Yeah. It’s also why for all they want to villain code Loki for things he didn’t do like trying to “steal” the throne (when?? literally when did this happen?) - or things that aren’t actually evil - like trying to stop a warmonger from taking the throne (aka exactly thor’s motivation in TR) - they never really address Loki’s attempted genocide because even though that was a horrible act, addressing it creates a problem since all the hero characters had similar attitudes. Actually Loki didn’t want to fight the Jotuns and tried to avert a war; only after he became suicidal and had breakdown because he discovered his heritage, did he try to kill them. Thor was literally laughing and having a great time murdering Jotnar. As were his friends. Branding Loki evil for this would mean acknowledging that Asgardian society was evil for those attitudes too. I mean literally if not for a twist of fate Loki could have been one of the Jotnar that Thor thoughtlessly murdered while laughing with exhilaration. But that never really gets addressed. 

Also remember Odin always planned to tell Loki the truther eventually because he wanted to use him to “unite” the kingdoms whatever that means. So he let Thor talk about how he was going to wipe out all the frost giants, knowing his son was a frost giant and fully intending to one day share that truth with him. He probably figured the resulting wave of self hatred and doubt when Loki learned the truth would both ensure that his loyalties remained to Asgard and that he would be even more obedient and desperate to prove himself. (And btw Frigga went right along with it).

In addition to all this great parenting, I’d just like to point out that Odin’s plan from the moment he found Loki was to raise him Asgardian, and then once the time came, since Loki would technically be the legitimate heir to Jotunheim, he could rule that realm while Thor ruled Asgard (“Only one of you can ascend the throne, but both of you were born to be kings”). That was literally Odin’s plan all along.

Like… from the very first time he held this child- the son of his enemy, who was?? maybe abandoned?? maybe not? how the hell would Odin have known?- he came up with a plot to:

1. kidnap him

2. trick him into thinking he was Asgardian and expose him to excessive anti-jotun propaganda thus indoctrinating him to the Asgardian imperialist mindset

3. groom him to strive for things that would benefit said imperialist regime (genocide, race supremacy, interventionist ideals)

4. once he was old enough, implant him on the throne of Asgard’s enemy nation as a puppet king and figurehead for the Asgardian Empire.

Like what the absolute fuck?? We all knew it was a dastardly situation to begin with, but when you actually lay it all out and see it for what it is, you realise that Odin legit 100% premeditatedly kidnapped and brainwashed Loki to use as a weapon against his own people. That’s not a headcanon, that’s what happened in the movie. And tbh?? It’s super hard to believe that Odin actually cared about Loki after all that.

I mean, I think he did love him (at least a little bit, in a twisted unhealthy way), but man. This is just. A lot.

Excellent additions. Also given that Odin did absolutely nothing to try to combat the severe violent anti-Jotun attitudes in Asgardian society at large (or even in his own household - Thor didn’t start talking about wiping them all out from childhood without outside influences) despite the fact that he knew of Loki’s true heritage, it seems likely that Odin agrees with those views and sees Loki as an inferior being fit only to be used as a tool, rather than as a person. Either that or he just felt that promoting these kinds of attitudes would make Loki more pliant and eager to prove himself once the truth was revealed, decrease the chance that Loki would feel loyalty to the other Jotnar, and decrease the chance that Loki could ever be accepted on the throne (thus ensuring he was not a threat to Thor). Either way. It’s horrific. 

Avatar
Avatar
lowkeyorloki

Marvel: Bucky was mind controlled by HYDRA

The fandom: That means he didn’t mean to kill anyone, and while his actions can’t exactly be excused, this fact provides a lot of context. It’s not fair to punish someone for something they couldn’t stop.

Marvel: Loki was mind controlled by Thanos

The fandom:

That is, in fact, a correct representation of 98% of the fandom, with the remaining 2% sitting and fuming and wondering why nobody will listen to sense

I think this picture also applies to the part of fandom that thinks Ragnarok in any way a contribution to Loki’s arc and personality.

Avatar

so about what Endgame did to Thor

I remember watching Endgame and when Thor had that lil speech and was going on and on about Jane I was so expecting him to mention Loki. Not a word. Then he ignores him in his cell.

Imagine how insecure you must be about your superheroes and how threatened you must be by a character,if you completely ignore them in the entire 3 hours long movie.

Avatar
kitkatd7

Actually, Thor didnt ignore Loki when he died, he mourned him. And then as a way of coping he became a drunk, also they never talked if Loki because it upset Thor.

@kitkatd7 if writers really wanted Loki, they could have. Even if Thor didnt wanna talk about Loki cos it hurts, someone could have asked about him,since he wasnt mentioning him. And as a painful reaction,it would be realistic if Thor changed subject cos Loki’s name brings too much pain. Also. What was stopping him to talk once more to brother he lost when he went back to 2013? Nothing. They just couldnt afford to have another movie stolen by Loki.

Avatar
lokijiro

Thor started out as a self-centred but ultimately good-natured guy who needed to learn to be more humble and attentive to others.

By the end, he’s more self-centred than he ever was and lost all his good nature.

Also though, let’s not pretend that Thor not giving a shit about Loki started with Endgame.

They had to have Thor mourn Loki a little bit in Infinity War. Remember Chris fought with the Russos over keeping “the Thor that he and Taika created”. If it was up to him he wouldn’t have mourned Loki at all. So they have Thor sniffle and wipe his nose, and that is all Chris is willing to do. When Thor drives his axe into Thanos’s chest, that was for Heimdall, not Loki. Loki’s death is totally dwarfed in the light of Thor’s wounded pride. That’s what he becomes a drunken lush over - his screw up over not going for Thanos’s head. What hurt and upset Thor was the mention of Thanos’s name, the guy whose head he didn’t go for. There were too many wasted opportunities in that movie for Thor to mention Loki or to show some outward sign of missing him. If we have to imply that Thor missed Loki too much to mention his name or even LOOK at him as he passes by, then we’re just reaching, because the movie doesn’t suggest that at all.

Avatar
darthxerik

Thor went from “know your place brother” to “you really are the worst brother,” shoving Loki to the sidelines and back into his shadow at every turn. Thor never wanted Loki to shine. Thor wanted Loki to go back into his little box, and make him understand that watching Thor’s back was all that he was ever good for.

Fitting that the scenes I’m pulling quotes from are literally the first and last scenes Chris and Tom filmed together as Thor and Loki. With the addition of Thor’s “Shut up” in Endgame.

Chris’ feelings toward Tom are the same as Thor’s feelings toward Loki.

Avatar
icyxmischief

This all makes me so sad.  There are nuances I could argue but overall this is the truth about the full circle Thor’s narrative came to.  

The best thing about Thor was his growing capacity to acknowledge those who were lesser or in some way disempowered, to unlearn the narcissism Odin taught him.  He had such potential to be a potent anti-bullying symbol in our society, but Endgame decimated that hope entirely.  And while I stan Loki and this is a Loki blog, it could be said that Thor’s character was ruined whether Loki existed or not.  Loki was simply the most poignant character tool for proving that Thor COULD change for the better, as his oft-misunderstood little brother. 

The one thing I can say with confidence is that while Loki’s death was needless, he died with dignity, and as someone who ultimately chose the slim chance of his brother’s welfare over his own survival (a brother who only dubiously earned that kind of loyalty and love).  Thor lived, but honestly, at what cost to his decency as a person? 

I have always loved the person Thor COULD be (ironic how Thor made that speech at Loki in Ragnarok…projection much????) but there is no doubt he did not reach his true potential in the canonical Cinematic Universe narrative.  

The issue of Mr. Hemsworth’s comportment toward Mr. Hiddleston is a whole other kettle of fish, but also unfortunate, yes.  I’m glad Mr. Hiddleston continues to accrue accolades from peers and elders outside of Marvel.  When I was in elementary school I won an award called the “never at nor about” award, meaning I never said anything unkind to or about a classmate.  I feel Mr. Hiddleston could earn that award too.  No matter how his colleagues might act. And perhaps that’s a lesson for the Loki fandom to consider.  Rise above it, I guess, guys. 

Avatar
Avatar
lego-loki

Shopping for essentials at my local supermarket.

I love his little mask!  He’s down for socially responsible for world domination.

Socially responsible world domination is the only valid kind of world domination.  Do not trust any world takeover attempts from people who do not follow the tenets of social responsibility.  

I mean? duh!

Hey, Lokes? Can you, uh… can you use that sceptre to make everyone else wear their fucking masks too? 😇

I would, but unfortunately stupidity is an impervious defense

I guess that explains why you didn’t use it on Thor 😘

Avatar

Did you notice

that almost all Loki fans cant come up with any other ending for Loki then to die (sacrifice) or end up as Thor's servant?

Its because they cant think for themselves and since this is the only scenario that Marvel has shown, they think this is the way its supposed to be.

Remember Carol Denvers? How she was told to 'control it'? How she didnt even know about powers she had?

Loki is the same. As long as he is by Thor's side, they will CGI the hell out of his powers meanwhile Loki will be toned down to just his stabby brother. (So much for powers) and when it comes to Loki's behavior, as long as he is by Thor's side, HE WILL NEVER BE HIMSELF because he will do as his brother dictates just so he loves him.

Loki needs to be independent and free and to let all his powers out.

Their relationship is toxic as hell and in the end Loki is always the one who gets hurt. Loki is vulnerable and sensitive anyway (altough he hardly ever shows it) but when it comes to his family he is twice as vulnerable. He loves them no matter what and in the end this love cost him his life.

Wishing them to be reunited again is absurd, I am asking myself how those fans fail to see what consequences it will have for Loki, where he will end up and what things he will be deprived of if he and Thor are together again.

Besides CH doesnt want him back. His own words were that Loki is like girlfriend you broke up with and she keeps coming back. His own words.

Where is that brotherly love fans talk about?

It was there. Yes. In 2013. But find me new footage where Chris hugs Tom and says hpw they are brothers and that he fights for Loki solo movie.

Anyone else remember back when Hemsworth used to claim he was president of the Loki fanclub? Oh, how times change...

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net