mouthporn.net
#crazy ass peter – @killian-whump on Tumblr
Avatar

Killian Whump

@killian-whump / killian-whump.tumblr.com

a blog mostly about Colin O'Donoghue and Whump
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

i get it now (about peter). honestly the first time i watched the movie i remember liking peter but now rewatching knowing what he’ll do just messed that up for me. i think colin absolutely was phenomenal as peter !! it made me laugh how he was so glad to be with anna even though she was so visibly uncomfortable with the entire situation but he was like “oh yeah this is awesome!!”

i also remember from my first watch not completely hating peter when the movie ended just feeling like, woah.. idk how to explain but i was hesitant to hate him completely even though he was bat shit crazy

Haha, yeah, it's actually kinda cute how genuinely oblivious he is to Anna's discomfort. He just simply doesn't understand that she (a) might not want to be with him and (b) has the right to make that choice for herself in the first place. I say this as respectfully as possible, but the guy's a fucking idiot 😂 He just has no clue what he's doing wrong or that it's not totally awesome (!!).

Mind you, it doesn't make his actions any less reprehensible. They're still terrible, terrible actions - and damaging, traumatic ones for Anna to have to endure. You can hate someone's actions and be completely against them while still understanding why they acted the way they did and having some sympathy for them.

It's that kind of complex emotion that Peter causes in the viewer that makes me love him as a character. Of course, some people choose not to (or can't) see the more complex aspects of his character and are just gonna hate the guy entirely - and that's perfectly fine! But by doing so, they're not getting the full impact of the character and the movie itself. It's not a film about one asshole with no concept of interpersonal decorum or boundaries. It's a film about how humanity can become a monstrous caricature of itself when left entirely to its own devices. It's about how people are shaped to fit into their environment and in an unhealthy environment, they will become unhealthy people and perpetuate that cycle. You just don't get that from the film if you focus merely on "he's a bad guy."

I feel like that's a key aspect to a lot of the roles Colin takes. He gravitates towards villains, yes - but complex villains that have more depth to their characters and their storylines than just, "He's a bad guy and he does bad things."

Well, except for maybe JJ Sneed. He's a bad guy and he does bad things. There's not really much more nuance to him than that. But he's a bit of an anti-hero. He's charismatic and charming, like Hook, and you want to like him... until you realize he actually IS completely bankrupt of any good qualities. And by then it's too late. You've been had right along with Maddie, and it makes the flick all the more fun.

Oh, and Professor Harrison. That guy's a dick.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

i just rewatched what still remains and idk how you like peter so much, i mean, i get that it’s colin and we’re all biased but i cannot with peter.. he truly gives me the biggest ick in every scene after the “second baptism”

Well, I don't like Peter personally. I don't want to, like, know the guy or be his best buddy or anything. Dude's crazy as they get.

But I love Peter as a character. There's a big difference.

When we first meet Peter, he's very likeable. He's friendly, handsome, and you just want to like him. Then the cracks and the red flags start appearing. We see the violent side of him. The angry side of him. The (unwanted!) amorous side of him. The megalomaniac side of him. And, finally, the batshit crazy side of him.

But none of this is left unexplained. Peter isn't a bad guy because he just happens to be a bad guy, or because he has some kind of personality disorder or mental defect. Peter is 100% a product of his upbringing. Had the 'apocalypse' not occurred, he likely would've been a perfectly normal individual.

He's violent because, in this world they live in, you have to be in order to survive. His temper is volatile and dangerous because he's been taught to swallow his anger and "forgive" others. He infringes on others' boundaries because he has no idea what personal boundaries are - he's never been allowed to have any, himself. He's a megalomaniac because he (and the entire community) was built on the idea that God himself speaks directly to him and him alone. And he goes batshit crazy at the end because the only world he's ever known is lying in ashes at his feet and he lacks any real understanding of how or why that's happened because all he knows about life he learned from completely dysfunctional people.

So no, I don't like Peter. But I do feel very, very sorry for him. He couldn't become anything other than the monster he became. He never had a choice. He was built from the ground up by the REAL monsters of the film. That doesn't make him blameless in the things he does and the choices he makes, but it certainly does make his terrible choices understandable. And it makes him a ridiculously sympathetic villain.

That's why I usually refer to Peter as my crazy ass son - because I don't relate to him as a peer or a partner, but as a profoundly broken boy that needed (and still needs!) a parent - not the two psychopathic pedophiles he got.

Incidentally, I think this was one of Colin's most underrated performances, because I feel like he did a brilliant job of portraying all of the above and making Peter's darkness evident (and chilling) while still maintaining the almost child-like naivety of a man who has no idea how terrible he actually is, let alone any understanding of why his actions are wrong or, bless his heart, why the world's gone down in flames on his watch.

GAH, thanks for the ask. I could talk about Peter all day.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

What would happen if Colin tried to take over Peter's community nfts?

Well, I'm guessing you meant "take over Peter's community with NFTs" because even crazy-ass Peter's smart enough not to bother with the things.

Anyway, I don't think Colin would have much success in taking over Peter's community with NFTs, since there's no technology remaining in their world - so no "blockchain" or "cryptocurrency" or digital images you pay money to "own" while other people just right click on them and "Save Image As..." like normal folk.

You know, the apocalypse is starting to not sound so bad.

But I DO think Peter would appreciate the spirit of Colin's latest adventures. I mean, look:

Peter can absolutely use this shit:

As always, this commune is suitable for all worshippers, whether new or ultra-devout. You need no prior knowledge of Me to join, just a keen interest in God's Word and to share and be open to whatever I say God's latest words are. Once you've attended the meetup you'll be invited to join our private river-chat to carry on the conversation after the meeting ends.

The jokes are literally writing themselves these days.

Avatar
reblogged

OKAY, I’M REBLOGGING THIS AGAIN, OKAY, BECAUSE LOOK AT THAT OOMPH, THAT… THAT TOP ENERGY RIGHT THERE, I CAN’T

Avatar
wyntereyez

Why does someone that hot have to be so crazy?

Personally… I think the crazy is partly what makes him hot.

Oh, definitely. That crazy ass energy about him is super hot. Like a roller coaster with ginger scruff and elf ears, and I wanna ride it all night long.

IN FICTION, GUYS. IN FICTION!!!

Please don’t hump actual crazy dudes.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

So would Peter Preacher be a Psychopath more so? and Dark Hook is more of a sociopath?

Not really.

Peter has a conscience, and he has ideas about what’s right and wrong... He’s just been so damaged by his childhood and environment that his moral compass has been permanently reset upside down. He truly believes he IS doing the right thing, and is clearly upset at the end of the film when he realizes he must have done something very wrong, since everyone is now dead. He is very, very confused... not malicious or uncaring.

So I would hesitate to call Peter either of those things, really.

Dark Hook, on the other hand... It doesn’t really matter which one you call him, because you could consider him either one of those things. He has absolutely no conscience, no empathy, no care for anyone other than himself the darkness and its needs. Because, essentially, he IS the darkness. It hollowed out Killian’s psyche under an onslaught of relived emotional trauma... and then used Emma to cut the final strings of sanity he was holding on to by giving her the great okay not terrible absolutely dreadful idea of hiding Excalibur from him and using it to control him. Check, mate, match.

So really, one has to ask themselves if we can even call Dark Hook a psychopath OR a sociopath, since these are uniquely human terms... and Dark Hook was really just the shallow husk of whatever remained of Killian Jones, filled to the brim with hot, sticky darkness.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

What if Peter (Preacher) was a Light One?

Well, now that’s just silly. Of course he’s a Light One.

He talks to GOD, Nonny.

And God talks back. And, like, tells him stuff.

Important stuff. God stuff.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

is it possibly Preacher Peter could of survived the kind of stab wound given to him? The Berserkers were able to save David Anna's brother. (Ik there's a big difference between a twisted ankle and a stab wound) Also what would it be like for Peter to have been one of the many to hold a dagger to Killian's throat?

Oooh… Good questions, Nonny!

I don’t think there’s any real chance of Peter surviving the stab wound Anna gave him. I mean, that was a solid knife-in-the-torso wound. I’m not sure if it was high enough to get him in the actual heart, but wherever it got him, it’s likely it hit something important, considering how quickly it felled him. Also, they just don’t have the kind of medical care in that world to treat that kind of deep, penetrating wound. And even if they did, he’s in no shape to tend to it, himself (if he even knew how, which I don’t think he would’ve). The people of the commune are all dead, save for Judith - and she’s pretty useless. Anna has no interest in helping him. Whoever remains of the Berserkers probably wouldn’t help him, either. True, they gave Ben (another Elder) a chance to join them, but with Peter unconscious, they probably wouldn’t bother to “waste” medical care on him with no guarantee he’d join them when he healed. Most likely, no one would help him - and since he’s already unconscious/dead when we last see him in the film, he’s pretty much a lost cause.

Of course, that shouldn’t stop anyone from saving his life in a fic if they wanted to or something! I mean, just because Canon points to him definitely dying, you can do whatever you want in fics. Y’know? You could have a helicopter fly in and pick him up for some reason, pull a total “Walking Dead” shadow society with technology and medical facilities thing… whatever you want! :)

Now Hook versus Peter… That would be interesting. And, as much as I adore Killian, I think I’d have to put my money on Peter. I don’t think he’d bother putting a dagger to Killian’s throat. I think he’d just ninja-kill him like he did with those two dudes in the woods. I mean, did you see him slay those two? Guy was like a Navy Seal or something, taking two guys in two seconds with some tiny little knife hidden in his boot. Geeeez. Killian’s good and all, but he’s a fairytale fighter, y’know? Primetime basic network TV show dude. The medium itself limits how “badass” he can actually BE in canon. I mean, yeah, he stabs dudes through the heart and stuff, but he never went all Jason Bourne on anybody’s ass or anything. Also, Peter has automatic weapons. Or at least one. But, really, that’s all he’d need.

But GOSH, that’s an interesting conundrum. All of Colin’s characters in a cage match to the death - who reigns supreme???

Wait, no, guys… Who let the alien in the cage?! He’s not actually one of Colin’s chara- Aw, shit. All of them are getting eaten! This is terrible! This is-

*camera pans over, Colin’s clapping happily*

Goddammit, Colin, I leave you unattended for one minute

Avatar
reblogged

Peter in What Still Remains

Ok I finally have time to flail about my problematic disaster son.

One of my favourite things about him is that he’s a subversion of the trope of his character. In most cases I can imagine a character, especially a male one, in a situation like this, he’s gonna get redeemed because he’s speshul *cough*self-insert*cough* and “win the girl” *cough*trophy*cough*. But Peter doesn’t get any of that, for a simple but important reason; the film isn’t about his story, it’s about Anna’s.

Peter is the distraction, there to make us think that Anna probably has someone to trust, even if that’s the hard choice… but then it’s subverted and we see him as the antagonist he unknowingly but indisputably is to her. He considers her unknowingly stepping into the water as her giving full and undeniable consent, he expects her to submit to him “because God said so”, he attacks her and is completely blind to the fact that she may have different feelings and opinions on the matter than he does. And so when Anna, at the end, says “Peter got what he deserved”… we agree with her. He was beyond redemption. And then the film ends with Anna moving on, without having her life revolve around Peter’s character, life, or death, as the case may be.

But just because he was that doesn’t mean he’s one dimensional. I’ve said before that something this film did perfectly was explain his “villainy” but didn’t justify nor sugarcoat it. We saw where he came from but his actions were shown as the horrible things they are and would be in real life. And again, since Anna is the sole protagonist, the film doesn’t spend time trying to redeem Peter or even turn him into a martyr.

So going into that explanation… oh boy, here come the feelzTM.

So basically Peter was like 8-9 when the apocalyptic disease burst out. He says he only has “flashes” of the old world, not being 100% sure if those are real memories or things he made up. And like, 8 years old is a bit old to not have solid memories of the world, anything about it. Which only points to childhood trauma, severe enough to cause memory loss. So first thing that messed him up, and in such a young age as this.

Second thing: thinking that his parents abandoned him. He says how his parents left him with his grandfather because he would probably be safer there, but then admits to thinking they might have abandoned him because he was dead weight to them. Things would’ve been much simpler for him if he thought they died trying to protect him, but no, the fear of having been abandoned was there.

Third thing and connected to the previous one: 20 something years having passed since his parents being gone, and him looking surprised when Anna tells him “Don’t ever think [your parents abandoned you]”. I got the feeling that it was literally the first time in his life someone told him not to torture himself with that thought. One would think that someone in the village would have told him that at some point in those 20 something years. But hey, why would the Elders care?

Fourth: Zach says that even as a 13yo Peter had “the blessings of the Holy Spirit running through his veins” and then keeps praising him about the work he’s done for the community. I don’t know if they intentionally wanted to show him caring for Peter only due to his religious beliefs and not because Peter was an emotionally scarred teenager who deserved love and care no matter how “blessed” he was, but combined with some other things Peter says about himself… he probably does indeed believe that his sole redeeming feature (since he thought his own parents didn’t want him) was that God somehow for some reason chose him. And the “abandonment” thing probably played a big role in him desperatly clinging to any positive traits Zach and/or Judith would recognize in him. Probably also why, despite their closeness to him, they never bothered to drive that painful thought from his mind. They probably truly only cared about him being “blessed” and how he would be of use to them, nothing else about him.

Fifth: his currently absent grandfather. We know the latter met Zach… but that’s where his story ends. We don’t know where he ended up, if he’s still alive… and there isn’t anything, especially about Zach that suggests the grandpa is alive and well and happy somewhere, or even that his possible death was not of Zach’s making.

Sixth: Judith. She’s a whole chapter of her own. Imagine all the things Peter had already gone through, then he had to deal with her claiming him as hers when he was still underage, and very very possibly unwilling. We see the teen girls saying they wished they were older so that Peter would sponsor them… which is so fucked up but at least they lived in their delusion of it being okay, so who knows, perhaps it wouldn’t have messed them up as much as it did Peter. And consider this: not only is Peter visibly uncomfortable when Judith touches him, not only does he know he has to protect Anna from the Elders… he says himself he wants an “equal”… meaning that he isn’t willing to sponsor a CHILD for the community’s future, even if said child was brought up to think this thing is acceptable, especially if your sponsor is hot. So, he knows doing it to a child is wrong - though he’s too messed up to realize that doing it to an adult against their will is also wrong. So, yeah. Adding sexual assault to an already traumatized teenager’s psyche… what were his chances?

And, wow, that’s some great character exploration from the narrative itself, isn’t it? Peter clinged onto the “blessings running through his veins” and considered himself immune to mistakes and misjudgments. He not only doesn’t bother to ask for Anna’s consent before he marries her, he takes it for granted, because Anna is good and religious; and the only good and religious way is to automatically give full consent for life to an Elder.

And then, there’s his last scene. His comrades have been murdered by the Berserkers, his village is being burnt to the ground… how could this happen? God was on their side. Unless… God wanted the others to die. Yes, that must be it, since Peter is God’s chosen one. No one survived but the chosen one and the one to bear his children. He immediately turns his back to the others, even not acknowledging Anna’s request to go and look for survivors - something she herself does later - because, well, God must have given up on them for some reason. “Our community was corrupt, I can see that now.”

The illusion has become his life. He’s too messed up, and even if he had any acknowledgment of it and any willingness to get help for it, he doesn’t have the means. And it’s when he pushes it further that you for sure know he’s past the point of no return, and his death comes off as the only way his story could go.

His “It’s okay, Anna. I forgive you” will always FUCK ME UP though. In his messed up mind, he was seeing everything he did to Anna as right. He welcomed her in his community, he saved her from those two guys and forgave her for her “mistake” of having invited them to join them, he sponsored and “took care” of her, he guided her to “God’s true path”, he would protect her from the Elders, he avoided humiliating her in front of the whole village by not tying her up before they left… and he forgave her for literally killing him. Putting her first, in his own, messed-up way.

Forget Romeo and Juliet. This is the most tragic (albeit very disturbing) love story of them all T_T

Okay, but... but... also... but... our soooooooooon T_T

This is all so perfect... 

But also! Also!!! There is such a sweet, gentle naivety about him at times... so very much like a child. There’s so much vulnerability there, and I think the viciousness comes out when (much like a child) he doesn’t get his way. He only feels “safe” and secure when he’s in control, and that requires him getting his way all the time. The moment he loses that and becomes truly vulnerable, the rage inside him is unleashed.

I just... He breaks my heart </3 My broken little boy T_T

And I wish I could, like, imagine an AU tale... or a happy ending... or... but there just isn’t one. He’s a disaster.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

things Peter should probably learn about women? Happy Women's Day

*sigh* Yeah, the timing of today’s O’Donoday is a little awkward.

But I’ll play. Sure. Spoilers ahead.

What Peter Should Probably Learn About Women:

  • What gates are. Okay, yeah, this has nothing to do with women, but why does the man look so mystified by Anna’s front gate? Like, “I’ve never seen one of these contraptions before! It even has bells! How would anyone ever get past one of these?!” Bless his dumb heart.
  • Chill. He has absolutely none. He just stands there and stares at her bathing in the lake like he’s experiencing the second coming of Christ. Play a little hard to get, could you? Geez.
  • He’s not God’s gift to women. Honestly, though, I think it would be hard to teach Peter this. God probably told him he was, and who is he to argue? And, I mean, since he has Colin’s gorgeous face, he’s not completely wrong...
  • Marriage isn’t a good surprise. It’s just not. Warn a girl. Maybe even, like, umm, ask her first? Just a thought. Ah, but asking someone first would require him to have already learned that-
  • “NO” is a concept. Look, I will die on the hill of Peter literally lacking this fundamental knowledge. Because "no” was never an option for him. Judith and Zach took what they wanted from him, and he was raised to think this was not only acceptable, but necessary. After all, they live and survive by following God’s messages to Zach. If Zach says that Peter must sleep with the elders who have raised him, that’s what Peter must do for the sake of the entire commune. Peter sees Anna as his only way out of that situation, because simply not wanting to be used sexually by them is not good enough. It doesn’t count. It’s not a consideration whatsoever. And so, in turn, he doesn’t understand that Anna may not want to be with him - or even that her feelings on the matter are something to be considered. The abused has become the abuser... and doesn’t even understand it’s “abuse” at all.
  • Kicks in the nuts aren’t foreplay. Peter lacks any idea of what a normal and positive sexual encounter looks like. He only knows what he’s experienced - an elder who wants it and a subject who doesn’t. You can tell how he physically shuts down and shrinks back when Judith even so much as hugs him - and how Judith completely ignores his discomfort. He has learned through experience that when the one being sexed shrinks back, or even kicks and screams, you simply forgive them... and keep going. That’s how sex is done. That’s all he knows and he’s repeating what he’s learned on Anna. He expects resistance from her, because that’s what the subject of the sexing does. He probably would’ve been confused if she’d been into it, honestly.
  • How to pleasure a woman. Nevermind. He probably knows all too well how to do this one. Judith doesn’t strike me as the kind of woman who would let him squirm away from her without getting her off first. He’s probably very... efficient at it :P Of course, whether he knows that the subject of the elder’s sexual encounter is even capable of enjoying the event is another thing altogether. Something tells me this would be yet another foreign concept to him.

Unfortunately, Peter never got the chance to learn any of these things. He was too damaged by his upbringing and environment to even be capable of learning any of it without some serious outside intervention. And in the apocalypse? Not likely. Without being able to get the help he was severely in need of, death was really the best ending for him. His own suffering is over... and he’s now unable to inadvertently pass the abuse he’s suffered on to others. RIP :(

And I murdered Judith with my own two hands after the credits rolled.

No one fucks with my boy.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net