mouthporn.net
#ivan-fyodorovich-k – @kasperl-ruprecht on Tumblr
Avatar

Dispatches from the Middle Circle

@kasperl-ruprecht

Avatar
reblogged
Today, the country indeed looks alien. The America many of us believed we knew now appears stranger in retrospect: The anger and resentment we may have thought was pitched at a simmer turned out to be at a rollicking boil. And one of liberals’ most cherished shibboleths from 2016—that Trumpism is a movement for aggrieved white men—unraveled in the face of a realignment that saw the GOP appear to give birth to a multiracial working-class movement. A second Trump presidency is the result of this misjudgment.

Democrats are a coalition party of the center-left

The Left has traditionally been associated with egalitarianism, which is by necessity concerned with the masses, the common people, the working class, but also the dispossessed, the marginalized, the disadvantaged

The modern Democratic party traces its roots most directly to the New Deal coalition of the 1930s, which it understands to have been a robust working-class and labor-rights movement

They also see themselves in the 1960s cultural revolutions and their repudiation of hierarchy, itself generally seen as the position of the common person, the masses, but also the dispossessed

The party takes its name from Andrew Jackson, great champion of the Common Man, at least as understood at his time, but it goes back to Thomas Jefferson, famous for declaring that "all men are created equal," and now excoriated for failing to live out that egalitarian principle

The Democrats are a party for the people, understood as capaciously as possible, the party that repudiates narrow nationalism and jingoism, in favor of spreading the benefits of American society widely, in opposition to favoring the privileged few

Why am I reminding you of all these things that you already know?

Because they believe so deeply that they are right in every way that matters, or at least incomparably superior to their opponents, they cannot begin to imagine repudiation from the very people in whose interests they thought they were acting, let alone in favor of the very person they swore was an existential, even murderous threat to those very same people

I think to appreciate the sensation, you might imagine a thief broke into your home, and then your family kicked you out in favor of the thief; someone broke in to ravish your spouse and they called the police on you; a sex offender told your children explicitly what he wanted to do them, and your children fought you to get out of your arms so they could crawl into the van knowing full well they'd never see you again

The shock is so existentially horrifying, such a betrayal of reality itself, that it would require rethinking all your most basic assumptions about the political order, human beings, and worst of all, yourself. Why would they do such a manifestly insane thing? Is there something I don't know? What did I miss? What did I do wrong? What do I do now?

Democrats cannot meaningfully internalize that they are the party of the privileged and the elite, by their own philosophy they are themselves the enemy, they write a blank check for the most lurid excesses of anti-colonial violence and call it "exhilarating" without dealing with the fact that given their assumptions, in this society, they are the power and not the resistance

But it's hard to ask yourself these kinds of questions and most people don't have the nerve for it, and so what we see instead, in another little paradox of human nature, is they're going to blame not the ravisher but the spouse

TL;DR, self-examination is hard, so now Democrats hate Latinos

Can't say I disagree.

Avatar
reblogged

aaah his shoulders light up!!

should I have been buying action figures instead of model kits this entire time?

I have that. It's pretty nice and probably the best Ingram figure out there. That video doesn't really highlight one of the neater features. There's actual cloth covering the joints there, not sculpted plastic. It also has a pretty extensive use of diecast metal throughout, giving it a nice reassuring heft.

If you're a fan of Patlabor and can find one, I can't recommend it enough.

Avatar
reblogged

Since you’re a teacher, how have you dealt with the rise of AI like ChatGPT? I know people over here who basically stopped doing their work in favor of just asking an AI.

Avatar

Honestly it's on the honor system. I do not integrate it into the class or the assignments and I tell students not to use it for anything. I am not interested in teaching them how to use it productively because I do not think there is any legitimate use for the technology whatsoever considering that LLMs are just massive plagiarism machines.

I know that some, even most students will cheat, but some students have always cheated. The software one uses to detect AI is itself an AI black box, and even using it, one cannot conclusively demonstrate that a student doesn't just happen to write in the way that AI writes. I would prefer to ignore the guilty than punish the innocent.

My overarching strategy is to weigh the course (and its grades) towards in-person things. Their final exams are hand-written in front of me, and I try to focus on in-class discussion and participation.

I think in the future when I have more institutional power (assuming I even continue in academia) I may try to design courses so that students who really want to learn how to write will have more writing-intensive assignments and students who can't be bothered at all will have other options. All the while continuing to emphasize the importance of in-person, face-to-face education.

The only long-term societal outcome of all this I can imagine is that it really does just make all education totally irrelevant--not because it is better than education, but because our society does not value education--and so the entire educational apparatus slowly consolidates into a handful of elite schools that just exist as formalized vehicles for wealthy elites to turn their children into wealthy elites while we politely ignore anything has gone wrong at all, which is to say we will continue doing what we have been doing for decades.

But the other problem with thinking about how to integrate it is that however it is integrated, a new technology that we cannot even fathom will replace it in a few short years anyway.

I've personally sort of checked out of that whole race, you can't keep ahead of it, so I find myself drifting into the posture of "politely ignore."

Avatar
Avatar

person who hates immigrants trying to sound normal: they endure desperately inhumane conditions to get here and then once they are here their labor is exploited cruelly, the entire thing is a massive humanitarian crisis

me: damn that’s crazy maybe we should make it easier to migrate legally and then treat them better when they get here

person who hates immigrants: no

Avatar
reblogged

opening an Adobe product in 2024

adobe: would you like to use AI?

adobe: have you seen our new AI features?

adobe: did you know you could do that with AI?

adobe: would you like to use your AI Assistant?

adobe: would you like to generate that with AI?

adobe: did I mention we use AI now?

adobe: AI?

adobe: Artificial Intelligence?

adobe: would--

adobe: we--you--

adobe: AI!?

Avatar
reblogged

The atheism movement hit Warhammer like crack hit the ghetto.

fellas 40k has been a massive secular humanist neckbeard fantasy for years, this is not new.

This is such reddit-brained horseshit. Space Marines since 2nd edition were monks, living in Fortress Monasteries, their worship was overseen by Chaplains chanting Litanies of Hatred. They were Space Catholics; absolutely, 100%, unequivocally sincere in their worship of "the emperor".

Let's play a thought exercise - which makes more sense from a worldbuilding standpoint?

A) The Emperor used the unifying power of religion to bind together all of humanity into a single, cohesive empire... (old 40k lore)

or

B) The 12' giant wearing golden armor surrounded by a halo of light, who could kill with a thought and spoke directly into your mind, who named his war a Great Crusade... never wanted people to see him as a god and spat at the very idea of religion. (nu 40k)

A) makes perfect logical sense and stays true to the (better) books that 40k ripped off, like Dune. B) is fucking retarded, and is completely laughable, yet is defended by smug pricks like you for some reason. The writers took one smell of Dawkin's and Hitchen's assholes, and shoved their noses up there, rewriting the setting and creating a clusterfuck of contradictory nonsense, all because they couldn't stop tipping their fucking fedoras.

Relax. They came up with that "Imperial Truth" thing by at least 2006 and it gets much more neckbeardy by 2009.

Rick Priestley who designed the game described the Imperium as "...something utterly horrific but driven by necessity - hence an eternal moral dilemma. To save everyone how many are you prepared to sacrifice?"

And on the Emperor, "I always liked to keep the Emperor as something of a mystery - not necessarily conscious or aware even - possibly the whole thing is a mistake that continues to hold the Imperium together as a social construct but which has no basis in reality. One could make comparisons with any number of religions and their role in history..."

It's not like they're retconning it, it's not "nu." What the hell else are a bunch of British sci-fi nerds going to write in a country that abandoned religion en masse?

This is how Space Marines are described in the Rogue Trader rulebook from 1987:

they're not like, unironically awesome guys

Avatar
reblogged

Kotobukiya 1/100 Metal Gear REX, completed in 2015, in honor of the 18th anniversary of the Shadow Moses Incident on 28 February, 2005

Reposting for anniversary of Metal Gear Solid’s release in Japan on September 3, 1998

I literally just bought and assembled the metal gear ray version, the decals make me nervous

REX didn’t have decals. Gotta say that one looks pretty good, though I wish they’d done the Marines version with the tail

Makes me want to pull my half size 3A Metal Gear Rex out of the box again.

Avatar
reblogged

Get some Nazis together. Have them drink from the would-be grails. We figure out who is wrong and if there are 200 candidate grails we get rid of at least 199 Nazis do I have to think of everything myself

Avatar
reblogged

AI entrepreneurs: this technology will cause short term upheaval* but will in the end be the best thing that ever happened to the species**

*billions of people will be impoverished and then die in squalor

**me and my hundreds of friends and investors, who will be the only ones to survive and reproduce

Avatar
reblogged

Broadly speaking I sympathize with the desire to have the smallest possible government or even no government but the latter is a fantasy, and in the case of the former, "possible" is really the operative word.

The world being as it is, and the history of the United States being what it is, I am not sure how to turn back the clock. The more power we give to individual states the more we are inviting individual states to have even more uneven outcomes than they have now. I cannot imagine untethering the states from one another will suddenly make West Virginia prosperous or ruin California. There is also the historical problem that much of the rise of the federal government in the 19th and 20th century occurred over problems of economic development and social justice, by which I do not mean even in the way the phrase is used and abused now, but what I hope we can all agree was the very real necessity that slavery be abolished and that equal rights be granted to minorities and women.

Whatever your stance on abortion we are seeing a version of this play out now on that very issue; left to the states, the lived experience of women in different states can become dramatically different based on a single policy. Gun rights and gun laws are another where we see this dramatic variation from state to state. And the thing is, a woman who lives in a no-abortion state can still get an abortion. Someone in an anti-gun state can still get a gun. They just have to make connections in states more amenable to their desires, and both laws impact the poor disproportionately who always have less autonomy. The states are so dramatically close physically and economically and even culturally (set aside the rural/urban divide, something for a future discussion), I'm skeptical how much federalization is going to achieve, except to exacerbate unequal conditions and unequal outcomes which are already a huge problem.

There is also the problem of defense. History shows time and again that the United States is stronger together. The very discussion of the extent to which it is the business of the United States to police the world is an almost unfathomable luxury that in history has fallen to a number of political bodies small enough to count on our hands. The United States was born in a world of neighboring hostile empires; in 1783 it shared a border with Spain and Britain; later with France, and the major European empires also held sway in the Caribbean and Latin America to the South. It is not impossible that something like that could happen again someday. Arguably, one of the lessons of the American Civil War was not only the Union's greater material wealth but also its greater ability to take advantage of it given its more centralized system helped secure victory over a decentralized, disorganized opponent. The South still smoulders from that defeat that is over a century and a half old, and in some ways it has yet to recover. What if it was the Chinese or the Russians tomorrow?

If the solution is not a curtailed federal government, what is it?

I honestly struggle deeply with this. To abolish the federal government is to roll the dice. Staggeringly few other political bodies in human history have had anything like the success of the United States of America under the Constitution of 1787. Yet negative counterexamples abound. To roll the dice on a new arrangement is to court a virtual guarantee that the new arrangement is not better but worse, maybe far worse.

My PhD would be revoked if my peers heard me say this but the United States is an exceptional place.

The problem as I see it, to which I do not have a solution, is how to hold the power accountable? Whether the power is the bureaucracy, the president, the court, the legislature, the corporations, the billionaires, the 1%, the coastal elite, the people, or however else you slice it, people have to be answerable for their influence, and right now they clearly are not.

Avatar
reblogged

My favorite part of US politics is how much is based around INTERPRETATIONS of the US constitution, mainly because it was written in a dogshit fancy way that went out of style shortly after its introduction, making many things ambiguous enough to garner constant infighting among political parties, simply because no one is exactly sure how it’s supposed to be read.

It was intentionally written to be ambiguous, that’s a feature and not a bug. Its strength is its weakness in that regard

Sounds like cope to me.

Columbia has had ten constitutions bro. And we never had a military junta.

There's only been one time where a transfer of power resulted in an actual conflict, back in 1861.

But, we also tend to settle our differences in civil society and not on the battlefield by and large.

The Constitution mainly gives negative freedoms or things that the government are not allowed to do versus positive freedoms which the citizens are allowed to have.

Colombia man, and yes, many countries have also rewritten their constitutions, to better adapt to modern times (last time we changed ours was to, among other things, set in stone the separation between church and state, and the rights of women), but also to fuck up their population, like in Venezuela, but in general it’s to have a document that actually reflects the issues and needs of the modern world.

And yeah, technically the US has been a stable democracy since 1861, but just how for long? Partisan politics, an aging political leadership and the lack of options for political representation other than red and blue have taken their toll on the democratic process in the country, just look at the upcoming elections, a fraudster vs a senile puppet, both well beyond the retirement age, while in many parts of the world people have been consistently electing young leaders, many places also breaking away from the old parties to give power to new ones, something many think it’s impossible to happen in the US.

I hope you guys enjoy our collapse as much as you expect you will

I was in your country man, I loved it! That’s the last thing I want to happen, but whenever someone from the outside points out at your flawed system, it’s like no, it’s perfectly fine, stfu man.

You guys have the power to make a change happen, use it god damn it, you’re supposed to be THE democratic nation!

I didn't say it was fine, but I did mean that its strength is its weakness. I guess its "fine" in the sense that dysfunction is how it's designed to work. But how much dysfunction can or should one tolerate? Hard to say.

The fact that the United States built in and expects ambiguity and imperfection is the explanation for its soon to end durability. For most of its history, it bends without breaking, precisely because its foundational documents are vague. Is durability good? Is it better than having an extremely specific tailor-made constitution for every generation or every crisis? I'm not sure. I do think I speak for most Americans in saying I do not trust Americans to come up with something better.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net