mouthporn.net
#stem – @kittennightfarts on Tumblr

Kitten Night Farts

@kittennightfarts / kittennightfarts.tumblr.com

http://www.emilytabet.co/
Avatar
Avatar
roadwrkahead

Life in Code: A Personal History of Technology

by Ellen Ullman

a while back I made a post along the lines of "every STEM major should have a required 'history of science' course that's just all about previously wrong and bad scientific theories like sperm all containing homunculi and spontaneous generation" and I got a lot of responses like "but STEM majors already have gen ed requirements!" and would not understand why I was specifically asking for a course that would teach people about why science is not infallible and does not exist in a vacuum and THIS IS EXACTLY WHY ACTUALLY

Avatar

Why art belongs in STEM / STEAM

Avatar
samthor

any field of art requires some form of math, geometry, chemistry, physics, technology, and/or engineering. like holy shit, Shannon, even primitive basket weaving with large blades of grass requires an understanding of certain mathematics principles.

Avatar
ravioliraz

I dated an engineer once who couldn’t problem solve his way out of a paper bag. Not because he was dumb, but because he had never been taught to think critically about anything at all in any of his STEM courses. For the sake of humanity we need to incorporate things like art, history, and humanities into STEM programming. Trust me, you want your structural engineers, your doctors, and your scientists to be able to use skills learned in these disciplines.

Avatar
flagellant

These motherfuckers don't even know that pretty much all origami since the 90s is designed completely through extremely complex mathematical principles. One of the most famous origami artists of all time is a literal NASA rocket scientist.

We're going to take a quick look at one of the most long lived paint producers in the world, Windsor and Newton.

Winsor and Newton was first established in 1832, by William Winsor (described by their website as a chemist) and Henry Newton (described by their website as an artist) (X). They had identified a hole in the arts market, notably, paints with reliable colours.

Notice that Winsor was a chemist. All of these colours don't just appear out of no-where, they have to be created, and they are largely created by chemists. That is because artists colours have to have several properties beyond being applicable by a brush, including consistent colour across batches, consistent colour before and after dying, and to stand up against the ravages of time. Although these may seem simple at first, they require precise measurements, precise sourcing, and an understanding of how chemical compounds change and break down over time.

Before the early 1800s artists would be expected to purchase pigments and mix them to create paint themselves, a time consuming, and often irregular process, that required all painting to be done indoors, as there was no stable way to transport the paint long distances. Artists would make studies or sketches of the landscape, and then try and translate those onto a canvas once back at their studio, reliant on their own memory for things like colour and distance.

Often, a painter's apprentice would take on the task of mixing the artist's pigment into paint at the artist's specification, and according to their measurements and recipes. However, smaller disciplines, or single artists who could not afford to keep apprentices, often mixed their own.

Let us look momentarily at the Mona Lisa.

(X)

The absence of eyebrows is often remarked upon by art scholars and there are a number of different theories as to why her eyebrows are absent here. In fact, she was originally painted with eyebrows, as discovered using infra-red imaging by Pascal Cotte (a photographer and, key to the orignal poster's point, an engineer) (X). One of the leading theories is that the pigment used to paint her eyebrows has faded to near invisibility over time, an idea for which there is significant precedence.

In fact, Da Vinci has made this mistake before, in his brief but illustrious career as an artist in the Last Supper. Da Vinci's Last Supper used an experimental technique of oil paints on dry plaster, rather than the well established tempera on wet plaster. (X) As a direct result, the Last Supper is under extreme conservational restrictions. The room in which the Last Supper stands is hermetically sealed in order to prevent mold growth and environmental damage. (X) Additionally, no flash photography is allowed. This is because the painting is literally so delicate that the light from flash photography damages it. (X)

Let us look now at contemporary pigments. One of the first lessons I had in my art classes was 'never put red or yellow paint on your face'. This is oddly specific, but it was quickly explained to us that mid- and high-quality red and yellow paint are often given their colour using cadmium. Those of you with science backgrounds might note that cadmium is highly toxic.

Despite the danger, cadmium is easy to acquire, and easy to process into pigment. Perhaps more importantly, and certainly more importantly for artists, cadmium does create a vibrant colour, and an opaque paint that, crucially, does not degrade over time.

Similar chemically or geographically interesting pigments can be found both contemporarily and through out history. Take ultramarine blue, which was initially made using crushed lapis lazuli, available from only one mine in the world during the renaissance era. As such it was more expensive by weight than gold. (X)

(X) (X)

Imagine for a moment the immense wealth that went into Giotto's Scrovegni Chapel, the immense distance and cost that went into that very colour of blue.

I would be remiss not to flag the Forbes Pigment Collection. The Forbes Pigment collection has more than 2,500 specimens, and is dedicated to preserving examples of rare or interesting pigments. (X)

An interesting, if horrifying example is that of 'Mummy Brown', made from the crushed remains of mummified corpses. Obviously, this colour is no longer standard, and its use was disputed even at the time, but it is a relevant point in history.

(X)

The continued presence of these well catalogued pigments allows a great deal of insight, both for the soft sciences (when did we have access to this pigment, was that pigment sourced from off continent, and if so, how did it get here?), and the hard sciences (where was this chemical sourced, how was that chemical treated to result in this vibrant colour?)

Finally, (and thank you all for sticking with me this far) is a pigment some of you may be familiar with. Vantablack, one of the worlds blackest substances, was originally developed to 'coat satellite camera openings, absorbing stray light from he sun and moon so distant stars can be seen better'. (X)

Although Vantablack was originally designed in pursuit of a strictly scientific discipline, it did not remain so. Anish Kapoor in 2016 bought the rights to vantablack's 'use as an art material' (X). Although this is not the only time that a pigment has been copyrighted, it was an extremely public display, and one that the art world rebelled against.

(X) Anish Kapoor - Gathering Clouds (2014)

Stuart Semple began the intense process of creating a rival 'blackest black'. He eventually succeeded. Although his recipe for the blackest black remains a guarded secret, a tube of the most recent edition of the paint is available on the artist's website for an extremely reasonable price, and smelling of fresh coffee. (X)

Although this is all fairly niche, it is still a fantastic example of how art and science intersect, to say nothing of feats of architecture like Brunelleschi's Dome, GFP Bunny by Eduardo Kac, Renissance perspective, or Pig Wings by Oron Catts, Ionat Zurr, and Guy Ben-Ary.

(Much of this information was first introduced to me at school. The links provided here are not comprehensive, nor have they been well vetted by me. My information comes largely from textbooks and professors I no longer have access to, and wouldn't know how to cite even if I did.)

Avatar
quickreaver

Okay, there's A LOT here? But it warms my heart to report *concrete ways* that visual mediums are necessary to the world. Yes, we could only use photographs, but photography is an art too. Art and science intersects. (But also, art transcends science to expression. Humans live in this sphere too.)

Avatar

The science world is freaking out over this 25-year-old's answer to antibiotic resistance

A 25-year-old student has just come up with a way to fight drug-resistant superbugs without antibiotics.
The new approach has so far only been tested in the lab and on mice, but it could offer a potential solution to antibiotic resistance, which is now getting so bad that the United Nations recently declared it a “fundamental threat” to global health.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria already kill around 700,000 people each year, but a recent study suggests that number could rise to around 10 million by 2050.
In addition to common hospital superbug, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), scientists are now also concerned that gonorrhoea is about tobecome resistant to all remaining drugs.
But Shu Lam, a 25-year-old PhD student at the University of Melbourne in Australia, has developed a star-shaped polymer that can kill six different superbug strains without antibiotics, simply by ripping apart their cell walls.
“We’ve discovered that [the polymers] actually target the bacteria and kill it in multiple ways,” Lam told Nicola Smith from The Telegraph. “One method is by physically disrupting or breaking apart the cell wall of the bacteria. This creates a lot of stress on the bacteria and causes it to start killing itself.”
The research has been published in Nature Microbiology, and according to Smith, it’s already being hailed by scientists in the field as “a breakthrough that could change the face of modern medicine”.
Before we get too carried away, it’s still very early days. So far, Lam has only tested her star-shaped polymers on six strains of drug-resistant bacteria in the lab, and on one superbug in live mice.
But in all experiments, they’ve been able to kill their targeted bacteria - and generation after generation don’t seem to develop resistance to the polymers.

Yes. All the yes. Women in STEM deserve ALLLLLLLL the applause. All of it. And cake. All the cake, too. 

Avatar
andrewiam

I love this solution because it’s just… So simple. Everyone is getting deeper and deeper into pharmacology trying to find new stuff and new combos that’ll overcome bacterial resistance (while Big Pharma rakes in the profits) and this student was like “what if.. We just.. Physically rip it the fuck apart?? What’s it gonna do? Develop resistance to me cutting a bitch?”

Iconic

Avatar
slapspert

Medicine: How do we defeat anti-biotic resistant super bugs?

Shu Lam: What if we just beat the shit out of it?

Avatar

Women in STEM of WWII - The real “Rosie Riveters”

In most countries women were not permitted to fight on the front lines of the war. Instead, they supported the war effort by learning, training and taking up jobs usually held by men.

These women did a lot more than rivet, they designed, built and tested thousands of aircraft in factories across Canada and the US.  Prior to the war, women would have been mostly banned from taking up such jobs.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net